Talarico supports full legalization

4,143 Views | 70 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by Grapesoda2525
Billys Cesspool Enjoyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think that IS CattleAg.
“…What?”

- Joe Biden
Fightin_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EMY92 said:

I am not a fan of Paxton, I think he's a terrible candidate.

But, this alone is worth voting for him.


I'm so confused by this post
The world needs mean tweets

My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA

Trump 2024
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Grapesoda2525 said:

https://www.marijuanamoment.net/talarico-says-hell-work-to-federally-legalize-marijuana-if-elected-to-the-senate/

Definitely a stark contrast from the statewide ban that Lt. Gov Dan Patrick single handedly decided for over 30 million texans despite receiving overwhelming input in favor of legalizing.


The definition of a single issue voter.
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
Helicopter Ben
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

It wouldn't surprise me at all if potheads voted for marxism in exchange for being legally allowed to smoke their brains out. Fitting, really.

I agree there are FAR more important issues in our governments, at all levels, but this one is just stupid to keep fighting. It's an unwinnable battle in the first place. Pot is legal in a lot of other states. A lot of it is making its way into Texas from places like Colorado. So yes, they are already smoking their brains out or whatever if they want to.

I also find it hypocritical on multiple points. Conservatives are supposedly on the side of freedom. Most posters in here were rightfully outraged when they wanted to mandate the covid shots. It would be inconsistent to say the govt can't mandate what you put in your body, but it can mandate what you can't put in. I'm not sure how you can defend that logical inconsistency. Another issue is, of course, the alcohol comparison. Can you overindulge on pot? Yes of course you can. But the consequences of overindulging on weed are far less severe. The simultaneous tolerance for legal alcohol while at the same time supporting a ban on pot is yet another major inconsistency.

IMO, conservatives should adopt the sensible approach. And that would be legalization along with restrictions on how it's used. No smoking in public, no impaired driving, etc. Basically, if I do it in my own home and you're never exposed to it then what's the problem?
Billys Cesspool Enjoyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CascadiaAg said:

Billys Cesspool Enjoyer said:

CascadiaAg said:

Ban Talarico.

And pot.

Everywhere.


Missed you, best buddy.

Even I needed a 2 year break from Texags


Breaks are healthy, so for once we might agree on something.

Either way, I hope you've been well.
“…What?”

- Joe Biden
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boogie2988Ag said:

Cool what can do about it as Senator

Absolutely nothing. But it makes the ignorant feel good.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok. Marxism it is!
Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The pot heads don't realize that in totalitarian governments like Democrats desire, weed would be banned. Can't have the worker ants not productive.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Helicopter Ben said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

It wouldn't surprise me at all if potheads voted for marxism in exchange for being legally allowed to smoke their brains out. Fitting, really.

I agree there are FAR more important issues in our governments, at all levels, but this one is just stupid to keep fighting. It's an unwinnable battle in the first place. Pot is legal in a lot of other states. A lot of it is making its way into Texas from places like Colorado. So yes, they are already smoking their brains out or whatever if they want to.

I also find it hypocritical on multiple points. Conservatives are supposedly on the side of freedom. Most posters in here were rightfully outraged when they wanted to mandate the covid shots. It would be inconsistent to say the govt can't mandate what you put in your body, but it can mandate what you can't put in. I'm not sure how you can defend that logical inconsistency. Another issue is, of course, the alcohol comparison. Can you overindulge on pot? Yes of course you can. But the consequences of overindulging on weed are far less severe. The simultaneous tolerance for legal alcohol while at the same time supporting a ban on pot is yet another major inconsistency.

IMO, conservatives should adopt the sensible approach. And that would be legalization along with restrictions on how it's used. No smoking in public, no impaired driving, etc. Basically, if I do it in my own home and you're never exposed to it then what's the problem?


Voting for Low T will accomplish none of what you want and he knows it
Helicopter Ben
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Ok. Marxism it is!

Is this a troll? It's so hard to tell these days with both sides so incapable of rational/logical debate. If it isn't, please explain how you can defend the blatant inconsistencies I pointed out?

I despise Marxism, or any other state enforced version of collectivism. I am what you would call a radical limited government minarchist, if not an outright Ancap. Not everything is Marxist…ESPECIALLY when it's advocating for freedom against state coercion. "Everything I don't agree with is Marxist" has become the conservative version of the left's "everything I disagree with is hitler."

American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A Net Full of Jello said:

This is the strangest issue to be obsessed with.

The fact that potheads are likely the most fervent single-issue voting block behind abortion should tell you all you need to know as to why it should be illegal and not accepted in normal society. To be so easily captured by the desire to get high is remarkable and sad. It's no wonder the left rolls this out every election.

I'm surprised, honestly, that they don't make it an even bigger top issue than it is. But sexually deviancy seems to REALLY get the party leadership going. Pot is for the stinky masses of their plantation voters.
foo00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

"Basically, if I do it in my own home and you're never exposed to it then what's the problem?"

While I 100% agree with the overall sentiment, even the libertarian in me sees the problem with the above argument. Just leave that part off.

"Well then I should be able to <insert here> in the sanctity of my own home!" ex: heroin, propofol, kidnapping someone in a homemade dungeon (the neighbors will never know), homemade napalm (home defense only!), a small nuclear reactor (solar is so last decade).

Somewhere they're going to demand to draw the line and to negotiate otherwise will only make them dig in further.
VaterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good. Enough with the nanny state.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Billys Cesspool Enjoyer said:

I think that IS CattleAg.


No, it's pronounced "SeattleAg".

Post something factual and negative about Seattle. If he goes apoplectic and gets enraged that you don't know what you are talking about, it's him.
CascadiaAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Billys Cesspool Enjoyer said:

I think that IS CattleAg.


No, it's pronounced "SeattleAg".

Post something factual and negative about Seattle. If he goes apoplectic and gets enraged that you don't know what you are talking about, it's him.

YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT WHEN YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT SEATTLEAG!

whoever he is.
Concerned Moderate Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Absolutely no reason weed shouldn't be legal as long as alcohol is legal. Not a reason to vote for this tool though. Eventually the old liberty-hating "conservatives" will die off.
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

Grapesoda2525 said:

https://www.marijuanamoment.net/talarico-says-hell-work-to-federally-legalize-marijuana-if-elected-to-the-senate/

Definitely a stark contrast from the statewide ban that Lt. Gov Dan Patrick single handedly decided for over 30 million texans despite receiving overwhelming input in favor of legalizing.

Dan Patrick is not running against Low T


Dude, he's way too f'n high to realize that Patrick and Paxton are not the same person
DeepEastTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Concerned Moderate Ag said:

Absolutely no reason weed shouldn't be legal as long as alcohol is legal. Not a reason to vote for this tool though. Eventually the old liberty-hating "conservatives" will die off.


Drinking a couple beers on your back porch doesn't make the whole block smell like it was sprayed by a skunk.
TxSquarebody
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This right here! I'd be more for it if every means of consumption, except lighting it on fire, was legal. Burning it should be a defense against prosecution when somebody kicks your ass!
Concerned Moderate Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeepEastTxAg said:

Concerned Moderate Ag said:

Absolutely no reason weed shouldn't be legal as long as alcohol is legal. Not a reason to vote for this tool though. Eventually the old liberty-hating "conservatives" will die off.


Drinking a couple beers on your back porch doesn't make the whole block smell like it was sprayed by a skunk.


Neither do gummies
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A Net Full of Jello said:

This is the strangest issue to be obsessed with.


Right? Why won't conservatives leave it the **** alone?
MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VaterAg said:

Good. Enough with the nanny state.


Take the shot…nanny state you were saying?
Billys Cesspool Enjoyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Billys Cesspool Enjoyer said:

I think that IS CattleAg.


No, it's pronounced "SeattleAg".

Post something factual and negative about Seattle. If he goes apoplectic and gets enraged that you don't know what you are talking about, it's him.


Thanks big dog. I know how it's pronounced. I'm just meming.

And yea, while I don't share the same disdain for Seattle (I live here too) as pretty much the entire board, it seems to me like C@lAg has a pretty even keeled opinion on Seattle's [numerous] flaws.

Eta to be on topic: I think weed should be decriminalized, if not fully legalized. I haven't touched the stuff ( or alcohol for that matter) at all over the last almost 5 years. I don't plan to for awhile yet and even then, only in moderation but it's one of the things the government really doesn't need to regulate, IMO.

as far as the smell goes, I get it but edibles exist too.
“…What?”

- Joe Biden
CascadiaAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Plus I have heard that SeattleAg no longer lives in Seatte. Or even King County. Because he was tired of the pot smoke and smell everywhere when walking his huskies or when wanting to leave his windows open at night.

He has now relocated to a suburb with a somewhat large and deep amount of water between him and Seattle, and while pot is still legal there, there is a much larger distance between him and any neighbors and he does not have to smell that vile **** in his home. Although it is still around when walking the dogs.

Or so I have heard.
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

CascadiaAg said:

Ban Talarico.

And pot.

Everywhere.

whatever happened to c@lag?

I totally forgot about that guy til you posted that.
I don’t say this in a braggedocious way. But it’s true. I’ve been right about everything.

-Donald J Trump
-9/22/2025



agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If I was king for a day in Texas.

Grow your own. Perfectly legal
Smoking in public is illegal everywhere.
Smoking in private is legal
Possession is decriminalized. No more going to jail for a little grass.
Edibles in any normal quantity are also decriminalized. Stop sticking felonies on 40 year olds with 20 gummies.

Distribution and sales- no thanks.

I get that is somewhat contradictory.
I don’t say this in a braggedocious way. But it’s true. I’ve been right about everything.

-Donald J Trump
-9/22/2025



pacecar02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agsalaska said:

Old McDonald said:

CascadiaAg said:

Ban Talarico.

And pot.

Everywhere.

whatever happened to c@lag?

I totally forgot about that guy til you posted that.

good ol cattle ag
Casual Cynic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Of all the things to outlaw that are dangerous; marijuana is one of the least dangerous things people can actually do. Conservatives will have to eventually give up on weed prohibition like they had to give up on gay marriage.
TxSquarebody
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now that you mention it, those things DO overlap!
Billys Cesspool Enjoyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
pacecar02 said:

agsalaska said:

Old McDonald said:

CascadiaAg said:

Ban Talarico.

And pot.

Everywhere.


Y'
whatever happened to c@lag?

I totally forgot about that guy til you posted that.

good ol cattle ag


Y'all dudes postin' in a Cattle Ag thread.
“…What?”

- Joe Biden
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Grapesoda2525 said:

https://www.marijuanamoment.net/talarico-says-hell-work-to-federally-legalize-marijuana-if-elected-to-the-senate/

Definitely a stark contrast from the statewide ban that Lt. Gov Dan Patrick single handedly decided for over 30 million texans despite receiving overwhelming input in favor of legalizing.

It just stinks up the entire city whenever you go to a legalized area. Hotels, elevators, sidewalks, every freaking where.
GenericAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TAMU1990 said:

Grapesoda2525 said:

https://www.marijuanamoment.net/talarico-says-hell-work-to-federally-legalize-marijuana-if-elected-to-the-senate/

Definitely a stark contrast from the statewide ban that Lt. Gov Dan Patrick single handedly decided for over 30 million texans despite receiving overwhelming input in favor of legalizing.

It just stinks up the entire city whenever you go to a legalized area. Hotels, elevators, sidewalks, every freaking where.


Facts. It really smells horrible in NYC.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GenericAggie said:

TAMU1990 said:

Grapesoda2525 said:

https://www.marijuanamoment.net/talarico-says-hell-work-to-federally-legalize-marijuana-if-elected-to-the-senate/

Definitely a stark contrast from the statewide ban that Lt. Gov Dan Patrick single handedly decided for over 30 million texans despite receiving overwhelming input in favor of legalizing.

It just stinks up the entire city whenever you go to a legalized area. Hotels, elevators, sidewalks, every freaking where.


Facts. It rally smells horrible in NYC.

Denver too.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

A Net Full of Jello said:

This is the strangest issue to be obsessed with.


Right? Why won't conservatives leave it the **** alone?

Let's make a deal, conservatives will repeal all weed laws if liberals will repeal all gun control laws. Individual liberty for the win!
Dallas82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Boogie2988Ag said:

Cool what can do about it as Senator


Nothing. But while he can't do that, he can supposedly mutilate your kids from what I hear around here. Strange dual powers of nothing and everything.
Page 2 of 3 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.