Trump classified documents case dismissed

18,737 Views | 185 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by captkirk
Pylon Cam
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to rgag12 • 9:48a, 7/15/24
AG
I can't think of a stupider thing to do politically than not to recharge him…letting a criminal get away with his crimes just because he's running for president would set an incredibly dangerous precedent.

If you actually cared about law and order, you would want Trump in prison where where he belongs. No one is above the law.
Reply Quote
1
Trajan88
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Larry S Ross • 9:50a, 7/15/24
AG
Re: "Melt Down in coming!!!"

To be clear... nuclear meltdown.

Wait until the cases in New York and Georgia result in same.... thermonuclear.
Reply Quote
5
Shooter McGavin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 9:51a, 7/15/24
AG
Pylon Cam said:
I can't think of a stupider thing to do politically than not to recharge him…letting a criminal get away with his crimes just because he's running for president would set an incredibly dangerous precedent.

If you actually cared about law and order, you would want Trump in prison where where he belongs. No one is above the law.
Clutch them pearls!
Reply Quote
44
Prosperdick
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 9:51a, 7/15/24
AG
Pylon Cam said:
Step 1: Appoint biased judges who will bend over backwards to protect you.

Step 2: Commit crimes.

Step 3: Profit. In this case literally profit, off of stolen national secrets and security documents.

Why so many good Aggies support this narcissistic convicted felon, adjudicated rapist, and overall evil person is beyond me. Trump is the antithesis of our university's core values.
You're talking about Biden, right?
Reply Quote
39
P.H. Dexippus
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 9:51a, 7/15/24
AG
Pylon Cam said:
I can't think of a stupider thing to do politically than not to recharge him…letting a criminal get away with his crimes just because he's running for president would set an incredibly dangerous precedent.

If you actually cared about law and order, you would want Trump in prison where where he belongs. No one is above the law.
LOL. PylonCam misses the call again. The dangerous precedent was set by Hillary "BleachBit" Clinton and Joe "non-compos mentis" Biden. Trump doesn't belong in prison...those abusing the legal system to target him for his politics belong there.
Reply Quote
38
2 edits
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 9:52a, 7/15/24
AG
Again, explain the corruption.
Reply Quote
18
Trajan88
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 9:52a, 7/15/24
AG
Equal protection of the laws is a good thing... either go after all equally or not at all.
Reply Quote
12
rgag12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 9:54a, 7/15/24
AG
Pylon Cam said:
I can't think of a stupider thing to do politically than not to recharge him…letting a criminal get away with his crimes just because he's running for president would set an incredibly dangerous precedent.

If you actually cared about law and order, you would want Trump in prison where where he belongs. No one is above the law.


The case would most likely never see a court room until sometime in 2025, but you'd be handing your opponent another political tailwind like you did when you first announced these charges.

This case was never about rule of law to begin with. It was about intimidating Trump and Republican voters.
Reply Quote
19
pacecar02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:54a, 7/15/24
Gotta love it!!


Never should have been brought
Reply Quote
6
agpetz
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 9:55a, 7/15/24
You mean alleged crimes, right?
Reply Quote
11
damiond
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:56a, 7/15/24
the tds is strong with this one
Reply Quote
11
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bunk Moreland • 9:56a, 7/15/24
Bunk Moreland said:
fullback44 said:
I'm no expert on any of these Trump cases… I figured all these cases were just BS to stsrt with


This case was for sure. This judge, however, is a GOP friendly judge. DOJ was going to have to be perfect to get this past her, and obviously she took issue with how Smith was appointed to start with all of this.
The law is clear. It is a shame it took this long to get the case thrown out. It's also a shame that a lot will have to be done to overturn Merchan's case.

Sad that the left is so unethical that they resort to criminal actions against the president because they hate him. Add trying to kill him to the mix.
Reply Quote
6
FIDO95
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:56a, 7/15/24
AG
It's a shame I can't watch Morning Joe to watch the mashing and grinding of teeth at the announcement of this news.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Reply Quote
7
Charpie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:56a, 7/15/24
AG
Can someone explain how this will all work for other special prosecutors? I mean does this mean that they are ALL illegally appointed?
Reply Quote
AggieUSMC
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to damiond • 9:57a, 7/15/24
AG
damiond said:
lawfare libs already have a contingency plan

There's lots of delusional people on X but this guy takes the cake.
Reply Quote
14
ThunderCougarFalconBird
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 9:58a, 7/15/24
AG
Pylon Cam said:
I can't think of a stupider thing to do politically than not to recharge him…letting a criminal get away with his crimes just because he's running for president would set an incredibly dangerous precedent.

If you actually cared about law and order, you would want Trump in prison where where he belongs. No one is above the law.
haha cry more.
Reply Quote
17
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to damiond • 9:58a, 7/15/24
damiond said:
lawfare libs already have a contingency plan
Or you guys can just take to kick to the teeth and move on.

It won't be "easy" because it is clear much of the evidence was tainted. The whole thing was a sham. Maybe take some ethics courses.
Reply Quote
10
MouthBQ98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:58a, 7/15/24
AG
Irony recognized with use of word "stupider".
Reply Quote
8
oysterbayAG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:58a, 7/15/24
AG
Congratulations to Ronald Reagan's Attorney General Edwin Meese for submitting the initial brief to the Court.
Reply Quote
4
pacecar02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Charpie • 9:59a, 7/15/24
He was never appointed as a prosecutor via congressional approval, I think that's the distinction


They could have used a different already approved attorney


......I think
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MiamiHopper • 10:00a, 7/15/24
MiamiHopper said:
Teslag said:
MiamiHopper said:
Finally. Now get this in front of a judge that knows what they are doing.

Will elevate to the conservative circuit courts. And if they disagree they just kick the case right back down to her.


She knows this will be reversed.
Have some dignity.
Reply Quote
10
ThunderCougarFalconBird
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Charpie • 10:00a, 7/15/24
AG
Charpie said:
Can someone explain how this will all work for other special prosecutors? I mean does this mean that they are ALL illegally appointed?
no. It's just that the method of appointment, how they're funded, etc. is more nuanced than saying, "hey lawyer guy, here's a job to do and an unlimited budget. Be sure to tell people how closely we supervise you (or don't) based on whatever suits your case."
Reply Quote
6
Irish 2.0
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:00a, 7/15/24
FIll me in lawyers:

Since she declared Smith's appointment as unlawful, wouldn't that mean that everything he has touched for this prosecution is fruit of the poisonous tree and can't be used in charges if they're refiled?
Of course it was for that. In what universe did you think it was okay to post a naked man spreading open his butt cheeks on our platform?
-Moderator
Reply Quote
9
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 10:01a, 7/15/24
Pylon Cam said:
I can't think of a stupider thing to do politically than not to recharge him…letting a criminal get away with his crimes just because he's running for president would set an incredibly dangerous precedent.
Yes, like saying the guy who is supposedly running the country is too feeble minded to charge him for crimes he clearly committed. Just stop.
Reply Quote
24
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to damiond • 10:01a, 7/15/24
AG
damiond said:
the tds is strong with this one

What do you mean, this one?
Reply Quote
3
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 10:05a, 7/15/24
AG
So Biden who showed classified documents to people who didn't have clearance and kept them unsecured should be in prison too?
Reply Quote
15
Viper16
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bunk Moreland • 10:06a, 7/15/24
AG
Bunk Moreland said:
fullback44 said:
I'm no expert on any of these Trump cases… I figured all these cases were just BS to stsrt with


This case was for sure. This judge, however, is a GOP friendly judge. DOJ was going to have to be perfect to get this past her, and obviously she took issue with how Smith was appointed to start with all of this.
GOP friendly huh. So, you are insinuating she dismissed the case because she is a GOP friendly judge!

To help you out, she basically dismissed the case because Jack Smith's appointment was unconstitutional/unlawful..

We could easily say Jack Smith is Democrat Friendly, which he is, but it would be pointless like your comment.
Reply Quote
22
1 edit
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 10:06a, 7/15/24
AG
So is lying but you do that a bunch.
Reply Quote
9
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:06a, 7/15/24
Reply Quote
3
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pylon Cam • 10:07a, 7/15/24
AG
Pylon Cam said:
nortex97 said:
Aileen could be a good pick for AG.
If you consider corruption and rulings not based in fact/law to be "good", then she'd be a great pick.


Can you show me where she made a decision not based on law?
Reply Quote
10
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Irish 2.0 • 10:07a, 7/15/24
AG
Irish 2.0 said:
FIll me in lawyers:

Since she declared Smith's appointment as unlawful, wouldn't that mean that everything he has touched for this prosecution is fruit of the poisonous tree and can't be used in charges if they're refiled?
Well there is a concept of parallel construction that can eliminate fruit of the poisonous tree.

But if Garland really wants to go down that route and appoint a Senate confirmed SC, they would likely streamline the case back down to just the obstruction charges and leave the classified stuff out.

OTOH, Smith could appeal to the 11th Circuit first, however long that takes.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
Charpie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ThunderCougarFalconBird • 10:07a, 7/15/24
AG
Gotcha. That makes sense.

In theory, this could come back around. I don't think it will thankfully.

This whole thing was petty. Glad its over
Reply Quote
1
Teslag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MiamiHopper • 10:09a, 7/15/24
AG
MiamiHopper said:
Teslag said:
MiamiHopper said:
Finally. Now get this in front of a judge that knows what they are doing.

Will elevate to the conservative circuit courts. And if they disagree they just kick the case right back down to her.


She knows this will be reversed. She's tapping out because she isn't competent to handle this case.

Negative. She's kicking it up because she believes in her ruling. And by the time it's back Trump's AG will drop the charges.
Reply Quote
5
Horn_in_Aggieland
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:09a, 7/15/24
CNN: I almost want to walk into a casino with Trump right now. He just can't seem to lose.
Reply Quote
8
StoneCold99
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 10:09a, 7/15/24
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:
damiond said:
lawfare libs already have a contingency plan
Or you guys can just take to kick to the teeth and move on.

It won't be "easy" because it is clear much of the evidence was tainted. The whole thing was a sham. Maybe take some ethics courses.
Dem's version of Justice: "If at first you don't succeed, keep trying until you find a corrupt judge!"
Reply Quote
10
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.