Libs at CBS throw a massive hissy fit at perceived rightward tilt

6,808 Views | 65 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by Humorous Username
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deerdude said:

It's a sad state that they have to move so far right just to achieve center.


But they likely still won't. CBS doing some ass kissing with remaining crew right now. Pelley was clearly toxic and insubordinate and clearly just wanted to go out in flames, so he gave them no choice. Meanwhile:

Quote:

The three remaining "60 Minutes" correspondentsLesley Stahl, Bill Whitaker and Jon Wertheimsaid Friday they will remain with the CBS News show.


Stahl is also insubordinate and has done it publicly now; they won't fire her. Look at this. Interference? As if they run CBS and should be able to do whatever they want? And then she slanders her boss in public like a teenager on social media.

Quote:

"We've been internally deeply distressed by the interference, and that's why it was not an easy decision for us," Stahl said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. Stahl also said she has heard Weiss "complaining about us, and that's been harmful."


Stahl still under delusion that they have been some gold standard independent news organization. lol. I would tell her to GTFO now. She's in her mid-80s. Go retire already. But following feels to me like CBS brass is going to acquiesce to the big 3 still left to calm everything down.

Quote:

"We are at the moment trusting Nick and he has told us he'll work to preserve our independence, and that he's not taking orders from the corporation," Stahl added. "If that is the way things go, we'll stay. But if it's not the way things go, we're gonna leave."

Bilton has been working to repair relationships with the frazzled "60 Minutes" team, meeting with producers to reassure them that the show would remain true to its journalistic principles.

"We heard all the right things in yesterday's 'independence' memo," Stahl, Whitaker and Wertheim wrote in their memo. "It went a long way, and now we need to see these commitments to our process and procedures put into action."
Icecream_Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
I seem to remember sometime around 2020 someone did a comprehensive study of media bias at least as it related to the Trump administration.

Fox News was considered extreme right leaning with 60% of their shows saying BAD things about Trump.

Being against what the president was doing 60% of the time is considered extreme right wing, so you can just imagine what "neutral" channels like CBS scored.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MRC the media research center has been all over this.
c-jags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bark Weiss is a liberal Zionist socialist lesbian Jew and for some reason just her saying to stop being biased all the time is right-wing?
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:



Bilton has been working to repair relationships with the frazzled "60 Minutes" team, meeting with producers to reassure them that the show would remain true to its journalistic principles.


60minutes represents a business initiative. If the employees disagree with the direction pursued by management, they are welcome to establish their own business that aligns with their "journalistic" values.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
doubledog said:

YouBet said:



Bilton has been working to repair relationships with the frazzled "60 Minutes" team, meeting with producers to reassure them that the show would remain true to its journalistic principles.


60minutes represents a business initiative. If the employees disagree with the direction pursued by management, they are welcome to establish their own business that aligns with their "journalistic" values.


True, but they never had journalistic principles in the first place as everyone knows. I don't think CBS leadership is going to rock the boat much further. They had a very high profile firing that was national headlines. They are going to retreat some and try to calm things down.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They didn't even have to move right. They just had to source stories that weren't born out of the left's agenda. Talk about mold in apartment complexes or drug addiction or whatever. But no, they couldn't even do that.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
doubledog said:

nortex97 said:

njohn87 said:

Just from a business perspective, seems like Bari is building a news department that appeals to precisely nobody. It's been compromised in the eyes of old Libs/centrists who were still getting their news from CBS a year ago, but still too lib/mainstream for anyone right of center.

A 'news channel' that entirely lacks self-awareness is nothing more than an entertainment channel/show.

What she's building? I dunno, but I doubt it can be any worse.

There is no requirement for a poll to inform us that fire is hot. A careful examination of CBS News is sufficient for any discerning individual to determine that it exhibits bias.

Heck, even their own employees know they're biased. Been that way a long time. Bernie's book came out years ago.


The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
TX_COWDOC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As a young man, I used to enjoy 60 minutes - particularly Andy Rooney's closing segment. Haven't watched it years as the liberal tilt has been unbearable mainly do to things I've heard / seen regarding Stahl and Pelley. I hope they can clean it up. I guess the shift has been going on for years beginning with Dan Rather & Ed Bradley.
www.southpawprecision.com
Type 07 FFL / Class 2 SOT
Nightforce Optics Dealer
AGM Night Vision Dealer
Aust Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bunk Moreland said:

They didn't even have to move right. They just had to source stories that weren't born out of the let's agenda. Talk about mold in apartment complexes or drug addiction or whatever. But no, they couldn't even do that.


Nope, we need to be told what to think because we're not smart enough to do that on our own.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The fact that the on air personalities refuse to even consider any self reflection is a testament to their bias. They are so far ingrained in their own ideology and bias that they can't be objective. Zero emotional maturity or intelligence by these people.
Nom de Plume
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

The fact that the on air personalities refuse to even consider any self reflection is a testament to their bias. They are so far ingrained in their own ideology and bias that they can't be objective. Zero emotional maturity or intelligence by these people.

If you watched Pelley's interview you'd know this to be false.

Warning: you'll also need to give him the benefit of the doubt.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nom de Plume said:

YouBet said:

The fact that the on air personalities refuse to even consider any self reflection is a testament to their bias. They are so far ingrained in their own ideology and bias that they can't be objective. Zero emotional maturity or intelligence by these people.

If you watched Pelley's interview you'd know this to be false.

Warning: you'll also need to give him the benefit of the doubt.


His career and the way he went out shows my comments to be true.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

60minutes represents a business initiative. If the employees disagree with the direction pursued by management, they are welcome to establish their own business that aligns with their "journalistic" values.

Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rocky the dog said:

Quote:

60minutes represents a business initiative. If the employees disagree with the direction pursued by management, they are welcome to establish their own business that aligns with their "journalistic" values.




Remember when the butthurt top CNN guy got mad and went to CNN Digital and it almost immediately failed? That was fun.
TexasAggiesWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
CBS libs, you are now reaping what you have sown for decades

Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hardcore Greg said:

This is effing HILARIOUS. The lack of self-awareness is genuinely astounding. Do they really believe in their warped, defective, degenerate-liberal brains that they have done anything but "make editorial decisions for political purposes" this whole damned time?
Quote:

"60 Minutes" correspondents who departed recently have accused the network of making editorial decisions for political purposes




Exactly. Remind me. Which show edited actual questions and answers by heels up?

Yea. Unbiased and factual. Good riddance to these losers. Got caught cheating for libs. Talk about politics over facts.
LOL OLD
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They should fire Leslie Stahl and then she should sue them for age discrimination.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Burdizzo said:

They should fire Leslie Stahl and then she should sue them for age discrimination.
No need. She's 85 or so. Contracts typically go 3 years. She will probably not sign another one.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ABATTBQ87 said:

Scott Pelley, almost honor grad from Texas Tech

How did I not know this? I looked at his wiki page and discovered that he grew up in Lubbock. One of my best friends probably worked with him as a fellow paper delivery boy. I can hardly wait to give him some crap about that on his birthday call coming in a few days lol. Come to think about it, my mom was a librarian at his high school at about the same time he attended and she might have known him too.

But yeah, screw that guy and the propaganda wagon he rode in on...
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Haleyscomet50
How long do you want to ignore this user?
c-jags said:

Bark Weiss is a liberal Zionist socialist lesbian Jew and for some reason just her saying to stop being biased all the time is right-wing?

At least Trump is getting something out of this war with Iran we need a friendly news network to go along with Fox. Maybe can bring in some new voters for midterms.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:




No bias though.
FrioAg 00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
60 minutes could shift WAY TO THE RIGHT and still be a left wing, radical communist propaganda piece
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CBS-lies has for a long time run off any honest reporters who happened to somehow get hired there.

I think they confiscated all of Sharyl's notes etc. even when they fired her.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Urban Ag said:

I love 60 Minutes.

It reminds me to change the channel from CBS to Sunday Night Football. I hate to miss a moment of Carrie's legs. One of my small joys in life in the fall.

Also reminds me to light my charcoal.






Funny because it's true. When I hear the 60 Minutes intro it's like Pavlov's dogs reaction. It's my cue to immediately rush into the room, if I'm not already in front of tv, and change the channel.


Me too
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We record Marshall's and Tracker on Sunday evenings. More often than not programming is running late due to sports events and CBS ain't forfeiting a minute of their Sunday indoctrination and Trump bashing, so we get part of 60 minutes nearly every week.
I probably will quit recording and just stream for next season.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

njohn87 said:

Just from a business perspective, seems like Bari is building a news department that appeals to precisely nobody. It's been compromised in the eyes of old Libs/centrists who were still getting their news from CBS a year ago, but still too lib/mainstream for anyone right of center.

Frankly, does mainstream news appeal to anyone, anyway?

CNN and MSNOW have dismal numbers and have for years. No one watches this crap aside from older, extremely partisan people.

I mean, who is watching network channel evening news anymore? Boomers and that's about it.

If you want to be both neutral and successful then you have to be one thing: you have to be first. They have to put in the hard work to do investigative journalism and be first to break stories, otherwise you are too late and everyone will have latched on to their preferred left/right news source instead. You have to get to the people before the bias sets in.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
javajaws said:

YouBet said:

njohn87 said:

Just from a business perspective, seems like Bari is building a news department that appeals to precisely nobody. It's been compromised in the eyes of old Libs/centrists who were still getting their news from CBS a year ago, but still too lib/mainstream for anyone right of center.

Frankly, does mainstream news appeal to anyone, anyway?

CNN and MSNOW have dismal numbers and have for years. No one watches this crap aside from older, extremely partisan people.

I mean, who is watching network channel evening news anymore? Boomers and that's about it.

If you want to be both neutral and successful then you have to be one thing: you have to be first. They have to put in the hard work to do investigative journalism and be first to break stories, otherwise you are too late and everyone will have latched on to their preferred left/right news source instead. You have to get to the people before the bias sets in.


Agree. Unfortunately, the MSM abandoned investigative journalism long ago. WSJ does some now and again, but the other big papers gave up on it because it would require them to hold their side (Democrats) accountable. The big networks certainly abandoned it unless they are manufacturing or parroting left wing takes.
Humorous Username
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When you look up "Smug" and "Sanctimonious" in the dictionary, there are pictures of Scott.

Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.