***** OFFICIAL PURGING OF THE DEEP STATE *****

67,931 Views | 533 Replies | Last: 40 min ago by TRADUCTOR
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here they come. We can consolidate the firings/removals here


texsn95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
An L of an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In!
ttha_aggie_09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Going to be interesting to see who, if any, survive.
pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?

TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump has nobody to answer to this time. No re-election to worry about. Gut it.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just shut the damn departments down! 80% of them are worthless.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In!

No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
Ad Lunam
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

And move others out of DC if you don't close them. Make them less politicized.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aglaw97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bring everything to the light. If nothing wrong was done they have nothing to fear but a lot of personal pain dealing with the process. They started this against Trump so he is the perfect person to say he's just doing what they said was necessary and if they are innocent they have nothing to worry about as was the case with him. Be careful the precedent and seeds you sow.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Then maybe Brennan and Wray will be?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a BIG one! A lot of good reading in that EO.



The President's power to remove subordinates is a core part of the Executive power vested by Article II of the Constitution and is necessary for the President to perform his duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." Because SES officials wield significant governmental authority, they must serve at the pleasure of the President.

Only that chain of responsibility ensures that SES officials are properly accountable to the President and the American people. If career SES officials fail to faithfully fulfill their duties to advance the needs, policies, and goals of the United States, the President must be able to rectify the situation and ensure that the entire Executive Branch faithfully executes the law. For instance, SES officials who engage in unauthorized disclosure of Executive Branch deliberations, violate the constitutional rights of Americans, refuse to implement policy priorities, or perform their duties inefficiently or negligently should be held accountable.

The President must be able to trust that the Executive Branch will work together in service of the Nation. My Administration will restore a "government of the people, by the people, for the people."

...

(f) Any agency head who becomes aware of an SES official whose performance or continued occupancy of the position is inconsistent with either the principles reaffirmed in this Order or their duties to the Nation under section 3131 of title 5, United States Code, shall immediately take all appropriate actions, up to and including removal of that official, with the support of OPM and OMB. Restoring an accountable government workforce is a top priority of my Administration.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They've clearly learned some lessons. Maybe not all of them, maybe not all they need, but some and that's a start. It's clear that they're not messing around. Tough to keep up that pace, but it's a good start.
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:




This shouldn't have been announced until trusted agents are knocking on their door with a warrant. This time there will be no intent assumed if they are holding classified information
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Ag In Ok said:

will25u said:




This shouldn't have been announced until trusted agents are knocking on their door with a warrant. This time there will be no intent assumed if they are holding classified information
Maybe the 51 already were told in such fashion? Would the public know.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
51 "Intelligence officials" right now.

titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Problem is none of the pardons post-date noon Jan 20th 2025. Levin was talking about this -- just one document or record destroyed by any of the pardoned now could get his opening around the pardon.
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This has the potential to be my favorite thread for 2025
whoop1995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



I collect ticket stubs! looking for a 1944 orange bowl and 1981 independence bowl ticket stub as well as Aggie vs tu stubs - 1926 and below, 1935-1937, 1939-1944, 1946-1948, 1950-1951, 1953, 1956-1957, 1959, 1960, 1963-1966, 1969-1970, 1972-1974, 1980, 1984, 1990, 2004, 2008, 2010
itsyourboypookie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is exactly what I voted for
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MORE MORE MORE!!

ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


Oh this one deserves very special attention. Fire or jail all involved with the double standards.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whoop1995 said:




Why do all Washington bureaucrats look like this? He's straight from central casting.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.