Atlanta looks very, very good.
TAZ99 said:
Not a catch, but looked like PI
Bunk Moreland said:
Geeze these teams need to slow down. I have u57. 5 in my teaser.
They're basically the 2013 A&M team. An awful defense paired with a historically good offense. Not sure what that means for Dallas, which has a bad defense and a very good offense. My guess is a lot of points.Bunk Moreland said:
Atlanta looks very, very good.
Yahooo I was right (for once). It helps when I don't have much emotional investment in the teams I think.KidDoc said:
I don't think the Seahawks offense is going to be able to keep pace with the Falcons. Should end up being a decent shootout.
Deputy Travis Junior said:They're basically the 2013 A&M team. An awful defense paired with a historically good offense. Not sure what that means for Dallas, which has a bad defense and a very good offense. My guess is a lot of points.Bunk Moreland said:
Atlanta looks very, very good.
Deputy Travis Junior said:
Well never mind then. I read a few articles, which said that the dallas defense was below average and didn't bother to dive into the stats to corroborate the opinions. Some of that fake news I guess.
EDIT: just checked out some stats. Dallas is #11 in yards/rush defense and #24 in passing efficiency defense. From what you said, the second sounds more like a pass rusher problem than a DB quality problem, but it doesn't really matter; the end result is the same. Perhaps you'd disagree, but with the rule changes over the last few years that greatly increase the value of the QB, I'd say that a slightly above average rush defense and a very poor pass defense add up to an overall bad defense.