Because republicans don't want to stop illegal immigration. Not one republican president since before WW2 has done anything to fight illegal immigration. Democrats are accelerating at astronomical levels but republicans are just as much to blame.

DRocks said:

---

The entire concept of impeaching a cabinet member over policy arguments is so wrong.

---

Lololololol

Gaw617 said:

---

Because republicans don't want to stop illegal immigration. Not one republican president since before WW2 has done anything to fight illegal immigration. Democrats are accelerating at astronomical levels but republicans are just as much to blame.

---

Nailed it.

Gaw617 said:

---

Because republicans don't want to stop illegal immigration. Not one republican president since before WW2 has done anything to fight illegal immigration. Democrats are accelerating at astronomical levels but republicans are just as much to blame.

---

Eisenhower deported over a million mostly Mexicans in a border enforcement action well after WW2.
That was a lot at the time.

Gaw617 said:

---

Because republicans don't want to stop illegal immigration. Not one republican president since before WW2 has done anything to fight illegal immigration. Democrats are accelerating at astronomical levels but republicans are just as much to blame.

---

Trump could have/ should have tried to do something about illegal immigration and voting laws right away his first 2 years in office, but I bet the RINOs like Romney, Ryan, McCain, McConell would have all sabotaged it for him, either out of chicken shigtedness, or just to not mess up their gravy trains...

The stunt got stunted.

Don't worry guys, after November they can just whine from the sidelines as the minority party. As they drive the GOP off the cliff. MTG can take over the leadership and just put the stabbing knife into the GOP and kill it once and for all.

DRocks said:

---

The entire concept of impeaching a cabinet member over policy arguments is so wrong.

---

I agree if it's an argument over pending legislation. Everybody weigh in with your opinions and try to shape it to your preference. Perfectly understandable.

But refusing to enforce existing law is a dereliction of duty. Immediate resignation or removal from office are the cures for that, with possible jail time if the damages to US citizens are severe.

shiftyandquick said:

---

The stunt got stunted.

Don't worry guys, after November they can just whine from the sidelines as the minority party. As they drive the GOP off the cliff. MTG can take over the leadership and just put the stabbing knife into the GOP and kill it once and for all.

---

So your proud of the job he's doing on the border?

Both parties are facades for the ruling elites.

The ruling elites LOVE more broke peasants pouring into our country. They are easily to manipulate, they create wealth dilution and barriers for the working class (who elites wish to suppress) and they represent an expansion to their subjects.

None of them, from either "party" have any intention of stopping it.

Against every impeachment from Nixon to this one. Nothing, but politics. The job of Congress is to legislate, so legislate!

Worthless!!!

Well, impeachment is indeed a political act and is a valid role of congress.

They can clearly do both things.

Clavell said:

---

Against every impeachment from Nixon to this one. Nothing, but politics. The job of Congress is to legislate, so legislate!

---

What's the point when the federal government refuses to enforce the laws?

If any of these mfers worked in the private sectors, they'd all be fired by now. In politics theres always room for failed lawyers.

MemphisAg1 said:

---

So if they vote again when Scalise comes back and Moore votes yes as he was planning, that vote passes 216Y and 215N, correct?

---

Here's what I don't get… what was the urgency in holding the vote today? Why not wait until you know you've got the vote to hold the vote?

TriAg2010 said:

---

MemphisAg1 said:

---

So if they vote again when Scalise comes back and Moore votes yes as he was planning, that vote passes 216Y and 215N, correct?

---

Here's what I don't get… what was the urgency in holding the vote today? Why not wait until you know you've got the vote to hold the vote?

---

Totally agree. That's a rookie error on Johnson's part, along with the failed Israeli aid vote.

You don't hold the vote if you don't have the votes.

Embarrassing incompetency in the R party, from Trump to the RNC, to party leaders in Congress.

A lot of good R governors out there. We need a clean sweep of R party leadership.

annie88 said:

---

“It's really appalling.”

Mitt Romney unloads on Donald Trump for trying to kill the bipartisan immigration-Ukraine bill because it might help President Biden politically. pic.twitter.com/b18DpC7m6X

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) February 5, 2024

---

Romney is FOR open borders and China. He is even carrying the same lying water that Biden's puppet masters programmed him with. Anti-American piece of ***** Rob and I told y'all when Romney ran for president that he was a piece of *****

DRocks said:

---

The entire concept of impeaching a cabinet member over policy arguments is so wrong.

---

Bull***** That cabinet member took an oath to uphold the Constitution. He has betrayed this country.

**** him. He should be tried for sedition.

MemphisAg1 said:

---

TriAg2010 said:

---

MemphisAg1 said:

---

So if they vote again when Scalise comes back and Moore votes yes as he was planning, that vote passes 216Y and 215N, correct?

---

Here's what I don't get… what was the urgency in holding the vote today? Why not wait until you know you've got the vote to hold the vote?

---

Totally agree. That's a rookie error on Johnson's part, along with the failed Israeli aid vote.

You don't hold the vote if you don't have the votes.

Embarrassing incompetency in the R party, from Trump to the RNC, to party leaders in Congress.

A lot of good R governors out there. We need a clean sweep of R party leadership.

---

He's in over his head.

Gaw617 said:

---

Because republicans don't want to stop illegal immigration. Not one republican president since before WW2 has done anything to fight illegal immigration. Democrats are accelerating at astronomical levels but republicans are just as much to blame.

---

Trump came as close to stopping it as anyone ever has

Not dead yet..

The 3 no votes against impeaching Mayorkas were:

Mike Gallagher (WI-08)
Tom McClintock (CA-05)
Ken Buck (CO-04)

Blake Moore changed his vote no when asked by leadership for procedural reasons to make a motion to reconsider so that we can vote on impeachment again next week.…

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) February 7, 2024

It's stunning how weak and stupid the Republican party is. Flip the script and the dems vote in lockstep to impeach.

Agthatbuilds said:

---

Dem Rep. Al Greene - wheeled in just as the vote appeared headed toward a tie, no shoes on, in what looked like hospital scrubs as pants - said he had surgery. But came to vote against the impeachment.

Hakeem Jeffries shook his hand after he arrived

— Jonathan Tamari (@JonathanTamari) February 6, 2024

---

This is the difference between dems and Republicans. They will do anything to win. We can't even agree of have the fortitude on seemingly simple things.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

DRocks said:

---

The entire concept of impeaching a cabinet member over policy arguments is so wrong.

---

Bull***** That cabinet member took an oath to uphold the Constitution. He has betrayed this country.

**** him. He should be tried for sedition.

---

Damn I'm glad you're the minority.

The republican districts that voted no should now be getting busloads of "immigrants"

DRocks said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

DRocks said:

---

The entire concept of impeaching a cabinet member over policy arguments is so wrong.

---

Bull***** That cabinet member took an oath to uphold the Constitution. He has betrayed this country.

**** him. He should be tried for sedition.

---

Damn I'm glad you're the minority.

---

You oppose constitutions and the rule of law?

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

DRocks said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

DRocks said:

---

The entire concept of impeaching a cabinet member over policy arguments is so wrong.

---

Bull***** That cabinet member took an oath to uphold the Constitution. He has betrayed this country.

**** him. He should be tried for sedition.

---

Damn I'm glad you're the minority.

---

You oppose constitutions and the rule of law?

---

DRocks said:

---

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

DRocks said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

DRocks said:

---

The entire concept of impeaching a cabinet member over policy arguments is so wrong.

---

Bull***** That cabinet member took an oath to uphold the Constitution. He has betrayed this country.

**** him. He should be tried for sedition.

---

Damn I'm glad you're the minority.

---

You oppose constitutions and the rule of law?

---

Damn funny. Thanks for the laugh.

---

Can't answer yes or no?

aggiepaintrain said:

---

if you can move out of this country, do it

---

Completely agree. The Chik Fil A lines are getting far too long. Would be great if some folks left so I can get in and out quicker.

This should have been a lay-up. R's really can **** up a wet dream. Once again, not one (1) single Dem broke ranks.

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

Embarrassing. I hate to say it, but a national tragedy may be necessary to shake things up a bit.

---

His name is TRUMP!

DRocks said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

DRocks said:

---

The entire concept of impeaching a cabinet member over policy arguments is so wrong.

---

Bull***** That cabinet member took an oath to uphold the Constitution. He has betrayed this country.

**** him. He should be tried for sedition.

---

Damn I'm glad you're the minority.

---

Standing for the rule of law may be rare, but it's right. I have morals.

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

DRocks said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

DRocks said:

---

The entire concept of impeaching a cabinet member over policy arguments is so wrong.

---

Bull***** That cabinet member took an oath to uphold the Constitution. He has betrayed this country.

**** him. He should be tried for sedition.

---

Damn I'm glad you're the minority.

---

You oppose constitutions and the rule of law?

---

I think he opposes misuse of the intent of the constitutions language. If some GOP members believe it didn't meet the level of high crimes and misdemeanors they must vote their conscience. If we keep going down this route we will diminish the definition of high crimes and misdemeanors and it will just be a continual back and forth impeachment process. I'm not saying Mayorkas doesn't suck at his job, but I find it hard to believe those who voted against it did so for reasons other than they just didn't believe it met the standard required. If you look at the short list of successful impeachments of cabinet members, they were pretty egregious and could not be defended as working within the confines of their roles.

My biggest fear is that we are getting into setting up a situation where congress is going to abuse impeachments to rack up political points or as retribution. Which is fine if the R's are in charge....but not good if the power flips.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

DRocks said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

DRocks said:

---

The entire concept of impeaching a cabinet member over policy arguments is so wrong.

---

Bull***** That cabinet member took an oath to uphold the Constitution. He has betrayed this country.

**** him. He should be tried for sedition.

---

Damn I'm glad you're the minority.

---

Standing for the rule of law may be rare, but it's right. I have morals.

---

DRocks said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Standing for the rule of law may be rare, but it's right. I have morals.

---

Cool - so you won't support Trump. Good to know.

---

My choice is Biden or Trump.

Since I am for America and hate corrupt marxists, I will proudly vote against Zhou Biden, you know, the guy undermining our Constitution (well the people who control him are).