Feminization of the workplace.
HollywoodBQ said:Swan Song said:
I manage the HR and Marketing departments at my company. The OP comments are not representative of all companies and their HR departments. Our size has not changed in 10 years, and we don't have a DEI position. I guess it all depends on who is leading HR.
So you're doing both of the jobs normally assigned to women.
Over_ed said:
And ruined the company (my add)The most telling stat for me.
- HR departments have ballooned in size. In the US alone, companies employed 1.3 million HR professionals in 2024a 64% increase over the past decadewhile overall employment grew just 14%.
- Professional services and tech firms saw HR headcounts double since 2014.
- Overall, the piece argues that HR's takeover reflects broader societal demands for fairer workplaces but warns of risks if it stifles agility.
The average number of discrimination or harassment allegations increased 150% from 2021 - 2025.
Increased from 6 complaints per 1000 employees to 15 complaints per 1000 employees in just 4 years.
My opinion - HR is actively fomenting dissention, because that is in HR employees best interest.
IMO, HR is truly a position that AI is welcome to eliminate.
Summary via Grok (Economist is paywalled )
https://www.economist.com/business/2025/11/10/how-hr-took-over-the-world
93MarineHorn said:
HR complaint increases from '21 - '24 probably have more to do with what used to be normal interactions now causing offense. And the offended person must be catered to, regardless of how silly or benign a comment was.
Over_ed said:93MarineHorn said:
HR complaint increases from '21 - '24 probably have more to do with what used to be normal interactions now causing offense. And the offended person must be catered to, regardless of how silly or benign a comment was.
Agree, my wife and I were talking about this Saturday, which is why this caught my eye.
She was talking about the best places she had worked (retired a few months ago) and how the humor and bonhomie would not be possible now.
When you give a dog attention for bad behavior, it can indeed give you more.
FarmerJohn said:
Seems very much related to the increase in administrators compared to educators in our school system. More deadweight whose overhead has to be carried by the producers.
MouthBQ98 said:
I'll just say it, because the data supports it: two X chromosomes is a huge factor.
ts5641 said:MouthBQ98 said:
I'll just say it, because the data supports it: two X chromosomes is a huge factor.
This is what can't be said. Most women are the death of fun in the workplace. My wife even says women are much more difficult to work with than men.
infinity ag said:cslifer said:
That was a scam going around a few years ago, people filing for unemployment using someone else's identity. I don't remember all the details but we had a couple people that had their names used by the scammers. I remember it caused a huge pain for payroll/finance folks.
Hmm this might have been it. I didn't hear anything from anyone after that one meeting I had with the HR SVP lady.
ts5641 said:
The public school district has 3 HR directors. 3! There's the Director of HR, the Senior Director of HR, and the Assistant Superintendent over HR. Prob nearly a half million in salary there.
Over_ed said:ts5641 said:MouthBQ98 said:
I'll just say it, because the data supports it: two X chromosomes is a huge factor.
This is what can't be said. Most women are the death of fun in the workplace. My wife even says women are much more difficult to work with than men.
BTW, blue star for swan song, and I apologize for the next...but I do tend to agree with ts5641.
My wife is so far in agreement that she has said if she ever had to go back to work, she would take a worse position to avoid working for a woman.
She won't have to go back, as we were both reasonably well paid and have always lived on one of our salaries. But it's interesting it is still on her mind.
ts5641 said:93MarineHorn said:
HR complaint increases from '21 - '24 probably have more to do with what used to be normal interactions now causing offense. And the offended person must be catered to, regardless of how silly or benign a comment was.
I had a boss once who told me the most powerful person in our office was our secretary. He said you have to walk on eggshells not to offend her. She basically ran the place because she knew she could just complain to HR if anything didn't go her way.
infinity ag said:ts5641 said:93MarineHorn said:
HR complaint increases from '21 - '24 probably have more to do with what used to be normal interactions now causing offense. And the offended person must be catered to, regardless of how silly or benign a comment was.
I had a boss once who told me the most powerful person in our office was our secretary. He said you have to walk on eggshells not to offend her. She basically ran the place because she knew she could just complain to HR if anything didn't go her way.
The boss likely was just one of those slimy men who try to make nice with women by praising them a lot and saying that they rule and are girl-bosses. Keeps many women happy and "heard". The man likely was watching too many movies where they show tough female secretaries of whom even the boss is afraid of.
TAMUallen said:
What's the male to female ratio in HR and is there anything done to stop discrimination against males?
infinity ag said:TAMUallen said:
What's the male to female ratio in HR and is there anything done to stop discrimination against males?
Discrimination against males is justifiable discrimination because women have been subjugated and held down by men for 100000000 years.
Over_ed said:ts5641 said:MouthBQ98 said:
I'll just say it, because the data supports it: two X chromosomes is a huge factor.
This is what can't be said. Most women are the death of fun in the workplace. My wife even says women are much more difficult to work with than men.
BTW, blue star for swan song, and I apologize for the next...but I do tend to agree with ts5641.
My wife is so far in agreement that she has said if she ever had to go back to work, she would take a worse position to avoid working for a woman.
She won't have to go back, as we were both reasonably well paid and have always lived on one of our salaries. But it's interesting it is still on her mind.
infinity ag said:Over_ed said:ts5641 said:MouthBQ98 said:
I'll just say it, because the data supports it: two X chromosomes is a huge factor.
This is what can't be said. Most women are the death of fun in the workplace. My wife even says women are much more difficult to work with than men.
BTW, blue star for swan song, and I apologize for the next...but I do tend to agree with ts5641.
My wife is so far in agreement that she has said if she ever had to go back to work, she would take a worse position to avoid working for a woman.
She won't have to go back, as we were both reasonably well paid and have always lived on one of our salaries. But it's interesting it is still on her mind.
My wife works for a woman. Until this Friday at least. The boss got fired. She says she was horrible and always belittled everyone. Everyone is happy she is going away.
Almost all my female bosses have been terrible maniacs except 1 lady. This one person was very nice to me. There is something about women not able to handle power given to them.
MouthBQ98 said:
I'll just say it, because the data supports it: Two X chromosomes is a huge factor.
MouthBQ98 said:
HR has balue when it solves problems instead of creating them. It has value in managing payroll and benefits, and conflict mitigation or the rarest tual workplace behavior issue actually breaking a law or disrupting productivity that can't alone be handled by management, which is usually a scale of business and task specialization matter. I think they can cause problem when overly aggressive, ideological, divisive, or begin to act as filters for interactions and hiring that override the needs of the business.
There can be a value there that justifies the overhead if they are efficient and focused.
MouthBQ98 said:
I agree a lot of it is corporate CYA but if it helps get the employees produce, and helps keep them employed by helping most of the business focus on core functions then great.
Get Off My Lawn said:
HR is a support network to help women invade men's spaces. Prove me wrong.
EclipseAg said:
Man, y'all are a crusty old bunch.
I've had some great female bosses, and horrible male bosses. Interestingly, the bad female bosses I had tried too hard to act like men.
EclipseAg said:
Man, y'all are a crusty old bunch.
I've had some great female bosses, and horrible male bosses. Interestingly, the bad female bosses I had tried too hard to act like men.
Swan Song said:HollywoodBQ said:Swan Song said:
I manage the HR and Marketing departments at my company. The OP comments are not representative of all companies and their HR departments. Our size has not changed in 10 years, and we don't have a DEI position. I guess it all depends on who is leading HR.
So you're doing both of the jobs normally assigned to women.
Well, I am a woman.
???
TAMUallen said:infinity ag said:Over_ed said:ts5641 said:MouthBQ98 said:
I'll just say it, because the data supports it: two X chromosomes is a huge factor.
This is what can't be said. Most women are the death of fun in the workplace. My wife even says women are much more difficult to work with than men.
BTW, blue star for swan song, and I apologize for the next...but I do tend to agree with ts5641.
My wife is so far in agreement that she has said if she ever had to go back to work, she would take a worse position to avoid working for a woman.
She won't have to go back, as we were both reasonably well paid and have always lived on one of our salaries. But it's interesting it is still on her mind.
My wife works for a woman. Until this Friday at least. The boss got fired. She says she was horrible and always belittled everyone. Everyone is happy she is going away.
Almost all my female bosses have been terrible maniacs except 1 lady. This one person was very nice to me. There is something about women not able to handle power given to them.
I've never had a good female boss, ever. In any trade.
There are exceptions but let's be real, they aren't leaders. They just are not geared the same way... they dont have the gear. Nature doesnt lie.
HollywoodBQ said:TAMUallen said:infinity ag said:Over_ed said:ts5641 said:MouthBQ98 said:
I'll just say it, because the data supports it: two X chromosomes is a huge factor.
This is what can't be said. Most women are the death of fun in the workplace. My wife even says women are much more difficult to work with than men.
BTW, blue star for swan song, and I apologize for the next...but I do tend to agree with ts5641.
My wife is so far in agreement that she has said if she ever had to go back to work, she would take a worse position to avoid working for a woman.
She won't have to go back, as we were both reasonably well paid and have always lived on one of our salaries. But it's interesting it is still on her mind.
My wife works for a woman. Until this Friday at least. The boss got fired. She says she was horrible and always belittled everyone. Everyone is happy she is going away.
Almost all my female bosses have been terrible maniacs except 1 lady. This one person was very nice to me. There is something about women not able to handle power given to them.
I've never had a good female boss, ever. In any trade.
There are exceptions but let's be real, they aren't leaders. They just are not geared the same way... they dont have the gear. Nature doesnt lie.
The best boss I ever had was a woman.
The worst boss I ever had was a woman.
All the men bosses fit in the canyon between those two extremes. Although, my current boss is rapidly approaching first place in the worst category.
TrumpsBarber said:EclipseAg said:
Man, y'all are a crusty old bunch.
I've had some great female bosses, and horrible male bosses. Interestingly, the bad female bosses I had tried too hard to act like men.
What does that mean? They tried to pee while standing up?