Measles outbreak in West Texas

21,285 Views | 333 Replies | Last: 41 min ago by Woods Ag
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

Anything vaccine related, you need to sit out.


I stand with president trump.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jt2hunt said:

many


Name them.
Woods Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OPAG said:

'Jaw-dropping' Study Finds Vaccinated Children Have 170% Higher Risk of Autism

The peer-reviewed study also found that vaccinated children had a 212% greater likelihood of developing other neurodevelopmental disorders, including ADHD, epilepsy/seizures, brain inflammation and tic and learning disorders.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/study-vaccinated-children-autism-risk-increase/

Here is the link to the study:
Quote:

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/vaccination-and-neurodevelopmental-disorders-a-study-of-nine-year-old-children-enrolled-in-medicaid/



Don't waste your time with Tesla and the other dude that pipes in. They won't look at any of your stuff. They'll nitpick your grammar if they have to to discredit you. Just ignore and move on.

Tesla turned in people for having fake vax cards.. that's how sold that dude is.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you have to lie about what people have done your arguments are probably terrible
p_bubel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Woods Ag said:

OPAG said:

'Jaw-dropping' Study Finds Vaccinated Children Have 170% Higher Risk of Autism

The peer-reviewed study also found that vaccinated children had a 212% greater likelihood of developing other neurodevelopmental disorders, including ADHD, epilepsy/seizures, brain inflammation and tic and learning disorders.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/study-vaccinated-children-autism-risk-increase/

Here is the link to the study:
Quote:

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/vaccination-and-neurodevelopmental-disorders-a-study-of-nine-year-old-children-enrolled-in-medicaid/



Don't waste your time with Tesla and the other dude that pipes in. They won't look at any of your stuff. They'll nitpick your grammar if they have to to discredit you. Just ignore and move on.

Tesla turned in people for having fake vax cards.. that's how sold that dude is.

Stop being stupid.
Woods Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I haven't lied about a thing.
Woods Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
p_bubel said:

Woods Ag said:

OPAG said:

'Jaw-dropping' Study Finds Vaccinated Children Have 170% Higher Risk of Autism

The peer-reviewed study also found that vaccinated children had a 212% greater likelihood of developing other neurodevelopmental disorders, including ADHD, epilepsy/seizures, brain inflammation and tic and learning disorders.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/study-vaccinated-children-autism-risk-increase/

Here is the link to the study:
Quote:

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/vaccination-and-neurodevelopmental-disorders-a-study-of-nine-year-old-children-enrolled-in-medicaid/



Don't waste your time with Tesla and the other dude that pipes in. They won't look at any of your stuff. They'll nitpick your grammar if they have to to discredit you. Just ignore and move on.

Tesla turned in people for having fake vax cards.. that's how sold that dude is.

Stop being stupid.


Mods deleted my response. But you can guess.
SociallyConditionedAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

Yes, the HPV vaccine that went through 7 years of testing prior to approval and has been around for almost 25 years now?

Yes, the one that has caused many injuries and deaths and is the subject of multiple lawsuits for fraudulent safety and efficacy trials.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jt2hunt said:

The amount of vaccines have skyrocketed since the Reagan administration.


So have the number and types of antibiotics, chemotherapy regimens and biologics and they have driven down the morality for all the diseases in which are designed to treat.

I cannot for the life of me understand what point those who say this sort of thing think they are making.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SociallyConditionedAg said:

Teslag said:

Other than Covid, which Trump said would be safe, effective and free, which vaccine was "rushed through"?

Ever hear of Gardasil?


The rate of serious reactions to Gardasil is between 1.5 and 1.9 per 100,000 doses, depending on whose data you choose to cite.

For reference, that's a lower risk of a severe adverse event than virtually every medication you've ever taken including some OTCs. And exponentially lower than every antibiotic you've ever taken.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump turned people in for fake cards? Damn I didn't know that. Interesting
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013 said:

Trump turned people in for fake cards? Damn I didn't know that. Interesting


He didn't and neither did I
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Infection_Ag11 said:

jt2hunt said:

The amount of vaccines have skyrocketed since the Reagan administration.


So have the number and types of antibiotics, chemotherapy regimens and biologics and they have driven down the morality for all the diseases in which are designed to treat.

I cannot for the life of me understand what point those who say this sort of thing think they are making.


I think their point is that if any medication has adverse side affects or possible rare side affects, it is inherently negative and unsafe on the whole.

Which is insane.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

I think their point is that if any medication has adverse side affects or possible rare side affects, it is inherently negative and unsafe on the whole.

Which is insane.
It's just not fair that their world is not absolutely perfect. Oh, the inhumanity!
Woods Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But it's not that. It's looking at the number of autism cases and the correlation and asking questions. The problem is that there is a huge contingent that want to close their eyes, stamp their feet, and say it's all make believe.

It's not make believe and you just embolden people when you do that.

I have less of a dog in that fight, but I understand it bc it's what happened with the Covid vax
SigAg6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Darwin
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Woods Ag said:

But it's not that. It's looking at the number of autism cases and the correlation and asking questions. The problem is that there is a huge contingent that want to close their eyes, stamp their feet, and say it's all make believe.

It's not make believe and you just embolden people when you do that.

I have less of a dog in that fight, but I understand it bc it's what happened with the Covid vax


It's not all make believe, we are diagnosing more autism cases. And it's largely due to changes in provider knowledge and diagnostic criteria. Autism criteria have become significantly more inclusive as the years have gone on, and far more providers (particularly pediatricians and developmental psychologists) are recognizing the signs and having kids checked for it.

ASD has always been extremely common. It represents a very broad swath of neurodivergent people. It's just that for nearly all of human history the extremely mild cases were just seen as the extreme end of "normal". Your quirky aunt wasn't autistic or abnormal, she was just eccentric.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Infection_Ag11 said:

Woods Ag said:

But it's not that. It's looking at the number of autism cases and the correlation and asking questions. The problem is that there is a huge contingent that want to close their eyes, stamp their feet, and say it's all make believe.

It's not make believe and you just embolden people when you do that.

I have less of a dog in that fight, but I understand it bc it's what happened with the Covid vax


It's not all make believe, we are diagnosing more autism cases. And it's largely due to changes in provider knowledge and diagnostic criteria. Autism criteria have become significantly more inclusive as the years have gone on, and far more providers (particularly pediatricians and developmental psychologists) are recognizing the signs and having kids checked for it.

ASD has always been extremely common. It represents a very broad swath of neurodivergent people. It's just that for nearly all of human history the extremely mild cases were just seen as the extreme end of "normal". Your quirky aunt wasn't autistic or abnormal, she was just eccentric.


I also believe there are some attention-craving inviduals out there who will seek out a diagnosis of "on the spectrum" in order to rationalize traditionally unacceptable social behavior.

I am not dismissing those individuals are truly neuro-divergent (or whatever the current term is). My nephew was diagnosed with Aspberger's in his youth, and as a 20something adult he is fully functional just very socially awkward. My wife and I attended a dinner party not long ago, and one of the other guests was a dad of our son's friend. He had always been socially awkward as a kid, and was diagnosed as an adult with Turrette's. While he never blurted out anything inappropriate during the party, he would ramble these long stream of consciousness stories while rapidly blinking his eyes and not making eye-contact with anyone. Exactly like my nephew.

And then we had the Scout mom who swore up and down her Scout son was autistic. When we worked with him one-on-one he seemed like a normal kid, although a little shy. When his mom was around he would clam up tight and crawl into a shell. If you asked him a question, he wouldn't answer without glancing at his mother. I came to suspect he was not autistic but that his mother was emotionally abusing him and that her autism claim was her cover story.
Woods Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Infection_Ag11 said:

Woods Ag said:

But it's not that. It's looking at the number of autism cases and the correlation and asking questions. The problem is that there is a huge contingent that want to close their eyes, stamp their feet, and say it's all make believe.

It's not make believe and you just embolden people when you do that.

I have less of a dog in that fight, but I understand it bc it's what happened with the Covid vax


It's not all make believe, we are diagnosing more autism cases. And it's largely due to changes in provider knowledge and diagnostic criteria. Autism criteria have become significantly more inclusive as the years have gone on, and far more providers (particularly pediatricians and developmental psychologists) are recognizing the signs and having kids checked for it.

ASD has always been extremely common. It represents a very broad swath of neurodivergent people. It's just that for nearly all of human history the extremely mild cases were just seen as the extreme end of "normal". Your quirky aunt wasn't autistic or abnormal, she was just eccentric.


There's no doubt that that is at least part of it. Especially in recent years. Maybe a large part of it. It's become the thing to do to look for something wrong with you or with your children to explain why you have it harder than others.

This is a huge issue. The health of our population and not wanting to cause irreparable harm to our kids. Both sides of this arguement can agree on that. Neither wants to harm their kids. We want what's best for them, so there should be multiple extensicd independent studies done. There seems one side that wants that and another side that wants to say "it's science" like science is irrefutable and then demonize those that are concerned as stupid, conspiracy theorist.That's such nonsense. There are incredibly smart people and idiots on both sides just as there are in the political parties.

We stretched our kids vax schedule out and did not give them the 3rd round of Hep B vaccines. Can't remember the others (mainly my wife's area of focus) They would have gotten the first round if we had looked into before hand. Hell, the first doc wanted to redo all the vaccines on our adopted kid just to be sure he got them even though his adoption paperwork shows everything he's gotten.

No need for Hel B for a kid. He's not sharing needles and they won't be in a situation where they'll be having sex. We can traverse that mountain when they're older.

Edit: excuse the spelling errors
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.