Marijuana: 42% increased risk of a stroke - & 25% higher chance of heart attack

6,691 Views | 63 Replies | Last: 3 mo ago by C@LAg
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bad news for marijuana users. Looks like it's unhealthy for them, even if they bake it in brownies.

Who would have thought it?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13135909/cannabis-heart-attack-stroke-risk-marijuana.html
Quote:

Using marijuana in ANY form is linked to a 42% increased risk of a stroke - and 25% higher chance of a heart attack, study warns
  • A study found that cannabis use could raise the risk of heart attack and stroke
  • Users had a 25% higher chance of heart attack and 42% greater stroke risk
By EMILY JOSHU HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 09:46 EST, 28 February 2024 | UPDATED: 09:51 EST, 28 February 2024

.....The researchers found that smoking, eating, or vaping cannabis was associated with a 'significant' increase in heart disease and stroke risk, and the more days someone smoked, the more likely they were to have adverse effects.

However, the team noted that this increased risk was consistent with other known heart disease and stroke risks, such as alcohol, body mass index (BMI), Type 2 diabetes, and lack of physical activity.

They also found that daily cannabis users were 25 percent more likely to develop heart disease and 42 percent more likely to suffer a stroke.

And younger adults - men under 55 and women under 65 - who were already at risk for cardiovascular disease had a combined 36 percent increase chance of heart disease, coronary artery disease, and stroke.

'Our study shows that smoking cannabis has significant cardiovascular risk risks, just like smoking tobacco,' Dr Jeffers said. .....

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38415581/
Quote:

Association of Cannabis Use With Cardiovascular Outcomes Among US Adults
Abra M Jeffers 1 2 3 4, Stanton Glantz 5, Amy L Byers 6 7 8, Salomeh Keyhani 1 9 10
Affiliations expand
PMID: 38415581 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030178
Abstract
Background: We examined the association between cannabis use and cardiovascular outcomes among the general population, among never-tobacco smokers, and among younger individuals.

Methods and results: This is a population-based, cross-sectional study of 2016 to 2020 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey from 27 American states and 2 territories. We assessed the association of cannabis use (number of days of cannabis use in the past 30 days) with self-reported cardiovascular outcomes (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and a composite measure of all 3) in multivariable regression models, adjusting for tobacco use and other characteristics in adults 18 to 74 years old. We repeated this analysis among nontobacco smokers, and among men <55 years old and women <65 years old who are at risk of premature cardiovascular disease. Among the 434 104 respondents, the prevalence of daily and nondaily cannabis use was 4% and 7.1%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the association of daily cannabis use and coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and the composite outcome (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke) was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.98-1.38), 1.25 (95% CI, 1.07-1.46), 1.42 (95% CI, 1.20-1.68), and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.13-1.44), respectively, with proportionally lower log odds for days of use between 0 and 30 days per month. Among never-tobacco smokers, daily cannabis use was also associated with myocardial infarction (aOR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.03-2.15]), stroke (aOR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.43-3.25]), and the composite of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke (aOR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.31-2.40]). Relationships between cannabis use and cardiovascular outcomes were similar for men <55 years old and women <65 years old.

Conclusions: Cannabis use is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, with heavier use (more days per month) associated with higher odds of adverse outcomes.

CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Poor GrapeSoda.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieDruggist89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not legit.

Didn't mention the real important adverse event. Hunger and increased appetite.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

However, the team noted that this increased risk was consistent with other known heart disease and stroke risks, such as alcohol, body mass index (BMI), Type 2 diabetes, and lack of physical activity.
But really, this statement is kinda key.

Just like any other thing that is bad for you, it increases your risk of dying.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
AGinHI
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WolfCall said:

Bad news for marijuana users. Looks like it's unhealthy for them, even if they bake it in brownies.

Who would have thought it?

I'll tell you who thought it.

All the kids I worked years ago who didn't want to do anything other than sit around getting high

and are probably now bitter and resentful of the systemic oppression which has prevented them from living the life of ease and pleasure they believed their due.
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I had a pretty bad stroke a couple years back
hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. good times create weak men. and weak men create hard times.

less virtue signaling, more vice signaling.

Birds aren’t real
Lol,lmao
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Still tho, weed.
hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. good times create weak men. and weak men create hard times.

less virtue signaling, more vice signaling.

Birds aren’t real
Lol,lmao
PA24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Very addictive drug, should only be used per medical prescription.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I could absolutely use a few hits off of a good blunt right about now
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

All the kids I worked years ago who didn't want to do anything other than sit around getting high
They hiring?
AGinHI
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Next time you visit a Hawaii Jack in the Box go ask.
Echoes97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Us And Them - The Pink Floyd Experience
http://www.usandthemband.net
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CDUB98 said:

Quote:

However, the team noted that this increased risk was consistent with other known heart disease and stroke risks, such as alcohol, body mass index (BMI), Type 2 diabetes, and lack of physical activity.
But really, this statement is kinda key.

Just like any other thing that is bad for you, it increases your risk of dying.



Who would have thought taking a drug that makes sitting around doing nothing but eating Doritos as fun could lead to bad side effects?
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well hell. This has finally got me on board.

Legalize pot.

Everywhere.
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What about gummies?

Smoking anything is terrible for you.
Tibbers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CDUB98 said:

Quote:

However, the team noted that this increased risk was consistent with other known heart disease and stroke risks, such as alcohol, body mass index (BMI), Type 2 diabetes, and lack of physical activity.
But really, this statement is kinda key.

Just like any other thing that is bad for you, it increases your risk of dying.


Ah so as it turns out it's no more taxing on the body than alcohol. Now we can commence with the Alcohol related traffic fatalities vs marijuana related traffic fatalities debate. Or the dangers of cutting out alcohol vs marijuana cold turkey. Which one leads to major detrimental effect again?

This might be the greatest study for the inclusion of marijuana if a fair debate can be had.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WolfCall said:

Bad news for marijuana users. Looks like it's unhealthy for them, even if they bake it in brownies.

Who would have thought it?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13135909/cannabis-heart-attack-stroke-risk-marijuana.html
Quote:

Using marijuana in ANY form is linked to a 42% increased risk of a stroke - and 25% higher chance of a heart attack, study warns
  • A study found that cannabis use could raise the risk of heart attack and stroke
  • Users had a 25% higher chance of heart attack and 42% greater stroke risk
By EMILY JOSHU HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 09:46 EST, 28 February 2024 | UPDATED: 09:51 EST, 28 February 2024

.....The researchers found that smoking, eating, or vaping cannabis was associated with a 'significant' increase in heart disease and stroke risk, and the more days someone smoked, the more likely they were to have adverse effects.

However, the team noted that this increased risk was consistent with other known heart disease and stroke risks, such as alcohol, body mass index (BMI), Type 2 diabetes, and lack of physical activity.

They also found that daily cannabis users were 25 percent more likely to develop heart disease and 42 percent more likely to suffer a stroke.

And younger adults - men under 55 and women under 65 - who were already at risk for cardiovascular disease had a combined 36 percent increase chance of heart disease, coronary artery disease, and stroke.

'Our study shows that smoking cannabis has significant cardiovascular risk risks, just like smoking tobacco,' Dr Jeffers said. .....

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38415581/
Quote:

Association of Cannabis Use With Cardiovascular Outcomes Among US Adults
Abra M Jeffers 1 2 3 4, Stanton Glantz 5, Amy L Byers 6 7 8, Salomeh Keyhani 1 9 10
Affiliations expand
PMID: 38415581 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030178
Abstract
Background: We examined the association between cannabis use and cardiovascular outcomes among the general population, among never-tobacco smokers, and among younger individuals.

Methods and results: This is a population-based, cross-sectional study of 2016 to 2020 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey from 27 American states and 2 territories. We assessed the association of cannabis use (number of days of cannabis use in the past 30 days) with self-reported cardiovascular outcomes (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and a composite measure of all 3) in multivariable regression models, adjusting for tobacco use and other characteristics in adults 18 to 74 years old. We repeated this analysis among nontobacco smokers, and among men <55 years old and women <65 years old who are at risk of premature cardiovascular disease. Among the 434 104 respondents, the prevalence of daily and nondaily cannabis use was 4% and 7.1%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the association of daily cannabis use and coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and the composite outcome (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke) was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.98-1.38), 1.25 (95% CI, 1.07-1.46), 1.42 (95% CI, 1.20-1.68), and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.13-1.44), respectively, with proportionally lower log odds for days of use between 0 and 30 days per month. Among never-tobacco smokers, daily cannabis use was also associated with myocardial infarction (aOR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.03-2.15]), stroke (aOR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.43-3.25]), and the composite of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke (aOR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.31-2.40]). Relationships between cannabis use and cardiovascular outcomes were similar for men <55 years old and women <65 years old.

Conclusions: Cannabis use is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, with heavier use (more days per month) associated with higher odds of adverse outcomes.


I can believe the smoking part, that makes complete sense. But the edibles part....I don't believe it unless their data points are eating some Betty Crock's that have super high THC all the time. Low THC in moderation is not going to do anything remotely to the body that's close to the damage by alcohol, high fat foods, etc. Not even close. Sounds like those in the study had preexisting conditions. I've never smoked pot or tobacco and I ended up with a heart problem due to genetics.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am trying to make sense of this...particularly the edibles part. How could the THC itself contribute to stroke/heart disease? Or is it the lifestyle that accompanies many lazy stoners...lack of physical activity, gorging unhealthy foods etc?

If someone is extremely healthy, and doesn't engage in this activity, I'd like to know how the THC itself puts them at risk.

Then, I would also like to see similar comparison to risks associated with things like regular caffeine use, nicotine, adderall/ritalin etc.
Tibbers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's simple. It doesn't have to equate to that for this to be a huge win. Now the study can commence of edibles eating salads vs smoking eating McDonald's. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what results you know you are going to get.

Now, who wants to sign up to be high for a year but only eat salads? That'll be one healthy stoner!

My point is, even at its worst, it's still the same taxation on the body as drinking heavy and eating badly. So it's obvious what direction it will take when eating edibles instead.
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
100% more likely to become like Jeff Spicoli.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieDruggist89 said:

Not legit.

Didn't mention the real important adverse event. Hunger and increased appetite.
Which likely leads to excessive eating and sitting around watching old reruns of "Friends" and "Cheech and Chong"
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Tibbers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Happiest mfers I've ever met were like Jeff Spicoli.

Taken decades to realize they were right all along.
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
the problem isnt the weed, its the habit.

too much of anything aint good for you
aggiedent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
" Bad news for marijuana users. Looks like it's unhealthy for them, even if they bake it in brownies.

Who would have thought it?"

So what? Are you surprised it has some risks?

Now do aspirin, Tylenol, erythritol, alcohol, salt, red meat, cigars, 60 hour work weeks……….and a host of other things. All commonly used or done by millions of people every day/week.

Every one of those things has some benefits. Whether it be pleasure, pain relief, or reducing sugar from your diet. Every one of those things is also bad for you. Look at the association between one of the most commonly used sweeteners, erythritol, and strokes and heart attacks.

We're adults who should know the risks of what we do/use, balance them with the benefits, and make an informed decision. It's that simple……and no…….the government doesn't need to help us make a decision.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

Researchers are still working to unravel exactly why this occurs, though it's thought that THC activates the body's fight-or-flight response, which typically occurs during stress or fear.

When fight-or-flight is triggered, it leads to higher heart rate and blood pressure. Over time, this causes the heart to need to work harder to pump blood to the rest of the body.
This is their theory from the link in the OP, just FYI. I would think this would mostly be an issue for those in poorer shape who don't eat right and exercise regularly. Oh, and those who smoke like all day.
MJ20/20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm all for studying the impacts of THC on the body. Both short and long term, but this particular study doesn't pass the smell test to me. Way to many variables in the sample, supply, method, and approach (basically the entire study).

For the record, my 67 year old FIL was prescribed THC as a treatment for shingles. Lives in an ultra conservative community in Texas and the doctor went straight to THC as the answer for his pain and inflammation. The dr went as far to say if he could go back to when he started practicing medicine he could have saved so many lives treating with THC verses opiates. I was blown away by both his comments and by who they were coming from. I didn't expect that at all. Ultra conservative farming community.
hsjnlssmith89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Echoes97 said:





Willie is to dope heads what George Burns was to cigar smokers. Simply an exception to the rule.
Tibbers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sure he saw the scourge of prescription pain pills then. Must have been awful to witness.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hsjnlssmith89 said:

Echoes97 said:





Willie is to dope heads what George Burns was to cigar smokers. Simply an exception to the rule.
Where does Keith Richards fit into that, or is he just from another planet at this point?
Algorithmic Epiphany
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WolfCall said:

Bad news for marijuana users. Looks like it's unhealthy for them, even if they bake it in brownies.

Who would have thought it?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13135909/cannabis-heart-attack-stroke-risk-marijuana.html
Quote:

Using marijuana in ANY form is linked to a 42% increased risk of a stroke - and 25% higher chance of a heart attack, study warns
  • A study found that cannabis use could raise the risk of heart attack and stroke
  • Users had a 25% higher chance of heart attack and 42% greater stroke risk
By EMILY JOSHU HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 09:46 EST, 28 February 2024 | UPDATED: 09:51 EST, 28 February 2024

.....The researchers found that smoking, eating, or vaping cannabis was associated with a 'significant' increase in heart disease and stroke risk, and the more days someone smoked, the more likely they were to have adverse effects.

However, the team noted that this increased risk was consistent with other known heart disease and stroke risks, such as alcohol, body mass index (BMI), Type 2 diabetes, and lack of physical activity.

They also found that daily cannabis users were 25 percent more likely to develop heart disease and 42 percent more likely to suffer a stroke.

And younger adults - men under 55 and women under 65 - who were already at risk for cardiovascular disease had a combined 36 percent increase chance of heart disease, coronary artery disease, and stroke.

'Our study shows that smoking cannabis has significant cardiovascular risk risks, just like smoking tobacco,' Dr Jeffers said. .....

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38415581/
Quote:

Association of Cannabis Use With Cardiovascular Outcomes Among US Adults
Abra M Jeffers 1 2 3 4, Stanton Glantz 5, Amy L Byers 6 7 8, Salomeh Keyhani 1 9 10
Affiliations expand
PMID: 38415581 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030178
Abstract
Background: We examined the association between cannabis use and cardiovascular outcomes among the general population, among never-tobacco smokers, and among younger individuals.

Methods and results: This is a population-based, cross-sectional study of 2016 to 2020 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey from 27 American states and 2 territories. We assessed the association of cannabis use (number of days of cannabis use in the past 30 days) with self-reported cardiovascular outcomes (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and a composite measure of all 3) in multivariable regression models, adjusting for tobacco use and other characteristics in adults 18 to 74 years old. We repeated this analysis among nontobacco smokers, and among men <55 years old and women <65 years old who are at risk of premature cardiovascular disease. Among the 434 104 respondents, the prevalence of daily and nondaily cannabis use was 4% and 7.1%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the association of daily cannabis use and coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and the composite outcome (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke) was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.98-1.38), 1.25 (95% CI, 1.07-1.46), 1.42 (95% CI, 1.20-1.68), and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.13-1.44), respectively, with proportionally lower log odds for days of use between 0 and 30 days per month. Among never-tobacco smokers, daily cannabis use was also associated with myocardial infarction (aOR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.03-2.15]), stroke (aOR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.43-3.25]), and the composite of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke (aOR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.31-2.40]). Relationships between cannabis use and cardiovascular outcomes were similar for men <55 years old and women <65 years old.

Conclusions: Cannabis use is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, with heavier use (more days per month) associated with higher odds of adverse outcomes.




There's lies, damned lies, and medical science.

When's the clinical study to prove the stats?
Algorithmic Epiphany
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BluHorseShu said:

WolfCall said:

Bad news for marijuana users. Looks like it's unhealthy for them, even if they bake it in brownies.

Who would have thought it?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13135909/cannabis-heart-attack-stroke-risk-marijuana.html
Quote:

Using marijuana in ANY form is linked to a 42% increased risk of a stroke - and 25% higher chance of a heart attack, study warns
  • A study found that cannabis use could raise the risk of heart attack and stroke
  • Users had a 25% higher chance of heart attack and 42% greater stroke risk
By EMILY JOSHU HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 09:46 EST, 28 February 2024 | UPDATED: 09:51 EST, 28 February 2024

.....The researchers found that smoking, eating, or vaping cannabis was associated with a 'significant' increase in heart disease and stroke risk, and the more days someone smoked, the more likely they were to have adverse effects.

However, the team noted that this increased risk was consistent with other known heart disease and stroke risks, such as alcohol, body mass index (BMI), Type 2 diabetes, and lack of physical activity.

They also found that daily cannabis users were 25 percent more likely to develop heart disease and 42 percent more likely to suffer a stroke.

And younger adults - men under 55 and women under 65 - who were already at risk for cardiovascular disease had a combined 36 percent increase chance of heart disease, coronary artery disease, and stroke.

'Our study shows that smoking cannabis has significant cardiovascular risk risks, just like smoking tobacco,' Dr Jeffers said. .....

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38415581/
Quote:

Association of Cannabis Use With Cardiovascular Outcomes Among US Adults
Abra M Jeffers 1 2 3 4, Stanton Glantz 5, Amy L Byers 6 7 8, Salomeh Keyhani 1 9 10
Affiliations expand
PMID: 38415581 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030178
Abstract
Background: We examined the association between cannabis use and cardiovascular outcomes among the general population, among never-tobacco smokers, and among younger individuals.

Methods and results: This is a population-based, cross-sectional study of 2016 to 2020 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey from 27 American states and 2 territories. We assessed the association of cannabis use (number of days of cannabis use in the past 30 days) with self-reported cardiovascular outcomes (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and a composite measure of all 3) in multivariable regression models, adjusting for tobacco use and other characteristics in adults 18 to 74 years old. We repeated this analysis among nontobacco smokers, and among men <55 years old and women <65 years old who are at risk of premature cardiovascular disease. Among the 434 104 respondents, the prevalence of daily and nondaily cannabis use was 4% and 7.1%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the association of daily cannabis use and coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and the composite outcome (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke) was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.98-1.38), 1.25 (95% CI, 1.07-1.46), 1.42 (95% CI, 1.20-1.68), and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.13-1.44), respectively, with proportionally lower log odds for days of use between 0 and 30 days per month. Among never-tobacco smokers, daily cannabis use was also associated with myocardial infarction (aOR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.03-2.15]), stroke (aOR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.43-3.25]), and the composite of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke (aOR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.31-2.40]). Relationships between cannabis use and cardiovascular outcomes were similar for men <55 years old and women <65 years old.

Conclusions: Cannabis use is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, with heavier use (more days per month) associated with higher odds of adverse outcomes.


I can believe the smoking part, that makes complete sense. But the edibles part....I don't believe it unless their data points are eating some Betty Crock's that have super high THC all the time. Low THC in moderation is not going to do anything remotely to the body that's close to the damage by alcohol, high fat foods, etc. Not even close. Sounds like those in the study had preexisting conditions. I've never smoked pot or tobacco and I ended up with a heart problem due to genetics.


You guys don't understand. They didn't do any new research they gathered existing research on different studies that had data on marijuana users, and extracted their analysis off the existing data. I don't think this is a really useful form of science, unless you're trying to sell a narrative, surprisingly narrative fishing pays well and there's lots of research that will create whatever narrative needs to fit the bill.

Next thing you know these buffoons will claim that people are suddenly dying and it's because there was a whiff of marijuana in the air from an illegal immigrant and therefore we need to ban mj, and all the immigrants...

The fools would jump on that like stink on ***** It's how they got it banned the first time too. Blamed weed for blacks and ********* rapin all the white wimmens.

History doesn't repeat but rhymes.
DarkBrandon01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ban everything that's unhealthy /s
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.