Fromm seems like a great QB for them. Underwhelming in college.lunchbox said:
We'll see if NE goes QB with either of their 2 picks to end the 3rd
Yeah, the last techtard who went in the 1st round had a lot of naysayers too.....was called a massive reach and system player.dixichkn said:
This techtard ahead of Xavier McKinney and Patrick Queen. Really.
It was pretty well known going in that year that Mahomes was a first round talent and rising. Plus he was an offensive skill position player which is the BDF's rare strength. The words "Texas Tech" and "defense" go together like "Democratic think tank". Brooks was a consensus 2nd day projection who was rated by one scout as "long term backup with a chance to start".........woo boy, there's a ringing endorsement for a 1st round pick.BigHitterDaLama said:Yeah, the last techtard who went in the 1st round had a lot of naysayers too.....was called a massive reach and system player.dixichkn said:
This techtard ahead of Xavier McKinney and Patrick Queen. Really.
He's a good kicker.PooDoo said:
The hero of day 3 is Justin Tucker.
He secured generators to get the Ravens staff back online after a power outage in the Baltimore area threatened to delay the start of the draft.
So by your rationale, a player can immediately be ruled a "whiff" because he is a on a traditionally bad collegiate defensive unit? And anyone from the SEC West is better? Makes sense.dixichkn said:It was pretty well known going in that year that Mahomes was a first round talent and rising. Plus he was an offensive skill position player which is the BDF's rare strength. The words "Texas Tech" and "defense" go together like "Democratic think tank". Brooks was a consensus 2nd day projection who was rated by one scout as "long term backup with a chance to start".........woo boy, there's a ringing endorsement for a 1st round pick.BigHitterDaLama said:Yeah, the last techtard who went in the 1st round had a lot of naysayers too.....was called a massive reach and system player.dixichkn said:
This techtard ahead of Xavier McKinney and Patrick Queen. Really.
Seattle whiffed badly on this one. I'll be happy to revisit this thread in 7 or 8 years and see where he stacks up next to Queen as an ILB
EKUAg said:
Fromm just got picked by Buffalo.
I think the only way to layer in draft rank and number of draftees is to take the inverse of the draft position. So the first pick is worth 255 points, 2nd overall pick is worth 254 points and the last pick is worth 1 point.DSAg44 said:
Did anybody do a draft analysis based on conference and when they were drafted? Or an average draft rank? Just curious if that's out there.
yeah, so basically more value than Big Ten and Pac-12 combined (second and third). SEC is an NFL factory.texagbeliever said:I think the only way to layer in draft rank and number of draftees is to take the inverse of the draft position. So the first pick is worth 255 points, 2nd overall pick is worth 254 points and the last pick is worth 1 point.DSAg44 said:
Did anybody do a draft analysis based on conference and when they were drafted? Or an average draft rank? Just curious if that's out there.
Conference Draft Value Points
SEC 9,769
Big Ten 5,793
Pac-12 4,035
Big 12 3,126
ACC 3,046
American 1,336
.... others 5,535
Additional point of note. Clemson accounted for 1,149 for the ACC. So ACC without Clemson is at 1,897. That conference is awful.DSAg44 said:yeah, so basically more value than Big Ten and Pac-12 combined (second and third). SEC is an NFL factory.texagbeliever said:I think the only way to layer in draft rank and number of draftees is to take the inverse of the draft position. So the first pick is worth 255 points, 2nd overall pick is worth 254 points and the last pick is worth 1 point.DSAg44 said:
Did anybody do a draft analysis based on conference and when they were drafted? Or an average draft rank? Just curious if that's out there.
Conference Draft Value Points
SEC 9,769
Big Ten 5,793
Pac-12 4,035
Big 12 3,126
ACC 3,046
American 1,336
.... others 5,535
BigHitterDaLama said:So by your rationale, a player can immediately be ruled a "whiff" because he is a on a traditionally bad collegiate defensive unit? And anyone from the SEC West is better? Makes sense.dixichkn said:It was pretty well known going in that year that Mahomes was a first round talent and rising. Plus he was an offensive skill position player which is the BDF's rare strength. The words "Texas Tech" and "defense" go together like "Democratic think tank". Brooks was a consensus 2nd day projection who was rated by one scout as "long term backup with a chance to start".........woo boy, there's a ringing endorsement for a 1st round pick.BigHitterDaLama said:Yeah, the last techtard who went in the 1st round had a lot of naysayers too.....was called a massive reach and system player.dixichkn said:
This techtard ahead of Xavier McKinney and Patrick Queen. Really.
Seattle whiffed badly on this one. I'll be happy to revisit this thread in 7 or 8 years and see where he stacks up next to Queen as an ILB
Kiper (hate/like agree/disagree) does this for a living and had him at #32 overall.
Last guy Seattle drafted like Brooks (size, production on tape, 40 time and can play all 3 downs at all LB spots) was Bobby Wagner......who played on some pretty underwhelming Utah State teams. Good thing Schneider and Carroll didn't ditch him for any SEC West player available.
