As of 2020 all new builds (3 stories or less) in California require solar power. I wonder if California will enforce this mandate with all the rebuilding that will happen. Thoughts?

A relative who lives there says the solar has to be hooked up to the grid. Illegal to have panels which supply a freestanding battery/inverter setup for personal use.

The system also must be large enough to meet the home's annual electricity usage, or at least have a battery system ($$$$) to make it capable of doing so.

Trucker 96 said:

---

The system also must be large enough to meet the home's annual electricity usage, or at least have a battery system ($$$$) to make it capable of doing so.

---

So they're basically forcing home builders and home owners to subsidize and build out the states solar capacity?

Sickos.

ArbAg said:

---

California aspires to become a national park whose only residents as movie stars and illegal immigrants.

---

How will illegals even be able to live there with silly ass regs like this?

BigRobSA said:

---

ArbAg said:

---

California aspires to become a national park whose only residents as movie stars and illegal immigrants.

---

How will illegals even be able to live there with silly ass regs like this?

---

State subsidies and exceptions because "muh racism"

BigRobSA said:

---

ArbAg said:

---

California aspires to become a national park whose only residents as movie stars and illegal immigrants.

---

How will illegals even be able to live there with silly ass regs like this?

---

Probably get means tested out of having to adhere to these laws.

Listened to Trump at Governor's Ball.

His thoughts on the California homes (paraphrasing):

1. Gavin Newsom is a terrible governor who turned down water when Trump put a bill on his desk to give them "unlimited" water from Northern states and Canada.

2. These are among the most expensive homes in the world and they are gone and likely won't be coming back.

3. Many of those people won't rebuild. They'll move to states like Florida and Texas costing California billions in tax revenue from these homeowners.

4. No one wants to live in a construction site for the foreseeable future.

5. Newsom is one of the worst governors to ever run a state (did I already say that?) and he has destroyed California.

aggierogue said:

---

Listened to Trump at Governor's Ball.

His thoughts on the California homes (paraphrasing):

1. Gavin Newsom is a terrible governor who turned down water when Trump put a bill on his desk to give them "unlimited" water from Northern states and Canada.

2. These are among the most expensive homes in the world and they are gone and likely won't be coming back.

3. Many of those people won't rebuild. They'll move to states like Florida and Texas costing California billions in tax revenue from these homeowners.

4. No one wants to live in a construction site for the foreseeable future.

5. Newsom is one of the worst governors to ever run a state (did I already say that?) and he has destroyed California.

---

he's right you know gif

While I don't believe solar to be nearly as effective as some claim, I don't have issues with people trying to utilize it as an alternative. Mandating it is BS. What I don't understand..... why do we try to utilize acreage that could be used for better purposes rather than covering the roofs of shopping malls, strip centers, walmarts, etc....? Utilize land that is already being utilized.

chjoak said:

---

While I don't believe solar to be nearly as effective as some claim, I don't have issues with people trying to utilize it as an alternative. Mandating it is BS. What I don't understand..... why do we try to utilize acreage that could be used for better purposes rather than covering the roofs of shopping malls, strip centers, walmarts, etc....? Utilize land that is already being utilized.

---

Solar works great in remote or small/mid use applications where running power lines isn't possible or economical. It can also make sense in combination with traditional power if you capture energy from the sun as a supplement to fossil fuel energy (rooftop panels, etc).

Just like electric cars can make sense for people in large metro areas who can recharge at home every night.

Of course, the economics need to make sense on a free market basis without government subsidies.

The problems come when politicians try to mandate these things and assume that if one pound is good, then a ton must be even better.

My bet on those displaced from these fires is that they will take their insurance money and move to another state. They can also sell their lot to Oprah for pennies on the dollar.

Burrus86 said:

---

My bet on those displaced from these fires is that they will take their insurance money and move to another state. They can also sell their lot to Oprah for pennies on the dollar.

---

Agree.

The libs who lost their homes believe climate change is responsible.

The conservatives know that DEI and insane environmental policies was the root cause.

Neither group will risk building and living there in the future because they believe neither cause will be addressed. The risk is too high.

Many of these people have California FAIR Plan insurance which is most assuredly bankrupt. I suspect rebuilding is going to way more limited than you might first believe.