Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Wow, wait until you find out what JD Vance once said about Trump. That will be ground breaking news.

---

Mark Levin has had some issues with Trump in the past as well.

---

Yes. And he directly spoke to that again.

Tucker is playing y'all.

esteban said:

---

Isn't Tucker the one who is vindicated by recent events?

---

Huh? Tucker said there would be thousands of dead Americans. Everything Tucker said was way over the top. He's a lunatic.

Levin isn't calling for us to go to war. Dropping a few bombs is not war, unless Hussein declared war on America a few years back when he droned a US citizen.

Quote:

---

Isn't Tucker the one who is vindicated by recent events?

---

Did you even read what he said? Vindicated? He was 100-% wrong about it all!!


BRICS start a war yet?

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

esteban said:

---

Isn't Tucker the one who is vindicated by recent events?

---

Huh? Tucker said there would be thousands of dead Americans. Everything Tucker said was way over the top. He's a lunatic.

Levin isn't calling for us to go to war. Dropping a few bombs is not war, unless Hussein declared war on America a few years back when he droned a US citizen.

---

You obviously have not listened to Mark Levin through the years much at all. The ideological difference between him and the Lincoln Project guys can be measured in millimeters.

He is currently calling for all out regime change in Iran. He was just yelling about this two days ago. If you think he will be happy with the results as they sit as of now, then I don't know what to tell you other than you live in a fantasy land.

Quote:

---

The ideological difference between him and the Lincoln Project guys can be measured in millimeters.

---

Just stop.

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

The ideological difference between him and the Lincoln Project guys can be measured in millimeters.

---

Just stop.

---

Mark Levin is 100% a National Review conservative. His guests come 100% from that ideological wing. This is not some earth shattering revelation.

He was 100% a Cruz guy. On trade, immigration, and foreign policy he is as establishment conservative as they get.

None of these "newsflash" Tucker Carlson quotes are new. He has mentioned them repeatedly in the past. And he has mentioned Trump giving him hell about it. But when Trump was getting the Republican Party nomination for 2024 who did he have sitting up in the stands with him? It was not Mark Levin.

I just laugh at anyone that says Levin hates Trump. If you listen to his opening, he plays the drop of Trump saying he's a good friend and one of the smartest people he knows.

Lots of words that don't show Levin is with the Lincoln project. Try to keep up.

Wes97 said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

The ideological difference between him and the Lincoln Project guys can be measured in millimeters.

---

Just stop.

---

Mark Levin is 100% a National Review conservative. His guests come 100% from that ideological wing. This is not some earth shattering revelation.

He was 100% a Cruz guy. On trade, immigration, and foreign policy he is as establishment conservative as they get.

None of these "newsflash" Tucker Carlson quotes are new. He has mentioned them repeatedly in the past. And he has mentioned Trump giving him hell about it. But when Trump was getting the Republican Party nomination for 2024 who did he have sitting up in the stands with him? It was not Mark Levin.

---

So now Ted Cruz is an establishment republican?

Where did I say that he was? I said ideologically that he is millimeters way from them. Most of those guys came from the same National Review/Weekly Standard wing of conservatism.

They broke off from the Republican Party and he didn't. But there historical political stands/views are not that different.


On what major issues do Jonah Goldberg and Mark Levin disagree on other than "supporting" Trump?

Wes97 said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Anyone telling you it's "easy" to highly enrich uranium or to reprocess plutonium is full of ***** It was the single most difficult aspect of the manhattan project and remains so today. It takes vast facilities and massive energy and power commitment which comes at great cost and time.

---

OK, I'll tell him next time that I speak with him that some guy on texags told me he was full of ***** He was only employed at one time as an actual inspector of these sites but I'm sure he will take your criticism to heart.

I am happy to know that for all these years he has been wrong in telling me why I was wrong and that we should be more concerned about this than I was.

---

If he's told you any of the things you've shared about enrichment then you should probably write him off for being a liar or a moron or both.

Teslag said:

---

Wes97 said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

The ideological difference between him and the Lincoln Project guys can be measured in millimeters.

---

Just stop.

---

Mark Levin is 100% a National Review conservative. His guests come 100% from that ideological wing. This is not some earth shattering revelation.

He was 100% a Cruz guy. On trade, immigration, and foreign policy he is as establishment conservative as they get.

None of these "newsflash" Tucker Carlson quotes are new. He has mentioned them repeatedly in the past. And he has mentioned Trump giving him hell about it. But when Trump was getting the Republican Party nomination for 2024 who did he have sitting up in the stands with him? It was not Mark Levin.

---

So now Ted Cruz is an establishment republican?

---

"he is as establishment conservative as they get."


Reading is hard.


That is a term that has been used for National Review types for years. Another term being fusionism, As opposed to neo-cons, paleo conservatives, the religious right, social conservatives, "small l" libertarian's....

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

esteban said:

---

Isn't Tucker the one who is vindicated by recent events?

---

Huh? Tucker said there would be thousands of dead Americans. Everything Tucker said was way over the top. He's a lunatic.

Levin isn't calling for us to go to war. Dropping a few bombs is not war, unless Hussein declared war on America a few years back when he droned a US citizen.

---

You conveniently ignored the rest of my post that explained my reasoning. You're absolutely correct that dropping a few bombs is not a war. War is the thing that Tucker opposed. He might have exaggerated the potential consequences, but so far we've avoided going to war which is what he wanted.

Levin on the other hand is constantly beating the war drum, extolling the benefits of regime change, and painting Iran as an imminent threat. He's not going to openly attack Trump, but he absolutely wants Trump to escalate the conflict. And he's willing to play the long game.

Here he is pushing essentially the same message as CNN with their deliberately misleading intel leak about how Iran's nuclear program is still a threat that must be dealt with in the near future.

IRAN DECLARES IT WILL RECONSTITUTE ITS NUCLEAR PROGRAM.

This is exactly what I was talking about on radio last evening and posted about as well. Serious questions about a ceasefire or any deal with a genocidal terrorist regime with a Jihadist/Islamist ideology There are very…

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) June 24, 2025

When CNN and Fox News are both trying to lead us in the same direction, there's a good chance we're being manipulated.

Yes. Obviously. Not nearly every working evening for the last 10 years. Obviously.

It's pretty clear someone else doesn't, though. He hates the National Review people and the Lincoln Project people. He speaks about it regularly. Weird.

Danny Vermin said:

---

I just laugh at anyone that says Levin hates Trump. If you listen to his opening, he plays the drop of Trump saying he's a good friend and one of the smartest people he knows.

---

Again, he said so in his own words. And his actions now back it up.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Danny Vermin said:

---

I just laugh at anyone that says Levin hates Trump. If you listen to his opening, he plays the drop of Trump saying he's a good friend and one of the smartest people he knows.

---

Again, he said so in his own words. And his actions now back it up.

---

Read again

He does absolutely not believe the program was barely scratched, like CNN is implying. He believes that whatever is there should be finished off before there is a ceasefire. He also primarily believes the Israelis can handle it. He said yesterday that the Iranian leadership is not going to change their stripes if left in power(hence needing to make sure the program is wiped out).

Im Gipper said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Danny Vermin said:

---

I just laugh at anyone that says Levin hates Trump. If you listen to his opening, he plays the drop of Trump saying he's a good friend and one of the smartest people he knows.

---

Again, he said so in his own words. And his actions now back it up.

---

Read again

---

Yep. Duh. My mistake. Brain is working in one direction.

Just this week, Levin talked about making amends with Trump before the 2016 election. He talked about why they differed and how Trump convinced him to buy in. They talk semi-frequently now.

He said he disagrees with Trump on some issues, but believes Trump is a truly great president because he is a patriot who loves his country and puts it first.

I might be the only one but every since this spat took place, I have stopped listening to Mark Levin. I listened the first night it happened for a little bit but almost every night I turn the radio on on the way home he mentions how great and smart he is compared to Carlson and anybody that doesnt agree with him to the point of being annoying to listen to any more.

Exactly l!

aggiefan09 said:

---

I might be the only one but every since this spat took place, I have stopped listening to Mark Levin. I listened the first night it happened for a little bit but almost every night I turn the radio on on the way home he mentions how great and smart he is compared to Carlson and anybody that doesnt agree with him to the point of being annoying to listen to any more.

---

I just scrolled through Levin's posts on X just from the past 24 hours. Has he always tried to sound like Trump?

Fraudster Pardon Me Bannon, lapdog to Chatsworth Qatarlson and Weight Watchers failure, screamed the president was going to “tear US apart,” if he ordered a military strike on Iran’s nuclear sites. Another fake MAGA isolationist and ignoramus. 94% of MAGA Republicans support the…

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) June 25, 2025

We're on the same team.

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

aggiefan09 said:

---

I might be the only one but every since this spat took place, I have stopped listening to Mark Levin. I listened the first night it happened for a little bit but almost every night I turn the radio on on the way home he mentions how great and smart he is compared to Carlson and anybody that doesnt agree with him to the point of being annoying to listen to any more.

---

I just scrolled through Levin's posts on X just from the past 24 hours. Has he always tried to sound like Trump?

Fraudster Pardon Me Bannon, lapdog to Chatsworth Qatarlson and Weight Watchers failure, screamed the president was going to “tear US apart,” if he ordered a military strike on Iran’s nuclear sites. Another fake MAGA isolationist and ignoramus. 94% of MAGA Republicans support the…

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) June 25, 2025

---

I think hes doing Trump shtick to continue to appeal to the MAGA evangelical boomers.

esteban said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

esteban said:

---

Isn't Tucker the one who is vindicated by recent events?

---

Huh? Tucker said there would be thousands of dead Americans. Everything Tucker said was way over the top. He's a lunatic.

Levin isn't calling for us to go to war. Dropping a few bombs is not war, unless Hussein declared war on America a few years back when he droned a US citizen.

---

You conveniently ignored the rest of my post that explained my reasoning. You're absolutely correct that dropping a few bombs is not a war. War is the thing that Tucker opposed. He might have exaggerated the potential consequences, but so far we've avoided going to war which is what he wanted.

Levin on the other hand is constantly beating the war drum, extolling the benefits of regime change, and painting Iran as an imminent threat. He's not going to openly attack Trump, but he absolutely wants Trump to escalate the conflict. And he's willing to play the long game.

Here he is pushing essentially the same message as CNN with their deliberately misleading intel leak about how Iran's nuclear program is still a threat that must be dealt with in the near future.

IRAN DECLARES IT WILL RECONSTITUTE ITS NUCLEAR PROGRAM.

This is exactly what I was talking about on radio last evening and posted about as well. Serious questions about a ceasefire or any deal with a genocidal terrorist regime with a Jihadist/Islamist ideology There are very…

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) June 24, 2025

When CNN and Fox News are both trying to lead us in the same direction, there's a good chance we're being manipulated.

---

Yeah long story short, Mark Levin is not satisfied. Obviously the Fordow strike didn't change anything. Israels primary war objective is regime change. Israel cannot do a regime change without the US. So Levin will continue to saber rattle.

I've seen some crazy spin, but "Carlson was vindicated" is next level.

Go read the tweet I posted on page 2. It's a line by line shredding of Carlson's nonsense.


Trump did not take a position closer to Carlson. Carlson wanted us to do nothing. "Iran isn't a threat". He chastised the president for being involved with the Israeli strikes. He was still predicting all out war.

He's entitled to his opinion and nothing wrong with being incorrect. Happens to everyone. But Carlson didn't just state an opinion. He attacked conservative stalwarts and tried to embarrass them. He is and always has been a bow tie wearing brown nosing twirp. Rush said it best about him.

Acting as if there was some victory for the isolationists here requires massive amounts of copium ingestion. Their arguments two weeks ago were, and remain today:

Quote:

---

REGURGITATED, DISHONEST TALKING POINTS FROM THE OBAMA APPEASEMENT TEAM, BUT ONLY MORE DISHONEST AND ABSURD.

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

I've seen some crazy spin, but "Carlson was vindicated" is next level.

Go read the tweet I posted on page 2. It's a line by line shredding of Carlson's nonsense.


Trump did not take a position closer to Carlson. Carlson wanted us to do nothing. "Iran isn't a threat". He chastised the president for being involved with the Israeli strikes. He was still predicting all out war.

He's entitled to his opinion and nothing wrong with being incorrect. Happens to everyone. But Carlson didn't just state an opinion. He attacked conservative stalwarts and tried to embarrass them. He is and always has been a bow tie wearing brown nosing twirp. Rush said it best about him.

Acting as if there was some victory for the isolationists here requires massive amounts of copium ingestion. Their arguments two weeks ago were, and remain today:

Quote:

---

REGURGITATED, DISHONEST TALKING POINTS FROM THE OBAMA APPEASEMENT TEAM, BUT ONLY MORE DISHONEST AND ABSURD.

---

---

Dang dude. Tucker attacked conservative stalwarts? That's crazy. Should we cancel him?

Tucker took the America First position. The OG 2015/2016 version, not whatever it is now. Trump campaigned on "No New Wars". Trump made his bones embarrassing Jeb Bush and the rest of the neocons regarding the Iraq War. One of his original primary platform positions which distinguished himself from the deep state swamp was rejecting the middle east forever wars.

Tucker took the correct position as far as "America First". And I say this fully aware he went against Trump in 2020 and is probably CIA

Stop reading after your ludicrous " should we cancel him?" Line. I suggested nothing remotely of the sort. Try having honest discussion for once.


The isolationist wing lost this round. Trying to claim sort of vindication here is Iraqi guy level spin

BMX Bandit said:

---

Stop reading after your ludicrous " should we cancel him?" Line. I suggested nothing remotely of the sort. Try having honest discussion for once.

---

I just made some points about how Tucker took the correct "America First" position. You didn't see them because you stopped reading

Are we at war again? Dang, I missed it

If you think Levin bases his opinions on ratings or popularity, you don't listen to him.

I don't agree with him on some things (like Ukraine), but he doesn't care what other people think about his opinions.

We have all read your "points" previously, I suspect BMX Bandit has also. You didn't add anything that hasn't been thoroughly debunked.

For those just joining us, allowing Iran or any other funders of radical Islam to get nukes is NOT "America First" in any way, shape or form!

Carlson is straight garbage. Sad to see.

Tucker Carlson hasn’t been apologized for devoting two shows to Anthony Aguilar’s lies and now he’s doing yet another show focused exclusively on anti-Israel conspiracies and trying to smear anyone who disagrees with his anti-American push.

A reminder that Tucker previously… https://t.co/y8O4vvdnIk

— AG (@AGHamilton29) September 5, 2025

Ask yourself, what causes someone to become so thoroughly evil that they promote 9/11 conspiracies, host Holocaust deniers and Hitler promoters, lavish praise on Putin and other monsters, smear our country's history, military, and great leaders, spread vicious lies and hate about…

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) September 5, 2025

Im Gipper said:

---

Carlson is straight garbage. Sad to see.

Tucker Carlson hasn’t been apologized for devoting two shows to Anthony Aguilar’s lies and now he’s doing yet another show focused exclusively on anti-Israel conspiracies and trying to smear anyone who disagrees with his anti-American push.

A reminder that Tucker previously… https://t.co/y8O4vvdnIk

— AG (@AGHamilton29) September 5, 2025

Ask yourself, what causes someone to become so thoroughly evil that they promote 9/11 conspiracies, host Holocaust deniers and Hitler promoters, lavish praise on Putin and other monsters, smear our country's history, military, and great leaders, spread vicious lies and hate about…

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) September 5, 2025

---

Ignore who this is from, just watch the clip.

It’s gets boring noting that crazy people are crazy, but I still feel obligated to point out: this is absolutely bonkers. https://t.co/Hi1mI8WloM

— Patterico (@Patterico) September 4, 2025

nm

HTownAg98 said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Carlson is straight garbage. Sad to see.

Tucker Carlson hasn’t been apologized for devoting two shows to Anthony Aguilar’s lies and now he’s doing yet another show focused exclusively on anti-Israel conspiracies and trying to smear anyone who disagrees with his anti-American push.

A reminder that Tucker previously… https://t.co/y8O4vvdnIk

— AG (@AGHamilton29) September 5, 2025

Ask yourself, what causes someone to become so thoroughly evil that they promote 9/11 conspiracies, host Holocaust deniers and Hitler promoters, lavish praise on Putin and other monsters, smear our country's history, military, and great leaders, spread vicious lies and hate about…

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) September 5, 2025

---

Ignore who this is from, just watch the clip.

It’s gets boring noting that crazy people are crazy, but I still feel obligated to point out: this is absolutely bonkers. https://t.co/Hi1mI8WloM

— Patterico (@Patterico) September 4, 2025

---

I remember when TC was semi-sane.

Maybe even had a few good points.

But, he's either gone off the deep end or decided his way to grift lies in catering to a really bad portion of people...