None of the names are a surprise.

Sadly virtually all of them are in very safe districts so nothing will happen to them come election time and they'll be right back in 2027.

I don't believe Jasmine Crockett is as safe as you think. I believe she got shifted to district 33

Amo -- Democratic -- Rhode Island -- Nay
Beatty -- Democratic -- Ohio -- Nay
Bell -- Democratic -- Missouri -- Nay
Bishop -- Democratic -- Georgia -- Nay
Brown -- Democratic -- Ohio -- Nay
Carson -- Democratic -- Indiana -- Nay
Carter (LA) -- Democratic -- Louisiana -- Nay
Cherfilus-McCormick -- Democratic -- Florida -- Nay
Clarke (NY) -- Democratic -- New York -- Nay
Cleaver -- Democratic -- Missouri -- Nay
Clyburn -- Democratic -- South Carolina -- Nay
Crockett -- Democratic -- Texas -- Nay
Davis (IL) -- Democratic -- Illinois -- Nay
Escobar -- Democratic -- Texas -- Nay
Espaillat -- Democratic -- New York -- Nay
Fields -- Democratic -- Louisiana -- Nay
Figures -- Democratic -- Alabama -- Nay
Foushee -- Democratic -- North Carolina -- Nay
Frost -- Democratic -- Florida -- Nay
Garcia (TX) -- Democratic -- Texas -- Nay
Gomez -- Democratic -- California -- Nay
Green, Al (TX) -- Democratic -- Texas -- Nay
Hayes -- Democratic -- Connecticut -- Nay
Horsford -- Democratic -- Nevada -- Nay
Ivey -- Democratic -- Maryland -- Nay
Jackson (IL) -- Democratic -- Illinois -- Nay
Jayapal -- Democratic -- Washington -- Nay
Johnson (GA) -- Democratic -- Georgia -- Nay
Kamlager-Dove -- Democratic -- California -- Nay
Kelly (IL) -- Democratic -- Illinois -- Nay
Krishnamoorthi -- Democratic -- Illinois -- Nay
Lee (PA) -- Democratic -- Pennsylvania -- Nay
McBath -- Democratic -- Georgia -- Nay
McIver -- Democratic -- New Jersey -- Nay
Menendez -- Democratic -- New Jersey -- Nay
Mfume -- Democratic -- Maryland -- Nay
Moore (WI) -- Democratic -- Wisconsin -- Nay
Moulton -- Democratic -- Massachusetts -- Nay
Ocasio-Cortez -- Democratic -- New York -- Nay
Omar -- Democratic -- Minnesota -- Nay
Pressley -- Democratic -- Massachusetts -- Nay
Quigley - Democratic -- Illinois -- Nay
Ramirez -- Democratic -- Illinois -- Nay
Randall -- Democratic -- Washington -- Nay
Scott (VA) -- Democratic -- Virginia -- Nay
Sewell -- Democratic -- Alabama -- Nay
Simon -- Democratic -- California -- Nay
Strickland -- Democratic -- Washington -- Nay
Sykes -- Democratic -- Ohio -- Nay
Thanedar -- Democratic -- Michigan -- Nay
Thompson (MS) -- Democratic -- Mississippi -- Nay
Tlaib -- Democratic -- Michigan -- Nay
Underwood -- Democratic -- Illinois -- Nay
Velzquez -- Democratic -- New York -- Nay
Waters -- Democratic -- California -- Nay
Watson Coleman -- Democratic -- New Jersey -- Nay
Williams (GA) -- Democratic -- Georgia -- Nay
Wilson (FL) -- Democratic -- Florida -- Nay

The below are ALL spineless cowards. Likely know EXACTLY how they feel but they won't say it
Beyer -- Democratic -- Virginia -- Present
Bonamici -- Democratic -- Oregon -- Present
Brownley -- Democratic -- California -- Present
Bynum -- Democratic -- Oregon -- Present
Carbajal -- Democratic -- California -- Present
Casar -- Democratic -- Texas -- Present
DeGette -- Democratic -- Colorado -- Present
DeSaulnier -- Democratic -- California -- Present
Dexter -- Democratic -- Oregon -- Present
Doggett -- Democratic -- Texas -- Present
Evans (PA) -- Democratic -- Pennsylvania -- Present
Frankel, Lois -- Democratic -- Florida -- Present
Friedman -- Democratic -- California -- Present
Garamendi -- Democratic -- California -- Present
Goldman (NY) -- Democratic -- New York -- Present
Goodlander -- Democratic -- New Hampshire -- Present
Hoyle (OR) -- Democratic -- Oregon -- Present
Jacobs -- Democratic -- California -- Present
Johnson (TX) -- Democratic -- Texas -- Present
Kennedy (NY) -- Democratic -- New York -- Present
Khanna -- Democratic -- California -- Present
Matsui -- Democratic -- California -- Present
McClellan -- Democratic -- Virginia -- Present
Meng -- Democratic -- New York -- Present
Pettersen -- Democratic -- Colorado -- Present
Pingree -- Democratic -- Maine -- Present
Pocan -- Democratic -- Wisconsin -- Present
Salinas -- Democratic -- Oregon -- Present
Snchez -- Democratic -- California -- Present
Scanlon -- Democratic -- Pennsylvania -- Present
Sherman -- Democratic -- California -- Present
Subramanyam -- Democratic -- Virginia -- Present
Thompson (CA) -- Democratic -- California -- Present
Tokuda -- Democratic -- Hawaii -- Present
Tonko -- Democratic -- New York -- Present
Vasquez -- Democratic -- New Mexico -- Present
Walkinshaw -- Democratic -- Virginia -- Present

Barragn -- Democratic -- California -- Not Voting
Casten -- Democratic -- Illinois -- Not Voting
Castor (FL) -- Democratic -- Florida -- Not Voting
Castro (TX) -- Democratic -- Texas -- Not Voting
Cohen -- Democratic -- Tennessee -- Not Voting
Collins -- Republican -- Georgia -- Not Voting
Conaway -- Democratic -- New Jersey -- Not Voting
Crane -- Republican -- Arizona -- Not Voting
Crawford -- Republican -- Arkansas -- Not Voting
Garcia (CA) -- Democratic -- California -- Not Voting
Garca (IL) -- Democratic -- Illinois -- Not Voting
Latimer -- Democratic -- New York -- Not Voting
Leger Fernandez -- Democratic -- New Mexico -- Not Voting
Mullin -- Democratic -- California -- Not Voting
Neguse -- Democratic -- Colorado -- Not Voting
Norcross -- Democratic -- New Jersey -- Not Voting
Pelosi -- Democratic -- California -- Not Voting
Ruiz -- Democratic -- California -- Not Voting
Schakowsky -- Democratic -- Illinois -- Not Voting
Schmidt -- Republican -- Kansas -- Not Voting
Stansbury -- Democratic -- New Mexico -- Not Voting
Swalwell -- Democratic -- California -- Not Voting
Torres (CA) -- Democratic -- California -- Not Voting
Torres (NY) -- Democratic -- New York -- Not Voting
Veasey -- Democratic -- Texas -- Not Voting
Vindman -- Democratic -- Virginia -- Not Voting

AgBQ-00 said:

---

think you might be looking at the wrong one

---

H.Res.519 - Condemning the attacks on Minnesota lawmakers in Brooklyn Park and Champlin, Minnesota, and calling for unity and the rejection of political violence in Minnesota and across the United States.

Looks like the right one to me...

Could you post a link of the one you're referring to?

Before tossing the Republicans under the bus, I'd want to know why they weren't there.

Were they just lazy and skipped it, or were they out of town for legitimate reasons.

ahhh didnt see what you were responding to. thought you were talking about this current one.

Capstone said:

---

I don't believe Jasmine Crockett is as safe as you think. I believe she got shifted to district 33

---

True, I forgot about the Texas redistricting, assuming it stands up in court.

Capstone said:

---

I don't believe Jasmine Crockett is as safe as you think. I believe she got shifted to district 33

---

What is to stop her from running in 30 again?

Can we talk about how 54 of the 58 who don't condemn this brutal murder are not white? That should shock everyone.

We are in a war. Stop being surprised when the enemy acts like an enemy.

A valid point that has to be considered, especially with what that party preaches and breeds.

Yep.

I think the strongest argument is that Hamas wants max Gaza collateral damage to drive Israel/US into further debt and turn global public opinion against them.

So for that reason alone, the US should stop supporting Gaza bombing, and Israel should get more surgical with its targeting.

The beeper bombs were great. Kill actual terror cell bad actors with minimal damage. Even blasting Iran's Uranium factory could be considered effective retaliation. But sloppy Gaza bombings benefits Hamas more than anyone else.

The Lindsey Graham's of DC will never understand this.

Rapier108 said:

---

Before tossing the Republicans under the bus, I'd want to know why they weren't there.

Were they just lazy and skipped it, or were they out of town for legitimate reasons.

---

They can choose to explain their absence or not. Ball is in their court, not mine

FobTies said:

---

Yep.

I think the strongest argument is that Hamas wants max Gaza collateral damage to drive Israel/US into further debt and turn global public opinion against them.

So for that reason alone, the US should stop supporting Gaza bombing, and Israel should get more surgical with its targeting.

The beeper bombs were great. Kill actual terror cell bad actors with minimal damage. Even blasting Iran's Uranium factory could be considered effective retaliation. But sloppy Gaza bombings benefits Hamas more than anyone else.

The Lindsey Graham's of DC will never understand this.

---

Good post. Yes, get more precise and limited in attack. Pay no heed to international location.

TheEternalOptimist said:

---

Txgunrnnr said:

---

It's going to be fun to read that list of 58!!

---

Crockett, Tlaib, Omar, and AOC over/under?

---

All 4 voted no.

TheEternalOptimist said:

---

Txgunrnnr said:

---

It's going to be fun to read that list of 58!!

---

Crockett, Tlaib, Omar, and AOC over/under?

---

The house wouldnt take that bet.

If you believe Israel is just carpet bombing Gaza, then you've bought into every lie Hamas has put out and there is no way to have a rational discussion with you on the topic.

The "Israel should get more surgical with its targeting" is a talking point directly from the pro-Hamas leftists in this country and Europe.

Scary thought, are they pro assignation?

I have always been told you get what you vote for

Yep. Majority of the destruction in Gaza is directly a result of the house to house, building to building, ground war.

Fightin_Aggie said:

---

Scary thought, are they pro assignation?

I have always been told you get what you vote for

---

that is one hell of an auto-correct

And this is why the Democrats will not win the midterms or 2028 independents are watching and even moderate Democrats or watching and they are coming over to the other side. This is not a situation that people will forget.

Fightin_Aggie said:

---

Scary thought, are they pro assignation?

I have always been told you get what you vote for

---

Pretty sure they are, also assassination...

As I have said on another thread and different topic, this is a good thing!

Fishing Fools said:

---

As I have said on another thread and different topic, this is a good thing!

---

Yes, it is a good thing. We may get pissed off at first, but all this is doing is hurting the Democrats and exposing them for the wicked evil pieces of **** they are.

Rapier108 said:

---

If you believe Israel is just carpet bombing Gaza, then you've bought into every lie Hamas has put out and there is no way to have a rational discussion with you on the topic.

The "Israel should get more surgical with its targeting" is a talking point directly from the pro-Hamas leftists in this country and Europe.

---

No, re-read FobTies first paragraph. I think he is absolutely right that it unfortunately plays into the hands of their enemies. Its not a demand Israel do that, just a tactic that might work better. Munich'72 response on steroids.

Fishing Fools said:

---

As I have said on another thread and different topic, this is a good thing!

---

Mike Johnson was smart to make this resolution because it puts the Democrats on record

AgBQ-00 said:

---

ahhh didnt see what you were responding to. thought you were talking about this current one.

---

Ah...

I guess I wasn't clear enough. Mea culpa.

I really do not know how to say this and I will probably get blasted for it but here it goes…..

I am grateful they did this action to honor Charlie Kirk but I really do not understand why it was needed and what was gained from it - just like I don't understand when the other side does it for their people.

We the people can barely get congress to work at all and there are a lot of important items that they could be spending their time on and those things never get accomplished because they don't have time or votes……

Is this a gotcha moment for the next election cycle or are they truly honoring this gentleman? If it is a gotcha moment does it truly honor Mr Kirk or was it just for them and they are using Mr Kirk to achieve this outcome?

They do not support Free Speech and do not support the US Constitution. Censure them.

Crockett and Green are soon out of a job thanks to the new redistricting, yes?

So 58 is just a "handful" of both sides doing it.

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

---

So 58 is just a "handful" of both sides doing it.

---

I keep coming back to this:

I don't personally think I can peacefully coexist with such hateful and grotesque people…and there are millions of them…

We are two different countries trapped inside a single border…

FireAg said:

---

Crockett and Green are soon out of a job thanks to the new redistricting, yes?

---

Green, most likely.


I still haven't seen anyone explain why Crockett will be out of a job!

Has anybody checked the X (twitters) of the 4 Republicans to see if there has been a valid reason?