They're saying he had plans to remotely detonate explosives in his car. Maybe he had a plan for egress.
Drove his car, walked home (or to wherever the van was) then drove the van to the venue as well.
Rest of Tweet:Lonestar_Ag09 said:NEW: Dan Bongino says an "unimpeachable source" tells him that someone was supposed to be on the roof where Thomas Crooks shot from but "didn't show up."
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 17, 2024
Bongino also claimed that the Biden admin is telling the USSS director to keep her mouth shut if she wants to keep her… pic.twitter.com/1ZZL1cWaG1
Haven't seen this posted.
Quote:
NEW: Dan Bongino says an "unimpeachable source" tells him that someone was supposed to be on the roof where Thomas Crooks shot from but "didn't show up."
Bongino also claimed that the Biden admin is telling the USSS director to keep her mouth shut if she wants to keep her job.
"According to my source, that roof was supposed to be a police post... [there] was so supposed to be someone there."
"They're now making up excuses saying the pitch of the roof. My source says to me that no one knows why the post didn't show up."
"I was also told that the USSS director has been given instructions from the administration and the DHS secretary: 'If you wanna keep your job, you'll keep your mouth shut about this.'"
BREAKING: CNN reports law enforcement saw Trump shooter walking near magnetometers with range-finder before he climbed roof and used device to scope out counter-snipers, who were also looking at him.
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) July 16, 2024
Detonators to bombs were also reported to be found on his person.
Who will be… pic.twitter.com/KHzDYqjhVe
The director of the Secret Service now admits that they knew the building was a vulnerability for Trump, but they didn’t put an agent there because the roof was slightly sloped and a safety risk for an agent.
— 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸 (@Travis_4_Trump) July 16, 2024
This is absolutely ridiculous. The agents were scared of a slightly… pic.twitter.com/LeCLY1MSNg
This is the most incriminating evidence demonstrating this weekend’s attempted assassination was a known event amongst powerful players. Like airlines were shorted before 9/11 (presumably by people connected to the terrorists), “somebody” placed a massive 8 million share bet that… https://t.co/Th4efjhe2d
— Joshua Hartley (@JHartley2) July 16, 2024
Look at the swale between the photographer and the building in this pic. You stand on that scale and shoot towards the building with a phone held over your head you can get the view of the shooter's position from the earlier photo.Ag with kids said:Ok...this pic may explain it...with a long zoom.TexasAggie_02 said:Ag with kids said:Can you post the video?tk for tu juan said:Watch the video above your post, notice where they are standing over his body. End of the building towards the parking lot. Then go watch videos on camera focal lengths and what happens to the background as you zoom in.Ag with kids said:And the cell phones that had pics of him in the exact same location? They've got that awesome photo technology, too?tk for tu juan said:Ag with kids said:How do you take THIS picture if he is on the parking lot side of the roof and facing where Trump was standing?tk for tu juan said:Monkeypoxfighter said:I'm trying to find a better map of how the shooter would have approached that building to climb it. One post said he carried a ladder a mile, through checkpoints and metal detectors. How were those set up in relation to the shooter's entry and getting on the building?Ag with kids said:
Ok...I'm confused...
All the pics show the shooter near the edge of the building facing to the right (in the pics) towards Trump.
Why does this pic have the shooter WAY over on the other side of the building? If those pics/videos are correct, wouldn't he have to be over on the far left of that building?
He was on the side closest to the parking lot, you can see the blood on the roof.
Are all of them giants? So that they can be seen from the ground ALL the way across the top of the building?
Background compression from the long focal length when the photo was taken.
Not only that, the person taking the job is 15 ft tall to get that angle?
Because I'm trying to understand how the geometry works for a person 6 ft tall filming a building that's 15 ft tall and seeing something on the roof that's 120 ft across the roof.
Look at the Google Street view screenshots here:
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3475585/replies/68101377#68101377
The back of the building where the video and photos are taken are several get below the ground level compared to where the spectators were.
However...there're still pics closer to the building that show him closer to the near edge. They were phone videos, not photog pics.
Again, I'm just trying to figure out the geometry.
fifytxags92 said:Look at the bermAg with kids said:Ok...this pic may explain it...with a long zoom.TexasAggie_02 said:Ag with kids said:Can you post the video?tk for tu juan said:Watch the video above your post, notice where they are standing over his body. End of the building towards the parking lot. Then go watch videos on camera focal lengths and what happens to the background as you zoom in.Ag with kids said:And the cell phones that had pics of him in the exact same location? They've got that awesome photo technology, too?tk for tu juan said:Ag with kids said:How do you take THIS picture if he is on the parking lot side of the roof and facing where Trump was standing?tk for tu juan said:Monkeypoxfighter said:I'm trying to find a better map of how the shooter would have approached that building to climb it. One post said he carried a ladder a mile, through checkpoints and metal detectors. How were those set up in relation to the shooter's entry and getting on the building?Ag with kids said:
Ok...I'm confused...
All the pics show the shooter near the edge of the building facing to the right (in the pics) towards Trump.
Why does this pic have the shooter WAY over on the other side of the building? If those pics/videos are correct, wouldn't he have to be over on the far left of that building?
He was on the side closest to the parking lot, you can see the blood on the roof.
Are all of them giants? So that they can be seen from the ground ALL the way across the top of the building?
Background compression from the long focal length when the photo was taken.
Not only that, the person taking the job is 15 ft tall to get that angle?
Because I'm trying to understand how the geometry works for a person 6 ft tall filming a building that's 15 ft tall and seeing something on the roof that's 120 ft across the roof.
Look at the Google Street view screenshots here:
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3475585/replies/68101377#68101377
The back of the building where the video and photos are taken are several get below the ground level compared to where the spectators were.
However...there're still pics closer to the building that show him closer to the near edge. They were phone videos, not photog pics.
Again, I'm just trying to figure out the geometry.swalebetween the photographer and the building in this pic. You stand on that bermscaleand shoot towards the building with a phone held over your head you can get the view of the shooter's position from the earlier photo.
DJT is a publicly traded stock. You can look at the options volumes on any trading platform.Ag In Ok said:
Where does one go to find DJT futures? This needs to be verified
Never let a good crisis go to waste,
— casaletto da malta ن (@casalettoalbert) July 17, 2024
especially when there's $$$ to be made ...$djt stock was heavily shorted in the days before the assassination attempt
people knew
Just like 9/11 AA excessive put options before the fact pic.twitter.com/sjl5GmvJIV
Thomas Crooks’ cellphone and transmitter seen next to his body after Trump shooting — as details emerge he told his boss he needed the day off work https://t.co/ByranHIRv5 pic.twitter.com/pQD8W6Zq0W
— New York Post (@nypost) July 17, 2024
TX_COWDOC said:
SO why the last minute stop for 50 rounds of ammunition? Makes zero sense.
FTAG 2000 said:TX_COWDOC said:
SO why the last minute stop for 50 rounds of ammunition? Makes zero sense.
It was reported he went to the range on Friday.
Maybe he did that, but then forgot about replacing the rounds he shot with there until the day of.
Exactly, but this is why everyone is posting their opinions. Nobody wants to believe this amount of negligence is purposeful, but when you look at the history of the SS, this does not happen. With this type of information, one can only be lead to believe that this shooter had assistance in some/many ways.Quote:
Regardless, if you think this is a conspiracy, inside job, incompetence, or whatever the lady who says the roof was too steep, is responsible for the murder of the innocent fireman. How in the hell was this not prevented this should have not happened you have officers reporting suspicious activity for 2030 minutes before the shooting, and the rally is still allowed to go on not delayed just proceed like normal… You have people on the ground for over a minute screaming about a guy on a building regardless if he had a gun or not, they're pointing out something crazy is going on. How does the Secret Service guy on stage not go grab Mr. Trump and say, sir we've got a take cover for a little bit to figure this out something's going on, it's absolutely ridiculous that he was able to stay up there on stage… If there is a bomb threat at a school, you don't just continue on the day like normal until a bomb is found or until you find that it was a prank Wake up, she should be fired and people should be in jail
Bighunter43 said:
I thought he had a car at the rally….not a van. I thought the van was back at his home…you know, the one they towed away with the "Arizona" plates. I'm still wondering how a guy who's lived in Pennsylvania his whole life has a van with Arizona plates. (Maybe he had recently purchased it used, and hadn't had time to change the plates yet?)….still very strange to me.
IndividualFreedom said:Exactly, but this is why everyone is posting their opinions. Nobody wants to believe this amount of negligence is purposeful, but when you look at the history of the SS, this does not happen. With this type of information, one can only be lead to believe that this shooter had assistance in some/many ways.Quote:
Regardless, if you think this is a conspiracy, inside job, incompetence, or whatever the lady who says the roof was too steep, is responsible for the murder of the innocent fireman. How in the hell was this not prevented this should have not happened you have officers reporting suspicious activity for 2030 minutes before the shooting, and the rally is still allowed to go on not delayed just proceed like normal… You have people on the ground for over a minute screaming about a guy on a building regardless if he had a gun or not, they're pointing out something crazy is going on. How does the Secret Service guy on stage not go grab Mr. Trump and say, sir we've got a take cover for a little bit to figure this out something's going on, it's absolutely ridiculous that he was able to stay up there on stage… If there is a bomb threat at a school, you don't just continue on the day like normal until a bomb is found or until you find that it was a prank Wake up, she should be fired and people should be in jail
IndividualFreedom said:Exactly, but this is why everyone is posting their opinions. Nobody wants to believe this amount of negligence is purposeful, but when you look at the history of the SS, this does not happen. With this type of information, one can only be lead to believe that this shooter had assistance in some/many ways.Quote:
Regardless, if you think this is a conspiracy, inside job, incompetence, or whatever the lady who says the roof was too steep, is responsible for the murder of the innocent fireman. How in the hell was this not prevented this should have not happened you have officers reporting suspicious activity for 2030 minutes before the shooting, and the rally is still allowed to go on not delayed just proceed like normal… You have people on the ground for over a minute screaming about a guy on a building regardless if he had a gun or not, they're pointing out something crazy is going on. How does the Secret Service guy on stage not go grab Mr. Trump and say, sir we've got a take cover for a little bit to figure this out something's going on, it's absolutely ridiculous that he was able to stay up there on stage… If there is a bomb threat at a school, you don't just continue on the day like normal until a bomb is found or until you find that it was a prank Wake up, she should be fired and people should be in jail
nortex97 said:
I've read that if he had been 3 feet further to the right (in that picture) he would have had full concealment from both counter sniper teams. Probably coulda gotten off at least a dozen more shots.
Bighunter43 said:
I thought he had a car at the rally….not a van. I thought the van was back at his home…you know, the one they towed away with the "Arizona" plates. I'm still wondering how a guy who's lived in Pennsylvania his whole life has a van with Arizona plates. (Maybe he had recently purchased it used, and hadn't had time to change the plates yet?)….still very strange to me.
What is he doing? Destroying evidence?TChaney said:The director of the Secret Service now admits that they knew the building was a vulnerability for Trump, but they didn’t put an agent there because the roof was slightly sloped and a safety risk for an agent.
— 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸 (@Travis_4_Trump) July 16, 2024
This is absolutely ridiculous. The agents were scared of a slightly… pic.twitter.com/LeCLY1MSNg
This is just terrible.
Who allowed this man up on such a dangerous slope, with water of all things, he could slip and fall.
Putting our agents at risk like this is simply unacceptable.