Trump went off last night and everybody spiderman memeing each other.samurai_science said:
Trump knows something about DEI we dont. Leaks and rumors now, I bet we know in detail by weekend
Trump knew. He knew.
Trump went off last night and everybody spiderman memeing each other.samurai_science said:
Trump knows something about DEI we dont. Leaks and rumors now, I bet we know in detail by weekend
It's on the east side of the river, more or less where the extended centerline of 33 crosses I-295Hey Nav said:
Also, I wonder where IDTEK fix is located in relation to the river.
Why all DEI hires? Eff that. If you're going to retest hires, retest them all. Selectively testing is in itself racist like the DEI claims.fullback44 said:The FAA needs to retest all DEI hires to see if they are capable of doing the job, if not, get out the ax cut them lose or send them out to California to help fight firesv1rotate92 said:
Good luck getting the data from the FAA to prove or disprove DEI effects on the accident/incident rates
Stat Monitor Repairman said:Trump went off last night and everybody spiderman memeing each other.samurai_science said:
Trump knows something about DEI we dont. Leaks and rumors now, I bet we know in detail by weekend
Trump knew. He knew.
REMINDER: Biden’s pick to lead the FAA was a DEI hire who couldn’t answer a single question about aviation. pic.twitter.com/Wpq27SSm9P
— Jessica 🇺🇸 (@RealJessica05) January 30, 2025
MarkTwain said:Stat Monitor Repairman said:Trump went off last night and everybody spiderman memeing each other.samurai_science said:
Trump knows something about DEI we dont. Leaks and rumors now, I bet we know in detail by weekend
Trump knew. He knew.REMINDER: Biden’s pick to lead the FAA was a DEI hire who couldn’t answer a single question about aviation. pic.twitter.com/Wpq27SSm9P
— Jessica 🇺🇸 (@RealJessica05) January 30, 2025
I will also note that night vision goggles are worse than useless with all the city lights.TRADUCTOR said:Burnsey said:
Maybe this has been addressed, but I expect the Blackhawk to be much more technologically advanced than the local newstation's Bell Ranger 206 with capabilities on board to detect an approaching aircraft. So it. Can't do that?
Called eyeballs and should be some on board every flight .
Stat Monitor Repairman said:
Looking back at GWOT there were some old ass CWO pilots out there. I'll tell you that for a fact. Somehow in 03-04 when **** had to get done some old guys came out of the woodwork. Remember old CWO that people joked may have flown in Vietnam. He may well have, but people too afraid to ask. Wild to look back on now.
Tone2002 said:MarkTwain said:Stat Monitor Repairman said:Trump went off last night and everybody spiderman memeing each other.samurai_science said:
Trump knows something about DEI we dont. Leaks and rumors now, I bet we know in detail by weekend
Trump knew. He knew.REMINDER: Biden’s pick to lead the FAA was a DEI hire who couldn’t answer a single question about aviation. pic.twitter.com/Wpq27SSm9P
— Jessica 🇺🇸 (@RealJessica05) January 30, 2025
This guy wasn't even confirmed. It was a white male ultimately.
I have a family member who works at the Pentagon and says the scuttlebutt is that this will 100% be the helo's fault and that the command knew it almost as soon as the accident happened. We'll see. Peeps have been wrong before.Dill-Ag13 said:
Reading through and catching up. Responsibility ultimately fell to the helo pilot to maintain visual separation, also noted that they were supposed to be below 200ft altitude and were instead near 400ft altitude.
nortex97 said:
Yep. It was apparently an NVG training flight. Unclear to me why that would need to happen if, in fact it is true, right at the end of the DCA runway instead of further up the river away from so much congestion.UPDATE: DC Aviation Disaster
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) January 31, 2025
The BlackHawk Pilot had 1,000 Hours Experience, Co-Pilot a women with 500 hours Experience
1,000 flying hours is considered “very experienced,” considering most flights are on average two hours in length.
• The co-pilot, who is known as the pilot… pic.twitter.com/fKGXvQMAXC
Crew chief was flying apparently, named Ryan O'Hara, not the co-pilot (not that I think it matters but the latter was a female, with 500 hours or so of experience). It's pretty obvious imho this was simple human error by whoever was actually flying the UH-60 at the time.
And to the person above who asked, while there are advanced/special forces types of blackhawks, the run of the mill models used by the Army are just glorified station wagons of the sky, not a lot of high-tech devices/stuff on them, other than radio's when used for VIP duties.
This guy seems to know what he is talking about (not sure if posted, sorry if so, I gave up keeping up with this thread):
nortex97 said:
Yeah my mistake, thx. I expect the pilot was a senior CWO?
Edit: and I didn't 'bag on the co-pilot's gender.' I specifically said 'not that it matters.' Whatever.
FriscoKid said:nortex97 said:Not my area but per a.net discussion apparently TCAS (traffic collision avoidance) is 'suppressed' below a certain altitude (maybe 200 feet for helo's and 1000 for fixed wing aircraft?). Joint Base Andrew's (where the 89th military airlift/marine 1 unit bases their stuff out of locally) is only a few miles from Reagan Nat'l. Theory is presently I guess that the Blackhawk pilot visually spotted a larger aircraft landing further from him, but missed the CRJ.FriscoKid said:This.TxAG#2011 said:
Why on earth would any aircraft ever be allowed through the flight path of a major commercial airport relying on visuals...
Sickening stuff
There are some snide remarks about helo's routinely violating airspace though around/near airports such as Reagan. If that's even an irregular problem it needs to be cleaned up, self-evidently. Still, this breaks a 16-year streak since a fatal airliner accident in the US, sadly.Quote:
The helicopter looks to have been following Route 1 to Route 4. The altitude restrictions along these two routes from the Memorial Bridge to the Woodrow Wilson Bridge is 200 feet and below and hugging the east side of the Potomac.
I've flown this Route a few times, once at night, probably 20 years ago and we were always down around 100-150 feet. I'd guess the helo was higher than it was supposed to be, and also was looking at the wrong aircraft when they told ATC they had traffic in sight.
Maybe our military helicopter should have stayed the hell out the way?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:
Are these gold top pilots supposed to be the best of the best? Seems like the kind of unit people strive to finish out their career at, no?
In any event, seems wild that they training new people in the most heavily trafficked airspace in the US at night.
Looking back at GWOT there were some old ass CWO pilots out there. I'll tell you that for a fact. Somehow in 03-04 when **** had to get done some old guys came out of the woodwork. Remember old CWO that people joked may have flown in Vietnam. He may well have, but people too afraid to ask. Wild to look back on now.
ArmyAg2002 said:nortex97 said:
Yep. It was apparently an NVG training flight. Unclear to me why that would need to happen if, in fact it is true, right at the end of the DCA runway instead of further up the river away from so much congestion.UPDATE: DC Aviation Disaster
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) January 31, 2025
The BlackHawk Pilot had 1,000 Hours Experience, Co-Pilot a women with 500 hours Experience
1,000 flying hours is considered “very experienced,” considering most flights are on average two hours in length.
• The co-pilot, who is known as the pilot… pic.twitter.com/fKGXvQMAXC
Crew chief was flying apparently, named Ryan O'Hara, not the co-pilot (not that I think it matters but the latter was a female, with 500 hours or so of experience). It's pretty obvious imho this was simple human error by whoever was actually flying the UH-60 at the time.
And to the person above who asked, while there are advanced/special forces types of blackhawks, the run of the mill models used by the Army are just glorified station wagons of the sky, not a lot of high-tech devices/stuff on them, other than radio's when used for VIP duties.
This guy seems to know what he is talking about (not sure if posted, sorry if so, I gave up keeping up with this thread):
Crew Chiefs aren't pilots. They don't fly in the front seat and don't have access to the controls. An experienced crew chiefs is great for many things, but given that he was most likely sitting on the right side of the aircraft he would not have been in a position to help the pilots search for the incoming aircraft.
And while we're at it quit bagging on one of the two pilots for being female. I know many fine female aviator and many ****ty male ones. Experience may have been an issue, which is an Army wide issue, but not what's between her legs.
A new clearer video has been released of the collision between a helicopter and passenger plane in Washington D.C. pic.twitter.com/lxzKax7TUN
— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) January 31, 2025
txags92 said:
Seems like there was a cascade of small errors by ATC and the pilots both that had to happen in order to cause the wreck. Hard to pick just 1 of them as the "root cause", because if any of them were erased, the accident becomes a near miss instead.
1) ATC calls out approaching traffic for PAT25, without telling them where to look for it (ie at your 11 o'clock), instead telling them a location relative to a specific ground feature (South of Woodrow Bridge), which leaves the possibility of seeing a more distant plane as the approaching traffic ATC is talking about.
2) ATC second callout about the traffic also does not specify where the traffic is relative to PAT25. ATC misses chance to say "If you have visual on traffic, why are you still flying right at the traffic?"
3) If the collision occurred at 395 ft, PAT25 is flying at nearly twice the max altitude for their cleared route. Neither the pilot nor ATC note the discrepancy in where they are supposed to be vertically.
You had 3 shots at missing the collision. If ATC calls out where the traffic was relative to PAT25 either time, the pilot presumably turns their head and sees the much closer plane. If PAT25 flies at <200' or ATC calls them out for flying above 200', the accident never happens...it is a near miss as PAT25 flies very close, but under the CRJ.
To me, if that turns out to be the scenario, the root cause is ultimately PAT25 flying too high. But ATC would have missed multiple chances to prevent the collision.