Shots fired at Trump [Keep it factual -- Staff]

847,274 Views | 6497 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by gigemags-99
William Foster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old McDonald said:

Texas velvet maestro said:

to be fair, when I go, "he hated politicians" might be in my obit.
I've seen some folks say some version of "if he hated politicians, why would he try to kill trump? he should like trump because he's an outsider/not a politician/etc." which for those of us over 30 might seem true, but trump has been the most famous politician in the world since the shooter was old enough to be aware of politics

makes me wonder if very young adults like the shooter are starting to see trump as a status-quo just-another-politician since he's been around for half their lives.


You see the video of that hispanic former classmate saying Crooks used to basically call him stupid for being a Hispanic and supporting Trump? It's actually pretty damn convincing. Kid could be one of the greatest actors the world has ever seen.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:



This must be how the DEI Hamburgler who was hiding behind Trump got a job.

Absolutely ridiculous.


Does anyone think Cheadle can do one pullups and 11 pushups to get up to the level of Poor for 50+ year old women?
TexasAggie_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Take solace in the fact that all of our questions will be answered in due course.

We've got the upmost confidence in this lady to reign all this back in and restore the public's faith in the democratic process.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Somewhere there's some written rules of engagement.

And somebody had to sign off on those rules of engagement.

That should be question 1 and 2 at any hearing on this.

#3 would be to look at the rules of engagement as it pertains to Trump and look to see whether those rules changed over time.

That they ostensibly watched the guy set up for 20-minutes while on the phone with DC is incredulous.
To me, this will be the key. What were the rules about engaging the shooter? Was there a standing rule that the snipers are allowed to shoot if they perceive a threat, but somebody was on the radio telling them to hold off from shooting in this case? Were the snipers forbidden from engaging a man on a roof with a rifle without clearance? If so, why was that clearance withheld? Was there some other reason they did not take him out before he shot?

By now it is abundantly clear from the reported facts that the shooter was identified early on as suspicious, that he was seen on the roof before Trump ever took the stage, and that he had been seen with a rangefinder. Why was Trump allowed to take the stage before he was secured, and why once Trump was on the stage and the rifle was seen, was he not neutralized? Thos are the questions I want the USSS and local PD members who were on site that day to answer under oath. Director Cheatle has already lied about the reasons for the sniper positioning, so I don't care to hear from her except about how the staffing decisions were made. I want to hear from the boots on the ground what happened and why.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lonestar_Ag09 said:

TexasRebel said:

Lonestar_Ag09 said:

nortex97 said:

Yeah he's a very good photographer who also got lucky. Trump gave a very Trumpy paise of his work a few years ago I read "The best. A genius photographer, a magician with a camera.' or something like that.

And when they are taking those pictures nowadays and hit click on the high end DSLR camera they bring, it takes like 10 or 20 in a row I believe. I think, but could be wrong, the camera even uploads images to the cloud (over time) automatically to be edited later, so they also aren't limited by the onboard flash storage even at this point.
Pro cameras today are mirrorless dslr and are capable of shooting much higher speeds than 10-20 in a row


You can't have a mirrorless DSLR.

Single Lens Reflex = mirror.
typing too fast. The not didn't show up. I've stated on numerous threads that his camera was mirrorless not dslr. My apologies.

Every time I post I miss 20 posts so I have to go back up and find my spot I am well aware of the differences between mirrorless and dslr. The poster I was commenting on made it appear the no 1 photo journalist in the world (or so they say) was shooting with a dslr


You know how you fix that problem? Stop derailing this thread and start a photography thread elsewhere
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
Not Coach Jimbo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looking forward to some bureaucratic speak, a few good clips on youtube and 0 results.

"I don't have that information"
"We are looking into that matter"
"We used same security protocols previously set"
"I am not aware of that information"
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wish people would stay up to date on the thread and stop reposting stuff we've already seen and covered
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Somewhere there's some written rules of engagement.

And somebody had to sign off on those rules of engagement.

That should be question 1 and 2 at any hearing on this.

#3 would be to look at the rules of engagement as it pertains to Trump and look to see whether those rules changed over time.

That they ostensibly watched the guy set up for 20-minutes while on the phone with DC is incredulous.


If this ends up being accurate, it might be the biggest WTF of the event.

🤡 🤡 🤡
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Director Cheatle will bring us to Jesus.

We all just blind hogs looking for a nut here.

Cheatle is the expert. And if there's one thing we've learnt as of late it's to trust the experts.

We can anticipate that Cheatle will sexplain this in simple terms that we as laypersons can understand. We just got to wait until July 22nd for that to happen.
TexasAggie_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


haven't seen this photo angle before, but it looks like there is a second ladder to the right on top of a small rubber-maid type shed/cabinet. We were discussing yesterday about ways he might have been able to get up without a ladder, and the cabinet and pallets on the loading dock were discussed as a possibility. Looks like he may have put a small ladder on the shed/cabinet.



it was speculated earlier in the week that he had a home depot telescoping ladder, and that is kinda what it looks like here.

https://www.homedepot.com/p/XTEND-CLIMB-15-5-ft-Aluminum-Telescoping-Extension-Ladder-19-5-Reach-Height-250-lbs-Load-Capacity-ANSI-Type-I-Duty-Rating-785P/309897050

EDIT: also, looks like the little shed is open, so maybe the ladder was in the shed? or maybe he stashed gear in that shed prior?
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?



The building used by the would-be assassin.....the ownership and operations history of this building reads like a Democrat Party front organization. So many coincidences.
Not Coach Jimbo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Was also a rumor or something stating he used hvac units to climb to the roof?

Not that the media would know the difference between a shed and an ac unit
TexasAggie_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not Coach Jimbo said:

Was also a rumor or something stating he used hvac units to climb to the roof?

Not that the media would know the difference between a shed and an ac unit
that would make more sense, given that all of the AC units were in not so ideal locations.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We gonna need some kind of coincidence management system before too long.

Struggling to keep up with the coincidences. It's becoming too much.
TexasAggie_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

We gonna need some kind of coincidence management system before too long.

Struggling to keep up with the coincidences. It's becoming too much.
its called the "Swiss cheese model"

IndividualFreedom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bongino's rumble show this am was good once again.

Couple of take aways from Bongino's sources:

shooter's phone pinged a week prior at the grounds

there was no ladder used to get on the roof

There is a working THEORY that the shooter found his way on the roof because he was trying to hide from the cops and became an ad lib location of opportunity. Also he was there to for a mass shooting vs. targeting DJT
The System
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IndividualFreedom said:

Bongino's rumble show this am was good once again.

Couple of take aways from Bongino's sources:

shooter's phone pinged a week prior at the grounds

there was no ladder used to get on the roof

There is a working THEORY that the shooter found his way on the roof because he was trying to hide from the cops and became an ad lib location of opportunity. Also he was there to for a mass shooting vs. targeting DJT
Why would he need a range finder for a mass shooting? I'm calling BS on the mass shooting theory. He was there for 1 purpose and one purpose only. To assassinate DJT.
FTAC2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah that's BS. Range finder, set up prone on roof, and first shot at the president? Mass shooting he could have just sprayed into the crowd and killed 5-10 before he was shot
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:


Quote:

Director Cheatle welcomes the opportunity to testify before the committee.
Ok then, it's settled. She accepted the subpoena and will testify on July 22.

Take solace in the fact that all of our questions will be answered in due course.

We've got the upmost confidence in this lady to reign all this back in and restore the public's faith in the democratic process.
One thing you'll notice about this Cheatle is that she tried to delay her congressional testimony saying in a letter that the July 22 date clashed with 'her travel and operational commitments."

What on earth could be more important than updating the American public as to why the former president and leading presidential candidate was shot on live tv?

What is more important than that?

Get all the big stuff out of the way at the hearing first, but somebody should ask that question.

What was on your schedule that would prevent you from testifying before the people's elected representatives?

What was it?
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Local LEO not silent on SS claims about responsibility for outside the perimeter.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13644937/trump-shooting-rally-secret-service-blame-Pennsylvania-police.html
Quote:

EXCLUSIVE: Local law enforcement fumes after Trump shooting debacle as Secret Service attempts to deflect blame: 'They threw us under the bus'
By LAURA COLLINS, CHIEF INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER IN BUTLER, PENNSYLVANIA and JOSH BOSWELL FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 12:36 EDT, 18 July 2024 | UPDATED: 12:41 EDT, 18 July 2024

Anger is growing among law enforcement and local officials in Pennsylvania over what they see as the Secret Service's attempts to pass the buck on who was to blame for Saturday's assassination attempt on Donald Trump.

'They threw us under the bus,' one cop in Butler told DailyMail.com exclusively.

The fury is over Secret Service claims that anything outside the perimeter set up around Trump's rally in Butler was the responsibility of local law enforcement agencies.

'The Secret Service came out here more than a month ahead of time and met with all the local agencies. They tell us exactly what to do, exactly what they want and exactly how they want it. It's all on them,' he added.
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This really needs to be looked at as though the assassination was successful and treated that way. For all intents and purposes it was a success and only luck/divine providence prevented it from being a kill of DJT.

I also wonder about the explosives in his car. Did he try to trigger those as a distraction and his device failed? Or was that some plan to blow that up to distract for a getaway?

If a ladder wasn't used, guessing he bought that just in case but found an easy way up maybe via that storage bin near that dock.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:


Quote:

Director Cheatle welcomes the opportunity to testify before the committee.
Ok then, it's settled. She accepted the subpoena and will testify on July 22.

Take solace in the fact that all of our questions will be answered in due course.

We've got the upmost confidence in this lady to reign all this back in and restore the public's faith in the democratic process.
One thing you'll notice about this Cheatle is that she tried to delay her congressional testimony saying in a letter that the July 22 date clashed with 'her travel and operational commitments."

What on earth could be more important than updating the American public as to why the former president and leading presidential candidate was shot on live tv?

What is more important than that?

Get all the big stuff out of the way at the hearing first, but somebody should ask that question.

What was on your schedule that would prevent you from testifying before the people's elected representatives?

What was it?


She and Jill were going to the boardwalk in Rehoboth Beach.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Director Cheatle bouta go prime-time.

Third time in a month we got must-see-tv.

Will have tens of millions of eyes on here trying to evaluate whether she's telling the truth.

That seems like a big job all things considered.
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Interview with the police chief. I am know just dumbfounded at the events as he claims them to be.
LoneStarFree
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JD Shellnut said:





So is this really him?
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:




Surely no-one in government would try to profit off of Trump's assassination...I jest.

Was this debunked, or just that Soros' firm wasn't the outfit shorting? Seems the volume of shorts to a stock would be pretty easy to find.
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stolen from another thread but belongs here I think. Courtesy of poster "theeyetest"

Quote:

If you don't know Bongino, he was a former USSS agent under W and the Obama. He is VERY respected and had built relationships with a lot of former and current agents.

He has numerous unimpeachable sources at the highest levels with the SS and local the LEO's involved in Saturdays attempted assassination.

Here's his latest updates:

1. 30 minutes before Trump took stage, Crooks had been identified as a person of interest.

2. Undeniable texts between local LEO's and SS prove that there was supposed to be a presence on the building Crooks shot from.

3. No drone was ever planned by SS or LEO

4. No ladder was used to gain access to the building by shooter.

5. July 7th, two weeks before shooting, shooter's phone pinged at shooting location (pre-op surveillance). Proving this was pre-planned

6. 7-8 degree slope of roof DID impede line of sight by counter sniper team causing 11-12 second delay of return fire.

7. 9" window by SS team from over 400 yards away was the shot that killed Crooks.

8. Working theory amongst investigators is Crooks planned mass casualty invent. Crooks purchased ladder earlier in week but didn't bring to event. Originally positioned himself on the ground with no line sight to stage, only the crowd (that's what range finder was for). How did he get on roof? Crooks recognized local LEO were on to him and Crooks scaled building via AC Unit to get away then realized clear sight to Trump and changed his plans.

Again, all of this is coming from sources he trusts and is relaying to us. He hasn't mentioned inside job or anything of the like. Just a complete and udder failure on behalf of the USSS. He says point 8 is ONLY a working theory not a fact.


Dans 3 biggest questions:

1. Why was Trump taken out of holding room or secure vehicle when they knew there was known threat?

2. Why didn't they obstruct line of sight from roof if no anti sniper team was placed on roof?

3. Why is Cheatle refusing to answer questions or admitting to complete failure? Why is she at the RNC and not in Butler County trying to figure out what went wrong?
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Director Cheatle bouta go prime-time.

Third time in a month we got must-see-tv.

Will have tens of millions of eyes on here trying to evaluate whether she's telling the truth.

That seems like a big job all things considered.


But were only going to get the same ol song.

"We can't comment on an ongoing investigation".
The System
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Once again, why would he need a range finder for a mass shooting at a rally? It's BS. He was there to assassinate DJT.
FIDO95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is the "Saddam Hussein" in the bottom right of the picture posted by Elon?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The System said:

Once again, why would he need a range finder for a mass shooting at a rally? It's BS. He was there to assassinate DJT.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The System said:

Once again, why would he need a range finder for a mass shooting at a rally? It's BS. He was there to assassinate DJT.


I think it needs to be more looked at like primary and secondary targets with Trump undoubtedly the primary target.

A mass shooting is BS and cover that they stopped it with little loss.

Pathetic….I wont be surprised if we hear next he was there to create popping noises to add to the entertainment.
VP at Pierce and Pierce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If he was planning a mass shooting event wouldnt he have had more ammo on his person? Seems like this is just a cover story.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IndividualFreedom said:

Bongino's rumble show this am was good once again.

Couple of take aways from Bongino's sources:

shooter's phone pinged a week prior at the grounds

there was no ladder used to get on the roof

There is a working THEORY that the shooter found his way on the roof because he was trying to hide from the cops and became an ad lib location of opportunity. Also he was there to for a mass shooting vs. targeting DJT
Not buying that one. That sound like his sources trying to use him to get a CYA story out to try and save face.
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not sure how anyone could plan to sit in a prone position a hundred yards from the former president in broad daylight and plan to get off more than 50 rounds using a semi-auto rifle. Let alone after they were alerted to your presence 30 minutes, or 2 hours prior or whatever one chooses to believe.

Oswald didn't have anywhere near that many rounds with him (bolt action…), from much further away, nor did any presidential assassin I am aware of in our history.

I think it's really as simple as the local cops screwed it up, rushing his shot, responding to the complaints/crowd. Once the stage team responded, it was over.
First Page Last Page
Page 127 of 186
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.