Johnson says Gaetz' ethics probe results are not relevant

2,133 Views | 33 Replies | Last: 15 days ago by CyclingAg82
knoxtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.


No matter how many times you repeat that statement nobody can make themselves believe that. It is so stupid that someone could say that in public, out loud.

Just say the truth Johnson, there is bad stuff in there.


Politicians, both sides of the fence, are just ********s.
f1ghtintexasaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you not believe in innocence until proven guilt? Lot of smoke. Why no conviction?
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Politicians
hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. good times create weak men. and weak men create hard times.

less virtue signaling, more vice signaling.

Birds aren’t real
Lol,lmao
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
knoxtom said:

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.


No matter how many times you repeat that statement nobody can make themselves believe that. It is so stupid that someone could say that in public, out loud.

Just say the truth Johnson, there is bad stuff in there.


Politicians, both sides of the fence, are just ********s.
What's the bad stuff? Or rather, what's the proof of the bad stuff?

Do you remember the farcical Kavanaugh/Ford hearing? Dems are going to need to bring proof for me to care one iota.
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If FJB's DOJ doesn't have him rotting in prison by now I'm declaring him 100% innocent.
Pretty sure most of you don’t know me.
zooguy96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's like people forget the media lies about things ALL the time!
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zooguy96 said:

It's like people forget the media lie about things ALL the time!
Democrats lie, they promote the lie.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He'd need to be found an Axe murderer to stoop below the ethical standards of the average Democrat.

Your party is a hive of scum and villany and has no moral high ground from which to call others unethical.

This is not hyperbole, but reality. Wake up!
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggieforester05 said:

He'd need to be found an Axe murderer to stoop below the ethical standards of the average Democrat.

Your party is a hive of scum and villany and has no moral high ground from which to call others unethical.

This is not hyperbole, but reality. Wake up!
Reading your post made me think of this cartoon:

jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
knoxtom said:

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.


No matter how many times you repeat that statement nobody can make themselves believe that. It is so stupid that someone could say that in public, out loud.

Just say the truth Johnson, there is bad stuff in there.


Politicians, both sides of the fence, are just ********s.
Are you prepared to defend the ethical actions of Merrick Garland? Of Eric Holder?

How about Joseph Robinette Biden? Or Nancy Pelosi? Or Adam Schiff?

That's a mighty large glass house you're throwing rocks from, pal.

Or in other words, I don't give one @#$* about your little OP.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You guys lie so much, it doesn't turn the head anymore.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
knoxtom said:

Just say the truth Johnson, there is bad stuff in there.

Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
zooguy96 said:

It's like people forget the media lies about things ALL the time!
Oh how quickly people forget -

Golden showers, pee tapes, Russia, Russia, Russia. 100% fabrication by a political opponent and the deep state.

Hunter's laptop is a Russian disinformation campaign.

There are mountains of evidence that will prove Ken Paxton is guilty, but when the trial comes up it is proven to all be hearsay and rumors.

Republicans need to remember that this is how Democrats operate. They like to make up fabrications about Republicans and win the court of public opinion to put political pressure on the squishy, weak ones they know will fold like a cheap suit.

Maybe Gaetz is guilty and maybe he isn't. But I don't believe one word that comes from Democrats or the media until I see inconclusive proof.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

zooguy96 said:

It's like people forget the media lies about things ALL the time!
Oh how quickly people forget -

Golden showers, pee tapes, Russia, Russia, Russia. 100% fabrication by a political opponent and the deep state.

Hunter's laptop is a Russian disinformation campaign.

There are mountains of evidence that will prove Ken Paxton is guilty, but when the trial comes up it is proven to all be hearsay and rumors.

Republicans need to remember that this is how Democrats operate. They like to make up fabrications about Republicans and win the court of public opinion to put political pressure on the squishy, weak ones they know will fold like a cheap suit.

Maybe Gaetz is guilty and maybe he isn't. But I don't believe one word that comes from Democrats or the media until I see inconclusive proof.
Yep
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
William Foster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rockdoc said:

You guys lie so much, it doesn't turn the head anymore.
It is part of their wicked and depraved religion. It is actually noble and vurtuous to lie for the cause.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
knoxtom said:

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.


No matter how many times you repeat that statement nobody can make themselves believe that. It is so stupid that someone could say that in public, out loud.

Just say the truth Johnson, there is bad stuff in there.


Politicians, both sides of the fence, are just ********s.
So you think a highly partisan DOJ controlled by Biden, Obama, and Garland looked at the allegations against Gaetz, determined there was nothing there to go after him over, but he's guilty?

Next time you're going to spam the board, maybe try to apply some critical thinking.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Compared to murdering babies, congressional ethical violations seem pretty trivial. Maybe the left should tone down the faux outrage.
The best way to keep evil men from wielding great power is to not create great power in the first place.
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The end always justifies the means with Marxists. Truth be damned.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
knoxtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FTAG 2000 said:


So you think a highly partisan DOJ controlled by Biden, Obama, and Garland looked at the allegations against Gaetz, determined there was nothing there to go after him over, but he's guilty?

Next time you're going to spam the board, maybe try to apply some critical thinking.


Oh I see, why didn't I think of that.

You are saying that since the DOJ didn't bring any criminal charges then there must be nothing. And since there is nothing, Johnson decided he didn't want it made public since the nothing would be bad for Gaetz, or bad for the Republicans, or bad for someone.

I am afraid you lost me again, why exactly would they not publish it if there was nothing there?


Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
knoxtom said:

FTAG 2000 said:


So you think a highly partisan DOJ controlled by Biden, Obama, and Garland looked at the allegations against Gaetz, determined there was nothing there to go after him over, but he's guilty?

Next time you're going to spam the board, maybe try to apply some critical thinking.


Oh I see, why didn't I think of that.

You are saying that since the DOJ didn't bring any criminal charges then there must be nothing. And since there is nothing, Johnson decided he didn't want it made public since the nothing would be bad for Gaetz, or bad for the Republicans, or bad for someone.
I think he is saying they've made up crimes and jailed political opposition for four years. Why would they give Gaetz a pass?

They're still arresting people for touring the Capitol on January 6.
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump should say, FINE we'll go with Jim Jordan!

Speaking of which and not to derail, does he fit in anywhere with this proposed A team?
Pretty sure most of you don’t know me.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
knoxtom said:

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.


No matter how many times you repeat that statement nobody can make themselves believe that. It is so stupid that someone could say that in public, out loud.

Just say the truth Johnson, there is bad stuff in there.


Politicians, both sides of the fence, are just ********s.
Dont care, just grind Democrats to dust
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jack Squat 83 said:

If FJB's DOJ doesn't have him rotting in prison by now I'm declaring him 100% innocent.
Or he had other names.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
knoxtom said:

FTAG 2000 said:


So you think a highly partisan DOJ controlled by Biden, Obama, and Garland looked at the allegations against Gaetz, determined there was nothing there to go after him over, but he's guilty?

Next time you're going to spam the board, maybe try to apply some critical thinking.


Oh I see, why didn't I think of that.

You are saying that since the DOJ didn't bring any criminal charges then there must be nothing. And since there is nothing, Johnson decided he didn't want it made public since the nothing would be bad for Gaetz, or bad for the Republicans, or bad for someone.

I am afraid you lost me again, why exactly would they not publish it if there was nothing there?




That's what I'M saying. They've (the DOJ and everyone short of the Space Cadets) brought criminal charges against Trump for nothing, yet didn't have anything to charge Gaetz with despite the rhetoric?

They would not publish it because they don't want lies repeated. If you can't figure that out, you need to go back to the football forum.
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How can anyone claim guilt or innocence without seeing the results of the investigation? If there's nothing to the investigation and he is clearly as innocent as a five year old school boy, great. Release the damn thing and shut everyone up.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PanzerAggie06 said:

How can anyone claim guilt or innocence without seeing the results of the investigation? If there's nothing to the investigation and he is clearly as innocent as a five year old school boy, great. Release the damn thing and shut everyone up.
He's innocent until proven guilty, especially with ZERO evidence and the DOJ taking a pass after the investigation.

But liberals believed BJ Ford. So it's pretty on the nose to see you believing your next big conspiracy theory based on no facts.
Geminiv
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You people are wild. Like some of your seriously only have righteous indication depending on a R or D in front of their name. Like literally defend one and attack the other based on the exact same allegations.
Ag in Tiger Country
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
knoxtom said:

FTAG 2000 said:


So you think a highly partisan DOJ controlled by Biden, Obama, and Garland looked at the allegations against Gaetz, determined there was nothing there to go after him over, but he's guilty?

Next time you're going to spam the board, maybe try to apply some critical thinking.


Oh I see, why didn't I think of that.

You are saying that since the DOJ didn't bring any criminal charges then there must be nothing. And since there is nothing, Johnson decided he didn't want it made public since the nothing would be bad for Gaetz, or bad for the Republicans, or bad for someone.

I am afraid you lost me again, why exactly would they not publish it if there was nothing there?





LOOK AT THE ABC NEWS THREAD; you have folks (your kindred spirits) reporting an allegation as being probative evidence of guilt without any evidentiary finding whenever it comes to Republicans. It's a sinister but all to common practice of controlling the narrative, especially in light of the Democrats' history of manufacturing bull**** to rebut factual evidence &/or to lend apparent legitimacy to meritless claims. So, maybe Johnson doesn't want to give your fellow dumbasses a sound bite to regurgitate against Gaetz, thereby tarnishing the supposed neutral fact-finding mission of a congressional hearing.
Ag in Tiger Country
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just saw your comment, which was posted while I was typing mine; great minds think alike!!
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

PanzerAggie06 said:

How can anyone claim guilt or innocence without seeing the results of the investigation? If there's nothing to the investigation and he is clearly as innocent as a five year old school boy, great. Release the damn thing and shut everyone up.
He's innocent until proven guilty, especially with ZERO evidence and the DOJ taking a pass after the investigation.

But liberals believed BJ Ford. So it's pretty on the nose to see you believing your next big conspiracy theory based on no facts.


I believe nothing about this as I have not seen the results of the investigation. I'm on the fence. He's innocent in the eyes of the judicial system none of here are bound by that. We can believe guilt or innocence or be completely neutral on the issue.
Gator92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Should do the same if he's asked about RFK Jr...


MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
F it! Let's get 'PizzaGate', Podesta bros and associated ilk back on the front burner.

Wanna play?? Let's play...
CyclingAg82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jrdaustin said:

knoxtom said:

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.

The probe of ethics is not relevant to the position of attorney general.


No matter how many times you repeat that statement nobody can make themselves believe that. It is so stupid that someone could say that in public, out loud.

Just say the truth Johnson, there is bad stuff in there.


Politicians, both sides of the fence, are just ********s.
Are you prepared to defend the ethical actions of Merrick Garland? Of Eric Holder?

How about Joseph Robinette Biden? Or Nancy Pelosi? Or Adam Schiff?

That's a mighty large glass house you're throwing rocks from, pal.

Or in other words, I don't give one @#$* about your little OP.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.