Yep. That's what I am reading too.1836er said:Here's the short version.Charpie said:
How though? And only 23 Republicans voted against it
1) Required that every single Vice Chair position be filled by Democrats, and allocated thousands of dollars to be awarded to these Vice Chairs. Functionally, the new rules makes Vice Chairs co-chairmen of committees.
2) Created 12 new "permanent standing sub-committees" which could also be chaired by Democrats, which the speaker will be allowed to refer legislation to.
In effect, instead of having the Dems control 8 committees where they could set the agenda and the Republicans the rest, we traded that away for joint control of every committee where they Chair and Vice Chairs have co-equal power to run the committees.
So, every single Dem voted against Dem chairs, so that they could empower themselves via vice-chairs. Clever ****s, those jerks are.Quote:
TEXAS HOUSE: The story of the week is how Texas Democrats voted to ban Democrats from serving as chairs in the House. Why would every Democrat (save one) vote to prevent members of their own party from running committees? Simple, the deal they cut to help Dustin Burrows win the Speakership gave them complete control of the legislative agenda of the House.
RINO Speaker Burrows allowed his allies to vote for the so-called 'Ban on Democrat Chairs' by increasing the power of Vice Chairs and banning Republicans from serving as Vice Chairs. He also gave Democrats the chairmanships of Subcommittees. Finally, he used taxpayer dollars to pay off the Democrats by giving Vice Chairs $4,000 a month (they've never been paid in the state's history).
So as you get text messages from your Republican House Rep bragging about how they voted to 'Ban Democrat Chairs' remind them that they vote to give Democrats control of the legislative agenda of Texas.
The one possible bright spot is the fact that there are 25 Republican House members who claim they will block all legislation (it takes 25 to block) until this situation is rectified. Sadly, I am skeptical as to whether they'll have the intestinal fortitude to challenge Burrows rein of terror.
TEXAS HOUSE: The story of the week is how Texas Democrats voted to ban Democrats from serving as chairs in the House. Why would every Democrat (save one) vote to prevent members of their own party from running committees? Simple, the deal they cut to help Dustin Burrows win the… pic.twitter.com/9R5B2ODgAI
— @amuse (@amuse) January 24, 2025
Dems have always been more devious than Republicans.nortex97 said:Yep. That's what I am reading too.1836er said:Here's the short version.Charpie said:
How though? And only 23 Republicans voted against it
1) Required that every single Vice Chair position be filled by Democrats, and allocated thousands of dollars to be awarded to these Vice Chairs. Functionally, the new rules makes Vice Chairs co-chairmen of committees.
2) Created 12 new "permanent standing sub-committees" which could also be chaired by Democrats, which the speaker will be allowed to refer legislation to.
In effect, instead of having the Dems control 8 committees where they could set the agenda and the Republicans the rest, we traded that away for joint control of every committee where they Chair and Vice Chairs have co-equal power to run the committees.So, every single Dem voted against Dem chairs, so that they could empower themselves via vice-chairs. Clever ****s, those jerks are.Quote:
TEXAS HOUSE: The story of the week is how Texas Democrats voted to ban Democrats from serving as chairs in the House. Why would every Democrat (save one) vote to prevent members of their own party from running committees? Simple, the deal they cut to help Dustin Burrows win the Speakership gave them complete control of the legislative agenda of the House.
RINO Speaker Burrows allowed his allies to vote for the so-called 'Ban on Democrat Chairs' by increasing the power of Vice Chairs and banning Republicans from serving as Vice Chairs. He also gave Democrats the chairmanships of Subcommittees. Finally, he used taxpayer dollars to pay off the Democrats by giving Vice Chairs $4,000 a month (they've never been paid in the state's history).
So as you get text messages from your Republican House Rep bragging about how they voted to 'Ban Democrat Chairs' remind them that they vote to give Democrats control of the legislative agenda of Texas.
The one possible bright spot is the fact that there are 25 Republican House members who claim they will block all legislation (it takes 25 to block) until this situation is rectified. Sadly, I am skeptical as to whether they'll have the intestinal fortitude to challenge Burrows rein of terror.TEXAS HOUSE: The story of the week is how Texas Democrats voted to ban Democrats from serving as chairs in the House. Why would every Democrat (save one) vote to prevent members of their own party from running committees? Simple, the deal they cut to help Dustin Burrows win the… pic.twitter.com/9R5B2ODgAI
— @amuse (@amuse) January 24, 2025
The Texas House remains just a complete disaster. No defense for these people.
ts5641 said:
The Texas legislature is a freaking miracle. We are one of the most conservative states and vote so for decades. And yet somehow a minority dem party maintains power because we have moron Republican legislators like my own Jeff Leach, who needs to be primaried.
Everyone needs to tell the Republican State Party to **** off! My rep is one of the good guys, but I'll likely be finding a Conservative elsewhere to back in the next primary. What a bunch of Rino ***holes! And they can take their Dem stooges with them!txags92 said:
I am eagerly looking forward to finding out who plans to run against Stan Gerdes so I can donate to them and work for them.
FIFYTea Party said:
Is there ever a more clear sign that Burrows, Phelan, Brad Buckley, and many more areisactively working against the conservative agenda and solely cares about his own grasp on power?
Looks like they gave the vice chairs more powerCharpie said:
The vice chairs still have to run everything through the main chairs, no?
The same.Charpie said:
More power than the actual chairs?
Why do you constantly defend reps defying their constituents and flat-out lying? Do Texans not deserve to be represented by their representatives? I realize you have ties to the House, but how is this defensible? They have lied and lied and lied to us.Charpie said:
The vice chairs still have to run everything through the main chairs, no?
Someone needs to get them on record, do we have any good reporters to confront them?Hubert J. Farnsworth said:
This pisses me off so badly. Burrows and the rest of the republicans that hatched that plan are major pieces of ****. It's unforgivable.
Meaning things like they can place a hold on any legislation under consideration by the committee. So things like school choice can be held up in committee by the vice chair of the education committee placing a hold on it without it ever making it to the floor.Spotted Ag said:The same.Charpie said:
More power than the actual chairs?
Questions you already know the answer to. It's called passive agressive gloating. You got what you wanted.Charpie said:
Who is defending? You're projecting. I'm asking questions.
1836er said:
Official statement from Republican Party of Texas.Official Statement from Chairman Abraham George @abrahamgeorge pic.twitter.com/34MjR88gye
— Texas GOP (@TexasGOP) January 23, 2025
It was a a bribe. It's so ****ing obvious. Really disgusting. Glad my new rep voted against it.aTmAg said:
Burrows is also paying Vice-chairs $4000/month. Never before in the history of the state has this been done.
So, Mr Chairman, when are the censures coming?1836er said:
Official statement from Republican Party of Texas.Official Statement from Chairman Abraham George @abrahamgeorge pic.twitter.com/34MjR88gye
— Texas GOP (@TexasGOP) January 23, 2025
He asked you a question about the nature of your question, which you ignored? Why don't you answer it?Charpie said:
Who is defending? You're projecting. I'm asking questions.
This is a dodge.Charpie said:
I did answer it. I didn't defend anyone.
These are the questions Ellis Wyatt asked of you (based upon your looong history on this site of passive aggressive behavior that many are onto). When called out, you plead ignorance/innocence and slink away, until he next time. It's good to see others calling attention to it. You're entitled to your opinion/attitude. Just own them.Quote:
Why do you constantly defend reps defying their constituents and flat-out lying? Do Texans not deserve to be represented by their representatives? I realize you have ties to the House, but how is this defensible? They have lied and lied and lied to us.
The Texas GOP is flaunting their anti-conservative desire for power over people and she's choosing to be obtuse over the subject. Good luck righting that ship .BoerneGator said:This is a dodge.Charpie said:
I did answer it. I didn't defend anyone.These are the questions Ellis Wyatt asked of you (based upon your looong history on this site of passive aggressive behavior that many are onto). When called out, you plead ignorance/innocence and slink away, until he next time. It's good to see others calling attention to it. You're entitled to your opinion/attitude. Just own them.Quote:
Why do you constantly defend reps defying their constituents and flat-out lying? Do Texans not deserve to be represented by their representatives? I realize you have ties to the House, but how is this defensible? They have lied and lied and lied to us.
Pretty ballsy for these traitors to openly defy the will of the majority of the voters in a state with a proud FAFO persona. I get that we're no longer the men of action that our forefathers were… but its like they're openly searching for one man of conviction and opportunity in a pool of 10M…coconutED said:So, Mr Chairman, when are the censures coming?1836er said:
Official statement from Republican Party of Texas.Official Statement from Chairman Abraham George @abrahamgeorge pic.twitter.com/34MjR88gye
— Texas GOP (@TexasGOP) January 23, 2025
Bueller...?
Bueller...?