Does the White-American category include our federal politicians?

We need an F test to show lack of significant diference or interaction between income and educacion and nationality and COO. Statisticlly Whats provided shows nothing to make valid inferences. It's just data.

Bayou City said:

---

We need an F test to show lack of significant diference or interaction between income and educacion and COO. Statisticlly Whats provided shows nothing to make valid inferences. It's just data.

---

I agree this is bad comparison e.g. there are 50 white Americans (of every economic division) for every 1 Indian American (upper economic division) ...

Bayou City said:

---

We need an F test to show lack of significant diference or interaction between income and educacion and COO. Statisticlly Whats provided shows nothing to make valid inferences. It's just data.

---

Texags doesn't care. It "proves" their point so don't argue or you're an idiot liberal.

That data is from 2015 too

Talk about trying your hardest to keep receipts lol. What a joke.

There no way to discern the effect of educacin vs income vs nationality vs income w the data provided. This is a trash projection and neither valid nor a reliabke measure

Also how was the population sampled? We need to know how they sampled before we can even start the analysis.

Can we assume normal distribucin? Perhaps it's a non liner fit

Again with the data provided you can't infer anything.

Bayou City said:

---

We need an F test to show lack of significant diference or interaction between income and educacion and COO. Statisticlly Whats provided shows nothing to make valid inferences. It's just data.

---

It's just data. We are all waiting for the MSM to let us know what we should believe/feel/think about this data.

If you give me the raw data I'm happy to run it in SAS or SPSS.

Would the left-tards be this inquisitive if the data satisfied their idiotic theories about inequity?

I would still want the raw data. You cant infer from data wo knowing how the sample was obtained and then if the sample was valid and reliable and then if the test was Proper.

Stats, if done correctly arent political. They're only political when people sample or Analyze post hoc to match a Paradigm.

Bayou City said:

---

I would still want the raw data.

---

your humor is helping me with this hangover. Cheers brother

No it doesn't

Bayou City said:

---

If you give me the raw data I'm happy to run it in SAS or SPSS.

---

Called census data, look it up and go all science brilliance on it.

Logos Stick said:

---

doubledog said:

---

Bayou City said:

---

We need an F test to show lack of significant diference or interaction between income and educacion and COO. Statisticlly Whats provided shows nothing to make valid inferences. It's just data.

---

I agree this is bad comparison e.g. there are 50 white Americans (of every economic division) for every 1 Indian American (upper economic division) ...

---

That is illogical. A white supremacist country with institutionalized racism that favors the white race would never allow Indians to rise to and occupy the upper economic division in the first place.

---

I understand your satire... I just hate bad statistics...

https://www.google.com/books/edition/How_to_Lie_with_Statistics

Bayou City said:

---

I would still want the raw data. You cant infer from data wo knowing how the sample was obtained and then if the sample was valid and reliable and then if the test was Proper.

Stats, if done correctly arent political. They're only political when people sample or Analyze post hoc to match a Paradigm.

---

You can't spell. write, or type based on your first post on this thread.

And this post you've proven you have no clue how to research or even do basic searches. I dont think the data would do you any good as far as you making a point.

Bayou City said:

---

There no way to discern the effect of educacin vs income vs nationality vs income w the data provided. This is a trash projection and neither valid nor a reliabke measure

Also how was the population sampled? We need to know how they sampled before we can even start the analysis.

Can we assume normal distribucin? Perhaps it's a non liner fit

Again with the data provided you can't infer anything.

---

Yeah as somebody who does data analytics for a living, those charts are hilarious trash. Unfortunately it's also the type of trash that many execs (and the HR morons who provide such trash) aren't smart enough to see through. The one thing I take away from is that claiming "African Americans have equal opportunity because slavery was a long time ago and I'm not racist" is...well you know.

But the term racist has been watered down beyond all meaning. We get to move on.

Bayou City said:

---

We need an F test to show lack of significant diference or interaction between income and educacion and nationality and COO. Statisticlly Whats provided shows nothing to make valid inferences. It's just data.

---

The doctrine of Disparate Impact doesn't care. It assumes that race is the only thing that matters which is why that portion of the Civil Rights Act should be repealed.

Given virtually my entire lifetime, the black population has generally had codified systemic advantages in educational preference and hiring policies, one could argue something else systematic at play here countering the effects of such institutional advantages to such a great extent that they are more than negated over time. Perhaps it is well past time to take an honest objective look at those possible factors at play, and consider measures that would be more effective in addressing them, versus the past measures that seem to have been politically exploitative window dressing.

I'd like to see good and fair opportunities and outcomes for all Americans but that will require investment by all Americans in their own self development. Largely, the opportunities are there. From an early age, everyone should be encouraged to seek them and take them. I think that is where the disparity begins, and remains.

gabehcoud said:

---

Bayou City said:

---

There no way to discern the effect of educacin vs income vs nationality vs income w the data provided. This is a trash projection and neither valid nor a reliabke measure

Also how was the population sampled? We need to know how they sampled before we can even start the analysis.

Can we assume normal distribucin? Perhaps it's a non liner fit

Again with the data provided you can't infer anything.

---

The one thing I take away from is that claiming "African Americans have equal opportunity because slavery was a long time ago and I'm not racist" is...well you know.

---

Blacks have MORE than equal opportunity and have had for a long time. They are given advantages that no other race is given, in education, corporate America, government, etc.

Land of opportunity.

gabehcoud said:

---

Bayou City said:

---

There no way to discern the effect of educacin vs income vs nationality vs income w the data provided. This is a trash projection and neither valid nor a reliabke measure

Also how was the population sampled? We need to know how they sampled before we can even start the analysis.

Can we assume normal distribucin? Perhaps it's a non liner fit

Again with the data provided you can't infer anything.

---

Yeah as somebody who does data analytics for a living, those charts are hilarious trash. Unfortunately it's also the type of trash that many execs (and the HR morons who provide such trash) aren't smart enough to see through. The one thing I take away from is that claiming "African Americans have equal opportunity because slavery was a long time ago and I'm not racist" is...well you know.

---

You'll have to explain that one.

But Wipipo are keeping everyone down am I right?

Logos Stick said:

---

gabehcoud said:

---

Bayou City said:

---

There no way to discern the effect of educacin vs income vs nationality vs income w the data provided. This is a trash projection and neither valid nor a reliabke measure

Also how was the population sampled? We need to know how they sampled before we can even start the analysis.

Can we assume normal distribucin? Perhaps it's a non liner fit

Again with the data provided you can't infer anything.

---

The one thing I take away from is that claiming "African Americans have equal opportunity because slavery was a long time ago and I'm not racist" is...well you know.

---

Blacks have MORE than equal opportunity and have had for a long time. They are given advantages that no other race is given, in education, corporate America, government, etc.

---

I think a lot of these programs have added to the problem even though people were well intentioned in trying to help. For example affirmative action to get kids into elite college programs results in someone who is not prepared to succeed to get in and then they fail and in many cases drop out of college altogether whereas they could have succeed in a school and program that better fit their skills and knowledge.

We also have had government programs like welfare that worked against strong nuclear programs.

https://www.heritage.org/courts/commentary/how-affirmative-action-colleges-hurts-minority-students#:~:text=The%20harms%20of%20affirmative%20action,of%20minorities%20in%20STEM%20fields.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Given virtually my entire lifetime, the black population has generally had codified systemic advantages in educational preference and hiring policies, one could argue something else systematic at play here countering the effects of such institutional advantages to such a great extent that they are more than negated over time. Perhaps it is well past time to take an honest objective look at those possible factors at play, and consider measures that would be more effective in addressing them, versus the past measures that seem to have been politically exploitative window dressing.

I'd like to see good and fair opportunities and outcomes for all Americans but that will require investment by all Americans in their own self development. Largely, the opportunities are there. From an early age, everyone should be encouraged to seek them and take them. I think that is where the disparity begins, and remains.

---

The measures exist. Get married, Stay married, raise your own kids, personal accountability, meaning and purpose = win at life. Practically every societal pathology flows from the systematic destruction of the nuclear family and feminist ideology.

The portions of society with the least in tact nuclear families fail at life. Pick a stat...the causation is there.