if all appeal maps pass, Rs net 5-7 seats

5,070 Views | 85 Replies | Last: 9 hrs ago by nortex97
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Tennessee completed their new map today in a special session (already now signed by governor, pending pathetic lefty lawfare challenge which will fail yet again). Democrats reacted as one would expect to a map that very likely adds a black US Representative to the state.

There's a lot of profanity/screeching/profanity on various videos out there of the voting (I think one Democrat state rep got in a shoving/cursing match with a state trooper). Hopefully this one is clean:









This one is not clean. NSFW
But does show why other TN representatives are saying that stuff like this should get you thrown in jail

TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dang, what a clown that guy is!

A reminder that Clyburn's endorsement saved Biden's presidential run in the primary, on the basis that he commit to picking a black female running mate and likewise Scotus nominee. He's essentially responsible for foisting Kamala and KBJ on the nation, is my point. I cannot wait for him to become just a retired private citizen.

David Pascoe (R, but a 'former' D) who is running for the state AG has praised Clyburn as the 'Godfather of South Carolina'.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?


STRUCK DOWN!

Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?



so right now, we end up flipping 10 at least, could be 14
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Told ya'll. There was no way the VA state supreme court would allow that many blatant violations of their state constitution and statutes to let that election result to stand.

VA can try it again, of course. But this time they will have to follow the lw in doing so.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Told ya'll. There was no way the VA state supreme court would allow that many blatant violations of their state constitution and statutes to let that election result to stand.

VA can try it again, of course. But this time they will have to follow the lw in doing so.


and how long would it take?
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?

honestly Hawg, I'm quite shocked. Dems simply dont follow the law anymore so I expected this to go forward.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whoop whoop! Down with VA libs trying to do things the illegal old democrat way! What a lovely Friday
JDUB08AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

aggiehawg said:

Told ya'll. There was no way the VA state supreme court would allow that many blatant violations of their state constitution and statutes to let that election result to stand.

VA can try it again, of course. But this time they will have to follow the lw in doing so.


and how long would it take?

According to their constitution, there is nothing they can do for 2026 at this point.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

aggiehawg said:

Told ya'll. There was no way the VA state supreme court would allow that many blatant violations of their state constitution and statutes to let that election result to stand.

VA can try it again, of course. But this time they will have to follow the lw in doing so.


and how long would it take?

Over two years, since the measure has to be passed twice with intervening elections before the subject can be put before the voters for a change in the state constitution.

Assuming this past election counts, then it would have to be passed again by the state assembly and then an election which has to be a statewide one, not local.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Told ya'll. There was no way the VA state supreme court would allow that many blatant violations of their state constitution and statutes to let that election result to stand.

VA can try it again, of course. But this time they will have to follow the lw in doing so.

I don't think certainty was justified. 3 justices dissented, on incredibly spurious bases from what I have skimmed so far.
https://www.vacourts.gov/static/opinions/opnscvwp/1260127.pdf
One can never trust democrats, in black robes or not, to follow basic principles of the law.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks!
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:


honestly Hawg, I'm quite shocked. Dems simply dont follow the law anymore so I expected this to go forward.

They fought the law…





And the law won (thank God).
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Possibly hilarious news in Utah re: Dem re-districting shenanigans. Justice resigns after 'rumors' she slept with Democrat plaintiffs attorney in redistricting case.

Utah is so weird I don't think they fix this one seat this cycle, tbf.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.