Sims said:
The obvious answer is, yes, they do.
In your specific situation? I dunno. You're the tech space stuck in the midwest poster right? Are you stuck because noone will pay you to move where you'd rather be or are you stuck in the midwest for other reasons? I'm not in tech, but from the outside looking in, nearly every person in the sector ballyhooed and leveraged themselves higher levels of work from home ability. Now companies are less likely to pay relo because they are paying everyone to work from home? That doesn't sound surprising to me at all.
Yes, that's me.
It's not that no one will pay, I am looking to know what to be prepared for. I was with a company with a SF presence and I had talked to my boss about wanting to move there. He said yes, the company will support the move but I had to pay relo myself. That made sense - I wanted to move, they did not ask me to move. But we had a layoff since and all that is out of the window.
But what happens when I apply to a new job that is in a different city? Do companies expect you to pay relo or do they not consider you at all? You may be right in your logic on work from home situations. Why pay when people can work remotely? But not all companies are this way so I was wondering what the current norms were.