tandy miller said:
They would have won if he had made that PAT
Or they would have lost because KC would have been trying for a TD instead of settling for a FG.
tandy miller said:
They would have won if he had made that PAT
Thats exactly what I was thinking… what if your defense gets a turnover?Kashchei said:
I probably would've deferred so I know what I need to do to tie/win
Texker said:
Need some D here.
Gigemags382 said:
Under these OT rules, don't you want the other team to get the ball first? Then you know what you need to do when you go on offense. And you have the small chance of winning th game outright with a defensive TD.
W said:
wow, flag bails out the 49ers
mega-huge penalty
Logos Stick said:
San Francisco didn't run the ball enough. I think that was their biggest mistake.
Great point. I wanna see the analytics…Gigemags382 said:Gigemags382 said:
Under these OT rules, don't you want the other team to get the ball first? Then you know what you need to do when you go on offense. And you have the small chance of winning th game outright with a defensive TD.
I guess in favor of a taking the ball, if you match each other on your 1st possession then you can win it on your 2nd possession without the other team getting a 2nd. So maybe for that reason it makes sense to take the ball.
this.Gigemags382 said:Gigemags382 said:
Under these OT rules, don't you want the other team to get the ball first? Then you know what you need to do when you go on offense. And you have the small chance of winning th game outright with a defensive TD.
I guess in favor of a taking the ball, if you match each other on your 1st possession then you can win it on your 2nd possession without the other team getting a 2nd. So maybe for that reason it makes sense to take the ball.