In my experience, the burden of proof is so beaten into the jury that they understand if. If the lawyer on the jury uses preponderance of the evidence, its not on accident. He/she/ze would be knowingly violating the law.Quote:
Since one of the attorneys on the jury is reportedly a civil trial lawyer, do you think he will be thinking in those terms (especially after the biased judge's jury charge that we know is coming) rather than realizing the rules are different in a criminal trial?
I'm Gipper