JamiesChallengeCard said:

---

Honestly, it'd probably be the best for my sanity anyway. I'm weary of seeing how stupid so many people are.


I'll allow it.

---

And what about Aggie football game day threads???? Where are we supposed to vent about our QB , OC and head coach ???


Wait. Maybe you hav ed a point.

deddog said:

---

JamiesChallengeCard said:

---

Honestly, it'd probably be the best for my sanity anyway. I'm weary of seeing how stupid so many people are.


I'll allow it.

---

And what about Aggie football game day threads???? Where are we supposed to vent about our QB , OC and head coach ???


Wait. Maybe you hav ed a point.

---

I already said I'm sold, you dont have to convince me.

The future will require an unfathomable amount of violence.

Logos Stick said:

---

You lose access for 4 years!

This is Democrat candidate for the GA State House Suzanna Karatassos.


Turley: "When Eric Swalwell promised to arrest ICE officers, take away their driver's licenses, and bar them from jobs, … I joked that next he would take about their WiFi and Internet. It appears that Karatossos beat him to it."


We are getting to the point of major confrontation with these lunatics.

The race to the bottom of Democrats continue to struggle to find new means for retaliation. This is Democrat candidate for the GA State House Suzanna Karatassos, who is running on barring anyone who voted for Trump from the Internet for four years... https://t.co/a1nnyTTl99

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) April 9, 2026

---

Listen to them when they speak what they actually believe. They are evil. If they win this is the kind of thing conservatives will be facing.

joeasht said:

---

They need to quit posting videos when they are drunk or on whatever they take. Crazy.

---

Whats sad, I dont believe she's drunk or on meds. Thats how she and the other dems truly feel. If the dems had it their way, every person who has or did vote for Trump would be marched to hiding facility and processed for life sentence.

Dems aka liberals truly hate anyone who stands in their way of power.

New age politicians are the worst. Let's say whatever unhinged thing comes to mind and see if I get support!

What an idiotic idea. Surpressing anyone who challenges ideals is un-American, in my opinion. It's why I don't bat an eye at Forever Trumpers, you've every right to go off. I have the right to decide whether to listen.

Read the book, "Unhumans: the history of communist revolutions and uprisings" by Jack Posobiec and Josh Lisec. It goes throughout history and covers common themes in each cycle: incite, seize, and purge. Ladies like this politician in Georgia are just dreaming out loud about their seizing power and purging opposition like has happened with every communist revolution in history.


the book goes through the french revolution, bolsheviks, lenin, stalin and the russian revolution, franco and the spanish civil war, maoist china, soviet-sponsored revolutions in Cuba, Chile, Nicaragua, etc. it relates very closely to all the same themes and tactics to certain movements and tactics by the modern democrat party here and how they're doing it.

oh no said:

---

Read the book, "Unhumans: the history of communist revolutions and uprisings" by Jack Posobiec and Josh Lisec. It goes throughout history and covers common themes in each cycle: incite, seize, and purge. Ladies like this politician in Georgia are just dreaming out loud about their seizing power and purging opposition like has happened with every communist revolution in history.


the book goes through the french revolution, bolsheviks, lenin, stalin and the russian revolution, franco and the spanish civil war, maoist china, soviet-sponsored revolutions in Cuba, Chile, Nicaragua, etc. it relates very closely to all the same themes and tactics to certain movements and tactics by the modern democrat party here and how they're doing it.

---

I'm in the middle of that very book right now. USA is in the middle of this process right now.

Question regarding the incite portion, or step 1 described above: When do you consider the moment where we truly began to "hate" the "other side"? When it became fashionable to openly decry the opposing party in a hostile way in modern times?

For me, I believe it was President Trump's first election bid. He came out and regularly went off on Twitter, made personal attacks on other politicians the likes of which had never been seen before in vulgarity and was/is still celebrated for it to this day. For many on here, it is one of the things they like most about him.

Certainly the Parties weren't playing nicely before, he was just saying it out loud. Would you not say by doing so he was encouraging his supporters to be more vocal about their opinions, strengthening his base and directing their anger towards Dems and Dem supporters? Is it only inciting when those people shoot off at the mouth in retort?

Consider the tone on this very board over the last 10+ years. It has shifted from critiques of the President, other politicians and government officials, and legislation to all of that plus generalized insults of any and all members of the opposing party.

That stuff doesn't bother me personally but I am using the example to show how perhaps the inciting part didn't originate where you might think.

You can be certain that this whackaddodle would absolutely follow through if she could.

HumbleAg04 said:

---

You know your ideas are good when you refuse to let people hear opposing views.

---

Like all the Covid discussion online.

Waffledynamics said:

---

Are we actually taking this seriously?

---

I think we should. The Democrats increasingly are removing their masks and telling us exactly what they will do to us, if they can get away with it. They are totalitarians by default and we should not ignore them when they admit to it.

one side riots, loots, commits arson, supports violence and degeneracy, and promotes division because their idol Karl taught them that a divided population is easier to control. their leaders openly talk about "reeducation camps", they push for banning and censoring of the other side, they called them baskets of deplorables for not voting for the socialist party to pay more taxes, they have made up crimes, tried to imprison opposition, tried to assassinate opposition, and tried to remove opposition from ballots. they celebrate bloody decapitated effigies of their political opposition and make comments about attacking and eliminating opposition all the time ...their politicians - on this very thread - are talking about banning millions off the internet for the crime of not voting for their socialist candidate. The "incite" portion of a communist uprising or revolution pits the haves vs the have-nots to divide and create chaos and animosity. Only now, it's not the bourgeoisie vs proletariats. It's movements like BLM that have made it more about superficial things like skin color and guilt as they intentionally move away from color blindness, content of character, and individualism towards identity politics and collectivism. they make it us vs them and create the hate. That's the incite.


but ok yeah, the other side that sat by and did nothing forever (because they were busy working, raising families and paying more and more to support ineffective inefficient government and an intentionally ever growing population of government-dependent free loaders with no choice but to vote for socialism) until someone came along and said mean things on twitter. so we're the exactly the same.

oh no said:

---

The "incite" portion of a communist uprising or revolution pits the haves vs the have-nots to divide and create chaos and animosity.

---

The haves vs the have nots, indeed! A big part of his push and success was succesfully targetting the many U.S. citizens that felt marginalized in modern society by bringing them together and empowering them with the goal of toppling the current ineffective Government. Draining the Swamp, so to speak. Chaos and Animosity can certainly be found in many places as a result.

A populist movement only arose and took enough labor and minority voters from the socialist party because people have had enough. Tell me exactly how Trump "targettted" marginalized people?

President Trump sought to reach out to and gain support from many Americans, particularly the working class and rural communities, during his campaigns. To relate to the people and and show his support of the "Average American". It was quite effective, as is evidenced by his die hard supporters.

I am not claiming they are right or wrong, in fact if you look further back in thread I expressed how the topic of this thread and the person who said is absolutely an idiotic take.

My point is that I personally think the true division and open hostility between our political parties (supporters) began during Trump's first run for President. And my question was, when do you think animosity towards eachother got as bad as it is currently? This is related to the summarized steps listed above. I provided my example and asked for opinions since I find the difference in opinions interesting (and necessary).

rocky the dog said:

---

---

Your user name gives you away Rocky. Now be good and you'll get a treat.

Jinx said:

---

President Trump sought to reach out to and gain support from many Americans, particularly the working class and rural communities, during his campaigns. To relate to the people and and show his support of the "Average American". It was quite effective, as is evidenced by his die hard supporters.

I am not claiming they are right or wrong, in fact if you look further back in thread I expressed how the topic of this thread and the person who said is absolutely an idiotic take.

My point is that I personally think the true division and open hostility between our political parties (supporters) began during Trump's first run for President. And my question was, when do you think animosity towards eachother got as bad as it is currently? This is related to the summarized steps listed above. I provided my example and asked for opinions since I find the difference in opinions interesting (and necessary).

---

"My point is that I personally think the true division and open hostility between our political parties (supporters) began during Trump's first run for President."

That happened under Obama.

Jinx said:

---

My point is that I personally think the true division and open hostility between our political parties (supporters) began during Trump's first run for President.

---

because the big gov bureaucrat and democrat party that controls the security and intel state, public ed and academia, as well as all of mainstream media and the tech platform monopolies, made it so. One side can make everything about identity politics and vilify the tax payers for 8 years, have their candidate call all +70 million citizens who don't vote for socialism a basket of deplorables.. and their next candidate call half of all of the citizenry ultra extremists and it's nothing. nothing happens.. .. but Trump comes along and tweets things like Hillary should be in jail and all the programmed useful idiots go haywire.

NE PA Ag said:

---

Otherwise how in the hell would this be enforceable?

---

The covid board mods certainly had no trouble censoring a majority of users and eliminating them from this site altogether if they didn't tow the line and keep the information one-sided. It's just a matter of scale, but they didn't have any trouble following the enforcement of an entire subset of users on this site, while keeping their side of the information front and center. It can be done, and now with AI Texags would've had an even easier method of addressing censorship. Using voting data with AI would make this actually terrifyingly easy with the right resources.

Stamp out all opposing views has always been the commie playbook. It's the only way for them to get and hold power because they can't do it based on honest and open debate.

Thanks for the response.

Was there a specific series of events or incidents during President Obama's time? The claim above is the left is following the playbook, but if the first step is inciting the masses I've already shared who I think started that deep hostile divison and when.

I'd like to know from your perspective what you'd say is the defining moment or series of actions where the Left crossed that same line. We're discussing when the original "shots" were fired in modern politics that led us down this divisive path.

they push and they push and they push until finally an outsider non-politician comes in with unprofessional, unstatesmanlike commentary and mean tweets that gains more popularity than the security state could even control with spies, fake dossiers, and full control of fake news. what a threat to the state!! the reaction was to flip the F out, cause mass riots and looting, impeach, change election laws, censor and ban, import 20 million from the 3rd world, make up new crimes, attempt assassinations, etc, etc. etc. ...and then they want to suggest it's all mean tweets' fault and ask when did the left cross the line?

The scariest part of this is that they will have the ability to know who you voted for. How that is legal is beyond me, but I'm sure the GOPe will gladly go along with it.

I'll say this, though, about this loser lady. She will never be anything more than a useful idiot for the communists. And if/when they take over, she will be amongst the first ones that disappear. Bolsheviks and Maoists got rid of those useful idiots first--so they could show their actual political opponents what they will do to you if you don't bend the knee and follow along. They don't give a damn about their virtue signaling for their side--those useful idiot actors, teachers, poets, etc...they will be so gone.

In short, the useful idiot is completely ignorant of history and of human desire of working towards achievement and development to move upwards for themselves and their families. See the USSR and Eastern Bloc and how they fell off after decades of communist control. Funny thing, when you demand people work, they will...and nothing more.

How long until democrats become too ignorant to breathe? Damn you involuntary muscles!!!

Logos Stick said:

---

You lose access for 4 years!

This is Democrat candidate for the GA State House Suzanna Karatassos.


Turley: "When Eric Swalwell promised to arrest ICE officers, take away their driver's licenses, and bar them from jobs, … I joked that next he would take about their WiFi and Internet. It appears that Karatossos beat him to it."


We are getting to the point of major confrontation with these lunatics.

The race to the bottom of Democrats continue to struggle to find new means for retaliation. This is Democrat candidate for the GA State House Suzanna Karatassos, who is running on barring anyone who voted for Trump from the Internet for four years... https://t.co/a1nnyTTl99

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) April 9, 2026

---

Meh, I'll worry about what a candidate says when they win the White House.

Everything else is just rage/cream bait.

I would like to get her stupid ass out of this country. And keep her from getting back in.

Jinx said:

---

Thanks for the response.

Was there a specific series of events or incidents during President Obama's time? The claim above is the left is following the playbook, but if the first step is inciting the masses I've already shared who I think started that deep hostile divison and when.

I'd like to know from your perspective what you'd say is the defining moment or series of actions where the Left crossed that same line. We're discussing when the original "shots" were fired in modern politics that led us down this divisive path.

---

How about when Obama militarized the IRS against conservative non-profits? Another great example is go remind yourself about Harry Reid's actions. Then, you can go back to Biden trying to spike Clarence Thomas's nomination. Then, you can go back to Bork.

The Left has always been on the bleeding edge and in the vanguard of our divisive politics.

The devastation that will be unleashed by letting modern Democrats take power again will be filled with horrors.

They have no lines they will not cross now.

Jinx said:

---

Question regarding the incite portion, or step 1 described above: When do you consider the moment where we truly began to "hate" the "other side"? When it became fashionable to openly decry the opposing party in a hostile way in modern times?

For me, I believe it was President Trump's first election bid. He came out and regularly went off on Twitter, made personal attacks on other politicians the likes of which had never been seen before in vulgarity and was/is still celebrated for it to this day. For many on here, it is one of the things they like most about him.

Certainly the Parties weren't playing nicely before, he was just saying it out loud. Would you not say by doing so he was encouraging his supporters to be more vocal about their opinions, strengthening his base and directing their anger towards Dems and Dem supporters? Is it only inciting when those people shoot off at the mouth in retort?

Consider the tone on this very board over the last 10+ years. It has shifted from critiques of the President, other politicians and government officials, and legislation to all of that plus generalized insults of any and all members of the opposing party.

That stuff doesn't bother me personally but I am using the example to show how perhaps the inciting part didn't originate where you might think.

---

Late 80s...

It got bad when Bush was elected. That's when the media really started to show their true colors.

Jinx said:

---

Thanks for the response.

Was there a specific series of events or incidents during President Obama's time? The claim above is the left is following the playbook, but if the first step is inciting the masses I've already shared who I think started that deep hostile divison and when.

I'd like to know from your perspective what you'd say is the defining moment or series of actions where the Left crossed that same line. We're discussing when the original "shots" were fired in modern politics that led us down this divisive path.

---

In July 2009, President Barack Obama stated that Cambridge, Mass., police "acted stupidly" by arresting Harvard scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr. at his own home, igniting a national debate on racial profiling.

The remark caused significant backlash from law enforcement, with Sgt. Crowley and supporters demanding an apology.

"If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon"
Obama noted that Trayvon Martin "could have been me 35 years ago," reflecting on his own experiences with racial profiling.

Example #854,253

Top Democrat political strategist James Carville just said he wants to watch Trump tortured first instead of just being ass*ssinated

This is the evil we’re up against pic.twitter.com/ankjHcu3IA

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) April 11, 2026

bUt tHe dIvIsIoN hApPeNeD uNdEr tRuMp

Athanasius said:

---

The devastation that will be unleashed by letting modern Democrats take power again will be filled with horrors.

They have no lines they will not cross now.

---

Thats already the case. They raided Trump's house. They made up crimes and arrested him. They tried to kill him.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Athanasius said:

---

The devastation that will be unleashed by letting modern Democrats take power again will be filled with horrors.

They have no lines they will not cross now.

---

Thats already the case. They raided Trump's house. They made up crimes and arrested him. They tried to kill him.

---

all those things are just to protect our democracy though.