What's stopping her from wearing her earrings/earbuds with someone giving her the answers? (Nothing; she's a cheat and will keep cheating and lying)

aggiegrad01 said:

---

What's stopping her from wearing her earrings/earbuds with someone giving her the answers? (Nothing; she's a cheat and will keep cheating and lying)

---

If she is getting info from her earrings, she should strongly reconsider that strategy because it ain't working.

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

---

aggiegrad01 said:

---

What's stopping her from wearing her earrings/earbuds with someone giving her the answers? (Nothing; she's a cheat and will keep cheating and lying)

---

If she is getting info from her earrings, she should strongly reconsider that strategy because it ain't working.

---

Well she did well in the debate. The debate performance is the only thing keeping her afloat right now

That assumes the person at the other end of the Bluetooth has some sense. But, that person works for/was hired by Kamala Harris and there's no reason to think they are an aberration. The wheels are coming off.

Her entire X feed yesterday was targeting black men..that screams big problems nationally

— AJ 🦆 (@AjApplegoose) October 16, 2024

Quote:

---

We're at a point in the election cycle where these things should be running like well-oiled machines. The fact that Harris' Pennsylvania HQ isn't at this stage is a deeply troubling sign for her campaign. Not that I'm complaining, of course, but in an ideal world for Kamala HQ, lessons would have been learned from her last embarrassing presidential run.

But as we've said before, Kamala Harris was and always will be her own worst enemy. Would be something else if that inconvenient fact ultimately proved to be her campaign's undoing.

---

nortex97 said:

---

That assumes the person at the other end of the Bluetooth has some sense. But, that person works for/was hired by Kamala Harris and there's no reason to think they are an aberration. The wheels are coming off.

Her entire X feed yesterday was targeting black men..that screams big problems nationally

— AJ 🦆 (@AjApplegoose) October 16, 2024

Quote:

---

We're at a point in the election cycle where these things should be running like well-oiled machines. The fact that Harris' Pennsylvania HQ isn't at this stage is a deeply troubling sign for her campaign. Not that I'm complaining, of course, but in an ideal world for Kamala HQ, lessons would have been learned from her last embarrassing presidential run.

But as we've said before, Kamala Harris was and always will be her own worst enemy. Would be something else if that inconvenient fact ultimately proved to be her campaign's undoing.

---

---

The Dems were very stupid to allow her to take the nomination instead of someone like Newsom, Whitmer or anyone not associated with the Biden admin.

• She cannot escape the last 4 years. No amount of media trying to paint her as a fresh candidate will erase that.
• She has no "core" or "center". She's an empty suit constantly shifting to which way the wind is blowing.
• She came into this with no platform. For weeks her website sat blank and then any policy positions were nebulous like "opportunity economy". There are no specifics and everything is "Trump bad".
• Because of this, once the newness of her wore off and she had to actually work to win, she's flailing at anything she thinks the day's polls say she's weak on. Recent example of her ridiculous 5-point plan for black men.

Trump has been consistent on 3-4 things that are paramount to many citizens -- economy, immigration, crime, foreign wars. while he has sidebars, for the most part, he's hammered these things consistently while she can't stay on topic with anything.

That was sort of one of halperin's points (with Tucker), that there was intense debate in their 'camps' for a couple weeks about a two step process to avoid this, but ultimately no one wanted to run against the sitting black female VP last second so it wound up going to her almost by default, despite concern from folks like Obama etc.

Won't get a true interview until you get her in with Rogan. That will be must watch TV. I wonder how long it will take Rogan to realize how awful she is.

Meanwhile, it seems like Trump is living his best life in the podcast format. Conversations with people that want him to be there just to talk who realize how insane it is to get a former president on his/her podcast.

Line Ate Member said:

---

Won't get a true interview until you get her in with Rogan. That will be must watch TV. I wonder how long it will take Rogan to realize how awful she is.

Meanwhile, it seems like Trump is living his best life in the podcast format. Conversations with people that want him to be there just to talk who realize how insane it is to get a former president on his/her podcast.

---

I dont see Rogan doing it, to be honest. He may have Trump on, but I promise you that Harris' handlers will have a list of off limit topics, questions and time limits that Rogan will not abide by. He did not become the number one podcaster in the world bending the knee.

Now, if you want real must see TV and the most viewed podcast in the world, bring on Harris and then have Tulsi walk in 5 minutes later.

Am I the only person that just wants unbiased interviews? I would think a good reporter could do this. You already know the questions you are asking. You pretty much know how she will answer the questions. So follow up with another question.

Line Ate Member said:

---

Won't get a true interview until you get her in with Rogan. That will be must watch TV. I wonder how long it will take Rogan to realize how awful she is.

---

Not. Long.

This thread isn't "Official" for tonight's event.

Hoyt Ag said:

---

Line Ate Member said:

---

Won't get a true interview until you get her in with Rogan. That will be must watch TV. I wonder how long it will take Rogan to realize how awful she is.

Meanwhile, it seems like Trump is living his best life in the podcast format. Conversations with people that want him to be there just to talk who realize how insane it is to get a former president on his/her podcast.

---

I dont see Rogan doing it, to be honest. He may have Trump on, but I promise you that Harris' handlers will have a list of off limit topics, questions and time limits that Rogan will not abide by. He did not become the number one podcaster in the world bending the knee.

Now, if you want real must see TV and the most viewed podcast in the world, bring on Harris and then have Tulsi walk in 5 minutes later.

---

Ha Rogan wouldn't want to do that. He would be cleaning up scared Harris pee.

it would be good in these legacy media interviews if beforehand they made clear the agreed upon parameters of the discussion. Just so viewers know what's been taken off the table.

Deputy Travis Junior said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Bret is an insider and member of the UniParty.

---

Not saying he's the bee's knees, but he's enough of a journalist and a conservative to push her when she gives ridiculous answers (eg what's your plan for inflation? Well I grew up in a neighborhood where everybody took care of their yard). At least I think he is.

I don't think this goes well for her.

---

Told you guys.

He's a fantastic journalist. Some don't like him because he's a big meanie to Trump. But he is tough and fair. He destroyed Harris!

Hogties said:

---

sam callahan said:

---

He needs to ask her, "You've had more access to President Biden than anyone else. When did you start noticing his mental and why didn't you raised concerns earlier?"

---

This is a critical question that everyone wants to know the answer to but it hasn't even been asked. Will Brett ask it? Doubtful.

---

So navy bad takes on page one.