Breaking - Criminal Referral for Obama

10,468 Views | 92 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by aggiehawg
TAMU1990
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:38p, 7/21/25
Gabbard did it. She's sending a criminal referral to the DOJ. Being reported by Fox right now.
Reply Quote
Nitro Power
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TAMU1990 • 7:39p, 7/21/25
TAMU1990 said:
Gabbard did it. She's sending a criminal referral to the DOJ. Being reported by Fox right now.


Wasted effort. Nothing happening to the Golden Boy
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:45p, 7/21/25
Already a thread:

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3549861

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Logos Stick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:48p, 7/21/25
Gabbard is an interesting case study.

She went from backing and nominating Bernie Sanders as the Democratic presidential nominee to this.

Nothing is going to come from any of this. It's all for show. No one will be charged, especially Obama. Trump doesn't have the balls.
Reply Quote
1 edit
4
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:49p, 7/21/25
Obama will never be touched.

But I will bet you he will throw someone to the wolves in return for dropping this thing quietly...
Reply Quote
rocky the dog
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:54p, 7/21/25
This meme is 5 years old...



...and never aged.
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Reply Quote
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:27p, 7/21/25
He will never be charged with treason.

What they did was sedition.

People toss the word treason out way too loosely nowadays and have no clue how it is defined in US law.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
Teslag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:31p, 7/21/25
Obama had the same immunity granted by scotus that trump has. Will go nowhere.
Reply Quote
Hank the Grifter
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:33p, 7/21/25
Reply Quote
dreyOO
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Teslag • 9:45p, 7/21/25
Teslag said:
Obama had the same immunity granted by scotus that trump has. Will go nowhere.

And like the Ds, they oughta charge him anyway just to antagonize that sack of ****
Reply Quote
Yukon Cornelius
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Teslag • 9:47p, 7/21/25
Didn't scotus rule Trump in that particular case had immunity but also clarified presidents don't have carte blanche immunity?
Reply Quote
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Yukon Cornelius • 9:48p, 7/21/25
You're correct.
Reply Quote
Secolobo
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Nitro Power • 9:53p, 7/21/25
Nitro Power said:
TAMU1990 said:
Gabbard did it. She's sending a criminal referral to the DOJ. Being reported by Fox right now.


Wasted effort. Nothing happening to the Golden Boy

Make him burn through his money.
Reply Quote
Teslag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Yukon Cornelius • 10:08p, 7/21/25
Yukon Cornelius said:
Didn't scotus rule Trump in that particular case had immunity but also clarified presidents don't have carte blanche immunity?


Basically ruled official acts in the office have immunity. So if he did all this against Trump officially then he's golden. They also pretty said the recourse is impeachment.

Presidents pretty much have absolute immunity for official acts. That's just how it is now.
Reply Quote
Teslag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Secolobo • 10:09p, 7/21/25
Secolobo said:
Nitro Power said:
TAMU1990 said:
Gabbard did it. She's sending a criminal referral to the DOJ. Being reported by Fox right now.


Wasted effort. Nothing happening to the Golden Boy

Make him burn through his money.


Won't even have to. Will be tossed by the DC circuit in about 30 seconds.
Reply Quote
BigRobSA
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:17p, 7/21/25
Is what he did "an official presidential act" ?

Not sure I'd label it thusly.
Reply Quote
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigRobSA • 10:19p, 7/21/25
No, creating fake intel to sabotage your successor is not an official presidential act.
Reply Quote
BigRobSA
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 10:20p, 7/21/25
Ellis Wyatt said:
No, creating fake intel to sabotage your successor is not an official presidential act.

That is my take as well, good sir.

This isn't even remotely similar to what Trump did as PotUS.
Reply Quote
FobTies
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:22p, 7/21/25
We can only hope we end up getting a plausible deniability statement from Obama throwing Comey and Brennan under the bus. A long way to go to get there.

This puts pressure on Comey and Brennan to take the fall.
Reply Quote
1 edit
lb3
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Teslag • 10:23p, 7/21/25
Teslag said:
Obama had the same immunity granted by scotus that trump has. Will go nowhere.
It might be hard to claim what Obama was doing was an official act.
Reply Quote
91AggieLawyer
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 10:24p, 7/21/25
Ellis Wyatt said:
No, creating fake intel to sabotage your successor is not an official presidential act.


It would be hard for me to believe that ALL the acts occurred between the November 2016 election and January 20, 2016. He doesn't have immunity for acts when he isn't POTUS.

That may ratchet things down a bit in terms of what criminal allegations can be made, but in terms of immunity, it also takes that off the table IF TRUE.
Reply Quote
Yukon Cornelius
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:26p, 7/21/25
Well bondi and Trump need a win. I'm sure they will try. Can't say it's political now after what they did to Trump.
Reply Quote
Ag87H2O
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Secolobo • 10:28p, 7/21/25
Secolobo said:
Nitro Power said:
TAMU1990 said:
Gabbard did it. She's sending a criminal referral to the DOJ. Being reported by Fox right now.


Wasted effort. Nothing happening to the Golden Boy

Make him burn through his money.
The idiots on the left gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to defend a kid that committed murder at a public sporting event in broad daylight. They would put a second mortgage on their homes to protect their messiah.

He'll never be indicted, but if he was he wouldn't be his money he was burning through.
Reply Quote
1 edit
4
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Teslag • 10:36p, 7/21/25
Teslag said:
Secolobo said:
Nitro Power said:
TAMU1990 said:
Gabbard did it. She's sending a criminal referral to the DOJ. Being reported by Fox right now.


Wasted effort. Nothing happening to the Golden Boy

Make him burn through his money.


Won't even have to. Will be tossed by the DC circuit in about 30 seconds.

Did any part of this occur in another state? Texas, Wyoming, Tennessee, Florida perhaps?

Can it be argued that it did?

Charge them in one of those states instead of DC
Reply Quote
Teslag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4 • 11:40p, 7/21/25
4 said:
Teslag said:
Secolobo said:
Nitro Power said:
TAMU1990 said:
Gabbard did it. She's sending a criminal referral to the DOJ. Being reported by Fox right now.


Wasted effort. Nothing happening to the Golden Boy

Make him burn through his money.


Won't even have to. Will be tossed by the DC circuit in about 30 seconds.

Did any part of this occur in another state? Texas, Wyoming, Tennessee, Florida perhaps?

Can it be argued that it did?

Charge them in one of those states instead of DC


It will default be in the DC circuit based on the parties involved. Yall can get worked up over this if you want but know it's not going anywhere and would and will be tossed in a heartbeat in that circuit.
Reply Quote
FobTies
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:14a, 7/22/25
Gonna need 4D chess jury selection in DC for any trials related Russia Gate. Most of that population still thinks Trump colluded with Russia.
Reply Quote
1 edit
ts5641
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TAMU1990 • 6:41a, 7/22/25
Obligatory nothing will happen post.
Reply Quote
ts5641
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Logos Stick • 6:53a, 7/22/25
Logos Stick said:
Gabbard is an interesting case study.

She went from backing and nominating Bernie Sanders as the Democratic presidential nominee to this.

Nothing is going to come from any of this. It's all for show. No one will be charged, especially Obama. Trump doesn't have the balls.

He's probably the closest a Republican will be to having balls. But the remainder of the party has never had the stomach to fight the left.
Reply Quote
TAMU1990
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:15a, 7/22/25


Here's the left's response. They will parade the crazies out looking for a fast buck.
Reply Quote
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TAMU1990 • 7:31a, 7/22/25
Yes. I had a thread about this yesterday.
Reply Quote
whatthehey78
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TAMU1990 • 7:49a, 7/22/25
TAMU1990 said:


Here's the left's response. They will parade the crazies out looking for a fast buck.

Pure fabrication for TDS victims
Reply Quote
El Gallo Blanco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Logos Stick • 7:51a, 7/22/25
Logos Stick said:
Gabbard is an interesting case study.

She went from backing and nominating Bernie Sanders as the Democratic presidential nominee to this.

Nothing is going to come from any of this. It's all for show. No one will be charged, especially Obama. Trump doesn't have the balls.

I think she has truly been red pilled to a significant degree. How they treated her didn't help. She became a paraiah...and enemy to the dem machine. For being principled and refusing to play their slimy games.
Reply Quote
1 edit
txwxman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:52a, 7/22/25
More proof that trump thinks we're complete idiots
Reply Quote
13B
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txwxman • 7:58a, 7/22/25
In your case...
Reply Quote
TexAgs91
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Nitro Power • 8:09a, 7/22/25
Nitro Power said:
TAMU1990 said:
Gabbard did it. She's sending a criminal referral to the DOJ. Being reported by Fox right now.


Wasted effort. Nothing happening to the Golden Boy

Watch as republicans (the party of law and order) uphold our two-tier justice system
No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
Ad Lunam
Reply Quote
Last Page
Page 1 of 3 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.