gkaggie08 said:
I live 2-2.5 hours west of the path. We are supposed to have 94.5% coverage of the sun for about 4 minutes. A friend of mine is pulling his kids out of school and headed east to see the total eclipse. It's a bucket list thing for him.
Is a 2.5 he drive worth the extra 5.5%? If I go, I'm parking on some FM road in the middle of nowhere, not going to fight traffic for 4 minutes
The gap in experience between 99.9% total and 100% total is huge. They are two completely different things. "Almost total" is a curiosity. Total is a a completely different animal.