Yeah,it's a broken record but it's true.

We have to split this union.

This is nothing but pure partisan obstruction that has nothing to do with legitimate constitutional issues. Enough is enough.

Today alone 4 federal judges ordered:
a) Elon Musk to reinstate USAID workers;
b) Trump to state disclose when/where flights left w/ terrorists;
c) reinstatement of transgender to military;
d) reinstatement of Dep't of Education grants.

— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) March 19, 2025

Sounds like four judges need to be ****canned. Can they learn to code?

The judges doing this need to throw their hat in the ring for President if they want this much say in executive branch affairs. Otherwise stfu.

Jailed for treason

Justice Thomas has been begging for a case to make a determination on whether these district judges have the authority to make these type of nationwide impacting decisions.

Looks like he's gotten his wish. The leftist judiciary has certainly given him a target rich environment.

Just do what the differents do. Ignore it. Go around it. Go above or below it.

The crap liberals fight for. It's not that they just see different solutions to problems than us. The things they fight for show that they are mentally sick or entirely corrupt. Probably both. They fight against reality and human nature itself.

DOGE should cut funding for those Judge's salaries

FIDO*98* said:

---

DOGE should advise Trump to cut funding for those Judge's salaries

---

FIFY, because investigating and advising is all DOGE is doing.

Bottom line is you believe in God or you don't. If you do you believe in civility and order. If you don't many times you are an evil liberal. Say what you want it often boils down to exactly that. You want to be your own God or you believe in one that sets standards to live by. Evil will never not be evil. Sooner you grip this idea sooner you realize why we live with these idiots.

Cut their staff, cut their salaries and impeach them.

These marxists judges are carrying out what is in The Communist Manifesto.

One isn't happening

The feds need as much money as possible

Ag87H2O said:

---

Justice Thomas has been begging for a case to make a determination on whether these district judges have the authority to make these type of nationwide impacting decisions.

Looks like he's gotten his wish. The leftist judiciary has certainly given him a target rich environment.

---

Ag87H2O said:

---

Justice Thomas has been begging for a case to make a determination on whether these district judges have the authority to make these type of nationwide impacting decisions.

Looks like he's gotten his wish. The leftist judiciary has certainly given him a target rich environment.

---

Won't matter. ACB will F it up by voting with her sisters.

Again.

4 said:

---

Ag87H2O said:

---

Justice Thomas has been begging for a case to make a determination on whether these district judges have the authority to make these type of nationwide impacting decisions.

Looks like he's gotten his wish. The leftist judiciary has certainly given him a target rich environment.

---

Won't matter. ACB will F it up by voting with her sisters.

Again.

---

Don't forget Bush's pet swamp creature Chief Justice Roberts

FIDO*98* said:

---

4 said:

---

Ag87H2O said:

---

Justice Thomas has been begging for a case to make a determination on whether these district judges have the authority to make these type of nationwide impacting decisions.

Looks like he's gotten his wish. The leftist judiciary has certainly given him a target rich environment.

---

Won't matter. ACB will F it up by voting with her sisters.

Again.

---

Don't forget Bush's pet swamp creature Chief Justice Roberts

---

Like he said, with her sisters.

Tom Fox said:

---

FIDO*98* said:

---

4 said:

---

Ag87H2O said:

---

Justice Thomas has been begging for a case to make a determination on whether these district judges have the authority to make these type of nationwide impacting decisions.

Looks like he's gotten his wish. The leftist judiciary has certainly given him a target rich environment.

---

Won't matter. ACB will F it up by voting with her sisters.

Again.

---

Don't forget Bush's pet swamp creature Chief Justice Roberts

---

Like he said, with her sisters.

---

If they do then Trump should release TDA thugs in their driveways behind their gated community. I'd also release them in Martha's Vineyard, The Hamptons, etc. I'd flood every elite progressive enclave with these murderous thugs. Let them see the true power of the dark side.

I've been hearing this MAGA pitch for a "national divorce" for a few years now. How exactly would that work? Be specific. It ain't like it was in 1860 when the country was divided geographically north & south, and the population was about the same as California today.

In 2025, the split between red and blue voters is about 50% to 48%, and the other 2% are goofy third-party nimrods. There isn't a true geographic split, nor is it rural
versus large metro.

So how do you suggest we determine custody in this divorce?

Aggie Dad Sip said:

---

I've been hearing this MAGA pitch for a "national divorce" for a few years now. How exactly would that work? Be specific. It ain't like it was in 1860 when the country was divided geographically north & south, and the population was about the same as California today.

In 2025, the split between red and blue voters is about 52% to 48%, and the other 2% are goofy third-party nimrods. There isn't a true geographic split, nor is it rural
versus large metro.

So how do you suggest we determine custody in this divorce?

---

Stake out which state are red and blue and will have laws that reflect that. People will largely self select to a place in line with their beliefs. The small minority that stays behind will just have to live with their enemies controlling policies where they chose to reside.

Aggie Dad Sip said:

---

I've been hearing this MAGA pitch for a "national divorce" for a few years now. How exactly would that work? Be specific. It ain't like it was in 1860 when the country was divided geographically north & south, and the population was about the same as California today.

In 2025, the split between red and blue voters is about 52% to 48%, and the other 2% are goofy third-party nimrods. There isn't a true geographic split, nor is it rural
versus large metro.

So how do you suggest we determine custody in this divorce?

---

I'll acknowledge that an amicable divorce along geographic lines would be impossible and I doubt it'd ever happen. If it ever got to that point, then I believe it'd be states going their own way and dissolving the union. Texas, and other red states, would pass laws that would be unpalatable for progressives and vice versa with deep blue states.

Ag87H2O said:

---

Justice Thomas has been begging for a case to make a determination on whether these district judges have the authority to make these type of nationwide impacting decisions.

Looks like he's gotten his wish. The leftist judiciary has certainly given him a target rich environment.

---

Will be interesting to see how he would do this without significantly weakening the concept of judicial review.

Quote:

---

"It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each." - Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Aggie Dad Sip said:

---

I've been hearing this MAGA pitch for a "national divorce" for a few years now. How exactly would that work? Be specific. It ain't like it was in 1860 when the country was divided geographically north & south, and the population was about the same as California today.

In 2025, the split between red and blue voters is about 52% to 48%, and the other 2% are goofy third-party nimrods. There isn't a true geographic split, nor is it rural
versus large metro.

So how do you suggest we determine custody in this divorce?

---

Stake out which state are red and blue and will have laws that reflect that. People will largely self select to a place in line with their beliefs. The small minority that stays behind will just have to live with their enemies controlling policies where they chose to reside.

---

So each state has 100% control over the executive, legislative and judicial branches, and the Feds do what?

Aggie Dad Sip said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Aggie Dad Sip said:

---

I've been hearing this MAGA pitch for a "national divorce" for a few years now. How exactly would that work? Be specific. It ain't like it was in 1860 when the country was divided geographically north & south, and the population was about the same as California today.

In 2025, the split between red and blue voters is about 52% to 48%, and the other 2% are goofy third-party nimrods. There isn't a true geographic split, nor is it rural
versus large metro.

So how do you suggest we determine custody in this divorce?

---

Stake out which state are red and blue and will have laws that reflect that. People will largely self select to a place in line with their beliefs. The small minority that stays behind will just have to live with their enemies controlling policies where they chose to reside.

---

So each state has 100% control over the executive, legislative and judicial branches, and the Feds do what?

---

DC is abandoned and the land reverts back to a swamp. The politicians scramble back to their states to try and take power.

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

---

The crap liberals fight for. It's not that they just see different solutions to problems than us. The things they fight for show that they are mentally sick or entirely corrupt. Probably both. They fight against reality and human nature itself.

---

I'm sure the Covidians were saying similar things when a Georgia federal judge issued a nationwide injunction barring Biden's vaccine mandate for federal contractors:

https://www.jacksonlewis.com/insights/judge-blocks-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-nationwide-federal-contractors-omb-issues-guidance

Or when a Florida federal judge used a nationwide injunction to strike down Biden's mask mandate:

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3273602-judges-textualist-ruling-on-airline-mask-mandate-sparks-backlash/

The Covidians were stupid sheep. My post wasnt about judges issuing injunctions. It was about the difference between liberals and conservatives. Modern liberals are constantly fighting against biology, human nature, and most of all, reality. It's not in an admirable, "believe the impossible", kind of way either.

We already tried a "national divorce" once, and sadly, it wasn't granted. The abusive husband forced the wife to stay and continued the abuse.

Aggie Dad Sip said:

---

I've been hearing this MAGA pitch for a "national divorce" for a few years now. How exactly would that work? Be specific. It ain't like it was in 1860 when the country was divided geographically north & south, and the population was about the same as California today.

In 2025, the split between red and blue voters is about 52% to 48%, and the other 2% are goofy third-party nimrods. There isn't a true geographic split, nor is it rural
versus large metro.

So how do you suggest we determine custody in this divorce?

---

Actually, it is Urban vs Rural. Some entire states, like Illinois for example, are held hostage by lib dip****s in Chicago. Even Texas, metro areas are filled with liberal morons and rural areas are heavily conservative.

So, yes, it's pretty U v R.

Unfortunately Democrats have won too many past elections, thus bad judges appointed by bad presidents.
In reality all we can do is vote (one vote per person).

Ag87H2O said:

---

Justice Thomas has been begging for a case to make a determination on whether these district judges have the authority to make these type of nationwide impacting decisions.

---

One of these cases will certainly get a determination on thst issue. I don't see a full "they are never allowed" determination. There are some limited circumstances where it's necessary for a nationwide injunction.

To me, they should be limited to situations where there is a "constitutional command for a consistent national policy". (5th circuit phrase, not mine)

Perhaps shorten the TRO time to 3 days for those cases to get to appeal quicker.

Interestingly, it was the Biden admin just two months ago asking to stop nationwide injunctions

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a653_c07d.pdf#page=2

Been saying for a while the gap is unbridgeable. There is no hope for reconciliation. One side believes in freedom, individual liberty, small government, and American exceptionalism. The other side believes in darkness, baby murder, giant government, cradle to grave government control, etc.
We are headed toward a violent civil war. One side is already violent. Once the other one is activated then there's no turning back.

You don't need a divorce, this ain't a marriage. It's more like one of them there cohabitations. You can just leave any time if you decide you're done with this. Have fun wherever you end up.

Some ****bag leftist judge would rule we don't have the right to leave. The right hasn't changed. The left has gone full fascist.

Never mind

Because you know I'm correct. They're blocking the legitimate functions of the Executive Branch on a purely political basis as we speak. They hate America. They hate the people. They hate the Constitution.