Tergdor said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Tergdor said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

So it's customary for the DOJ to not refer a case to state authorities if they suspect a state crime has been committed? That seems ........ unbelievable.

---

I don't think there's anything that says they didn't.

The law moves slow.

---

Yeah, this DOJ would never leak to the press.

---

They wouldn't if they want to make sure the guy gets nailed. Leaking a criminal referral is a good way to cause problems for the state.

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Charpie said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

The gloves should be off now. Republicans should release all committee dirt they have on democrats.

---

Let's do just that. Get it all out there. R or D, time to purge the dirty ****s, no matter how high up the chain it goes.

---

I'm fine with that. But this only ever goes one way.

---

Well, when you can't get your indiscretions past a committee equally staffed with people from your own party, maybe it's time to have a hard look at your indiscretions.

---

Hey, I am all for throwing the bums out.

I am also fine with committees not making things up. I am still skeptical that Biden's DOJ couldn't file charges on the guy but a congressional committee knows the truth. Reeks of Paxton and Phelan.

---

Matt Gaetz and Ken Paxton are one and the same.

Serial cheaters and abusers of their power.

So yes, it does seem like the cases are similar

---

Yep. All that evidence…

---

Yeah, Ken Paxton didn't benefit from a $3M "donation" from a political PAC to his "judge" and fellow Republican Dan Patrick. No benefit at all.

---

BlackGold said:

---

Tergdor said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Tergdor said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

So it's customary for the DOJ to not refer a case to state authorities if they suspect a state crime has been committed? That seems ........ unbelievable.

---

I don't think there's anything that says they didn't.

The law moves slow.

---

Yeah, this DOJ would never leak to the press.

---

They wouldn't if they want to make sure the guy gets nailed. Leaking a criminal referral is a good way to cause problems for the state.

---

The naivety or denial here seems tremendous

---

annie88 said:

---

Then I want the other reports released on the other people in Congress, including Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell and Omar, AOC, Pelosi and Talib et all.

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Charpie said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

The gloves should be off now. Republicans should release all committee dirt they have on democrats.

---

Let's do just that. Get it all out there. R or D, time to purge the dirty ****s, no matter how high up the chain it goes.

---

I'm fine with that. But this only ever goes one way.

---

Well, when you can't get your indiscretions past a committee equally staffed with people from your own party, maybe it's time to have a hard look at your indiscretions.

---

Hey, I am all for throwing the bums out.

I am also fine with committees not making things up. I am still skeptical that Biden's DOJ couldn't file charges on the guy but a congressional committee knows the truth. Reeks of Paxton and Phelan.

---

Matt Gaetz and Ken Paxton are one and the same.

Serial cheaters and abusers of their power.

So yes, it does seem like the cases are similar

---

Yep. All that evidence…

---

Yeah, Ken Paxton didn't benefit from a $3M "donation" from a political PAC to his "judge" and fellow Republican Dan Patrick. No benefit at all.

---

Now do Dade Phelan/Burrows.

---

Charpie said:

---

Shoefly! said:

---

Charpie said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

The gloves should be off now. Republicans should release all committee dirt they have on democrats.

---

Let's do just that. Get it all out there. R or D, time to purge the dirty ****s, no matter how high up the chain it goes.

---

I'm fine with that. But this only ever goes one way.

---

Well, when you can't get your indiscretions past a committee equally staffed with people from your own party, maybe it's time to have a hard look at your indiscretions.

---

Hey, I am all for throwing the bums out.

I am also fine with committees not making things up. I am still skeptical that Biden's DOJ couldn't file charges on the guy but a congressional committee knows the truth. Reeks of Paxton and Phelan.

---

Matt Gaetz and Ken Paxton are one and the same.

Serial cheaters and abusers of their power.

So yes, it does seem like the cases are similar

---

Nope, not close at all but keep clinging to the liberal msm narrative! Are you still wearing a mask?

---

Resulting to personal attacks, or what you think is a personal attack, is sad when you've got nothing.

Why are you so called conservatives not expecting more from our elected reps? I voted for Guzman in the primary because I do.

But back on topic, the ethics committee should release everything about everyone.

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

One of the big issues going after Gaetz is the fact that she lied about her age. It makes it harder to get a conviction when your star witness is a liar.

---

AtticusMatlock said:

---

I don't know who is right and who is wrong in this crazy, mad world we live in. What I do know is that 15,412 embedded quotes in one post is annoying.

---

annie88 said:

---

Then I want the other reports released on the other people in Congress, including Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell and Omar, AOC, Pelosi and Talib et all.

---

annie88 said:

---

Then I want the other reports released on the other people in Congress, including Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell and Omar, AOC, Pelosi and Talib et all.

---

aggiehawg said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

One of the big issues going after Gaetz is the fact that she lied about her age. It makes it harder to get a conviction when your star witness is a liar.

---

Agree. I believe the state investigated these claims but had a proof problem. Could have been credibility issue with a he said, she said issue, etc.

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

One of the big issues going after Gaetz is the fact that she lied about her age. It makes it harder to get a conviction when your star witness is a liar.

---

FishrCoAg said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

One of the big issues going after Gaetz is the fact that she lied about her age. It makes it harder to get a conviction when your star witness is a liar.

---

Agree. I believe the state investigated these claims but had a proof problem. Could have been credibility issue with a he said, she said issue, etc.

---

I thought it was the Feds who didn't have enough to proceeed with a trafficking charge

---

FishrCoAg said:

---

You think he checked her DL??

---

FishrCoAg said:

---

You think he checked her DL??

---

Quote:

---

I thought it was the Feds who didn't have enough to proceeed with a trafficking charge

---

45-70Ag said:

---

I don't think it's garbage it's being released but whatever documents exist on swalwell banging a chicom spy should be released as well.

---

45-70Ag said:

---

I don't think it's garbage it's being released but whatever documents exist on swalwell banging a chicom spy should be released as well.

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Complete GARBAGE this is being released.

---