Shots fired at Trump [Keep it factual -- Staff]

864,050 Views | 6497 Replies | Last: 3 mo ago by gigemags-99
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This was no "accident" or "incompetence". They wanted to get him to get a couple of shots in before neutralizing. There's no other way to explain it.

If there is 1 blanket tactical channel, even the people surrounding the president that shielded him had to have known. There are no excuses for not removing him from the stage unless they were directly instructed not to.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BCG Disciple said:


That's divine intervention.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think it did.

The bullet traveled from the muzzle to Trump in 1/10th of 1 second based on average 5.56 193 velocity.

I think Trump's head was already turned when he pulled the trigger and he was off the mark a bit.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

rolo said:

This is either the single most gross lack of acting on knowledge in the history of the country since 9/11 or a complete and utter inside job by shadow puppets to eliminate a president
Still waiting for a surprise reveal that they were running some kind of drill or 'security audit' at the time of the incident and there was confusion surrounding that.
You are referring to the next excuse?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There's a period of acceleration involved though (while in the barrel). It's not a constant speed.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The lag was between shooters brain command and action of his finger. The shooter thought he was lined up. He never registered the quick head turn.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

bobbranco said:

rolo said:



My god
Heads should roll if true.
It's 2024. We'll see Kimberly Cheatle promoted to SecDef.
Bury that cow in the cereal division of PepsiCo
BlackLab
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Per Fox News, the overhead closeup photo of the shooter had been circulated among police prior to the shooting.
Tea Party
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

I don't think it did.

The bullet traveled from the muzzle to Trump in 1/10th of 1 second based on average 5.56 193 velocity.

I think Trump's head was already turned when he pulled the trigger and he was off the mark a bit.
Right, he did not move his head after the bullet left the barrel.

But he moved his head after the shooter commited to pulling the trigger and did not have the human reflex quick enough to either alter his aim or stop pulling the trigger.

We're talking fractions of a second and I would guess only specially trained individuals have the skill to stop a trigger pull with that quick of a reflex.
Learn about the Texas Nationalist Movement
https://tnm.me
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
confucius_ag said:

FrioAg 00 said:

The shooters mat supports the theory he planned to shoot from the ground, then realized these bafoons left the top of a the metal building uncovered and accessible.


Not necessarily......steel roof hot as hell.

Remember it's in PA north of Pittsburg. Believe me not as hot as Texas.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
confucius_ag said:

FrioAg 00 said:

The shooters mat supports the theory he planned to shoot from the ground, then realized these bafoons left the top of a the metal building uncovered and accessible.


Not necessarily......steel roof hot as hell.

this dude was wearing a t-shirt and khaki cargo shorts...couldnt have been too hot.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlackLab said:

Per Fox News, the overhead closeup photo of the shooter had been circulated among police prior to the shooting.
Unbelievable. The number of pieces of evidence stacking up have passed well beyond what could be attributed to negligence/incompetence at this point. Do we know who the USSS team leads were? Can we get their text messages and emails subpoenaed before the FBI has time to wipe all the phones?
Ramdiesel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can you imagine the shock all over the world if the kid had connected with that brain shot, and now all this information coming out in the news, even liberal news outlets, of how fugg'd up the whole security operation was?

I mean this is like some 3rd world country assassination BS...This is worse than any of the conspiracies around JFK. It would be like blantant outright murder "assisted" by Law Enforcement officers/ Secret Service intentionally or because of total incompetence. And, nobody would ever believe they could be this incompetent so it has to be intentional.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlackLab said:

Per Fox News, the overhead closeup photo of the shooter had been circulated among police prior to the shooting.
If true, this is getting worse for USSS.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

confucius_ag said:

FrioAg 00 said:

The shooters mat supports the theory he planned to shoot from the ground, then realized these bafoons left the top of a the metal building uncovered and accessible.


Not necessarily......steel roof hot as hell.

this dude was wearing a t-shirt and khaki cargo shorts...couldnt have been too hot.
I don't know if they are shorts. Looks like pants to me.
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Since fed boys cannot handle slope roofs.
2025 sure started off with a bang.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Check.

And this is the guy whose people the SS 'leadership' wanted to point the fingers at:



Yet again (sorry if repetitive on this thread etc), no excuse for leaving Trump on the "X" for the shooter given what was known, and documented thoroughly, for anywhere from 26 minutes to 3 hours.

It's real damn hard to see this as merely 'incompetence' on the USSS team planning/leadership, imho.


From that interview and other reports it seems like the below is a plausible timeline specifically for the shooter's area:

1. Officers get reports of dude on roof from people around the building. (Are they radioing in again at this point? If so what's the report?)
2. Officers circle building trying to find way up.
3. Officers give up on finding a ladder and one tries to boost the other up.
4. Cop 1 pokes his head over edge of roof while trying to boost himself up there, sees shooter who initially points his weapon at Cop 1.
5. Cop 1 falls and drops about 8 feet on the ground. Cop 1 and 2 then radio command post? (Still seems unclear when they actually saw/reported a weapon and that guy says he doesn't know)
6. Shooter then turns around and starts firing.

Definitely helpful info there. It seems like there are still questions around when the shooter was actually reported to command post, because if it was right after Cop 1 fell off the roof not sure that would have been enough time to pull Trump off stage if he immediately turned around, aimed and started firing.

And then the other important question for the SS would be - should being told there's a shady looking kid wandering around the perimeter with a range finder have been enough to cancel or postpone the event. Definitely need to get more info on who knew what and at what point in the day.
option short side
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lonestar_Ag09 said:


Haven't seen this posted.

Dan is now a credible source? Look, there was no conspiracy. All this deep state crap just gives the libs an opening to attack us. The SS had some serious laps in security but to think they would allow an assassination is insane. Trump will win, no need to make it harder.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
option short side said:

Lonestar_Ag09 said:


Haven't seen this posted.

Dan is now a credible source? Look, there was no conspiracy. All this deep state crap just gives the libs an opening to attack us. The SS had some serious laps in security but to think they would allow an assassination is insane. Trump will win, no need to make it harder.


If you listen to what Bongino says that the sniper team assigned to the roof set up inside at a second story window. See posts above for the likely location of the second story window.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
option short side said:

Lonestar_Ag09 said:


Haven't seen this posted.

Dan is now a credible source? Look, there was no conspiracy. All this deep state crap just gives the libs an opening to attack us. The SS had some serious laps in security but to think they would allow an assassination is insane. Trump will win, no need to make it harder.
Bongino was a Secret Service agent for 12 years, including time on the presidential protection detail during Bush's second term and Obama's first term, and time spent as an instructor at their academy. So yes, he is a credible source and is likely to have many contacts still inside the USSS.
lobopride
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only conspiracy theory is have ever believed in is the Seth Rich murder. It was just too clear it was planned.

This will be my second.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lobopride said:

The only conspiracy theory is have ever believed in is the Seth Rich murder. It was just too clear it was planned.

This will be my second.
At this point, when the left starts calling something a conspiracy theory, I almost assume it is true based on their recent track record of things they called conspiracies later turning out to be true.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BuddysBud said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

BuddysBud said:

Foreverconservative said:

MagnumLoad said:

nortex97 said:



Dan is not one to go with soft/unverified claims.

Caution:language but yes, all of this:



Was it a two story building?


Next to it





If the snipers were in that two story building, they could take out the shooter with a blow gun.

Things just don't add up.

Edit to add, a sniper team posted on top of that building would make a lot more sense.
So are there reports that there was SS personnel in the two story building? The more that comes out the more it seems intentional. The shorting of the stock is very 9/11. Totally normal to short a stock massively the week before a horrific event.


In the Bongino post, he claims that local PD was originally supposed have a sniper team in the building where the sniper was. Instead they set up indoors on the second floor.

Another TA poster correctly noted that the building on which the shooter was posted only had one story.

Then Foreverconservative's post of the two story building attached to the other building.

If Bongino is correct that the local PD snipers were in that second story building adjacent to the shooter's location, then the screw up appears even worse, because they should have seen everything from that position.

Perhaps nobody was in the two story building or they were but weren't paying attention. Either way, it ijust confirms that the entire security operation was a complete SNAFU.
Some links earlier said the PD who was supposed to be in or on that building didn't show up.

Also, the building was supposed to be a command post, not a snipers nest INSIDE the building. But it was all twitter links (IIRC).
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

lobopride said:

The only conspiracy theory is have ever believed in is the Seth Rich murder. It was just too clear it was planned.

This will be my second.
At this point, when the left starts calling something a conspiracy theory, I almost assume it is true based on their recent track record of things they called conspiracies later turning out to be true.
Better than House odds in Vegas.
Lonestar_Ag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
option short side said:

Lonestar_Ag09 said:


Haven't seen this posted.

Dan is now a credible source? Look, there was no conspiracy. All this deep state crap just gives the libs an opening to attack us. The SS had some serious laps in security but to think they would allow an assassination is insane. Trump will win, no need to make it harder.
since when was he not? I take it you aren't a fan, but to ignore him in this exact situation is an absolute joke.

As someone else already said he is absolutely the most tied in individual to this world to be a source to get the info out. I'd actually bet he's being a bit restrictive to cover up individuals who he believes messed up or should have done more but he isn't saying it because it won't help. Like the female agents. He has been fairly quiet on the folks directly on Trump whereas they absolutely screwed up allowing him to stop and fist pump. Yes it's an awesome photo and iconic moment. But it never should have happened and Bongino knows that.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

They caught him with a range finder 3 hours before the shooting and did nothing.

They spotted him 30 minutes before the shooting and did nothing.

They took a literal picture of him and did nothing.

Members of the crowd were pointing at him and did nothing.


And this is why so many are rolling our eyes at some many of the conspiracy stuff.

THE BOLD PART IS NOT TRUE!

The X-thread you linked even quotes the Butler Township Comm stating THEY DID SOMETHING when locals pointed out the shooter.

Yeah, a lot of us agree there is something fishy, but stick to KNOWN FACTS and stop quoteing known falsehoods (Not you poster, but the X-threads and other BS posted that are flat out FALSE),
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agracer said:

Quote:

They caught him with a range finder 3 hours before the shooting and did nothing.

They spotted him 30 minutes before the shooting and did nothing.

They took a literal picture of him and did nothing.

Members of the crowd were pointing at him and did nothing.


And this is why so many are rolling our eyes at some many of the conspiracy stuff.

THE BOLD PART IS NOT TRUE!

The X-thread you linked even quotes the Butler Township Comm stating THEY DID SOMETHING when locals pointed out the shooter.

Yeah, a lot of us agree there is something fishy, but stick to KNOWN FACTS and stop quoteing known falsehoods (Not you poster, but the X-threads and other BS posted that are flat out FALSE),


There was a video, taken separately from the video of the guy that did talk to the police. It was INSIDE the grounds and they were yelling and pointing at the shooter.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Anybody have any idea what the rules, regulations and restrictions for entering the premises of the rally were?

No umbrellas, no tripods no x, y, z. ...etc.

I bet there was a whole list of dos and don'ts for attendees, but somehow this kid with a spotting scope wasn't a priority.

Memaw set up an umbrella on the side of her Rascal and security would have probably swarmed her ass as being a security risk.
He didn't have a spotting scope. Again, more falsehoods.

He had a range finder. Very different.
Post removed:
by user
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So…y'all still onboard with the "lone wolf nutjob got lucky" theory, or are y'all sobering up to what this really was?
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like the establishment is at least starting to get its official story together…but remember, whatever they tell you, you are trusting the same people who were complicit in allowing this to happen to explain how and allegedly "why" it happened…
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

He didn't have a spotting scope. Again, more falsehoods.

He had a range finder. Very different.
Different, but still related to a distance rifle shot. The range finder is actually the more damning of the two devices.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I feel like I'm living in the twilight zone as all this comes out. Witb all of this info, people don't want to believe the obvious conclusion
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rolo said:



Yes, we know this. When he went thru security with a rangefinder he became a 'person of interest', but they lost track of him in the crowd. It was ~ 3-hours before the shooting.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agracer said:

Quote:

They caught him with a range finder 3 hours before the shooting and did nothing.

They spotted him 30 minutes before the shooting and did nothing.

They took a literal picture of him and did nothing.

Members of the crowd were pointing at him and did nothing.


And this is why so many are rolling our eyes at some many of the conspiracy stuff.

THE BOLD PART IS NOT TRUE!

The X-thread you linked even quotes the Butler Township Comm stating THEY DID SOMETHING when locals pointed out the shooter.

Yeah, a lot of us agree there is something fishy, but stick to KNOWN FACTS and stop quoteing known falsehoods (Not you poster, but the X-threads and other BS posted that are flat out FALSE),
Ok but what wasn't done was removing Trump from an insecure, even threat, at the scene.

Between all the warnings or not, the moment ALL 4 counter snipers from the SS, stopped scanning their assigned sectors and trained in on a single location for at least :42, regardless of having him in their sights, they had lost control of security for the event and Trump should have been removed from the scene until the potential threat investigated and cleared allowing security control of the entire event to be reestablished.
First Page Last Page
Page 120 of 186
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.