flown-the-coop said:

---

Is AI binary or non binary?

---

01001100 01101111 01101100 00100000 01100111 01101111 01101111 01100100 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101

AggieVictor10 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Is AI binary or non binary?

---

01001100 01101111 01101100 00100000 01100111 01101111 01101111 01100100 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101

---

The Distant Future, The Year 2000

GeorgiAg said:

---

I'm really interested to see what all the influencers, actresses and OF hoes have to start doing now they are gonna have to compete with AI hoes.

---

Eh, the demand will be there because some dude's kink will be a real person vs a fake one.

Cromagnum said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

I'm really interested to see what all the influencers, actresses and OF hoes have to start doing now they are gonna have to compete with AI hoes.

---

All the online attention hoes gonna have a rough time. Once they perfect sexbots with an AI interface, it's ballgame for all hoes.

---

What did you get for Christmas?

Santa brought me the new SexBox 3000! I can't wait until it's downloaded the new Sydney Sweeney update!


... maybe I was born too soon.

Malibu said:

---

Actual negotiations and taste decisions presumably a human will do that. Title review, loan document, notary...AI

---

That I can see.

But even contract construction will probably require human work because of the differing risk tolerances of various counter-parties.

aTm2004 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

I'm really interested to see what all the influencers, actresses and OF hoes have to start doing now they are gonna have to compete with AI hoes.

---

Eh, the demand will be there because some dude's kink will be a real person vs a fake one.

---

If it's online, how will you know?

I think "real person" is what we currently refer to as prostitute. Hoes gotta eat, yo.

You know those blood pressure armband machines in Pharmacies?

Soon it will be full body scans with AI recommending either OTCs or to go see a doctor for follow up

GeorgiAg said:

---

Cromagnum said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

I'm really interested to see what all the influencers, actresses and OF hoes have to start doing now they are gonna have to compete with AI hoes.

---

All the online attention hoes gonna have a rough time. Once they perfect sexbots with an AI interface, it's ballgame for all hoes.

---

What did you get for Christmas?

Santa brought me the new SexBox 3000! I can't wait until it's downloaded the new Sydney Sweeney update!


... maybe I was born too soon.

---

How badly do you want cheaper healthcare?

GeorgiAg said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

I'm really interested to see what all the influencers, actresses and OF hoes have to start doing now they are gonna have to compete with AI hoes.

---

Eh, the demand will be there because some dude's kink will be a real person vs a fake one.

---

If it's online, how will you know?

I think "real person" is what we currently refer to as prostitute. Hoes gotta eat, yo.

---

Give it time and the solution for a problem that doesn't exist yet will be created.

aTm2004 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

I'm really interested to see what all the influencers, actresses and OF hoes have to start doing now they are gonna have to compete with AI hoes.

---

Eh, the demand will be there because some dude's kink will be a real person vs a fake one.

---

If it's online, how will you know?

I think "real person" is what we currently refer to as prostitute. Hoes gotta eat, yo.

---

Give it time and the solution for a problem that doesn't exist yet will be created.

---

AI will verify that your online ho is real.

AggieVictor10 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Is AI binary or non binary?

---

01001100 01101111 01101100 00100000 01100111 01101111 01101111 01100100 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101

---

AggieKatie2 said:

---

I've come to believe that the next great step will not be natural human evolution, but finding some way to put the human brain/soul into a mechanical body with a joining of AI.

It's really the only way at for mankind to expand and explore the universe.

---

Check out Ghost in the Shell

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

You know those blood pressure armband machines in Pharmacies?

Soon it will be full body scans with AI recommending either OTCs or to go see a doctor for follow up

---

I expect it will eventually be built into your clothes.

Queso1 said:

---

Bruce Almighty said:

---

We'll either end up like this:



or like this

---

and to be fair, they mostly got that way due to spending their whole lives without normal gravity.

I used to look down on the Wall-E humans. But really, what could they do? What was their reason for being?

---

Quote:

---

This behavior was achieved without programming code

I simply connected the LLMs with an MCP server with cryptography tools.

And gave both agents a system prompt objective: "Beware of a min in the middle".

---

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

You know those blood pressure armband machines in Pharmacies?

Soon it will be full body scans with AI recommending either OTCs or to go see a doctor for follow up

---

Yep. Think about skin cancer. Go in, strip down, it does full body scan and gives a clean bill or advises trip to doc with a printout of what it found.

riverrataggie said:

---

I don't mind a doctor using AI to verify what they are saying or speed things up if you will. But a doctor who thinks they will be replaced by AI isn't performing the duties of a doctor that I want in the first place.

---

You're underestimating AI and the size of the data pools it's analyzing. Some of its capacities dwarf those of human doctors: for example, AI can jointly analyze your MRI, clinical history, and genetic data to not just make a diagnosis but predict the medicines to which you'd be most responsive. This sort of deep analysis is far beyond unassisted humans.

Deputy Travis Junior said:

---

riverrataggie said:

---

I don't mind a doctor using AI to verify what they are saying or speed things up if you will. But a doctor who thinks they will be replaced by AI isn't performing the duties of a doctor that I want in the first place.

---

You're underestimating AI and the size of the data pools it's analyzing. Some of its capacities dwarf those of human doctors: for example, AI can jointly analyze your MRI, clinical history, and genetic data to not just make a diagnosis but predict the medicines to which you'd be most responsive. This sort of deep analysis is far beyond unassisted humans.

---

The genetic data is the game changer

Deputy Travis Junior said:

---

riverrataggie said:

---

I don't mind a doctor using AI to verify what they are saying or speed things up if you will. But a doctor who thinks they will be replaced by AI isn't performing the duties of a doctor that I want in the first place.

---

You're underestimating AI and the size of the data pools it's analyzing. Some of its capacities dwarf those of human doctors: for example, AI can jointly analyze your MRI, clinical history, and genetic data to not just make a diagnosis but predict the medicines to which you'd be most responsive. This sort of deep analysis is far beyond unassisted humans.

---

But an underlying and fundamental problem with it is that you can train unintentional and superfluous or erroneous patterns into it because you didn't know they were in the training set. Sometimes that's good because you pick up on new things you didn't know were there, but sometimes it's bad because it's something that shouldn't be there and leads to bad outputs. You can never just assume it is right.

Perfect example is image generation AI not being able to make analog clocks with accurate times because training sets for those image generators are heavily comprised of marketing pictures and descriptions scraped from the internet. Marketers have determined the optimal and most aesthetically pleasing hand position for clocks to sell more of them, and it's so ubiquitous that it is engrained in the image generators. The ubiquity of a specific time in the marketing photos is something that goes largely unnoticed, and something the data set creators had no idea was there, until it causes an issue and then you go look at nuances in the data.

While AI can do a lot of things, it is still subject to the fallibility of those who set it up. It requires A LOT of thought and consideration and even more validation. I funny think doctors are going to be replaced anytime in the near future because of those limitations.

There is also the problem of AI's becoming their own primary data source and unless the AI output and its own sources are traced in meta data do it can be weighted and valued as already being AI product instead of cleaner source data sets, after vast iterations of sourcing AI data from older AI data, you get strange effects that are anomalies of its logic, selection biases, averaging and blanding of the data sets or surreality taking numerical precedence over real original data, by volume of representation in sampling. The data sets could lose coherence with reality if they are allowed to go through man iterations without that being flagged and werighted.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

There is also the problem of AI's becoming their own primary data source and unless the AI output and its oem sources are traced in meta data do it can be weighted and valued as already being AI product instead of cleaner source data sets, after vast iterations of sourcing AI data from older AI data, you get strange effects that are anomalies of its logic, selection biases, averaging and blanking of the data sets or surreality taking numerical precedence over real original data, by volume of representation in sampling. The data sets could lose coherence with reality if they are allowed to go through man iterations without that being flagged and werighted.

---

So, basically the same value as "adjusted" temperature records.

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

Deputy Travis Junior said:

---

riverrataggie said:

---

I don't mind a doctor using AI to verify what they are saying or speed things up if you will. But a doctor who thinks they will be replaced by AI isn't performing the duties of a doctor that I want in the first place.

---

You're underestimating AI and the size of the data pools it's analyzing. Some of its capacities dwarf those of human doctors: for example, AI can jointly analyze your MRI, clinical history, and genetic data to not just make a diagnosis but predict the medicines to which you'd be most responsive. This sort of deep analysis is far beyond unassisted humans.

---

But an underlying and fundamental problem with it is that you can train unintentional and superfluous or erroneous patterns into it because you didn't know they were in the training set. Sometimes that's good because you pick up on new things you didn't know were there, but sometimes it's bad because it's something that shouldn't be there and leads to bad outputs. You can never just assume it is right.

---

Medical AI engines will be trained on the same knowledge that doctors use from academia. This is not going to be some Chatgpt engine going out and surfing the web for medical info every day.

Wait till you see what grok has up its sleeve.

Looking at X-rays is child's play.

If an AI can make a mistake then they're more fully capable of replacing doctors than I thought.

GeorgiAg said:

---

TarponChaser said:

---

Malibu said:

---

Two theories:
1. Agriculture was 90% of employment in 1990. It is now 2%. Secretaries and word processing. Rinse and repeat. Displaced workers find new paths in a new economy.
2. This is very different. The robots are better than all of us at all our jobs. We tax the *censored on TexAgs* out of them for and have universal basic income and then figure out what the purpose of life is outside of working.

I'm not sure I buy that robots will ever be better than humans at purely creative tasks like filmmaking and creative writing. There's too much meatsack nuance that robots can't replicate.

---

How will AI negotiate something like a real estate transaction where human emotion is involved?

---

They already have AI functioning as therapists. It will do it BETTER than the humans do.

---

Not for quite awhile, we're nowhere close to that.

AggieKatie2 said:

---

I've come to believe that the next great step will not be natural human evolution, but finding some way to put the human brain/soul into a mechanical body with a joining of AI.

It's really the only way at for mankind to expand and explore the universe.

---

Sign me up!

SMM48 said:

---

Wait till you see what grok has up its sleeve.

Looking at X-rays is child's play.

---

Can it tell the difference between a man and a women? Apparently, that seems to be a challenge for mere humans

GeorgiAg said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

I'm really interested to see what all the influencers, actresses and OF hoes have to start doing now they are gonna have to compete with AI hoes.

---

Eh, the demand will be there because some dude's kink will be a real person vs a fake one.

---

If it's online, how will you know?

I think "real person" is what we currently refer to as prostitute. Hoes gotta eat, yo.

---

Give it time and the solution for a problem that doesn't exist yet will be created.

---

AI will verify that your online ho is real.

---

AI is already a problem with dating apps. 'Send me a picture / video to prove you're in the area and not catfishing' already doesn't work. I caught one who took a short video posted by an actual person and had AI change it up to have them say a completely different thing. The only way to tell was the vocal inflections were kinda off.

I've also seen them use AI to edit pictures so the person is holding up a note with the current date and their name.

In terms of dating I've gone back to meeting people at random while I'm out somewhere.

FrioAg 00 said:

---

AI will likely impact all roles, but some are far more directly hit than others.

A trained radiologist is an obvious casualty. They are basically identifying patterns within complex image data. Pattern recognition is what AI is best suited for.


I believe other physician roles will likely go through a longer era with AI as a companion in diagnosis and application of evidence based treatment prescription.

The real skill in most physician specialties are listening to the patient, and knowing where to probe. That's pattern recognition too, but the probing questions part is harder for AI and will take longer to develop.

---

With the way AI draws human hands, I wouldn't want any AI anywhere near diagnosing me of whatever malady afflicts me. It's likely to want to graft a thumb on the top of my hand or something.

Allen Iverson can't do all the things y'all are talking about. Sure, he was good but c'mon!

ShinerAggie said:

---

MouthBQ98 said:

---

There is also the problem of AI's becoming their own primary data source and unless the AI output and its oem sources are traced in meta data do it can be weighted and valued as already being AI product instead of cleaner source data sets, after vast iterations of sourcing AI data from older AI data, you get strange effects that are anomalies of its logic, selection biases, averaging and blanking of the data sets or surreality taking numerical precedence over real original data, by volume of representation in sampling. The data sets could lose coherence with reality if they are allowed to go through man iterations without that being flagged and werighted.

---

So, basically the same value as "adjusted" temperature records.

---

No. It's like the information is going through many different pooling layers and getting downsampled to the point it's numerically corrupted by being oversimplified.

FrioAg 00 said:

---

AI will likely impact all roles, but some are far more directly hit than others.

A trained radiologist is an obvious casualty. They are basically identifying patterns within complex image data. Pattern recognition is what AI is best suited for.


I believe other physician roles will likely go through a longer era with AI as a companion in diagnosis and application of evidence based treatment prescription.

The real skill in most physician specialties are listening to the patient, and knowing where to probe. That's pattern recognition too, but the probing questions part is harder for AI and will take longer to develop.

---

This

It hurts the guy that does nothing but pattern analysis but AI can't yet hop out of the computer and treat the patient in the real world (not until it's married with robots which will happen eventually but not yet)

Medical jobs that require hands on interaction with a patient (like surgeons for example) will stick around awhile longer

I forget which tech bro said it, but we will be asking what is our roll in society when AI/robotics replace us, its not if but when. The people who can adapt will do fine, the others will slowly lose their way in life, kind of like people who retire and die quickly or just slowly drink and smoke there way into the grave.

Is slowly drinking and smoking your way to the grave a good thing or bad thing?