Can we please stop talking about Oswald?
captkirk said:
Quote:
EXCLUSIVE
Trump shooter Thomas Crooks threatened to 'shoot up' his high school and 'put bombs in the bathrooms' years before his failed assassination attempt on the former president
By LAURA COLLINS, CHIEF INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER, IN BETHEL PARK, PENNSYLVANIA, FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 17:24 EDT, 18 July 2024 | UPDATED: 19:21 EDT, 18 July 2024
Thomas Crooks threatened to 'shoot up' his high school when he was just 15-years-old in an incident that wasn't taken seriously at the time but is now being probed by the FBI, DailyMail.com can reveal.
Federal officers on Thursday visited Crooks's former classmate Vincent Taormina, 20, to quiz him about the shooter's 'hatred' of politicians and the threats he made as a freshman at Bethel Park High School.
Speaking exclusively to DailyMail.com Taormina said, 'We had like this anonymous place you could post things or tell on someone on our computers at school and he posted something like 'Don't come to school tomorrow,' and something else that made it sound like he'd put bombs in the cafeteria bathrooms.
Ulysses90 said:Guitarsoup said:nortex97 said:
Oswald's shot was much more challenging, vs. a moving target (and waving etc) using a craptastic surplus italian bolt action rifle he wasn't overly familiar with (obviously without a scope, though Oswald was a better marksman by all accounts). Just my two cents, sorry, not trying to get in trouble with a…much longer topic.
Crooks' shot, unrushed, if at center mass, is one any 10-12 year old in Texas who has gone deer hunting makes.
That rifle was considered accurate, Oswald had a 4x scope, and the distance was significantly less. Don't know why you think he was unfamiliar with the rifle, he had it over 6mo at the time he shot Kennedy. Plus, Oswald was trained in the Marines and had earned the Sharpshooter designation. There is the slowly moving car that made it somewhat more difficult, but tests showed the scope led it perfectly for that very slow speed.
Both Oswald and Crooks shots were pretty easy. Crooks had the advantage of a modern gun and a less mobile target, but Oswald had Marine training, much shorter distances, a 4x scope, and less pressure since no one knew he was there or suspicious.
LHO's rifle data book that was cited in the Warren Commission report showed that while he scored a 212 of 250 possible points (low Sharpshooter) on qualification, his best performance was in the 200m rapid fire string where he put 8 rounds in the black and 2 rounds just outside the black. Surprisingly, a scan of this document is posted at the following link.
https://www.rrauction.com/auctions/lot-detail/345171706200220-lee-harvey-oswalds-us-marine-corps-rifle-score-book-warren-commission-exhibit-no-239
The following link is an Anglefire blog post from 25 years ago by a guy named Sully who was the Command Duty Officer at the Marine Corps Command Center on Nov 23, 1963. It would take too long to explain why but, just read Sully's narrative for some information that is not widely known about Lee Harvey Oswald and his relationship to a person riding in the Lincoln limousine at Dealy Plaza that day.
https://www.angelfire.com/ca4/gunnyg/vignettes24.html
So using foreign forums/social media.Foreverconservative said:
So the second cell phone found in the shooter's home have three encrypted message accounts that the servers are overseas that the FBI claims to be trying to get opened up to see what he was talking about
techno-ag said:
That looks like a bullet and a shell. Not just a bullet.
techno-ag said:
That looks like a bullet and a shell. Not just a bullet.
TexasRebel said:techno-ag said:
That looks like a bullet and a shell. Not just a bullet.
Cartridge, maybe.
techno-ag said:captkirk said:
Maybe the deeply troubling news events are linked to DEI.
Earth Rider said:
I posted these on the Bongino thread just now, but thought I should post them here also. They are aerial photographs I pay for through my company. They are higher quality images than those online. The first shows the trump location relative to the building the shooter was at. The second shows the side of hte shooters building that faces Trump. You can see there was some AC ductwork there that might have enabled him access to the roof. The third image is the front of the building, and the last image is the back of the building.
So you can see, there really isn't an access point to that roof, other than he would have had to scale the roof on the Trump side in front of the crowd. I could be wrong, but I don't know how he would have gotten up on that roof any other way.
txags92 said:Earth Rider said:
I posted these on the Bongino thread just now, but thought I should post them here also. They are aerial photographs I pay for through my company. They are higher quality images than those online. The first shows the trump location relative to the building the shooter was at. The second shows the side of hte shooters building that faces Trump. You can see there was some AC ductwork there that might have enabled him access to the roof. The third image is the front of the building, and the last image is the back of the building.
So you can see, there really isn't an access point to that roof, other than he would have had to scale the roof on the Trump side in front of the crowd. I could be wrong, but I don't know how he would have gotten up on that roof any other way.
Look at the photos of the parking lot side of the buildings posted earlier in the thread. There was a cabinet against the building adjacent to a portico that would have been an easy climb.
I agree on the long walk, but its not a hard walk. He probably did a double pull with that little ladder, to get on the little cabinet, then pulled it up to the roof. The "Secret Service" or someone else needs to check his phone location history through pinging the cell towers to see if he scouted it so he knew how to quickly access the roof.El Hombre Mas Guapo said:txags92 said:Earth Rider said:
I posted these on the Bongino thread just now, but thought I should post them here also. They are aerial photographs I pay for through my company. They are higher quality images than those online. The first shows the trump location relative to the building the shooter was at. The second shows the side of hte shooters building that faces Trump. You can see there was some AC ductwork there that might have enabled him access to the roof. The third image is the front of the building, and the last image is the back of the building.
So you can see, there really isn't an access point to that roof, other than he would have had to scale the roof on the Trump side in front of the crowd. I could be wrong, but I don't know how he would have gotten up on that roof any other way.
Look at the photos of the parking lot side of the buildings posted earlier in the thread. There was a cabinet against the building adjacent to a portico that would have been an easy climb.
But a long walk to get to the correct roof.
BREAKING: Trump shooter Thomas Crooks had “3 encrypted overseas accounts” — Rep. Michael Waltz (R–FL)
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) July 19, 2024
oh no said:
Not sure what allowed and what's not on this thread anymore but has anyone seen anything more to this?BREAKING: Trump shooter Thomas Crooks had “3 encrypted overseas accounts” — Rep. Michael Waltz (R–FL)
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) July 19, 2024
Huge Update pic.twitter.com/V7NKqXVQh7
— Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸 (@KarluskaP) July 18, 2024
Shots were fired from behind the bleachers 👇 pic.twitter.com/Bd6cGNku7V
— Not A Number (@myhiddenvalue) July 18, 2024
Wasn't one of the counter sniper teams to Trump's back and left?drcrinum said:Shots were fired from behind the bleachers 👇 pic.twitter.com/Bd6cGNku7V
— Not A Number (@myhiddenvalue) July 18, 2024
This lady seems level headed to me. She was there and insists there were two shooters, one on Trump's right (building) and one on Trump's left (not being reported).
She says what you want to hear, therefore you believe her.dr said:
This lady seems level headed to me. She was there and insists there were two shooters, one on Trump's right (building) and one on Trump's left (not being reported).
Earth Rider said:I agree on the long walk, but its not a hard walk. He probably did a double pull with that little ladder, to get on the little cabinet, then pulled it up to the roof. The "Secret Service" or someone else needs to check his phone location history through pinging the cell towers to see if he scouted it so he knew how to quickly access the roof.El Hombre Mas Guapo said:txags92 said:Earth Rider said:
I posted these on the Bongino thread just now, but thought I should post them here also. They are aerial photographs I pay for through my company. They are higher quality images than those online. The first shows the trump location relative to the building the shooter was at. The second shows the side of hte shooters building that faces Trump. You can see there was some AC ductwork there that might have enabled him access to the roof. The third image is the front of the building, and the last image is the back of the building.
So you can see, there really isn't an access point to that roof, other than he would have had to scale the roof on the Trump side in front of the crowd. I could be wrong, but I don't know how he would have gotten up on that roof any other way.
Look at the photos of the parking lot side of the buildings posted earlier in the thread. There was a cabinet against the building adjacent to a portico that would have been an easy climb.
But a long walk to get to the correct roof.
I think if he can stay below the ridgeline, then he may not have been spotted hopping from roof to roof.
I'd like to know more about the rifle, just to see how he was able to conceal it.
I'd argue that the video and still captures are self authenticating and should be taken as fact.Rapier108 said:She says what you want to hear, therefore you believe her.dr said:
This lady seems level headed to me. She was there and insists there were two shooters, one on Trump's right (building) and one on Trump's left (not being reported).
This needs to be on the conspiracy thread because it definitely isn't "facts." Just someone's opinion.
Doesn't mean he was visiting foreign websites, just that the servers that host those accounts are located overseas, I assume. Many people who do illegal things online operate out of servers based outside of the US and in places that generally don't care what you put on them or what you do with them. It is also fairly easy to get access to these types of servers. Going to have to check his Discord/Telegram account(s), that's where I am assuming you can start getting a good paper trail...Rapier108 said:So using foreign forums/social media.Foreverconservative said:
So the second cell phone found in the shooter's home have three encrypted message accounts that the servers are overseas that the FBI claims to be trying to get opened up to see what he was talking about
Wasn't there some mass shooter in the last few years who did the same thing?
Foreverconservative said:
The painting is titled "Devine Intervention"
true. i use paid VPNs and very often set them to overseas servers because (*#$&* the US govt, they have no right to know whatever I am up to.BlackGold said:
Doesn't mean he was visiting foreign websites, just that the servers that host those accounts are located overseas, I assume. Many people who do illegal things online operate out of servers based outside of the US and in places that generally don't care what you put on them or what you do with them. It is also fairly easy to get access to these types of servers. Going to have to check his Discord/Telegram account(s), that's where I am assuming you can start getting a good paper trail...
oh no said:
Not sure what allowed and what's not on this thread anymore but has anyone seen anything more to this?BREAKING: Trump shooter Thomas Crooks had “3 encrypted overseas accounts” — Rep. Michael Waltz (R–FL)
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) July 19, 2024
Guitarsoup said:
Puts together a lot of what we know and videos from various places.
The shooter in Butler, Pennsylvania had three overseas encrypted accounts. This is getting deep
— Steve Ferguson (@lsferguson) July 19, 2024
C@LAg said:true. i use paid VPNs and very often set them to overseas servers because (*#$&* the US govt, they have no right to know whatever I am up to.BlackGold said:
Doesn't mean he was visiting foreign websites, just that the servers that host those accounts are located overseas, I assume. Many people who do illegal things online operate out of servers based outside of the US and in places that generally don't care what you put on them or what you do with them. It is also fairly easy to get access to these types of servers. Going to have to check his Discord/Telegram account(s), that's where I am assuming you can start getting a good paper trail...
legal or not.