ETFan said:

---

There it is, temporary. Transient. Give me some other good ones.

---

So you think the Straits of Hormuz will be blocked forever?

deddog said:

---

ETFan said:

---

There it is, temporary. Transient. Give me some other good ones.

---

So you think the Straits of Hormuz will be blocked forever?

---

Yes, they think Trump is going to put boots on the ground and grunts floating in the ocean locked in a forever war with Iran that can only be stopped by General Kamala and Trans Sec of Peace who will apologize to Iran, pay them reparations and give them nukes since we stole their nuclear dust in a big meanie way.

In return, the Gay Ayatollah will issue another fatwa promising that they nukes are only for peace, unless Mahdi is ready to return in which case they will say Allah has willed them to destroy Big and Little Satan.

deddog said:

---

ETFan said:

---

There it is, temporary. Transient. Give me some other good ones.

---

So you think the Straits of Hormuz will be blocked forever?

---

Totally bro, lol. Of course not.

I have no idea how long it'll be closed, nor do you. Same as I have no idea when "economy will improve soon" and "jobs are coming back soon" timelines end.

Yes, it'll reopen, could be tomorrow, could be 3 years? Just a funny, explicit example from someone using the exact phrase I mentioned in a comment earlier.

deddog said:

---

Aggie Infantry said:

---

According to Mark Felton, there are more Flag Officers (Admirals) in the Royal Navy than there are ships! There are more horses in the British Army than tanks!

---

I don't know about officers, but when looking up the Challenger 2 tank, I was shocked to learn that the British Army has something like 400 tanks total.

---

I'm guessing half of those are not operable and/or they don't have the fuel to run them anyway.

ETFan said:

---

Jack Squat 83 said:

---

If they knew they had a better chance of winning the next election, Democrats would be happy for ALL Americans (rich or poor, any color, any sexual preference, etc) to pay $25/gallon. They would still sleep extremely well at night with no guilty conscience whatsoever.

You can never convince me otherwise. We know this is true. They are 100% willing to give up our culture and sovereignty already for power and control, as they continue to prove.

---

It seems to me gas/fuel prices aren't a concern to the GOP anymore so how could the democrats use that against them?

---

Your logic is poor.

What he said was that if high gas prices would improve Democrat chances of winning the election, they would have zero problem with it going to $25/gal. Your premise in your sentence has no bearing on how the GOP feels about gas prices...


Considering the liberals you support want to basically end fossil fuel production, please spare me your hypocrisy about how gas prices are too high.

If those liberals, and you by proxy, got their wish, gas WOULD get extremely expensive. And that's a FEATURE, not a BUG...

It's designed to drive us away from fossil fuels...

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

We are leaving NATO I suspect

---

Not a chance. Trump might try and Europe will sh** themselves, give in to some demands. Or Congress will stop him

But there's no way we leave. We'd need them if WW3 popped off.

Rutt had a point, we gave them no notice about Iran. It takes time to form a coalition to come help with their navies. Now not allowing us to Use bases and air space its weak AF and petty, that should of not happened at all

Y'all talk about their Muslim immigration and problems but we're not far behind. We just let 18 million people into our country. We have unfair elections and have no cash bail

On top of that we have idiot voters that forget how bad Dems were in just under two years. They're about to vote in Dems again

I hope to hell we win in Iran and Cuba. And the economy turns around before 2028 or JD might lose the presidency. That said, the Dems only have one good choice in Newsom to run against JD. The gay guy is winning in the latest poll I saw and I don't see a gay winning. Blacks won't turnout for a gay and Hispanics don't like that crap. Which is the reason I laugh at anybody that thinks Talorico has a chance in Texas that's just crazy talk

2026NCAggies said:

---

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

We are leaving NATO I suspect

---

Not a chance. Trump might try and Europe will sh** themselves, give in to some demands. Or Congress will stop him

But there's no way we leave. We'd need them if WW3 popped off.

Rutt had a point, we gave them no notice about Iran. It takes time to form a coalition to come help with their navies. Now not allowing us to Use bases and air space its weak AF and petty, that should of not happened at all

Y'all talk about their Muslim immigration and problems but we're not far behind. We just let 18 million people into our country. We have unfair elections and have no cash bail

On top of that we have idiot voters that forget how bad Dems were in just under two years. They're about to vote in Dems again

I hope to hell we win in Iran and Cuba. And the economy turns around before 2028 or JD might lose the presidency. That said, the Dems only have one good choice in Newsom to run against JD. The gay guy is winning in the latest poll I saw and I don't see a gay winning. Blacks won't turnout for a gay and Hispanics don't like that crap. Which is the reason I laugh at anybody that thinks Talorico has a chance in Texas that's just crazy talk

---

Not sure if serious, but saying we'd need them in WWIII is both naive and proven incorrect.

We are leaving NATO or substantially redrawing the agreement. Part of that will be Greenland being ceded to US control.

Trump is wearing so big boy britches right now. The weak need not to offer their criticisms, worrying, Nancy mating pearl clutching. Be strong.

2026NCAggies said:

---

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

We are leaving NATO I suspect

---

Not a chance. Trump might try and Europe will sh** themselves, give in to some demands. Or Congress will stop him

But there's no way we leave. We'd need them if WW3 popped off.

Rutt had a point, we gave them no notice about Iran. It takes time to form a coalition to come help with their navies. Now not allowing us to Use bases and air space its weak AF and petty, that should of not happened at all

Y'all talk about their Muslim immigration and problems but we're not far behind. We just let 18 million people into our country. We have unfair elections and have no cash bail

On top of that we have idiot voters that forget how bad Dems were in just under two years. They're about to vote in Dems again

I hope to hell we win in Iran and Cuba. And the economy turns around before 2028 or JD might lose the presidency. That said, the Dems only have one good choice in Newsom to run against JD. The gay guy is winning in the latest poll I saw and I don't see a gay winning. Blacks won't turnout for a gay and Hispanics don't like that crap. Which is the reason I laugh at anybody that thinks Talorico has a chance in Texas that's just crazy talk

---

Why would we need NATO if WWIII opened? We no longer fly B-17s or B-24s, meaning we no longer need land bases that Europe would provide. We can strike anyone, anywhere, in the world by flying B-2s from domestic bases.

NATO has shown itself to be worthless, and even combative, to our interests. Screw them.

They need to watch this HIPE Video and go get their Oil!

They told you this country has nothing to be proud of.

They were wrong. 🇬🇧

2,300 years ago, Greek explorer Pytheas of Massalia sailed to these islands. He found Cornish tin miners already trading with the ancient world, and Stonehenge, built before the pyramids of Giza. He… pic.twitter.com/XKbvDTjxyj

— Proudofus.uk (@ProudofusUK) March 6, 2026

https://pjmedia.com/jennifer-rust/2026/04/01/proudofusuk-reminds-british-and-anglophiles-everywhere-of-untaught-past-glories-n4951356