Shots fired at Trump [Keep it factual -- Staff]

847,017 Views | 6497 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by gigemags-99
Schneider Electric
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FireAg said:

Folks still convinced these were all just at crazy set of coincidences created by incompetence?



How long until we are racist for asking questions?
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Next y'all bouta tell me he somehow hooked up with Blackrock.

Come'on man!
Old Tom Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Dems are about to rerun the election fraud playbook where you are labeled a nutter for acknowledging painfully obvious issues and questions
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And with Biden's announcement, Trump's assassination attempt is memory holed.....
Hittag1492
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Raiderjay said:

And with Biden's announcement, Trump's assassination attempt is memory holed.....


I have afeeling it will be ongoing-no worries there.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Foreverconservative said:

Here's the first few pages of Johnson's report














Sorry for forgetting to post the link to the full report

https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/services/files/4E6577F1-8AD2-4CB9-9FC7-5896C27A9647
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Say what you want about salty ole Chuck Grassley, he may sound like an actor off of Mayberry RFD or Green Acres but he gets on the scent and stays after it. He's evidently obtained internal Secret Service docs that show ONLY THREE post-standers allotted to the Trump rally versus 12 at Jill Biden's event the same day in Pittsburgh.

Grassley presses the SS director for answers in this letter sent yesterday, citing internal Secret Service emails obtained from protected whistleblowers.

Grassley cites internal USSS emails showing just three post-standers assigned to Trump's rally and 12 for Jill Biden's indoor event in nearby Pittsburgh that had less than a hundred people there total.

He reiterates his demands for a list of all security personnel from all agencies present at the Trump rally and the Jill Biden indoor dinner.

Quote:

"I welcome any additional information you can provide relating to these communications and the total number of federal employees that were present that day,"




dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bunch of random thoughts:

  • This never smelled right from the beginning. My initial gut hunch was this was an intentional "slip"…and the more evidence that comes out, the more it seems that way.

  • Imagine the chorus if this had happened to Obama in his re-election campaign. There would be a fire raging across America spurred on by all the media b/c America is systemically racist and that system "allowed" a complete novice to stroll into an unguarded vantage point and take potshots at him. But our state-controlled media is out carrying water. Any questions are swatted away as if it's entirely wrong to ask questions or be critical. The talking points were out immediately to tell America what to think not to present facts and/or investigate.

USSS Gross incompetence:
  • If I were an enterprising reporter, I would research backwards in time. Were other sites left this open to potential nuts? Had there been a number of open risks that weren't capitalized? How far off the average was this episode? Was it just this particular timing when they stripped away a solid team or has it always been like this? IMO, it's either the most incredible coincidence of gross incompetence or it was intentional ineptitude. Pretend to be unaware of the threats and see what happens.
  • And remember, the Intel community hates Trump. They stood up Crossfire Hurricane two seconds after he was elected to destroy him. That's OUR government. BTW, I always felt that was appropriately named since Trump took fire from all directions even his supposed allies. Caught in a crossfire immediately.

Two-shooters:
  • Did they collect any of the slugs? If so, can't they put that to bed when the ballistics show up?

DEI Girl:
  • I've laughed and made fun of this girl as much as anyone. But now I'm feeling pretty bad about it. She signed up to serve her country and put herself in harm's way. She certainly doesn't look well trained or qualified for the role just on appearances. No way she can do a single pullup. But still, she's someone's daughter, and I feel ashamed for poking so much fun at her. It's not her fault so many worthless people above her made this all happen. She should never have been put in that position.

Shorting the market:
  • This should be the simplest way to find out who's behind this. But again, our government will miraculously not understand why that should be investigatedor they'll find excuses as to why they can't 'legally' do anything. And again, what would they be willing to do (or the MSM) if it had been Obama up on stage.

God's plan:
  • I didn't see it live. I was dealing with a funeral and wasn't in a real frame of mind to jump much. I just heard that Trump was shot at, but that he was fine. First thought was "they finally got at him." The timing with Biden flaming out at the debate and the charade coming to an endit was going to force somebody's hand. I originally thought they'd off Biden, but I think his family was highly motivated to make sure only the trusted assets are around him. So they go after Trump…and boy, the more I see the minor little head shift and the bullet whizzing by it's a miracle he didn't get his head blown off. In fact, I think we were all supposed to see just how close he came to reaching the end. Interventionnot sure I'd call it that. It was always God's plan.

Biden Stepping aside:
  • I wonder if this whole episode made any impact on the Bidens playing hardball and then finally relenting on a second term. Was there a photo of a bullet and "46" delivered to them somehow?
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Sniper #1 leaves his second floor post to go downstairs and talk to the roving patrol about the suspect.

While he's gone Trump is shot in the head.
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shame they don't have radios. or cell phones. or smoke signals
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Homing pigeons.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
'quit my post only when properly relieved' ... you know ... the thing.
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dreyOO said:




DEI Girl:
  • I've laughed and made fun of this girl as much as anyone. But now I'm feeling pretty bad about it. She signed up to serve her country and put herself in harm's way. She certainly doesn't look well trained or qualified for the role just on appearances. No way she can do a single pullup. But still, she's someone's daughter, and I feel ashamed for poking so much fun at her. It's not her fault so many worthless people above her made this all happen. She should never have been put in that position.


How would your opinion change if it was a short fat man that couldn't holster his pistol?
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Madman said:

dreyOO said:




DEI Girl:
  • I've laughed and made fun of this girl as much as anyone. But now I'm feeling pretty bad about it. She signed up to serve her country and put herself in harm's way. She certainly doesn't look well trained or qualified for the role just on appearances. No way she can do a single pullup. But still, she's someone's daughter, and I feel ashamed for poking so much fun at her. It's not her fault so many worthless people above her made this all happen. She should never have been put in that position.


How would your opinion change if it was a short fat man that couldn't holster his pistol?

Men weren't subject to lower qualifications though.
Trump will fix it.
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

Madman said:

dreyOO said:




DEI Girl:
  • I've laughed and made fun of this girl as much as anyone. But now I'm feeling pretty bad about it. She signed up to serve her country and put herself in harm's way. She certainly doesn't look well trained or qualified for the role just on appearances. No way she can do a single pullup. But still, she's someone's daughter, and I feel ashamed for poking so much fun at her. It's not her fault so many worthless people above her made this all happen. She should never have been put in that position.


How would your opinion change if it was a short fat man that couldn't holster his pistol?

Men weren't subject to lower qualifications though.
I must be missing your point and think you are missing mine.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We ain't never seen nothing like this.

The number of failures here are inexplicable.

It's goodnight Irene on this deal.

We can simply go no further.
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If that were a "person of color", I'd be just as pissed. Because that's a box-checking decision.

But the point is nobody (man, woman, it) deserves to be in that role unless they can do the job. And the person in charge should have led that way instead of putting dumb ideas out across that organization.
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Madman said:

techno-ag said:

Madman said:

dreyOO said:




DEI Girl:
  • I've laughed and made fun of this girl as much as anyone. But now I'm feeling pretty bad about it. She signed up to serve her country and put herself in harm's way. She certainly doesn't look well trained or qualified for the role just on appearances. No way she can do a single pullup. But still, she's someone's daughter, and I feel ashamed for poking so much fun at her. It's not her fault so many worthless people above her made this all happen. She should never have been put in that position.


How would your opinion change if it was a short fat man that couldn't holster his pistol?

Men weren't subject to lower qualifications though.
I must be missing your point and think you are missing mine.

My point is you're not going to see a short fat man because they have rigorous standards for male SS agents. Thanks to DEI these standards were lowered for women. So the whole question about how he would feel about seeing a short fat male agent is entirely moot.

What's your point?
Trump will fix it.
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dreyOO said:

If that were a "person of color", I'd be just as pissed. Because that's a box-checking decision.

But the point is nobody (man, woman, it) deserves to be in that role unless they can do the job. And the person in charge should have led that way instead of putting dumb ideas out across that organization.

Then don't feel bad for pointing it out. She earned the ridicule.
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

Madman said:

techno-ag said:

Madman said:

dreyOO said:




DEI Girl:
  • I've laughed and made fun of this girl as much as anyone. But now I'm feeling pretty bad about it. She signed up to serve her country and put herself in harm's way. She certainly doesn't look well trained or qualified for the role just on appearances. No way she can do a single pullup. But still, she's someone's daughter, and I feel ashamed for poking so much fun at her. It's not her fault so many worthless people above her made this all happen. She should never have been put in that position.


How would your opinion change if it was a short fat man that couldn't holster his pistol?

Men weren't subject to lower qualifications though.
I must be missing your point and think you are missing mine.

My point is you're not going to see a short fat man because they have rigorous standards for male SS agents. Thanks to DEI these standards were lowered for women. So the whole question about how he would feel about seeing a short fat male agent is entirely moot.

What's your point?

Its not moot. The OP felt bad for poking fun when he shouldn't feel bad at all. If it had been a man we all would have mocked the agent even more and probably not felt bad afterwards. We both agree she wasn't qualified to have the job.

DEI doesn't absolve her performance. It underlines it.
Corporal Punishment
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Check out the conspiracy theorist. Unhinged.

MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stop derailing the thread with stupid crap
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


8pm in the east and the hearing with Cheatle is still a go. Barring a day of cancellation Cheatle be in the hot-seat by the time you get out the bed.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Allegedly the man in the gray suit.
Cepe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:




Allegedly the man in the gray suit.



Man in the Grey Suit?

Have we slipped into an X-Files episode?

Seriously????
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump is at the podium speaking. Sniper #1 gets up from his position. Moseys on downstairs to have a chat with the guy on roving patrol. Meanwhile the shooter bear crawling on the roof directly above them. If he'd have opened up the door that went out to the roof he probably could have shot the guy offhand.

But Sniper #1 goes downstairs on the backside of the building to talk about Crooks; where he at and where he went.

Meanwhile Crooks out on the roof. Crooks shoots Trump in the head and gets off a few more rounds. Kills one other person and injures others.

Who knows why they inside the building with an obstructed view. Maybe they wanted to be in the A/C. We just don't know. Maybe they didn't want to open the door to the roof and let the A/C out. We just don't know that either.

Just about the time you think this story can't get any wilder; it does.

People on here probably pulled a lot of duty but this don't sound like anything we ever heard of in our life.

1. Who leaves their post unattended?

and;

2. Was Sniper #1 the guy that gave the other cop a boost to peek over the roof?

Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the Senator's timeline is accurate, Sniper #1 off his post and at ground level for 5 minutes before the shooting starts.

What you gotta do for 5 minutes?

Who leaves their post for 5-minutes while Trump at the podium?

Who leaves their post for 1 second while Trump at the podium?

If you do leave your post what you gotta do for 6-minutes away from your post?

"Do not leave your post "

Thats literally rule 1. Rule number 1 is dont' leave your post and this guy gone for 5-minutes.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dreyOO said:

Bunch of random thoughts:

  • This never smelled right from the beginning. My initial gut hunch was this was an intentional "slip"…and the more evidence that comes out, the more it seems that way.

  • Imagine the chorus if this had happened to Obama in his re-election campaign. There would be a fire raging across America spurred on by all the media b/c America is systemically racist and that system "allowed" a complete novice to stroll into an unguarded vantage point and take potshots at him. But our state-controlled media is out carrying water. Any questions are swatted away as if it's entirely wrong to ask questions or be critical. The talking points were out immediately to tell America what to think not to present facts and/or investigate.

USSS Gross incompetence:
  • If I were an enterprising reporter, I would research backwards in time. Were other sites left this open to potential nuts? Had there been a number of open risks that weren't capitalized? How far off the average was this episode? Was it just this particular timing when they stripped away a solid team or has it always been like this? IMO, it's either the most incredible coincidence of gross incompetence or it was intentional ineptitude. Pretend to be unaware of the threats and see what happens.
  • And remember, the Intel community hates Trump. They stood up Crossfire Hurricane two seconds after he was elected to destroy him. That's OUR government. BTW, I always felt that was appropriately named since Trump took fire from all directions even his supposed allies. Caught in a crossfire immediately.

Two-shooters:
  • Did they collect any of the slugs? If so, can't they put that to bed when the ballistics show up?

DEI Girl:
  • I've laughed and made fun of this girl as much as anyone. But now I'm feeling pretty bad about it. She signed up to serve her country and put herself in harm's way. She certainly doesn't look well trained or qualified for the role just on appearances. No way she can do a single pullup. But still, she's someone's daughter, and I feel ashamed for poking so much fun at her. It's not her fault so many worthless people above her made this all happen. She should never have been put in that position.

Shorting the market:
  • This should be the simplest way to find out who's behind this. But again, our government will miraculously not understand why that should be investigatedor they'll find excuses as to why they can't 'legally' do anything. And again, what would they be willing to do (or the MSM) if it had been Obama up on stage.

God's plan:
  • I didn't see it live. I was dealing with a funeral and wasn't in a real frame of mind to jump much. I just heard that Trump was shot at, but that he was fine. First thought was "they finally got at him." The timing with Biden flaming out at the debate and the charade coming to an endit was going to force somebody's hand. I originally thought they'd off Biden, but I think his family was highly motivated to make sure only the trusted assets are around him. So they go after Trump…and boy, the more I see the minor little head shift and the bullet whizzing by it's a miracle he didn't get his head blown off. In fact, I think we were all supposed to see just how close he came to reaching the end. Interventionnot sure I'd call it that. It was always God's plan.

Biden Stepping aside:
  • I wonder if this whole episode made any impact on the Bidens playing hardball and then finally relenting on a second term. Was there a photo of a bullet and "46" delivered to them somehow?



What a great post. Very well said and pondered.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

If the Senator's timeline is accurate, Sniper #1 off his post and at ground level for 5 minutes before the shooting starts.

What you gotta do for 5 minutes?

Who leaves their post for 5-minutes while Trump at the podium?

Who leaves their post for 1 second while Trump at the podium?

If you do leave your post what you gotta do for 6-minutes away from your post?

"Do not leave your post "

Thats literally rule 1. Rule number 1 is dont' leave your post and this guy gone for 5-minutes.


This. Piss your pants if you have to. It's a short but very critical job assignment.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gallo Blanco said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

If the Senator's timeline is accurate, Sniper #1 off his post and at ground level for 5 minutes before the shooting starts.

What you gotta do for 5 minutes?

Who leaves their post for 5-minutes while Trump at the podium?

Who leaves their post for 1 second while Trump at the podium?

If you do leave your post what you gotta do for 6-minutes away from your post?

"Do not leave your post "

Thats literally rule 1. Rule number 1 is dont' leave your post and this guy gone for 5-minutes.
This. Piss your pants if you have to. It's a short but very critical job assignment.
I can't imagine the guy voluntarily leaving his post while Trump at the podium.

I also can't imagine a commander ordering a sniper off their post for any reason, and especially while Trump is at the podium.

A guy being off post or ordered off post for 5-minutes while Trump is at the podium is inconceivable. It's incredulous to think thats what actually happened. So thats got to be some bad information. Maybe the timeline is inaccurate or someone fed the Senator some bad info. There's got to be some other explanation for this or we looking at bad info here.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

If the Senator's timeline is accurate, Sniper #1 off his post and at ground level for 5 minutes before the shooting starts.

What you gotta do for 5 minutes?

Who leaves their post for 5-minutes while Trump at the podium?

Who leaves their post for 1 second while Trump at the podium?

If you do leave your post what you gotta do for 6-minutes away from your post?

"Do not leave your post "

Thats literally rule 1. Rule number 1 is dont' leave your post and this guy gone for 5-minutes.
The guards watching Epstein also stopped watching him.
Ramdiesel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sam callahan said:

shame they don't have radios. or cell phones. or smoke signals


LOL! Or even handguns. Fire them off in the air to cause a commotion or something to get Trump off stage, if the radios aren't working...

I think this going to go down as the craziest event in this century so far, and we will never get answers just like the Vegas shooting. They will just blame it on incompetency, poor planning, etc when it seems like statistically it would be impossible for so many things to go wrong for this to happen without it being intentional.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Quote:

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), ahead of Monday's scheduled House Oversight Committee hearing where lawmakers will question Secret Service Director Kim Cheatle, is now demanding answers and a list of everyone who was providing security. He cited emails showing there were only the three post-standers for Trump and the 12 for Jill Biden.
That's insane. You have a former president who has a ton of threats against him, largely because of the demonization by the Democrats. There actually was an Iranian threat. Yet still they detailed more to Jill, if this report is true.
That's a big problem, and how they are handling Trump's security needs to be upgraded immediately. Cheatle needs to resign, but beyond that, all that went on here needs to be exposed and dealt with, with people held accountable.
Not pathetic, deliberate.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

agracer said:

ttu_85 said:

agracer said:


and lots of video evidence.

but some random person on Twitter posts an "audio analysis" and we're supposed to take it all as 100% concrete evidence of 3 shooters and someone zip lining from the water tower.
And! This is why I dont partake on these kinds of threads. Problem is , if we had a gov and media we could trust to do an impartial, unbiased, fact based investigation threads like this would not exist. Personally I think most of it is silly.

But man Im glad it does exist. Because I dont trust this gov or the media as far as I can throw it. Trust is a wonderful thing and we ain't got it.
I don't trust them either. But I, and a lot of other posters have enough common sense to see some of the conspiracy nonsense for what it is, nonsense.


True….but do you think there's a tiny but greater than 0% chance he could have had some help or that some security holes/vulnerabilities could have been intentional? Because, if you think there's at least SOME small chance any part of this was intentional, you're a "conspiracy theorist" to a lot of people. I personally think only a fool would think it was impossible.
I was talking more about the second shooter in the trees or building behind him (THOSE WINDOWS DON'T OPEN!!!) and third shooters (beyond the return fire from the SS) and the zip line from the water tower conspiracy types. Also, the continued "locals saw him on the roof, told the nearby police and the police did nothing" crowd. People keep posting the same false narratives over and over, and getting corrected but then they get posted again.

I would not surprise me in the least bit if there was some willful disregard for Crooks walking around and sub-standard staffing of the security detail in the hopes something like this might happen. But then still have some plausible deniability such that no one gets jail time or any consequences for the failure (IE: We followed protocol set down by our superiors). Or even he was getting some indoctrination online or help outside of doing this by himself.
First Page Last Page
Page 147 of 186
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.