Bubblez said:
This is regarding the Biden administration's changes to Title IX. He doesn't like them, and is suing the government to get them overturned, but unlike some other states, he isn't going to simply ignore the law. We have people like Ken Paxton that don't believe in the rule of law, They don't believe in the Constitution. They fully demonstrate this by openly defying the rule of law by saying they won't comply. This is no other than the anarchy they claim they decry.
Glad somebody on the right still believes in the rule of law.
So much to digest here.
1. Where in the Constitution that you profess to revere is the Biden administration empowered to change Title IX to advance its radical political agenda?
2. Since when is refusing to implement an unconstitutional power ''ignoring the law"?
3. Since when is an AG who follows the Constitution instead of an unconstitutional and extra-statutory regulation demonstrating a disbelief in the rule of law?
4. Since when is a following of the Constitution as the supreme law of the land demonstrating a disbelief in the Constitution?
5. So implementing anarchy is a way of opposing anarchy?
What are the bases of Tennessee's challenge to the power grab by Biden? That Biden lacks statutory and Constitutional power to do so. If the Tennessee AG is raising that challenge in good faith, then how in the world does the Constitution and rule of law allow, much less mandate, that he implement the deficient grabbing and abuse of power? And how does a leftist contort the Constitution and concept of rule of law to spout such nonsense?