Russia, Russia, Russia: DEBUNKED

29,439 Views | 304 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by will25u
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?


This video is interesting considering it's a week old.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wranglers_04 said:

Why has there been only 2 pages worth of posts in the 4 hours since this dropped?
We've known a lot of this for several years.
5Amp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obama took "weaponizing the feds" to a different level. Horrible person!

f burg ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FireAg said:

I would argue it was a Yuge problem for BOTH parties…

Do you know what uniparty means?
revvie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
f burg ag said:

FireAg said:

I would argue it was a Yuge problem for BOTH parties…

Do you know what uniparty means?

Wink, wink, nod, nod. Each party trashes each other, while they both get rich and never address the real issues facing everyday Americans.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:



This video is interesting considering it's a week old.

The good thing about it being a week old is we can see some of the things he said would happen have happened.

I might never stop laughing if the Mar-a-Lago raid allows them to prosecute the case in Florida, as it was an overt act in the conspiracy.
FlyRod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We interfered in several Russian elections, most famously 1996 when it looked like Yeltsin was going down. Putin said after that, many, many times, that he wanted pay back. Did Russian efforts sway the 2016 election? No HRC was a terrible enough candidate that no help was needed. Was there Russian interference?"
Absolutely. And likely other countries interfered too. This is a very common thing and it's weird that people think it's a huge secret scandal. We interfere in other countries' elections all the time. So do the Russians, the Chinese, the Israelis, the Iranians, and many others.

Yes this is me defending Trump in a rare way. Because he's correct on this particular thing.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
revvie said:

Wink, wink, nod, nod. Each party trashes each other, while they both get rich and never address the real issues facing everyday Americans.
Oddly, these thugs don't seem to be on Trump's side. This goes way beyond politics. This is evil and un-American.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're dismissing what Hussein and the fascists did to Trump and to America.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

You're dismissing what Hussein and the fascists did to Trump and to America.


That's the posters goal. Distract and diffuse.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Russians have interfered every us election since 1919
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nothing but Treason is applicable unless there is some recent furtherance.

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FireAg said:

So I come back to the same question I had back then when I called it out for what was…

WHY WAS/IS TRUMP SO DANGEROUS that they would literally make up crimes to attempt to discredit and undermine him?

What does he know that makes him so dangerous to their vision for this country?

Let's remember that, since the manufactured Russian interference, they've changed laws and created crimes trying to imprison him, and they've even tried to kill him twice…

WHY?


Don't forget 2020 election interference by fed agencies and the intel community.

That might be every bit as troubling, if not more, than this.

We basically have a fake country but luckily enough came out to vote in 2024 to shove it up their asses, for now. Butler PA sealed it for Trump.
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MaroonStain said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

You're dismissing what Hussein and the fascists did to Trump and to America.


That's the posters goal. Distract and diffuse.

Don't rise to the fly.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For all those not following Mueller thread.

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Kunkle for Congress TX-34
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There needs to be severe consequences for this.

Now we know why Come wanted to 86 Trump…
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself."
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gabbard was on Hannity tonight. It's worth watching.

The briefing for December didn't include the Steele Dossier because the intelligence community knew it was garbage.

The people in the meeting didn't like the conclusion and decided to redo it (seems to have been pushed by Obama). The political appointee IC people then insisted on including the dossier, which drew complaints from career IC people.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6375824229112
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That piece of **** brought up the "Russia, if you're listening…" joke as if it were serious, just like the democrats did when impeaching Trump.

Comey is a lawless *****, and a liar. Glad his daughter got fired. It's jail time, *****.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's not forget him illegally leaking when he gave his notes to his friend the law professor. Dead to ****ing rights.
unmade bed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's weird how the DNI Report selectively uses excerpts from the memo to make its conclusions.

For example:

DNI report draws the following conclusion:

Quote:

In the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the Intelligence Community (IC) consistently assessed that Russia is "probably not trying … to influence the election by using cyber means."


DNI report bases this conclusion off the following excerpt from released Memo:

Quote:

Russia is probably not trying to going to be able to? influence the election by using cyber means to manipulate computer enabled election infrastructure.


I wonder why DNI left that bolded part out in reaching the conclusion?

Oh and the very next sentence in the memo:

Quote:

Russia probably is using cyber means primarily to influence the election by stealing campaign party data and leaking select items, and using public propaganda.


Do you guys feel the DNI's statement that the intel community in the months leading up to the 2016 election believed Russia was "not trying to influence the election by using cyber means" is an accurate summary of what the memo states?
donkeykick90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FireAg said:

So I come back to the same question I had back then when I called it out for what was…

WHY WAS/IS TRUMP SO DANGEROUS that they would literally make up crimes to attempt to discredit and undermine him?

What does he know that makes him so dangerous to their vision for this country?

Let's remember that, since the manufactured Russian interference, they've changed laws and created crimes trying to imprison him, and they've even tried to kill him twice…

WHY?


Not the biggest fan of Trump because he's a loose canon….However he was the perfect person to stop their 16 year plan to completely subvert our govt from within. They had it all planned. Bush set up with the most invasive laws against all of us as citizens to begin unilaterally collecting data and spying. They didn't let 9/11 go in to waste. The endless Middle East war accelerated our national debt and further eroded our dollar. The financial system was set up. Next came the actual 16 year plan. Obama change us culturally and morally from within with his socialist nature. The final nail in the coffin would have been if Hillary won. America would have been done. Truly divine intervention that Trump won
Clear Eyes. Full Heart. Might Lose
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brennan and Comey have both on multiple occasions conflated attacks on them as attacks on the "sacred gov institutions" and "hardworking public servants at the agency". Just like Fauci said an attack on him was an "attack on science." This is what guilty men say.

60% chance of jail time for at least one of these treasonous cowards who tried to frame a sitting POTUS and execute a coup.

When Stzok texted "we will stop him", it wasnt the electorate, it was Comey and his ilk. He committed perjury in that lie. Kevin Clinesmith wasnt a rogue agent who decided on his own to lie to FISA court, so they could spy on Trump. He was ordered to do it. Thats why he wasnt punished at all.

Trump needs to put the press on Epstein's back door deal making with the Feds. Instead of combating the "Epstein list". Let the public see how the deep state used Epstein to their benefit. Then let that segue into Crossfire Hurricane.
StandUpforAmerica
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All the fans of the No Kings movement won't watch or read about this in fear of seeing what the behavior of someone trying to be a king really looks like.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Have any of the major networks picked this up and run with it?

Seen a little on Fox. What about the others? Weekend memory hole?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Their own words tell you what they think. They were setting a conspiracy in motion. Stop defending them.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are you joking? The intel community knew they were staging a hoax. You need to swallow a little of your dem pride and quit carrying their water.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MAGA runs away with this bat**** conspiracy bone the instant it's presented. Full bore, all in, full accepted truth, anything to pivot from the President calling them dopes for expecting him to keep his word. For expecting him not to do everything in his power to obfuscate the epstien issue.

"There's a list, we've got the dems, we're releasing the list, we have the list! What list? What evidence? What edited tape? Epstien? Never heard of him. HOAX! "


This is all just a little bit silly at this point.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ETFan said:

MAGA runs away with this bat**** conspiracy bone the instant it's presented. Full bore, all in, full accepted truth, anything to pivot from the President calling them dopes for expecting him to keep his word. For expecting him not to do everything in his power to obfuscate the epstien issue.

"There's a list, we've got the dems, we're releasing the list, we have the list! What list? What evidence? What edited tape? Epstien? Never heard of him. HOAX! "


This is all just a little bit silly at this point.


Except this is not a conspiracy theory, but it is a conspiracy to take down a duly elected President by the whole of the American people by political adversaries.

This was used to totally sabotage Trumps first term. All because Trump is an outsider and couldn't be bought by the swamp politicians/crony henchmen.

A lot of what Gabbard put out has been known for a while, just that no one had the underlying documents to make it 100%. Now we can see it and everything people said is backed up by actual receipts.

Also, did you actually read and try to comprehend what Gabbard put out? It has the receipts and is pretty easy to follow and actually see what actually happened.

If you're you really want a much better deep dive all up in the weeds there is the Mueller thread with almost 50,000 posts and 8 million views.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/2912732

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Yep.
Quote:

"Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people."

The DNI chief added: "No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again."

Gabbard's expos draws heavily on astounding new details dredged up by a whistleblower from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence who informed Clapper there was "no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count through cyber means."

That whistleblower was pressured by the National Intelligence Officer for Cyber to accept the later Obama intelligence assessment's findings, which included that Moscow had a preference for Trump.

"You need to trust me on this," the whistleblower's superior told him, referencing reporting that the informant was "not allowed to see," which presumably included the Steele dossier.

"As for the 2017 ICA's judgement of a decisive Russian preference for then-candidate Donald Trump," the whistleblower stated in one of their emails. "I could not concur in good conscience based on information available, and my professional analytic judgement."

El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ETFan said:

MAGA runs away with this bat**** conspiracy bone the instant it's presented. Full bore, all in, full accepted truth, anything to pivot from the President calling them dopes for expecting him to keep his word. For expecting him not to do everything in his power to obfuscate the epstien issue.

"There's a list, we've got the dems, we're releasing the list, we have the list! What list? What evidence? What edited tape? Epstien? Never heard of him. HOAX! "


This is all just a little bit silly at this point.


Liberal males calling others silly. That's funny just on its own. But hilarious when it's part of a desperate attempt to deflect from something we all know happened, and knew long before recent declassified docs.

Also….Kash Patel was excitedly telegraphing this a month or two ago on Rogan. So spare us the "it's just a drummed up distraction from the Epstein" BS. This has been in the works for a while.

My goodness liberals are dense and have ZERO sense of self awareness. They are always projecting.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anybody who has kids knows that consequences are all that matter if you want to change behavior.

We're talkin about 2016 in the year 2025. Nothing will change. We knew it was BS then, and this proves it again. But the morally corrupt will continue as they never pay a price.

ETA: and thanks to you that post these updates. I don't mean to dump on them. They're somewhat encouraging. I'm just a bit antipathetic with the lack of recourse. Our government is so broken.
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've actually seen people claim going after an ex=president would set a bad precedent.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.