C@LAg said:
there was no 12MM fake votes cast last time, if that is what you are implying. anything that large would be outright obvious even to a blind democrat.
trump is about even to what he pulled last time. Which means he ACTUALLY lost some votes from the group that voted for him last time, which have been made up by the huge swing in Latino, jews and blacks (plus some Muslims) that voted Trump this time. those are all lost Kamala votes because she sucks.
Kamala was just a ****ty candidate. The Dem base, in spite of being vocal to all hell, turned out in much smaller number for her than for Biden. Plus the aforementioned blacks, Jews Latinos that switched over to Team Trump.
And yes. the amount of cheating was significantly decreased from last time.
No huge conspiracy here.
Guess there weren't enough Zuckbucks to pay the ballot mules from NJ over the bridge to Philly this time. If all of the places True the Vote found evidence of ballot mules, Philly was far and away the highest in number. The same mules would cross over the bridge and hit up several drop boxes...n the middle of the night.Dan Scott said:
Philadelphia had 30K fewer total votes. Harris lost 40K and Trump gained 10K.
dermdoc said:
It actually worked out better for the repubs.and Trump. He now has the Senate and probably the House. As well as the SC.
And I think the dems will be very careful after the convincing election to start impeachment stuff. The American people have spoken. Loud and clear.
God is good.
TravelAg2004 said:C@LAg said:
there was no 12MM fake votes cast last time, if that is what you are implying. anything that large would be outright obvious even to a blind democrat.
trump is about even to what he pulled last time. Which means he ACTUALLY lost some votes from the group that voted for him last time, which have been made up by the huge swing in Latino, jews and blacks (plus some Muslims) that voted Trump this time. those are all lost Kamala votes because she sucks.
Kamala was just a ****ty candidate. The Dem base, in spite of being vocal to all hell, turned out in much smaller number for her than for Biden. Plus the aforementioned blacks, Jews Latinos that switched over to Team Trump.
And yes. the amount of cheating was significantly decreased from last time.
No huge conspiracy here.
But across 50 states, that's an average of 250k votes. I agree, 12M sounds ridiculous until you realize you could add 500k in 25 states and achieve the same thing.
Do I think there was a central, coordinated effort to cheat? No… But a bunch of local groups doing "everything they could" to ensure Trump wasn't re-elected? Absolutely!
I do think it would be interesting to see vote totals between 2016, 2020 and 2024 on a county by county basis. I'd be willing to bet you'd see most counties follow the average increase we see around 5% and then a select few counties will have a spike in 2020.
They failed to cheat as well, we got it.Dan Scott said:
In Texas, Joe Biden received 5.3M votes. Harris will get 4.8M votes. Voter turnout is about the same.
In New York. Biden got 5.2M voters and Trump 3.3M votes. Harris will get 4.4M votes and Trump 3.4M votes.
In California Biden got 11M votes and Trump got 6M. Estimated Harris will get 9.7M votes and Trump will get 6.5M votes.
The 81M is largely Dems running up the vote in blue states. They didn't come out this time.
Those parallels are indeed so far the best argument for doubting the identical "upshot" of the Great Lakes states group in 2020.Ag in Tiger Country said:
"tHeRe WaS nO cHeAtInG iN 2020!!!!"
Meanwhile, Maduro's vote tracking trend is practically IDENTICAL to Biden's miraculous albeit statistically impossible jump in 2020; given such & the fact that every civilized Western nation condemns Venezuela's fraudulent election, I really don't understand digging in your heals to insist 2020 was the 'most safe & secure election ever', especially when its importance was to 'save democracy from Hitler'!!! Give me a ****ing break!
BAN NARCISSISTIC BELLIGERENCE EVERYWHERE!!!!
Ag in Tiger Country said:
"tHeRe WaS nO cHeAtInG iN 2020!!!!"
Meanwhile, Maduro's vote tracking trend is practically IDENTICAL to Biden's miraculous albeit statistically impossible jump in 2020; given such & the fact that every civilized Western nation condemns Venezuela's fraudulent election, I really don't understand digging in your heals to insist 2020 was the 'most safe & secure election ever', especially when its importance was to 'save democracy from Hitler'!!! Give me a ****ing break!
BAN NARCISSISTIC BELLIGERENCE EVERYWHERE!!!!
Dan Scott said:
In kentucky a solid red state.
Biden 770K votes, Trump 1.3M votes
Harris 700k voted, Trump 1.3M votes.
No reason to cheat in Kentucky. Harris got 70K fewer votes. There was no motivation to vote Blue like in 2020.
dermdoc said:Dan Scott said:
In kentucky a solid red state.
Biden 770K votes, Trump 1.3M votes
Harris 700k voted, Trump 1.3M votes.
No reason to cheat in Kentucky. Harris got 70K fewer votes. There was no motivation to vote Blue like in 2020.
Why was there no blue motivation? She was running against the same guy.
AVX Engineer said:
Biden supposedly got 82M votes in 20.
Historically the total votes cast have increased each presidential election year. Pretty linear by the way. 20 was a big anomaly.
So, why did Harris get 12M votes less than Biden?
Why are we back on the predictive line with this election?
What possibly could have been the difference?
Thank you for everyone who poll watched.
Thank you to state officials who implemented election law changes to protect the vote.
dermdoc said:Dan Scott said:
In kentucky a solid red state.
Biden 770K votes, Trump 1.3M votes
Harris 700k voted, Trump 1.3M votes.
No reason to cheat in Kentucky. Harris got 70K fewer votes. There was no motivation to vote Blue like in 2020.
Why was there no blue motivation? She was running against the same guy.
JB99 said:AVX Engineer said:
Biden supposedly got 82M votes in 20.
Historically the total votes cast have increased each presidential election year. Pretty linear by the way. 20 was a big anomaly.
So, why did Harris get 12M votes less than Biden?
Why are we back on the predictive line with this election?
What possibly could have been the difference?
Thank you for everyone who poll watched.
Thank you to state officials who implemented election law changes to protect the vote.
I don't think they cheated in the sense that those votes weren't real people. I think they made mail in voting so easy combined with massive ballot harvesting they got a ton of people to vote who normally don't because they are lazy and apathetic. The rules didn't allow for that this cycle.
Dan Scott said:
In Mississippi, Biden got 540K votes and Trump 756K
Harris got 422K votes and Trump 690K votes.
Lower turnout.
This right here. 31 million mail-in ballots sent out without requests for them. I think millions were filled out by persons other than the person intended.Stinky T said:
How many people do you think would be surprised to find out that they voted in 2020? I bet you it is a much higher number than you think. There were way too many ballots in circulation before the 2020 election to ever be considered secure.
Dan Scott said:
Is there an explanation why Trump gained 11M votes in 2020?
Any 6th grade math class could figure it out.AVX Engineer said:
I'm a data guy and 2020 sticks out like a sore thumb.
2024 is more consistent with the historical trend.
Do you really think that many democrats didn't vote?
Wait for the postmortem. Watched Baris yesterday and the no or low propensity voters, defined as 2 or fewer elections comprised nice percentage of Trump's early vote. The pollsters (besides Baris and maybe Rasmussen) could not find those people because they were not on anyone's radar besides the Republicans and third parties participating in the GOTV efforts in the swing states.wannaggie said:
I think the most likely Occam's Razor answer is -- you still had something like 60 million people who were forcibly unemployed due to covid shutdowns. Without covid, none of those BLM protests would have been so large and sustained and coordinated across multiple cities. It would have been short outbreaks in a few major metropolitan areas, and burned out very quickly.
The total number of voters has always been significantly lower than the total number of ELIGIBLE voters. The major party doctrines, for their own narratives, always come up with all kinds of complex reasons like disenfranchisement, intimidation, etc. I think it's quite simple. Humans are lazy and probably every 4 years vaguely tell themselves they intend to vote THIS time, but there's always a reason not to go early vote today, and then election day comes and they decide they don't want to stand in line or they can't get off work early or whatever. This mentality is much more common among hourly employees, retail employees, service industry, etc. Folks who don't have the flexibility of a salaried person who can just run over to a polling place whenever they have an hour between meetings -- AND exactly the folks who were out of work during 2020, while the professional/salaried folks were able to quickly switch to WFH/Zoom/Teams and carry on with the workweek.
I think it's unlikely there were 18 million manufactured votes. I think it's that the entire planet was gripped in covid fear and felt a greater sense of "we're in this together" (especially among collective leftists) PLUS, quite simply, democrat voters were just sitting around bingeing Netflix and scrolling Twitter, or had switched to self-scheduled gigs like Uber, Favor, Doordash, and OnlyFans where they could arrange their day whatever way they liked.
2020 was the first election in living memory when it was trivially easy for everyone to get to the polls - including all those people who mean well but never quite hit the tipping point of proactively making it happen.
We don't have to go hunting for a big nefarious conspiracy. The banal simplicity of human indolence is all around us every day.