Tesla plans to lay off 10% of global workforce amid 'rapid' company growth

3,980 Views | 40 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by deddog
Post removed:
by user
3:58p, 4/15/24
GeorgiAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:04p, 4/15/24
AG
Laying off 10% of your workforce for "growth?"

Reply Quote
6
Post removed:
by user
In reply to GeorgiAg • 4:07p, 4/15/24
Hobbes01
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 4:09p, 4/15/24
AG
Hmm, wonder what percent this would be if the federal government used the same strategy!!
Reply Quote
25
Post removed:
by user
In reply to Hobbes01 • 4:10p, 4/15/24
BoydCrowder13
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:11p, 4/15/24
Doesn't Exxon cut 5-10% of their workforce annually?
Reply Quote
4
GeorgiAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 4:13p, 4/15/24
AG
C@LAg said:
GeorgiAg said:
Laying off 10% of your workforce for "growth?"
yes.

eliminating unneeded groups due to redundancies, changes in product mix, to reflect cancelled projects, to focus on new strategies, etc.

tech companies do this all the time./
I need to buy some stock. Maybe this will knock the price down a bit and I'll pick up some.
Reply Quote
1
VitruvianAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:13p, 4/15/24
AG
He's replacing them with Optimus!

Duh!!!
Reply Quote
1
No Spin Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BoydCrowder13 • 4:14p, 4/15/24
BoydCrowder13 said:
Doesn't Exxon cut 5-10% of their workforce annually?


Is that just Exxon, or do all oil companies do that?
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Reply Quote
1
GeorgiAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:16p, 4/15/24
AG
Reply Quote
9
Bubblez
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:39p, 4/15/24
He could have simply said Tesla is getting rid of some of the low performing dead weight the company has unfortunately accumulated over the past few years, and they won't be missed one bit.
Reply Quote
2
Post removed:
by user
4:40p, 4/15/24
torrid
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:42p, 4/15/24
AG
Getting rid of dead wood so he can hire better talent to help with growth.
Reply Quote
7
torrid
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to No Spin Ag • 4:44p, 4/15/24
AG
No Spin Ag said:
BoydCrowder13 said:
Doesn't Exxon cut 5-10% of their workforce annually?


Is that just Exxon, or do all oil companies do that?
Any company worshipping at the altar of Neutron Jack and using stacked ranking, where performance reviews ae forced to a bell curve.
Reply Quote
3
Bobaloo
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:59p, 4/15/24
I worked at Texas Instruments 30 years ago, and we had standard reductions in force. Every company that large can reduce head count of those not producing.
Reply Quote
1
aggiejayrod
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BoydCrowder13 • 5:07p, 4/15/24
AG
BoydCrowder13 said:
Doesn't Exxon cut 5-10% of their workforce annually?


Comes from the Jack Welsh management training from his GE days. Rack and stack all employees. Cut the worst 10%, promote the top 10%. Especially ineffective when you actually have an entire team of high performers but needs to cut a few because upper management says they can't possibly all be high performers.
Reply Quote
14
TexAgs91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to GeorgiAg • 5:55p, 4/15/24
AG
GeorgiAg said:
Laying off 10% of your workforce for "growth?"
Yes

"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Reply Quote
Kraft Punk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bubblez • 5:59p, 4/15/24
Bubblez said:
He could have simply said Tesla is getting rid of some of the low performing dead weight the company has unfortunately accumulated over the past few years, and they won't be missed one bit.



But then people on your team would cry & demand they unionized so that everyone can loaf....


Elon is smarter than the people on your team
Reply Quote
5
Logos Stick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BoydCrowder13 • 6:00p, 4/15/24
BoydCrowder13 said:
Doesn't Exxon cut 5-10% of their workforce annually?


Not sure, but I know GE used to under Welch.
Reply Quote
J. Walter Weatherman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bubblez • 6:03p, 4/15/24
Bubblez said:
He could have simply said Tesla is getting rid of some of the low performing dead weight the company has unfortunately accumulated over the past few years, and they won't be missed one bit.


Internally, you cut the bad performers. Externally, it's a "cost cutting layoff" so you can avoid any HR issues. It's exactly how you do these things. But I'm sure you know better.
Reply Quote
2
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:04p, 4/15/24
AG
TexAggers have been noting Teslas falling fortunes for months. The EVangelists on here have been stridently insisting everything's fine.

Layoffs are not "fine."
Trump will fix it.
Reply Quote
Brother Shamus
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:23p, 4/15/24
Eh, cutting the fat is okay. I bet Tesla has some complacent folks that need to be cut.
Reply Quote
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to GeorgiAg • 8:26p, 4/15/24
AG
GeorgiAg said:
Laying off 10% of your workforce for "growth?"

In the traditional Big 3 automakers, the answer would be **** NO...

But, Tesla is not one of them. They operate like a tech company, not an automaker.

Not being unionized helps I guess...
Reply Quote
2
bmks270
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:53p, 4/15/24
AG
I see a lot of linked in posts about the layoff: looks like it already happened, people posting about how great their experience was now looking for work.
Reply Quote
Texas Yarddog
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 11:05p, 4/15/24
AG
C@LAg said:
Hobbes01 said:
Hmm, wonder what percent this would be if the federal government used the same strategy!!
govt see redundancies as a "feature" to govt. not a problem.

they only exist to grow govt.



The Fed civilian "workforce" could be cut by 80% and still function and it would be closer to what the Founders had in mind.
Reply Quote
2
deddog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiejayrod • 11:27p, 4/15/24
AG
aggiejayrod said:
BoydCrowder13 said:
Doesn't Exxon cut 5-10% of their workforce annually?


Comes from the Jack Welsh management training from his GE days. Rack and stack all employees. Cut the worst 10%, promote the top 10%. Especially ineffective when you actually have an entire team of high performers but needs to cut a few because upper management says they can't possibly all be high performers.
Pisses me off...Many companies have stopped this - especially in Tech
Reply Quote
deddog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 11:29p, 4/15/24
AG
techno-ag said:
TexAggers have been noting Teslas falling fortunes for months. The EVangelists on here have been stridently insisting everything's fine.

Layoffs are not "fine."
Its a terrible economy, unless you work in government , defense, or a gov approved green energy company.
Reply Quote
1
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiejayrod • 7:44a, 4/16/24
AG
aggiejayrod said:
BoydCrowder13 said:
Doesn't Exxon cut 5-10% of their workforce annually?


Comes from the Jack Welsh management training from his GE days. Rack and stack all employees. Cut the worst 10%, promote the top 10%. Especially ineffective when you actually have an entire team of high performers but needs to cut a few because upper management says they can't possibly all be high performers.
I've been through that a few times.

Mandated that EVERY department had to cut 10%.

So some areas with nothing but high performers lost a few high performers and some areas that were NOTHING but LOW performers also only lost a few.

Dumbest thing I ever saw.
Reply Quote
6
japantiger
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiejayrod • 9:41a, 4/16/24
S
aggiejayrod said:
BoydCrowder13 said:
Doesn't Exxon cut 5-10% of their workforce annually?


Comes from the Jack Welsh management training from his GE days. Rack and stack all employees. Cut the worst 10%, promote the top 10%. Especially ineffective when you actually have an entire team of high performers but needs to cut a few because upper management says they can't possibly all be high performers.
Uuuhhhmmm, a team of all high performers? Really?
Reply Quote
1
Logos Stick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 9:47a, 4/16/24
Ag with kids said:
aggiejayrod said:
BoydCrowder13 said:
Doesn't Exxon cut 5-10% of their workforce annually?


Comes from the Jack Welsh management training from his GE days. Rack and stack all employees. Cut the worst 10%, promote the top 10%. Especially ineffective when you actually have an entire team of high performers but needs to cut a few because upper management says they can't possibly all be high performers.
I've been through that a few times.

Mandated that EVERY department had to cut 10%.

So some areas with nothing but high performers lost a few high performers and some areas that were NOTHING but LOW performers also only lost a few.

Dumbest thing I ever saw.

Now do seniority based mandates. Way back, I watched one of my best friends, MS in Industrial Engineering, get canned because he was the newest in that particular group. He was outstanding. They kept a goofball low performer who had more time on the job who ended up quitting a few months later. Ridiculous.
Reply Quote
nai06
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:52a, 4/16/24
AG
How much of tesla is the cybertruck team? 10%?

maybe he realized what a money hole that thing is and has decided to cut his losses
Reply Quote
1
Faustus
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:35p, 4/16/24
Doubled employment in Austin last year to rival HEB as the city's biggest employer, which surprised me.

https://www.expressnews.com/business/article/tesla-doubles-texas-employment-elon-musk-led-ev-19379719.php

Reply Quote
1
No Spin Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Faustus • 12:41p, 4/16/24
Faustus said:
Doubled employment in Austin last year to rival HEB as the city's biggest employer, which surprised me.

https://www.expressnews.com/business/article/tesla-doubles-texas-employment-elon-musk-led-ev-19379719.php



Two companies that couldn't have bluer employees. Of course it would be Austin.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Reply Quote
Faustus
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:01p, 4/16/24
SpaceX's Starbase is just outside of Brownsville, which is also pretty blue.
Reply Quote
1 edit
LMCane
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:27p, 4/16/24
C@LAg said:
GeorgiAg said:
Laying off 10% of your workforce for "growth?"
yes.

eliminating unneeded groups due to redundancies, changes in product mix, to reflect cancelled projects, to focus on new strategies, etc.

tech companies do this all the time./
is Tesla a tech company - or a car company?
Reply Quote
3
Page 1 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.