Do you think the WH's 'long live the king' comment went too far?

9,665 Views | 167 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by RGLAG85
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The CM's are out in force today.

And as always with Trump, it's all about their emotional response to his words.

In the meantime, your idols are being exposed for decades of corruption and theft of taxpayer dollars. And it's only been 1 month.

You guys weren't ready, and you had years to prepare. The playbook was stated in every single rally, including every single thing DOGE is doing. You simply never though in a million years someone would expose and reverse the damage your party has subjected every day Americans to. And you are too brainwashed to understand how much everything happening is going to help you.

So cry harder. I promise you.. I am enjoying it.
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Again, is there anything President Trump could do that would make you stop and think, "Wow. As much as I enjoy owning the libs and taking my country back from the extreme leftists, he just crossed the line and I'm uncomfortable, only because when the Democrat party wins again, they could do the same thing."
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hullabaloonatic said:

Science Denier said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

Sims said:

Well, at least Musk is paying for his own large diet of bull***** We've spent years secretly funding the libs diet of bull****, apparently.
Yes, it's abundantly clear Musk paid Trump for this level of power and influence. Glad you at least can see that.
Soros paid alot more. But he lost.

America is the clear winner in the bidding war between Soros and Musk.
By the end of Trump's presidential campaign, Musk had spent $277 million to elect Trump and allied Republicans, making the largest individual political donor of the 2024 election and the largest individual political donor since at least 2010 outside of candidates funding their own campaigns


Soros gave much more thru many of his organizations. But Soros orgs got paid a lot of it back thru USAID.
Average Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

The CM's are out in force today.

And as always with Trump, it's all about their emotional response to his words.

In the meantime, your idols are being exposed for decades of corruption and theft of taxpayer dollars. And it's only been 1 month.

You guys weren't ready, and you had years to prepare. The playbook was stated in every single rally, including every single thing DOGE is doing. You simply never though in a million years someone would expose and reverse the damage your party has subjected every day Americans to. And you are too brainwashed to understand how much everything happening is going to help you.

So cry harder. I promise you.. I am enjoying it.
Ever stop and ask why the democrats were getting away with decades of corruption? Why didn't the Republicans fix this decades ago?

Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

Again, is there anything President Trump could do that would make you stop and think, "Wow. As much as I enjoy owning the libs and taking my country back from the extreme leftists, he just crossed the line and I'm uncomfortable, only because when the Democrat party wins again, they could do the same thing."


Sure.

But this particular instance isn't one of them.

Have a nice day.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Average Joe said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

The CM's are out in force today.

And as always with Trump, it's all about their emotional response to his words.

In the meantime, your idols are being exposed for decades of corruption and theft of taxpayer dollars. And it's only been 1 month.

You guys weren't ready, and you had years to prepare. The playbook was stated in every single rally, including every single thing DOGE is doing. You simply never though in a million years someone would expose and reverse the damage your party has subjected every day Americans to. And you are too brainwashed to understand how much everything happening is going to help you.

So cry harder. I promise you.. I am enjoying it.
Ever stop and ask why the democrats were getting away with decades of corruption? Why didn't the Republicans fix this decades ago?


Because the majority of them suck ass too. BigRob was right all along. Ron Paul was right about everything. What's coming to light isn't new. It's just seeing sunlight for the first time.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mr. Fingerbottom said:

No not at all


Obvious joke that only idiots are upset about



Trump killing it as usual
He just has them scrambling from minute to minute doesn't he?
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Dad Sip said:

Again, is there anything President Trump could do that would make you stop and think, "Wow. As much as I enjoy owning the libs and taking my country back from the extreme leftists, he just crossed the line and I'm uncomfortable, only because when the Democrat party wins again, they could do the same thing."


Yes.

I'll let you know when he does this term.
BoydCrowder13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've supported a lot of what Trump has done this month. Especially DOGE. I've learned to tune out what he says day to day. He tries to get a rise out of people. Half of it is BS.

The only real "authoritative" concern I have with Trump is the shifting mindset of his biggest supporters. He could say the sky is purple and a lot of his supporters would say "Hell yea! Own the libs!" I am concerned that if push came to shove, there wouldn't be enough Republican pushback if Trump did something truly beyond the pale.

Checks and balances are a good thing. Biden, Romney, McCain, Bush, etc never had the fanboy/girl love like Trump gets. Obama is really the only competition.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

Again, is there anything President Trump could do that would make you stop and think, "Wow. As much as I enjoy owning the libs and taking my country back from the extreme leftists, he just crossed the line and I'm uncomfortable, only because when the Democrat party wins again, they could do the same thing."
Concentration camps. Oh wait, that's what Dems and Covidians would have done if they could have gotten away with it.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

Average Joe said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

The CM's are out in force today.

And as always with Trump, it's all about their emotional response to his words.

In the meantime, your idols are being exposed for decades of corruption and theft of taxpayer dollars. And it's only been 1 month.

You guys weren't ready, and you had years to prepare. The playbook was stated in every single rally, including every single thing DOGE is doing. You simply never though in a million years someone would expose and reverse the damage your party has subjected every day Americans to. And you are too brainwashed to understand how much everything happening is going to help you.

So cry harder. I promise you.. I am enjoying it.
Ever stop and ask why the democrats were getting away with decades of corruption? Why didn't the Republicans fix this decades ago?


Because the majority of them suck ass too. BigRob was right all along. Ron Paul was right about everything. What's coming to light isn't new. It's just seeing sunlight for the first time.
This.

For the longest time, many Republicans were ok with the grift, as it was a relatively small thing and considered a perk for anyone in DC that wanted to participate.

A little skinning of the top never hurt anyone, right?

But over time, the Dems couldn't be satisfied with a little grift. They were diligently working towards a long term goal to imbed themselves into every facet of the DC bureaucracy, fund their pet projects across the globe, ensure their power supremacy, and get rich in the process.

The grifting grew and grew, until it became too big to ignore.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BoydCrowder13 said:

I've supported a lot of what Trump has done this month. Especially DOGE. I've learned to tune out what he says day to day. He tries to get a rise out of people. Half of it is BS.

The only real "authoritative" concern I have with Trump is the shifting mindset of his biggest supporters. He could say the sky is purple and a lot of his supporters would say "Hell yea! Own the libs!" I am concerned that if push came to shove, there wouldn't be enough Republican pushback if Trump did something truly beyond the pale.
I don't think you have enough faith in the American people, let alone conservatives. Let's say, for the sake of illustrating the absurdity of this point, that Trump announced he was going to run for a third term. You seriously think a majority of Republicans and conservatives wouldn't push back on that? Calling himself King in a Xeet to tweak TDS afflicted libs and media shills is harmless.
Quote:

Checks and balances are a good thing.
Yes, they are. Those "checks and balances" have devolved into a system of stagnant government through Legislative, Judiciary, and unelected bureaucrats that have expanded their own power at the expense of the Executive branch. So far, Trump is taking action to restore the "checks and balances" that the Executive branch is supposed to have in place over the other branches.
Quote:

Biden, Romney, McCain, Bush, etc never had the fanboy/girl love like Trump gets. Obama is really the only competition.
Biden, Romney, McCain, and Bush were all ultimately ineffectual, ordinary, vision-less politicians who lost the respect of their own party. That's why there was no Obama/Trump level love.
aggievaulter07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I really couldn't care less about the statement. But I imagine that some of you who are saying it's nothing would have lost your ****ing mind if Obama had said the same thing after passing AHA.

Obama called me and my fellow conservatives his enemy. Much worse, imo.
You got an actual quote to cite on this one?
"I think aggievaulter07 may be the first person on TexAgs to actually back his **** up. I'm astounded, a little confused, and possibly hungry. I need some time to think about what this means." -MW03
87IE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Francis Macomber said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I really couldn't care less about the statement. But I imagine that some of you who are saying it's nothing would have lost your ****ing mind if Obama had said the same thing after passing AHA.
I'll wait until Trump violates the Constitution to be bothered by it. Hussein showed early and often that he would wipe his ass with it.

What will you do if Trump and his administration defy Court Orders?

What if they defy an order from the Supreme Court?

If/when Trump breaks the law I'll call him out on it.

I'm a conservative who thinks that when someone breaks the law there should be consequences.

  • Illegals, pay to beef up the immigration court system and give them their hearing ASAP, then deport them when their BS asylum claims are found unproven
  • People who lie on the 4473, charge them and hope they don't get a presidential pardon if convicted
  • Hire and harboring illegals, arrest and charge them
  • End the revolving door of low or no bail by activist judges so that scumbags out on bail aren't committing murder in the streets

I don't give a rat's ass if members of Congress are Dem's, Rino's, or Conservative... if they are found to have taken illegal kickbacks or any other shady **** then charge them and let them have their day in court.
BoydCrowder13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
G Martin 87 said:

BoydCrowder13 said:

I've supported a lot of what Trump has done this month. Especially DOGE. I've learned to tune out what he says day to day. He tries to get a rise out of people. Half of it is BS.

The only real "authoritative" concern I have with Trump is the shifting mindset of his biggest supporters. He could say the sky is purple and a lot of his supporters would say "Hell yea! Own the libs!" I am concerned that if push came to shove, there wouldn't be enough Republican pushback if Trump did something truly beyond the pale.
I don't think you have enough faith in the American people, let alone conservatives. Let's say, for the sake of illustrating the absurdity of this point, that Trump announced he was going to run for a third term. You seriously think a majority of Republicans and conservatives wouldn't push back on that? Calling himself King in a Xeet to tweak TDS afflicted libs and media shills is harmless.
Quote:

Checks and balances are a good thing.
Yes, they are. Those "checks and balances" have devolved into a system of stagnant government through Legislative, Judiciary, and unelected bureaucrats that have expanded their own power at the expense of the Executive branch. So far, Trump is taking action to restore the "checks and balances" that the Executive branch is supposed to have in place over the other branches.
Quote:

Biden, Romney, McCain, Bush, etc never had the fanboy/girl love like Trump gets. Obama is really the only competition.
Biden, Romney, McCain, and Bush were all ultimately ineffectual, ordinary, vision-less politicians who lost the respect of their own party. That's why there was no Obama/Trump level love.


I think a lot of posters here and MAGA in general would celebrate if Trump announced another run in 2028. He'd win the nomination again. So no, not enough pushback.
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
87IE said:

Francis Macomber said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I really couldn't care less about the statement. But I imagine that some of you who are saying it's nothing would have lost your ****ing mind if Obama had said the same thing after passing AHA.
I'll wait until Trump violates the Constitution to be bothered by it. Hussein showed early and often that he would wipe his ass with it.

What will you do if Trump and his administration defy Court Orders?

What if they defy an order from the Supreme Court?

If/when Trump breaks the law I'll call him out on it.

I'm a conservative who thinks that when someone breaks the law there should be consequences.

Well bad news for you, the Supreme Court just ruled that President's can't be charge with crimes while in office!
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hullabaloonatic said:

87IE said:

Francis Macomber said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I really couldn't care less about the statement. But I imagine that some of you who are saying it's nothing would have lost your ****ing mind if Obama had said the same thing after passing AHA.
I'll wait until Trump violates the Constitution to be bothered by it. Hussein showed early and often that he would wipe his ass with it.

What will you do if Trump and his administration defy Court Orders?

What if they defy an order from the Supreme Court?

If/when Trump breaks the law I'll call him out on it.

I'm a conservative who thinks that when someone breaks the law there should be consequences.

Well bad news for you, the Supreme Court just ruled that President's can't be charge with crimes while in office!
And bad news for you as well.

Simply pointing at Trump and screaming "CRIMINAL!!!!" doesn't make him one. Nor, for that matter, does a cooked up indictment brought before a friendly judge and jury for political reasons make him one either - especially before the 'convictions' have made their way through the appellate process.

If you truly think this President has committed an actual crime, how about letting us in on the secret of what it actually is.

(and again, don't waste my time with novel 'felonies' brought forth by DA's who ran on the specific concept of "getting Trump", which have never been used in any prior legal proceeding against anyone else...)
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jrdaustin said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

87IE said:

Francis Macomber said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I really couldn't care less about the statement. But I imagine that some of you who are saying it's nothing would have lost your ****ing mind if Obama had said the same thing after passing AHA.
I'll wait until Trump violates the Constitution to be bothered by it. Hussein showed early and often that he would wipe his ass with it.

What will you do if Trump and his administration defy Court Orders?

What if they defy an order from the Supreme Court?

If/when Trump breaks the law I'll call him out on it.

I'm a conservative who thinks that when someone breaks the law there should be consequences.

Well bad news for you, the Supreme Court just ruled that President's can't be charge with crimes while in office!
And bad news for you as well.

Simply pointing at Trump and screaming "CRIMINAL!!!!" doesn't make him one.
Of course not. To be designated a criminal you need to be first indicted, then arraigned, then face a jury of peers to present evidence for/against prosecution, then be found guilty. So as long as none of that happened, Trump is obviously not a criminal..wait...
87IE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hullabaloonatic said:

87IE said:

Francis Macomber said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I really couldn't care less about the statement. But I imagine that some of you who are saying it's nothing would have lost your ****ing mind if Obama had said the same thing after passing AHA.
I'll wait until Trump violates the Constitution to be bothered by it. Hussein showed early and often that he would wipe his ass with it.

What will you do if Trump and his administration defy Court Orders?

What if they defy an order from the Supreme Court?

If/when Trump breaks the law I'll call him out on it.

I'm a conservative who thinks that when someone breaks the law there should be consequences.

Well bad news for you, the Supreme Court just ruled that President's can't be charge with crimes while in office!
No bad news for me.

If/when Trump breaks the law I'll call him out on it... that has no bearing on him being charged with a crime while in office.

I'm a conservative who thinks that when someone breaks the law there should be consequences definition - I'm pretty sure the US Supreme Court didn't rule that the President can't be impeached by Congress. The House can still bring articles of Impeachment against Trump who can then be tried in the Senate.

In most intelligent peoples mind an impeachment trial would be considered a consequence of President Trump breaking the law.
ReturnOfTheAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

BoydCrowder13 said:

I've supported a lot of what Trump has done this month. Especially DOGE. I've learned to tune out what he says day to day. He tries to get a rise out of people. Half of it is BS.

The only real "authoritative" concern I have with Trump is the shifting mindset of his biggest supporters. He could say the sky is purple and a lot of his supporters would say "Hell yea! Own the libs!" I am concerned that if push came to shove, there wouldn't be enough Republican pushback if Trump did something truly beyond the pale.
I don't think you have enough faith in the American people, let alone conservatives. Let's say, for the sake of illustrating the absurdity of this point, that Trump announced he was going to run for a third term. You seriously think a majority of Republicans and conservatives wouldn't push back on that? Calling himself King in a Xeet to tweak TDS afflicted libs and media shills is harmless.
Quote:

Checks and balances are a good thing.
Yes, they are. Those "checks and balances" have devolved into a system of stagnant government through Legislative, Judiciary, and unelected bureaucrats that have expanded their own power at the expense of the Executive branch. So far, Trump is taking action to restore the "checks and balances" that the Executive branch is supposed to have in place over the other branches.
Quote:

Biden, Romney, McCain, Bush, etc never had the fanboy/girl love like Trump gets. Obama is really the only competition.
Biden, Romney, McCain, and Bush were all ultimately ineffectual, ordinary, vision-less politicians who lost the respect of their own party. That's why there was no Obama/Trump level love.


I'm sorry but I don't see how he's making attempts to "restore" checks and balances.

When anyone who opposes his views express them in Congress, half his base screams that they should be removed from office immediately. That's completely undemocratic.

The same could be said for anyone who opposes his executive actions. I'm all for the man working to be an agent of change, hell - call out who you want if they do, but to try and remove any and all opposition to clear your way is not restoring checks and balances.
Average Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

Average Joe said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

The CM's are out in force today.

And as always with Trump, it's all about their emotional response to his words.

In the meantime, your idols are being exposed for decades of corruption and theft of taxpayer dollars. And it's only been 1 month.

You guys weren't ready, and you had years to prepare. The playbook was stated in every single rally, including every single thing DOGE is doing. You simply never though in a million years someone would expose and reverse the damage your party has subjected every day Americans to. And you are too brainwashed to understand how much everything happening is going to help you.

So cry harder. I promise you.. I am enjoying it.
Ever stop and ask why the democrats were getting away with decades of corruption? Why didn't the Republicans fix this decades ago?


Because the majority of them suck ass too. BigRob was right all along. Ron Paul was right about everything. What's coming to light isn't new. It's just seeing sunlight for the first time.


They have been getting rich off of it too, and making their buddies rich. Most are just as bad as the Democrats.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Aggie Dad Sip said:

Again, is there anything President Trump could do that would make you stop and think, "Wow. As much as I enjoy owning the libs and taking my country back from the extreme leftists, he just crossed the line and I'm uncomfortable, only because when the Democrat party wins again, they could do the same thing."
Very much so for many of us. But none of it has to do with perceptions of hypocrisy or counter-lawfare to complete lawlessness and un-accountability for decades. The sauce for Goose is for Gander stuff. In other words, things already done and which the Regressives will simply do again.

That said, there are a number of things he could do that would object to. But as we see, the system is so corrupt and so reflexively opposed to any accountability he has more than enough obstructions in his path.

Increasing the size of the SC for example, talked about by the Left, that would be objectionable. Mandating purchases of various kinds is another. He probably is skirting one with much of the right with the Gaza idea--- its being given the benefit of the doubt but can tell you much of the Right is a bit "I don't know about that---sounds neo-conish world building'. So yes, there are examples.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
87IE said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

87IE said:

Francis Macomber said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I really couldn't care less about the statement. But I imagine that some of you who are saying it's nothing would have lost your ****ing mind if Obama had said the same thing after passing AHA.
I'll wait until Trump violates the Constitution to be bothered by it. Hussein showed early and often that he would wipe his ass with it.

What will you do if Trump and his administration defy Court Orders?

What if they defy an order from the Supreme Court?

If/when Trump breaks the law I'll call him out on it.

I'm a conservative who thinks that when someone breaks the law there should be consequences.

Well bad news for you, the Supreme Court just ruled that President's can't be charge with crimes while in office!
In most intelligent peoples mind an impeachment trial would be considered a consequence of President Trump breaking the law.

In most rational peoples mind, an impeachment trial would not be considered a consequence of President Trump breaking the law because it's not serving justice (the entire purpose of law).

Like sure, he could theoretically be impeached (It would require half of the presidents own party to break away and remove him. Which would be damn near career suicide with the looming threat of Elon's purse) but so what? He would suffer no personal consequences. He's 80 years old on a 2nd term. If he violates the oath of office, shreds the constitution, and uses his power to personally enrich himself and other oligarchs, where's the avenue of retribution? There is none.
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Dad Sip said:

Again, is there anything President Trump could do that would make you stop and think, "Wow. As much as I enjoy owning the libs and taking my country back from the extreme leftists, he just crossed the line and I'm uncomfortable, only because when the Democrat party wins again, they could do the same thing."

No. When the other side is literally viewed as being evil, even then incarnation of evil, all behavior can be tolerated and excused by the one that is viewed as the savior.
GreasenUSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ReturnOfTheAg said:




I'm sorry but I don't see how he's making attempts to "restore" checks and balances.

When anyone who opposes his views express them in Congress, half his base screams that they should be removed from office immediately. That's completely undemocratic.

The same could be said for anyone who opposes his executive actions. I'm all for the man working to be an agent of change, hell - call out who you want if they do, but to try and remove any and all opposition to clear your way is not restoring checks and balances.
"Screaming" that someone should be removed from office is not undemocratic.

Calling for violence, like a few of the dem politicians often do, is quite a bit worse.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BoydCrowder13 said:

G Martin 87 said:

BoydCrowder13 said:

I've supported a lot of what Trump has done this month. Especially DOGE. I've learned to tune out what he says day to day. He tries to get a rise out of people. Half of it is BS.

The only real "authoritative" concern I have with Trump is the shifting mindset of his biggest supporters. He could say the sky is purple and a lot of his supporters would say "Hell yea! Own the libs!" I am concerned that if push came to shove, there wouldn't be enough Republican pushback if Trump did something truly beyond the pale.
I don't think you have enough faith in the American people, let alone conservatives. Let's say, for the sake of illustrating the absurdity of this point, that Trump announced he was going to run for a third term. You seriously think a majority of Republicans and conservatives wouldn't push back on that? Calling himself King in a Xeet to tweak TDS afflicted libs and media shills is harmless.
Quote:

Checks and balances are a good thing.
Yes, they are. Those "checks and balances" have devolved into a system of stagnant government through Legislative, Judiciary, and unelected bureaucrats that have expanded their own power at the expense of the Executive branch. So far, Trump is taking action to restore the "checks and balances" that the Executive branch is supposed to have in place over the other branches.
Quote:

Biden, Romney, McCain, Bush, etc never had the fanboy/girl love like Trump gets. Obama is really the only competition.
Biden, Romney, McCain, and Bush were all ultimately ineffectual, ordinary, vision-less politicians who lost the respect of their own party. That's why there was no Obama/Trump level love.


I think a lot of posters here and MAGA in general would celebrate if Trump announced another run in 2028. He'd win the nomination again. So no, not enough pushback.
Well what you think is often wrong. There's a long posting history to support that. So just another one to add to the list.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rgvag11 said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Again, is there anything President Trump could do that would make you stop and think, "Wow. As much as I enjoy owning the libs and taking my country back from the extreme leftists, he just crossed the line and I'm uncomfortable, only because when the Democrat party wins again, they could do the same thing."

No. When the other side is literally viewed as being evil, even then incarnation of evil, all behavior can be tolerated and excused by the one that is viewed as the savior.
Hence why our country is so screwed. Letting the democrats get away with weaponization of government, stealing taxpayer money, and fighting against America's best interest in the name of globalism and marxism.

The people said enough. Time to deal with it.
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BoydCrowder13 said:

I've supported a lot of what Trump has done this month. Especially DOGE. I've learned to tune out what he says day to day. He tries to get a rise out of people. Half of it is BS.

The only real "authoritative" concern I have with Trump is I am concerned and moderate and don't like Trump.
Fify
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.