CA Dem Katie Porter 'Pedophilia is an identity'

6,798 Views | 60 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by Slicer97
TheEternalOptimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The sad this is that even THIS is probably not enough to bury her campaign because of the swaths of far-left voters in California.

powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In a sane world this alone would end her political career.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
powerbelly said:

In a sane world this alone would end her political career.


We left sanity a while back.

The AG candidate in Virginia fantasizes about killing his political opponent's family and he is fully endorsed by the Dems.

Where we are now is beyond sad. There is no bottom.
normalhorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
powerbelly said:

In a sane world this alone would end her political career.

In a sane world, eliminating pedophiles from the earth should be rewarded with not having to pay taxes, ever again.

Kalifornia is going to have to live with this filth as their Gov, and they'll deserve every moment of ruin that comes their way.
...take it easy on me, I'm a normal horn
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In California it will be lauded as forward thinking and nuanced.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She's a POS, but that's not what she's saying. She's saying that being gay or trans did not automatically make someone a groomer or pedophile.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Beat my by a minute or so. I'd like to see the question and full answer.

This seems like deceptively edited rage-bait
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dems doing internal oppo dumps to take advantage of a news cycle.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I remember when the left said they would never go this far.

We can only hope our recent (but likely temporary slight lurch back to normalcy) will be enough to kill her chances.
normalhorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

She's a POS, but that's not what she's saying. She's saying that being gay or trans did not automatically make someone a groomer or pedophile.

She's half-right. The half she's leaving out is that every pedophile is either gay or trans, ipso facto....
...take it easy on me, I'm a normal horn
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheEternalOptimist said:

The sad this is that even THIS is probably not enough to bury her campaign because of the swaths of far-left voters in California.





We all knew where this was going. The left is insidious in how it infiltrates and uproots societal norms.

That she is even considered a viable candidate is mind numbing, but thinking like this is how California has gotten to where it is.
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Liberals are on the opposite side on every issue. Men in women's sports, abortions till the day the baby is born. criminals having more rights than civilians, list goes on and on and on. No one should be surprised by this. If you vote democrat, you have no moral soul.
When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, she could be right in a way. The recidivism rate is incredibly high for pedophiles and ephebephilies. It may be deeply behaviorally ingrained, and maybe we should start treating it as such. Institutionalizing or permanently isolating them from children.

The act is what is illegal, but the data would seem to indicate the great majority of these persons are unwilling or unable to control their urges to exploit and harm children.

So, maybe if they identify that way, we assign them to a place like a colony or something where they can live permanently separate from any children, where they can't do the harm that would require imprisonment in an actual prison and maybe they can lead otherwise productive lives. Of course we would immediately get civil right complaints about such a permanent internment camp or colony, but I'd see it as saving them from themselves, and saving us the cost of trials and long term imprisonment when they can otherwise maybe have jobs and live out their lives in an environment where they can't do harm.

Of course, this would have the problem that a lot of these types will not voluntarily self identify and only get detected after doing harm to children, so they'd spend a lot of time in prison anyways but maybe they go straight there when they get out of actual prison.

Maybe we can put to use the unoccupied Aleutian Islands or something.
Canyon Lake Agbu94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LGBPTQIA++ now or does the LGB separate itself and adopt the Rainbow flag again?
Sometimes I feel like I can't feel. This isn't real, I should be hurting
I was alone, I was a song. Music and bone, God's perfect wording
Rubicante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Friends of pedophiles and school shooters.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

In California it will be lauded as forward thinking and nuanced.

It pains me to say Katie Porter represented me in the House from '19 from '23. Good news is, she's the very reason the Dems went from a being a lock in dist 45 to barely +1%.
Aggie Jurist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We already have such a system with "Megan's" laws throughout the country and 20 states with Sexually Violent Predator Acts which call for civil commitment for sex offenders who are likely a danger to the community and therefore are not released to the public after their criminal incarceration.

I observed over 100 such hearings. None of the lawyers representing the pedophiles could find a psychiatrist to testify that the individual's mental illness could be effectively treated. Pedophiles re-offend.

As a civil rights advocate, I found these laws repulsive when I was a young lawyer, even though I myself was the victim of a pedophile. After observing these hearings though, I hope we lock them all up and leave them there. Under no circumstances can we allow the left to 'normalize' this behavior. They continue to try though (calling them Minor Attracted Persons and such). You sexually abuse a child? out of society for good.
oldcrow91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

She's a POS, but that's not what she's saying. She's saying that being gay or trans did not automatically make someone a groomer or pedophile.


False headline to get desired result.
Right wing angle indeed to get any more than this out of that clip.

YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canyon Lake Agbu94 said:

LGBPTQIA++ now or does the LGB separate itself and adopt the Rainbow flag again?


Someone posted on here last week where the international LGB group did just this. What I'm not clear on is if that group is the main advocacy group for all of the gays or just some low rent pretend group. No idea.
normalhorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

Well, she could be right in a way. The recidivism rate is incredibly high for pedophiles and ephebephilies. It may be deeply behaviorally ingrained, and maybe we should start treating it as such. Institutionalizing or permanently isolating them from children.

The act is what is illegal, but the data would seem to indicate the great majority of these persons are unwilling or unable to control their urges to exploit and harm children.

So, maybe if they identify that way, we assign them to a place like a colony or something where they can live permanently separate from any children, where they can't do the harm that would require imprisonment in an actual prison and maybe they can lead otherwise productive lives. Of course we would immediately get civil right complaints about such a permanent internment camp or colony, but I'd see it as saving them from themselves, and saving us the cost of trials and long term imprisonment when they can otherwise maybe have jobs and live out their lives in an environment where they can't do harm.

Of course, this would have the problem that a lot of these types will not voluntarily self identify and only get detected after doing harm to children, so they'd spend a lot of time in prison anyways but maybe they go straight there when they get out of actual prison.

Maybe we can put to use the unoccupied Aleutian Islands or something.


Do you not follow the news? THIS is what Greenland can be used for :-)

In all seriousness, Democrats have allowed the camel's nose under the tent. Unfortunately for the sake of our youth, there is no stopping this depravity. They'll normalize it just like any sane person saw coming years ago and miles away. Pedophiles will be codified as a minority when D's have control of Congress, they'll be murdered for their actions, it'll embolden the sickness in our population, and erode the fabric of our civilization even faster.

There aren't too many things that make me as angry as the notion of stealing someone's childhood. When this does become a social norm, I'll have made it known that this was a line in the sand I wasn't willing to cross, and I'll have to repent for my actions.
...take it easy on me, I'm a normal horn
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just got back from Newport/Huntington area. A LOT of those people do not deserve this. There is an in-your-face right wing element there that has lived long enough in the decaying belly of the beast and is tired of it. Not just talking about the folks with money...moreso the good honest folks who have spent their lives in Cali and are getting crushed financially and tired of seeing it fall to ruin. Noticed it in the area of San Diego we were in last yr as well to a lesser degree. Quite a bit of "Don't tread" and "III" and "1776" swag. American flags too.

San Fran and LA have that state in a stranglehold. Such an amazing place geographically and in terms of climate and resources. No excuse for it not to be thriving. You have to TRY to ruin a place like California.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Not all "identities" should be allowed to continue.
Ag98and03
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

The half she's leaving out is that every pedophile is either gay or trans, ipso facto...

This would be a real surprise to all the female victims who have been raped by their fathers, uncles, clergy.

I bet Epstein would be real surprised to know you think he was gay or trans.
Hank the Grifter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These are the people we're supposed to reason and find middle ground with.

It will never happen.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is inexcusable.
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The "+" in LGBTQ+ is the space holder for pedos.

BkYdPitmaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

She's a POS, but that's not what she's saying. She's saying that being gay or trans did not automatically make someone a groomer or pedophile.

She's confusing pedophilia with being a pedophile. A pedophile is not an identity, it's a pervert and criminal. Someone with pedophilia may not be guilty of anything.
Backyard Pitmaster
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oldcrow91 said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

She's a POS, but that's not what she's saying. She's saying that being gay or trans did not automatically make someone a groomer or pedophile.


False headline to get desired result.
Right wing angle indeed to get any more than this out of that clip.



False headlines and out-of-context quotes are BS, aren't they?

Try being a conservative/Republican and having to take that 24/7/365, from literally 95% of the media in all forms, for years and years and years. Welcome to the party.
I don't think you know me.
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Since libs never call out there own, it would appear they condone pedophilia,
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She said what the left is thinking, accepting, and hiding. While she'll be cast out of the party now, why 3 years later? Because it's the norm from the crazy left.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is a crime and abhorrent to ever be attracted to children.

It is not natural and not how things work, regardless of your moral or religious beliefs. Well unless youre name starts with an M
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oldcrow91 said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

She's a POS, but that's not what she's saying. She's saying that being gay or trans did not automatically make someone a groomer or pedophile.


False headline to get desired result.
Right wing angle indeed to get any more than this out of that clip.



Listen to it again. She clearly states that a pedophile is an identity. No need to get anymore out of the video than that.
AtomicActuator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well that was quite a short clip, wasn't it?
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She may or may not have said that, but the clip starts in the middle of a response. It's just as disingenuous as taking Charlie Kirk's answers out of context.

She's clearly a hateful AWFL, but there might have been more to it than that.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
AtomicActuator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If anyone wants to see more context, the full video of the hearing is here: https://www.c-span.org/program/house-committee/survivors-of-club-q-shooting-and-activists-testify-on-anti-lgbtq-violence/621628

Her comments start at 2:49:33
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.