ACLU of Indiana sued to challenge the ban on behalf of five anonymous Jewish, Muslim, and spiritual plaintiffs and the group Hoosier Jews for Choice. The plaintiffs argued that their religious beliefs not only support but in some situations, even mandate - abortions that would be illegal under Indiana's ban. The conflict between the Indiana abortion ban and the plaintiffs' individual religious beliefs meant the ban violated the state's Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), they said in their complaint.
https://lawandcrime.com/abortion/severely-decreased-their-sexual-intimacy-with-their-husbands-indiana-appeals-court-uses-mike-pences-religious-liberty-law-to-block-abortion-ban/
misconstrue and deflect
this is how the devil works
the is no moral reasoning in support of baby killing
https://lawandcrime.com/abortion/severely-decreased-their-sexual-intimacy-with-their-husbands-indiana-appeals-court-uses-mike-pences-religious-liberty-law-to-block-abortion-ban/
misconstrue and deflect
this is how the devil works
the is no moral reasoning in support of baby killing