Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Dan Carlin said:

---

Oh look, the GOP talking points are about nonsensical social issues which coincidentally ignore the atrocious behavior of their own candidate. Same old shtick since the 1980s

Wonder if Texans will fall for the sleight of hand and continue to vote for corruption

---

Hating the One True God of the Bible isn't a social issue. It's eternal life versus eternal death.

---

OK Flanders

Muy said:

---

I live in Frisco and voted in the mayoral runoff. The candidate whose signs you see the most is Mark Hill. Googled him and the other candidate Rod-something and looked up what is different about their platforms.

Hill is an ISD school board member standing on a half ass tagline "unite Frisco" with zero concerns about the Indian and Muslim takeover.

Rod is a country boy construction business owner who is respectful but not on board with mosques popping up everywhere. I voted for Rod, never would ever believe a school board shmuck could ever run a city of this size and growth.

Then on my walk through old town last night I see a house with an Aggie flag, a Mark Hill sign, and a "Talarico for Texas" sign.

I made the right choice. And am embarrassed about those Ags.

---

Looks like Hill won the Frisco mayor election pretty easily.

1939 said:

---

I'll be voting for Paxton. But nominating him was a mistake, Cornyn would have waxed him, now this is probably going to be close.

---

It won't be.

15-20 point win, relax.

twk said:

---

txags92 said:

---

I can't believe we FINALLY got rid of Cornyn and have a chance to get a real conservative voice into the Senate instead, and now there are people who would rather vote for a democrat because Paxton did something that cost basically nothing for a donor or because he cheated on his wife. Newsflash, ALL politicians do special favors for their biggest donors. Newsflash, a great many politicians cheat on their spouses. We are not voting on who to invite to be our best friend and hunting buddy for the next 6 years, we are voting for who will go to Washington DC and represent Texas as a conservative voice for the next 6 years. The obvious choice is obvious...

---

Paxton has no principles. He's an opportunist. Fortunately, that will probably be enough to get him to vote the right way in the Senate, but thinking that Paxton is anything but a totally unscrupulous, vile human being is naive. He will be in good company in the Senate.

---

Hes not more vile than any other politician. Unfortunately, Jesus Christ isn't on the ticket.

K2-HMFIC said:

---

SHSU-AG said:

---

K2-HMFIC said:

---

DG-Ag said:

---

K2-HMFIC said:

---

txags92 said:

---

K2-HMFIC said:

---

Who?mikejones! said:

---

K2-HMFIC said:

---

Who?mikejones! said:

---

Sure. You could abstain. Then you for sure will get what you absolutely don't want.

Again, you've got 2 choices and one is clearly, by a long amount, more likely to produce the results I want. The other is 1000% likely to produce the results i don't want.

So, abstain all you want. Its stupid and self defeating. If you want tceh to ruin your day twice, go for it

---

Better to abstain, wait six years to get the right person in office than elect Paxton and have him in office in perpetuity.

---

That's what the primary was for. Paxton won and now is your choice if you prefer anl candidate more oriented towards the right.

It's that or real disaster

---

Given the nature of party primaries its difficult to get someone out once they get in.

I mean the success rate is atrocious.

We are better of losing...and making up for it now than have the stain of Ken Paxton perpetually hanging over us.

---

You keep saying "we". Are you talking about the democrats? Because sure, voting in Talarico is surely better for them. There is no planet on which 6 years of Talarico in the senate representing Texas is better for the Rs.

---

I'll take 6 years of Talarico over 24 of Ken Paxton.

---

Good luck with that, comrade!

---

Folks aren't focused enough on the long game…we need to get the Republican Party right, and if we tolerate corruption, then we will become that.

---

If you would take Talafreako for six years, you are no Republican!

---

Voted Republican in every election since I was 18.

Won't support abject corruption.

I think there's something more to being an American than voting your party every single time regardless of outcome.

I want a strong Republican Party, and if Talafreako needs to be elected, so Paxton never runs again…so be it.

---

Look - a Groyper!

boulderaggie said:

---

Which candidate is best for Texas? I don't think it's Talarico.

---

Unless you want to see Texas turn into California, Virginia, Massachusetts or any other left wing ****hole.

Captn_Ag05 said:

---

Muy said:

---

I live in Frisco and voted in the mayoral runoff. The candidate whose signs you see the most is Mark Hill. Googled him and the other candidate Rod-something and looked up what is different about their platforms.

Hill is an ISD school board member standing on a half ass tagline "unite Frisco" with zero concerns about the Indian and Muslim takeover.

Rod is a country boy construction business owner who is respectful but not on board with mosques popping up everywhere. I voted for Rod, never would ever believe a school board shmuck could ever run a city of this size and growth.

Then on my walk through old town last night I see a house with an Aggie flag, a Mark Hill sign, and a "Talarico for Texas" sign.

I made the right choice. And am embarrassed about those Ags.

---

Looks like Hill won the Frisco mayor election pretty easily.

---

Everyone knew he'd win because he started with the most support, and Rod came out of nowhere but got people's attention because of his straight shooting. Frisco has been run by sellouts for a long time now.

Paxton has been indicted so much and morally bankrupt.

Gradin said:

---

Paxton has been indicted so much and morally bankrupt.

---

More or less morally bankrupt than making false claims about God and Jesus?

I realize God haters aren't fazed by that. It's why democrats are unable to understand why Talarico is so offensive to actual Christians. A party that literally booed God is incapable of grasping biblical truths.

Religion should have no bearing on politics IMO. Their policies and character is what matters most to me. Talarico is a no brainer vote for me. I know lots of people including many relatives (many whom are older) are looking forward to voting for him.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Yep. Incapable of understanding.

---

Yep. Religion and government should be separate as the fore fathers intended.

Morally bankrupt candidate #1 was acquitted with no evidence after the whistleblowers in his office confirmed under oath all they had was a claim of overhearing a conversation about a conversation about a kitchen remodeling. Biden's DOJ then dug in for four more years and came up with nothing. Oh, and the horror: he's going through a divorce now. At least he has a strong track record as an anti-socialist state AG fighting federal overreach and protecting Texans.

Morally bankrupt candidate #2 preaches from the altar in his church that everyone should crush their babies' skulls because the angel Gabriel gave Mary a choice to have Jesus. He also has a disingenuous track record of pandering to all the other single-issue causes that trick people into voting us into socialism, from the climate alarmists, end fossil fuels, vegan green freaks, to the defund the police, DEI equity of outcome racist communists, to the to open border welcome mat import the third world communists, to the thing he loves most besides family is transing kids. This guy's notable track record in the state house consists solely of fleeing the state to the sanctuary of Chicago to break quorum and avoid his one job- voting on proposed bills in the state house. This phony snake sacrilegious theatre kid commie is about as genuine as the story of his former campaign staffer being his longtime girlfriend, best friend, and soulmate.


Obviously the bar is always so much lower for socialist regime candidates with the full backing of east and left coast and foreign elites and the msm.

Gradin said:

---

Religion should have no bearing on politics IMO. Their policies and character is what matters most to me. Talarico is a no brainer vote for me. I know lots of people including many relatives (many whom are older) are looking forward to voting for him.

---

What policies make it a no brainer? Please list 5 policies. I'm curious because I don't anything his policies and you seem like someone with a clear understanding of his policy. I appreciate the effort and I look forward to learning more about his stance. I'd like to learn more about Paxton's policies but I'll learn from one of his acolytes.

Gradin said:

---

Religion should have no bearing on politics IMO. Their policies and character is what matters most to me. Talarico is a no brainer vote for me. I know lots of people including many relatives (many whom are older) are looking forward to voting for him.

---

Stripping religion out makes it worse for talarico. He's a dem socialist whose ideas are quite ruinous wherever tried.

I dont really give a **** about his or Paxton religious beliefs, other than talarico just makes **** up to suit him. I do care that talarico is a modern neo marxist at heart and would vote for policies that would ruin the great things we have going for us

Gradin said:

---

Paxton has been indicted so much and morally bankrupt.

---

Trump was also indicted many times. It's called lawfare.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

I'm not going to let liberals touch children no matter how strongly they insist upon it.

---

the righteous and just liberals want no religion and to touch your kids. You must vote for them because the other guy is "morally bankrupt"