Mike Hancho said:

---

So when the unhinged rants on moderate conservatives

---

There is literally no such thing as a "moderate conservative." You're either conservative or you aren't.

You aren't.

nortex97 said:

---

Tucker, horrible evil traitorous scum, discusses why he has sided with the evil empire/dark side/satan.

Wait, none of that is true. He just sounds like a normal journalist used to, trying to share a story. Weird.

Why I'm interviewing Vladimir Putin. pic.twitter.com/hqvXUZqvHX

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 6, 2024

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

I rest my case.

He didn't side with RDS. So, the former was correct.

Teslag said:

---

Well I literally did ask about Russia invading a peaceful neighbor. Figured you read the question. My bad.

---

Your position is that it's ok for the founders of America to invade, kill and occupy another land because it's not a neighbor.

Like I said, it's ridiculously idiotic, but you do you man.

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

Tucker, horrible evil traitorous scum, discusses why he has sided with the evil empire/dark side/satan.

Wait, none of that is true. He just sounds like a normal journalist used to, trying to share a story. Weird.

Why I'm interviewing Vladimir Putin. pic.twitter.com/hqvXUZqvHX

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 6, 2024

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

Are you for real?

Slicer97 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

Tucker, horrible evil traitorous scum, discusses why he has sided with the evil empire/dark side/satan.

Wait, none of that is true. He just sounds like a normal journalist used to, trying to share a story. Weird.

Why I'm interviewing Vladimir Putin. pic.twitter.com/hqvXUZqvHX

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 6, 2024

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

We're not interested in harmony. We're interested in preventing the spread of Marxism.

---

Amen.

People like Blu have brought division and are now shocked that we've rejected their terms.

I have found that in general 'liberals' (leftists, imho) only feel their way through opposition media, and are stuck in transmit mode when it is political dissent.

BluHorseShu said:

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

A disqualifier is when you go to your own government, your own masters, or ignore conflicts of interest, get a narrative or quote, and call it a day.
So who is your fair and balanced journalists, and would anyone in charge like to see them dead?

Slicer97 said:

---

That's what he wants you to believe.

---

Slicer97 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

Tucker, horrible evil traitorous scum, discusses why he has sided with the evil empire/dark side/satan.

Wait, none of that is true. He just sounds like a normal journalist used to, trying to share a story. Weird.

Why I'm interviewing Vladimir Putin. pic.twitter.com/hqvXUZqvHX

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 6, 2024

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

We're not interested in harmony. We're interested in preventing the spread of Marxism.

---

Then Tucker is your guy to keep that fear stoked and tell you what you should believe. Just know even if this 'spread of Marxism' is wiped out, Tucker will move on to tell you the next thing you should fear. If he can't make you believe there is a constant crisis, you wouldn't watch him.

Do you really believe Tucker is an unbiased journalist who gives only fair and balanced reporting? Tuckers entire livelihood, as with any other host of a 'news' show, is based solely on viewership.

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

A disqualifier is when you go to your own government, your own masters, or ignore conflicts of interest, get a narrative or quote, and call it a day.
So who is your fair and balanced journalists, and would anyone in charge like to see them dead?

---

I can tell you that no one that hosts their own 'news' show is who I go to for accurate balanced reporting. I honestly don't believe it exists in any one place, unfortunately. You have to listen to a lot of different sources and make your own educated decision on what the truth is. They all have some bias in their reporting.

Remember too that Tuckers masters are those who pay his salary and the number of viewers he has. If he didn't draw people to watch, he risks losing his show. And people don't tune in to hear a balanced view anymore. They tune in to hear someone agree with their concerns.

"Most Americans don't know why Russia invaded Ukraine because no one has ever interviewed Putin." Really? It's not like he didn't announce to the world his "reasons" for the "special military operation."

No one has interviewed Putin because no one is naive enough to think he'd tell you the truth. He's a KGB officer who got into power and has kept it for decades by murdering or imprisoning anyone who might create opposition to him. Tucker might as well be interviewing Hitler to ask him why he was invading Poland and France and what he intended to do with the Jews.

He's about as much of a journalist as Walter Duranty.

MelvinUdall said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

Tucker, horrible evil traitorous scum, discusses why he has sided with the evil empire/dark side/satan.

Wait, none of that is true. He just sounds like a normal journalist used to, trying to share a story. Weird.

Why I'm interviewing Vladimir Putin. pic.twitter.com/hqvXUZqvHX

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 6, 2024

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

You listened to none of what he said in that tweet based on what you posted…

---

Perhaps I did only key in on the part where he said he sounds like a 'normal journalist'. If you believe that, then that assumes there is a standard that exists for 'normal journalists' that can be trusted.

Logos Stick said:

---

Slicer97 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

Tucker, horrible evil traitorous scum, discusses why he has sided with the evil empire/dark side/satan.

Wait, none of that is true. He just sounds like a normal journalist used to, trying to share a story. Weird.

Why I'm interviewing Vladimir Putin. pic.twitter.com/hqvXUZqvHX

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 6, 2024

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

We're not interested in harmony. We're interested in preventing the spread of Marxism.

---

Amen.

People like Blu have brought division and are now shocked that we've rejected their terms.

---

Yes, I'm concerned that some anonymous posters reject whatever 'my terms' are (whatever that means). What does that have to do with Tucker being a journalist? Or did you just need some blue stars to feel good this afternoon?

Quote:

---

Do you really believe Tucker is an unbiased journalist who gives only fair and balanced reporting? Tuckers entire livelihood, as with any other host of a 'news' show, is based solely on viewership.

---

Who is unbiased?

BluHorseShu said:

---

Slicer97 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

Tucker, horrible evil traitorous scum, discusses why he has sided with the evil empire/dark side/satan.

Wait, none of that is true. He just sounds like a normal journalist used to, trying to share a story. Weird.

Why I'm interviewing Vladimir Putin. pic.twitter.com/hqvXUZqvHX

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 6, 2024

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

We're not interested in harmony. We're interested in preventing the spread of Marxism.

---

Then Tucker is your guy to keep that fear stoked and tell you what you should believe. Just know even if this 'spread of Marxism' is wiped out, Tucker will move on to tell you the next thing you should fear. If he can't make you believe there is a constant crisis, you wouldn't watch him.

Do you really believe Tucker is an unbiased journalist who gives only fair and balanced reporting? Tuckers entire livelihood, as with any other host of a 'news' show, is based solely on viewership.

---

I don't watch Tucker and I don't "fear" anything. "Contempt" or "disgust" would be more accurate descriptors.

BluHorseShu said:

---

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

A disqualifier is when you go to your own government, your own masters, or ignore conflicts of interest, get a narrative or quote, and call it a day.
So who is your fair and balanced journalists, and would anyone in charge like to see them dead?

---

I can tell you that no one that hosts their own 'news' show is who I go to for accurate balanced reporting. I honestly don't believe it exists in any one place, unfortunately. You have to listen to a lot of different sources and make your own educated decision on what the truth is. They all have some bias in their reporting.

Remember too that Tuckers masters are those who pay his salary and the number of viewers he has. If he didn't draw people to watch, he risks losing his show. And people don't tune in to hear a balanced view anymore. They tune in to hear someone agree with their concerns.

---

Tucker is annoying. He never breaks a story, He just platforms stuff and gives it traction, I hate his laugh. He plays dumb/aw-shucks. just a regular guy. I hate that. He isn't even-handed. they should throw his laugh in prison. But say, if there are nazis and bio-labs and illegal stuff being funded in Ukraine (there is) he would be the right one to get it out there.

Mainstream media for the most part lies by omission and runs interference. There are a few people who might be annoying by nature, who say something true. You hear it, it resonates. One side of the story is ubiquitous and mainstream. The journalistic principal of getting the other side of the story, is the attraction.

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

Quote:

---

Do you really believe Tucker is an unbiased journalist who gives only fair and balanced reporting? Tuckers entire livelihood, as with any other host of a 'news' show, is based solely on viewership.

---

Who is unbiased?

---

Almost nobody these days. Some may be better at times but in our current climate, people can't help to slant their reporting. I can't watch most news shows without walking away stressed out. News has become about viewership

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

A disqualifier is when you go to your own government, your own masters, or ignore conflicts of interest, get a narrative or quote, and call it a day.
So who is your fair and balanced journalists, and would anyone in charge like to see them dead?

---

I can tell you that no one that hosts their own 'news' show is who I go to for accurate balanced reporting. I honestly don't believe it exists in any one place, unfortunately. You have to listen to a lot of different sources and make your own educated decision on what the truth is. They all have some bias in their reporting.

Remember too that Tuckers masters are those who pay his salary and the number of viewers he has. If he didn't draw people to watch, he risks losing his show. And people don't tune in to hear a balanced view anymore. They tune in to hear someone agree with their concerns.

---

Tucker is annoying. He never breaks a story, He just platforms stuff and gives it traction, I hate his laugh. He plays dumb/aw-shucks. just a regular guy. I hate that. He isn't even-handed. they should throw his laugh in prison. But say, if there are nazis and bio-labs and illegal stuff being funded in Ukraine (there is) he would be the right one to get it out there.

Mainstream media for the most part lies by omission and runs interference. There are a few people who might be annoying by nature, who say something true. You hear it, it resonates. One side of the story is ubiquitous and mainstream. The journalistic principal of getting the other side of the story, is the attraction.

---

And i'm not saying Tucker doesn't have moments where he hits the nail on the head. I have been in agreement with things he's said. But his shtick is to get the viewer riled up enough to keep coming back. Just like Hannity, Morning Joe, etc

BluHorseShu said:

---

MelvinUdall said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

Tucker, horrible evil traitorous scum, discusses why he has sided with the evil empire/dark side/satan.

Wait, none of that is true. He just sounds like a normal journalist used to, trying to share a story. Weird.

Why I'm interviewing Vladimir Putin. pic.twitter.com/hqvXUZqvHX

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 6, 2024

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

You listened to none of what he said in that tweet based on what you posted…

---

Perhaps I did only key in on the part where he said he sounds like a 'normal journalist'. If you believe that, then that assumes there is a standard that exists for 'normal journalists' that can be trusted.

---

First, I don't care about anything concerning Russia/Ukraine, I am just blown away by those that are freaking out about Tucker interviewing Putin, who cares. 60 minutes interviewed Bin Laden back before 9/11.

MelvinUdall said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

MelvinUdall said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

Tucker, horrible evil traitorous scum, discusses why he has sided with the evil empire/dark side/satan.

Wait, none of that is true. He just sounds like a normal journalist used to, trying to share a story. Weird.

Why I'm interviewing Vladimir Putin. pic.twitter.com/hqvXUZqvHX

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 6, 2024

---

Tucker? A journalist? Surely you jest. He's an entertainer at best. Nothing about his show says 'fair and balanced' research with integrity.
And that may be true for most talking heads that have their own show. Real journalists stop existing once the spotlight hits them and they get their own show. Tucker wouldn't have a show if he was giving a balanced view. People want drama, not harmony.

---

You listened to none of what he said in that tweet based on what you posted…

---

Perhaps I did only key in on the part where he said he sounds like a 'normal journalist'. If you believe that, then that assumes there is a standard that exists for 'normal journalists' that can be trusted.

---

First, I don't care about anything concerning Russia/Ukraine, I am just blown away by those that are freaking out about Tucker interviewing Putin, who cares. 60 minutes interviewed Bin Laden back before 9/11.

---

I'm blown away too, to the point of LMAO. I think there's some underlying problems here. It's just not that big of a deal.

nortex97 said:

---

Tucker, horrible evil traitorous scum, discusses why he has sided with the evil empire/dark side/satan.

Wait, none of that is true. He just sounds like a normal journalist used to, trying to share a story. Weird.

Why I'm interviewing Vladimir Putin. pic.twitter.com/hqvXUZqvHX

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 6, 2024

---

so tucker contends that zelenskyy interviews are propaganda meant to advance his agenda of getting the us to support ukraine's defense against russia. no reason to pretend an interview with putin will be any different, just from the other side. it's not like other western journalists haven't tried to interview putin. it should be pretty telling that tucker was the first one he agreed to.

Jeeper79 said:

---

At the end of the day, Tucker Carlson is a domestic political pundit and conspiracy theorist - not a geopolitical news reporter. So anybody thinking about this objectively should expect him to go over there and do more of the same. The Russian "guest" will likely be a color commentator.

---

That's a compliment in this day and age and means he's batting just under a thousand.

in case it wasn't clear, i was talking about since russia invaded ukraine in 2022

More wannabe traitors.

Does Tucker really think we journalists haven't been trying to interview President Putin every day since his full scale invasion of Ukraine? It's absurd -- we'll continue to ask for an interview, just as we have for years now. https://t.co/pW8F2zbq1i

— Christiane Amanpour (@amanpour) February 6, 2024

Why aren't you using your upvoting script?