T-Rexican said:

---

Lol, I answered the question and then had to start answering whataboutism from people. You asked why it is considered weird, and I answered. You didn't like it, so you deflected and projected.

---

No you made up bull**** connections where there are none.

"weird" is totally the new "deplorable" - y'all should embrace it proudly. Who will be the first to make a killing off "weirdos for trump" t-shirts at the next rally??

agjacent said:

---

"weird" is totally the new "deplorable" - y'all should embrace it proudly. Who will be the first to make a killing off "weirdos for trump" t-shirts at the next rally??

---

Or "childless cat ladies for Harris". In fact I just Googled it, and I got so many hits I doubt there is big money to made.

It is trying to make her 5th grade response look presidential - prob not a talking point , just an MSM response to try to make the childish response appear to be important

AggieDub14 said:

---

Calling people weird is a bullying tactic? After the abhorrent statements made by Trump and his supporters (this board) this statement cannot be taken seriously. Republicans can dish it all day, but upon being called weird, they show they have the thinnest skin imaginable.

---

Wait...so if Trump is a bully, that means that no one else can be a bully back?

THAT is your position?

Did you understand that it is possible for both Trump to be a bully and the Democrat party to be a bully at the same time?

BTW, no one here is whining about what the Dems are doing. They're laughing at them for this...

Ag with kids said:

---

T-Rexican said:

---

Are you equally upset at Kushner receiving 2 billion from Saudi Arabia?

---

Kushner didn't receiving 2 billion.

The Saudis invested 2 billion in his hedge fund.

However, Kushner had years of experience in the business...

---

Correct, thank you. The ignorant minions parrot this $2 billion number without knowing the facts. The Democratic Party leadership and their minions are constantly trying to perfect the art of obfuscation(read lying)

Hungry Ojos said:

---

Such an obvious trap is being laid here and I can't believe we are about to take the bait.

This is all being done to prompt the easy response of campaign ads that initially show Harris calling us weird, then they'll show pics of all the freaks they interact with on a daily basis as a rebuttal, only for the media to then immediate flip the script on us and call us bigots, anti-gay, etc. for our messaging.

And we're gonna fall for it. Just watch.

---

edit to add agjacent beat me to post this.
An enterprising soul might start selling t-shirts proclaiming, "Proud to be Weird".

T-Rexican said:

---

Lol, I answered the question and then had to start answering whataboutism from people. You asked why it is considered weird, and I answered. You didn't like it, so you deflected and projected.

---

No, they challenged your reasoning and you let everyone know you don't have any.

StandUpforAmerica said:

---

“JD Vance is weird” pic.twitter.com/5iKaLk5Ugs

— Extremely Careless (@Shanghaibeast) July 29, 2024

---

And?

This is all 'normal' behavior in the mind of leftists. It's so normal that you're a radical for not embracing it.

Hungry Ojos said:

---

Such an obvious trap is being laid here and I can't believe we are about to take the bait.

This is all being done to prompt the easy response of campaign ads that initially show Harris calling us weird, then they'll show pics of all the freaks they interact with on a daily basis as a rebuttal, only for the media to then immediate flip the script on us and call us bigots, anti-gay, etc. for our messaging.

And we're gonna fall for it. Just watch.

---

When the left has a stranglehold on what people see: everything is a potential "trap" that'll be "used against us."

Fine. Let them call us all the names that they have for the past 30 years. It has become white noise which no longer moves the needle. That's not to excuse it: they're dehumanizing us, but it is to say they're going to do it anyway so why *****foot around in fear of it?

The swing voters are who matter here, and if the Karen that's trying to trans Jerome's kid is calling us a bigot… well… it may just HELP to break Jerome from preconceptions.

i'm sure many people think vance's stated positions that:

- people without children have no stake in the future
- people should get "extra" votes for every child they have; and
- women should stay in violent marriages for the sake of their children

are totally normal and not "weird" at all.

Jared is a legit rock star.

I was a little surprised that Ivanka married him. I'm not anymore.

agjacent said:

---

i'm sure many people think vance's stated positions that:

- people without children have no stake in the future
- people should get "extra" votes for every child they have; and
- women should stay in violent marriages for the sake of their children

are totally normal and not "weird" at all.

---

I agree that people without children and therefore no prospect of having grandchildren do in fact has different worldviews than those of us that do. Believe that completely. They have no real skin in the future.

Don't know about the "extra votes" thing but I would be against it.

Can you provide a link to the part about staying in violent marriages?

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

---

T-Rexican said:

---

Are you equally upset at Kushner receiving 2 billion from Saudi Arabia?

---

Not at all, he had a history of brokering real estate and development deals prior to that. What background did Hunter have speaking Ukrainian and working in O&G?

---

Need to call the cops after that whatbaoutism beatdown!!!

Urban Ag said:

---

agjacent said:

---

i'm sure many people think vance's stated positions that:

- people without children have no stake in the future
- people should get "extra" votes for every child they have; and
- women should stay in violent marriages for the sake of their children

are totally normal and not "weird" at all.

---

I agree that people without children and therefore no prospect of having grandchildren do in fact has different worldviews than those of us that do. Believe that completely. They have no real skin in the future.

Don't know about the "extra votes" thing but I would be against it.

Can you provide a link to the part about staying in violent marriages?

---

Yeah - not really sure how anyone can claim that a cat lady is equally invested in the future as a mother of 4…

JD is so weird to these people:

“JD Vance is weird” pic.twitter.com/SSCfsLd7KM

— 🇺🇸𝓒𝓱𝓪𝓭🇺🇸𝓗𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓸𝓷🇺🇸 (@Texas_jeep__guy) July 29, 2024

Dems are not only WEIRD, they are REPUGNANT.

agjacent said:

---

i'm sure many people think vance's stated positions that:

- people without children have no stake in the future
- people should get "extra" votes for every child they have; and
- women should stay in violent marriages for the sake of their children

are totally normal and not "weird" at all.

---

Dropped without a link.

Classic leftist post.

bobbranco said:

---

agjacent said:

---

i'm sure many people think vance's stated positions that:

- people without children have no stake in the future
- people should get "extra" votes for every child they have; and
- women should stay in violent marriages for the sake of their children

are totally normal and not "weird" at all.

---

Dropped without a link.

Classic leftist post.

---

since googling seems to be beyond your abilities:

JD Vance said Kamala Harris is a “childless cat lady” who is “miserable” with her life because she didn’t have children, and that not having children means that she doesn’t have “a direct stake” in America.

Should really help win over women voters, huh? pic.twitter.com/VuBprI6aEg

— Roshan Rinaldi (@Roshan_Rinaldi) July 23, 2024

JD Vance says Americans without children should “face the consequences and the reality” and not get “nearly the same voice” in democracy

Vance: “Let’s give votes to all children in this country, but let’s give control over those votes to the parents of those children.” pic.twitter.com/uYS6NcGkKn

— Pat Rynard (@patrynard) July 24, 2024

Donald Trump just selected JD Vance as his running mate.

Here is a video of him implying that women should stay in violent marriages "for the kids."

He wants to eliminate no-fault marriage, which would make it harder for women to leave abusive relationships. pic.twitter.com/1y1r5dwjCt

— Jeff Michael 🥥🌴 (@ZeoVGM) July 15, 2024

agjacent said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

agjacent said:

---

i'm sure many people think vance's stated positions that:

- people without children have no stake in the future
- people should get "extra" votes for every child they have; and
- women should stay in violent marriages for the sake of their children

are totally normal and not "weird" at all.

---

Dropped without a link.

Classic leftist post.

---

since googling seems to be beyond your abilities:

JD Vance said Kamala Harris is a “childless cat lady” who is “miserable” with her life because she didn’t have children, and that not having children means that she doesn’t have “a direct stake” in America.

Should really help win over women voters, huh? pic.twitter.com/VuBprI6aEg

— Roshan Rinaldi (@Roshan_Rinaldi) July 23, 2024

JD Vance says Americans without children should “face the consequences and the reality” and not get “nearly the same voice” in democracy

Vance: “Let’s give votes to all children in this country, but let’s give control over those votes to the parents of those children.” pic.twitter.com/uYS6NcGkKn

— Pat Rynard (@patrynard) July 24, 2024

Donald Trump just selected JD Vance as his running mate.

Here is a video of him implying that women should stay in violent marriages "for the kids."

He wants to eliminate no-fault marriage, which would make it harder for women to leave abusive relationships. pic.twitter.com/1y1r5dwjCt

— Jeff Michael 🥥🌴 (@ZeoVGM) July 15, 2024

---

Thanks. For doing the right thing and following up. Will review and determine if they are out of context.

Cat lady comment is appropriate. Not sorry.

Get Off My Lawn said:

---

Urban Ag said:

---

agjacent said:

---

i'm sure many people think vance's stated positions that:

- people without children have no stake in the future
- people should get "extra" votes for every child they have; and
- women should stay in violent marriages for the sake of their children

are totally normal and not "weird" at all.

---

I agree that people without children and therefore no prospect of having grandchildren do in fact has different worldviews than those of us that do. Believe that completely. They have no real skin in the future.

Don't know about the "extra votes" thing but I would be against it.

Can you provide a link to the part about staying in violent marriages?

---

Yeah - not really sure how anyone can claim that a cat lady is equally invested in the future as a mother of 4…

---

Hey, was George Washington invested in the future of this country? He didn't have any biological children either. He was only a step-parent, just like Kamala Harris.

Are you truly so divorced from reality that you don't believe childless people could be invested in the future for its own sake? Or imagine that childless people don't have children in their lives whom they love, and in whose futures they are personally invested? No childless person was ever a loving aunt or uncle or step-parent? How weird of you, and JD Vance.

You know who *truly* has "no skin in the game"? People who believe in The Rapture. Talk about people with zero reason to care about the future of this planet and the people living on it.

I was going to say people who don't pay any federal income tax have no skin in the game. I would bet people who believe in the rapture probably donate more to charity than people who pay no income tax so I would say they do care. Guessing most pay income tax and donate more.

Call me whatever you want, but I'm not the one who puts on a dress while having a wanger.

The libs love weird... So they love Vance?

https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2020/4/3/21199768/weird-olga-khazan-outsiders-mental-health-introverted

"He is just weird! okay. … OKAY! … ?

I said HE's WEIRD! Got IT!?"

agjacent said:

---

You know who *truly* has "no skin in the game"? People who believe in The Rapture. Talk about people with zero reason to care about the future of this planet and the people living on it.

---

Tell me you know nothing about Christians...

The leftist emotional tantrum decision making is both amusing and terrifying because they vote.

Its like the little emo goth kids from South Park grew up and became politically active

agjacent said:

---

Get Off My Lawn said:

---

Urban Ag said:

---

agjacent said:

---

i'm sure many people think vance's stated positions that:

- people without children have no stake in the future
- people should get "extra" votes for every child they have; and
- women should stay in violent marriages for the sake of their children

are totally normal and not "weird" at all.

---

I agree that people without children and therefore no prospect of having grandchildren do in fact has different worldviews than those of us that do. Believe that completely. They have no real skin in the future.

Don't know about the "extra votes" thing but I would be against it.

Can you provide a link to the part about staying in violent marriages?

---

Yeah - not really sure how anyone can claim that a cat lady is equally invested in the future as a mother of 4…

---

Hey, was George Washington invested in the future of this country? He didn't have any biological children either. He was only a step-parent, just like Kamala Harris.

Are you truly so divorced from reality that you don't believe childless people could be invested in the future for its own sake? Or imagine that childless people don't have children in their lives whom they love, and in whose futures they are personally invested? No childless person was ever a loving aunt or uncle or step-parent? How weird of you, and JD Vance.

You know who *truly* has "no skin in the game"? People who believe in The Rapture. Talk about people with zero reason to care about the future of this planet and the people living on it.

---

If you have adopted kids you should get a tax break. That occurs today. Making a mountain out of a molehill.

agjacent said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

agjacent said:

---

i'm sure many people think vance's stated positions that:

- people without children have no stake in the future
- people should get "extra" votes for every child they have; and
- women should stay in violent marriages for the sake of their children

are totally normal and not "weird" at all.

---

Dropped without a link.

Classic leftist post.

---

since googling seems to be beyond your abilities:

---

Cat ladies are weird and are usually Democrats. Embrace your weird cat ladies. LOL.

Did some googling.

Vance advocates for continuing the child tax credit. Not a bad idea. If you want the tax credit adopt of start popping out some offspring.

Vance is being cruel to the childless, LOL, for proposing more votes for parents. He's not being cruel. My experience is that a large majority of unmarried and childless woman in their 40's are loons.

Vance claiming women staying in violent marriages? Snopes shot you down.

Per usual another leftist did not vet BS claims. LOL.

We're the weird ones . Riiiiiiight.

Straight out of Alinsky's rules for radicals.

You people don't understand...

Calling Republicans weird is their "kryptonite"...

Quote:

---

The Democrats' use of "weird" turns the Republicans' self-image on its head. For years, the GOP has positioned itself as the party of "real Americans," fighting to reestablish "real" American values. "Weird" points out how many of their positions, including but not limited to their antiabortion stance and historic refusal to support broader access to health- and childcare, put them at odds with a majority of Americans.


Vance's openly crackpot assertion that people who do not procreate are somehow less sane, and less American, than people who do is most definitely weird. As is Project 2025's demand that a two-person, male-led, heterosexual, cisgender nuclear family should be the American standard. Republican leaders' obsession with the "dangers" of drag queens, transgender people and the LGBTQ community in general makes them the outliers in a society that, particularly among its younger members, is generally supportive and accepting.

---

They think that it gives them POWER...

Quote:

---

So why are "weird" and its increasingly popular cousin "creepy" freaking Republicans out in a way that "fascist" or "authoritarian" never did?

Power. "Weird" does not convey a sense of power. Indeed, in its current usage, it is a dismissive term, a labeling of bizarre behavior or beliefs that implies not a threat but a diminishment.

---

StandUpforAmerica said:

---

“JD Vance is weird” pic.twitter.com/5iKaLk5Ugs

— Extremely Careless (@Shanghaibeast) July 29, 2024

---

yeah it's definitely weird to curate a collection of pictures of lgbt people and make a collage of it and post it online, this is precisely what they mean. conservatives' fanatical obsession with drag shows and trans people and gays is weird.

Old McDonald said:

---

yeah it's definitely weird to curate a collection of pictures of lgbt people and make a collage of it and post it online, this is precisely what they mean. conservatives' fanatical obsession with drag shows and trans people and gays is weird.

---

Your post proves the point that leftists are weird. Thank you. And tomorrow your fellow leftists will keep pimping the chemical castration cocktail to young children and experimenting on children with grotesque medical procedures.