I get that offense is important in this day and age in the NFL. But I'm still a firm believer defense wins championships. Dallas needs to focus on shoring up the defense this off season.
LB12Diamond said:
I get that offense is important in this day and age in the NFL. But I'm still a firm believer defense wins championships. Dallas needs to focus on shoring up the defense this off season.
That's what I think.Southlake said:
Dallas needs to burn this thing down instead of kicking MM down the road another year. This was supposed to be his year to prove himself. He didn't do it. Yes, he made the playoffs- a quarter of the teams make the playoffs. Maybe Jerry at 82 is just impatient to rebuild? He'll win 11 games next year then lose early in the playoffs again.
That's why he held onto a loser like Jason Garrett for nearly 15 years. Garrett was completely green when Jerry elevated him to the NFL ranks. It's telling that nobody else has given Garrett a coaching gig in the NFL since he flamed out with the giants. Jerry is the only person in the world who thinks Garrett is a good coach. He wanted it to work so bad because he would've got all the credit if it did.J.P. 03 said:
The Ticket guys were discussing a fan theory earlier this week about Jerry's thought process regarding whether to retain MM: basically, if he hired Bill Belichick or Jim Harbaugh and subsequently won a Super Bowl, everyone would give the credit to the new coach instead of him. But if he can somehow win a Super Bowl with MM (lol), it will prove to everyone that he did it HIS way, which, even in his 80s and in the midst of a 30-year drought, might still be more important to him than just winning one by any means possible.
We will see what they do this offseason with Dak, but with his deal and Mcarthey's deal both expiring after next season I could see Jerry thinking 2024 is the year and if they fail well time to start over with a new coach and QB. It would make sense to blow it up after 2024 but sign Parsons and Lamb and try to bridge the gap in 25 with Lance or a draft pick. I personally do not think Jerry will part ways with Dak mainly because of all the marketing and branding that has went into making Dak the face of the franchise; Jerry doesnt want to start that over and risk it not working out in terms of marketability.Grapesoda2525 said:That's what I think.Southlake said:
Dallas needs to burn this thing down instead of kicking MM down the road another year. This was supposed to be his year to prove himself. He didn't do it. Yes, he made the playoffs- a quarter of the teams make the playoffs. Maybe Jerry at 82 is just impatient to rebuild? He'll win 11 games next year then lose early in the playoffs again.
We're being taken for a ride because of Jerry's age. He personally doesn't want to rebuild because he's so old. It sucks because the franchise clearly needs to rebuild, fire everyone, and start over. I don't care if we have a few bad years if things are going in the right direction. Look at what just happened with the rangers.
Problem is Jerry might die by the time another rebuild is complete. I'm highly skeptical these guys can get anything even close to a Super Bowl or nfc title game with the 49ers, packers, and lions out there.
Maybe they see an easy path to winning the division? It all doesn't matter if you can't win in the playoffs.
City Dumme said:
I think Jerry the owner needs to fire Jerry the GM
What makes it tricky is clearly the defense was good, and probably very good, this year.LB12Diamond said:
I get that offense is important in this day and age in the NFL. But I'm still a firm believer defense wins championships. Dallas needs to focus on shoring up the defense this off season.
The tricky thing is the Cowboys need to address left tackle and beefing up the front seven in the draft along with finding an RB that can break tackles. I suppose they can get the Patriots LT in free agency and use that 1st pick for a QB but I would imagine they will address needs considering Lance is on the bench. We know deep down Jerry wants Dak comfortable here for years to come.Woods Ag said:
At this point this is the best outcome we can hope for.
If JJ McCarthy is there in Dallas' 1st pick, should we draft him and not extend Dak? I want the fire so dang hot on Dak that he either poops his pants or we win the super bowl. Don't really care the outcome. Maybe I want to win the super bowl a little more than pooping his pants, but either would be a resolution.
Do we play the NFC south next year?jr15aggie said:
All I know is, this feels like another 2008 season incoming!
(For those that don't know... 2007 was a crazy successful regular season, but we went 1 and done in the playoffs... lost to a team that everyone assumed we'd smoke. Jerry and Co. assumed we could just do it all again so we basically put the same team/coaches on the field and didn't even make the playoffs the next season).
definitely not a 1st round pickDannyDuberstein said:
He may prove me wrong, but I really don't see McCarthy as an NFL qb
Tksymm7 said:
You have to have a plan in place, be willing to take swings in the draft or via trade, and be comfortable being bad for a few years until you find the right guy again. I'll just keep saying it, but what is the point of winning 12 games a year, knowing you can't and won't get it done in the playoffs? The only thing that matters for the Cowboys is what they do in the playoffs. I personally don't think people would care a lick if they let Dak go and were 5-7 wins per year bad for a few years, because we haven't done anything with 12 win seasons for a decade. I think people would actually be more interested in a bad Cowboys team that would be trying to find the next QB and reset the franchise.
At that point in Romo's career I don't think there was any way he could have stayed healthy.Woods Ag said:
Would Romo have come back and taken them to the Super Bowl then?
Would Paxton Lynch developed better because he had a dominant defense and offense that was built to ground and pound?
That's what I think the key is to developing a QB. Unless they are Manning, Andrew Luck, or Joe Burrow.
This is mostly all true. But that doesnt mean we need to extend his contract or make him paid like a top 5 QB with a new contract.Infection_Ag11 said:
The weird revisionist hindsight with respect to Prescott within this fanbase right now is really something to behold.
The Cowboys drafted a QB in the 4th round who is going to end up being their full time starter for at least a decade, will most likely retire holding every single conceivable passing record in team history (in significantly fewer games than Aikman or Romo played to get there), is on pace to play his entire career never finishing below .500 in a season and will have won 4+ division titles. And that's IF he only plays one more year here, which is unlikely since he's going to be extended and even if MM leaves no new coach is gonna come in and be like "yeah let's get rid of this pro bowl caliber QB right in the middle of his prime years". These people realize that if Dak ever wins even just one Super Bowl, he's going to be in the hall of fame? You do all realize this, correct? Hell with the numbers he'd finish with in that scenario he's likely a first ballot hall of famer based on past QB precedent.
Dak Prescott is one of the greatest draft steals of all time even if he never played another down here. The front office should never receive anything other than praise for his selection. Hes already accomplished more than the vast majority of first round QBs that have ever been selected and ever will be selected.