vansprinkle said:
JW said:
The social contract should protect both employee and employer. When it favors one over the other is when it falls apart. We see pandering to both sides constantly making it all worse, when decreasing regulation/barrier to entry and minimum wages would be the better choice.
Getting rid of minimum wage would be the best choice. This would be decreasing regulation and removing a barrier to entry.
Of course, killing minimum wage does nothing if you don't kill at least 75% of the government handouts along with it.
Yesterday, I was talking to my favorite teacher who teaches HS on the wrong side of the tracks and she told me about a conversation she had with one of her students about how many bags of potato chips he kept bringing to class.
Student told her that he and his grandmother (who he lives with) get $700/month in Food Stamps and they can spend $100/month at convenience stores. And of course kids get free lunch and breakfast at school anyway.
There's really very little incentive to work if you're in that category.
And back to the original story in the OP, for a lot of the barista class of workers, the job is just a place to hang out. They're not even really trying to sell one tea much less the TexAgs legendary "two teas".