I'm conflicted on this.
I generally am against world police type interventions, especially when it's under dubious ideas of "saving the children" or "bringing democracy to the Middle East". These are missions with no end goals. Missions that can constantly shift.
Now, a distinction CAN be drawn here - while admitting to myself this could be mental gymnastics.
If the claim is "Nigerian Christian's are being systematically exterminated by Islamic terrorists", the respond could only be agreed by me if it is "We are going in to exterminate every Islamic radical in Nigeria, and then we are out" I may be okay with it. Or, we exterminate all the Islamic radicals and then hand the country back to its rightful leader.
If that's the mission with hard defined parameters, I could be for it. Trump has shown this kind of strategic restraint before like when we struck Iran. Even Tucker Carlson was cliff jumping. What did Trump Admin do? Exactly what it said it would - take out certain facilities. Precise and systematic. Nothing else (publicly).
As a Christian, I can't help but feel that if fellow Christians are being exterminated and we have the means to help, we should. Does this mean get into an African gauntlet? Absolutely not.
As an aside, there's a huge Nigerian population here and idk if yall have come across many of them, but I have, and the vast majority of them are salt of the earth people. Hard workers, Christ believers, and generally more right wing. That could also be part of this.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.