California Loses Another Gun Control Case

1,544 Views | 12 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by APHIS AG
UTExan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:13p, 2/1/24
They're 0 for 5 against the constitution so far.
In this case a federal judge ruled against Cali's requirement that ammunition purchases required a background check and against Cali's law forbidding private ammunition purchases outside the state being brought into the state.
The next big case will involve California's refusal to recognize CCWs from other states and will probably reference Obergefell vs Hodges in which SCOTUS ruled that constitutional rights commonly enjoyed in one state cannot be denied in another. (The gay marriage equality case)
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
Reply Quote
12
1 edit
aggieforester05
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:20p, 2/1/24
AG
This is why it's important to get the Democrats out of the executive branch. These wins will turn in to losses more often the more Marxist judges they send for confirmation. Sitting out the election because you don't like the R nominee is incredibly stupid, because there's so much more to an administration than just the guy in the oval office. The Biden administration is among the most damaging in history and they need to be standing in the unemployment line next January.
Reply Quote
41
Psycho Bunny
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:31p, 2/1/24
Good for communist California, still wont step foot in that god forsaken land.
Reply Quote
6
agracer
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:48p, 2/1/24
AG
The problem with so many of these cases is that the legislature's passing them KNOW they're unconstitutional. But they do it anyway to get the other side to waste time, money and resources going after them while ignoring the real problems. They also probably hope on of them will stick and 'voila' path to tearing apart the 2nd amendment.
Reply Quote
7
UTExan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to agracer • 2:53p, 2/1/24
These same idiots have a $30-something billion deficit this year but are funding Health insurance for 700,000 illegals and want to pay out reparations.

It reminds me of 1830s Mexico where the Army was given 150 % of the government's budget to appease the generals.
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
Reply Quote
6
CDUB98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to UTExan • 3:11p, 2/1/24
AG
Quote:
These same idiots have a $30-something billion deficit
Question I have: who in the hell is buying their debt when it's obvious they couldn't manage the finances of a lemonade stand?
Reply Quote
4
UTExan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to CDUB98 • 3:13p, 2/1/24
CDUB98 said:
Quote:
These same idiots have a $30-something billion deficit
Question I have: who in the hell is buying their debt when it's obvious they couldn't manage the finances of a lemonade stand?


What's left of their middle and upper class. Through higher taxes.
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:20p, 2/1/24
AG
Trump will fix it.
Reply Quote
3
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to CDUB98 • 3:44p, 2/1/24
AG
CDUB98 said:
Quote:
These same idiots have a $30-something billion deficit
Question I have: who in the hell is buying their debt when it's obvious they couldn't manage the finances of a lemonade stand?
Biden and Schumer well.

Well, they will pass it on to the US taxpayer via a bailout.
Reply Quote
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to UTExan • 3:46p, 2/1/24
AG
UTExan said:
They're 0 for 5 against the constitution so far.
In this case a federal judge ruled against Cali's requirement that ammunition purchases required a background check and against Cali's law forbidding private ammunition purchases outside the state being brought into the state.
The next big case will involve California's refusal to recognize CCWs from other states and will probably reference Obergefell vs Hodges in which SCOTUS ruled that constitutional rights commonly enjoyed in one state cannot be denied in another. (The gay marriage equality case)

I think having Obergefell being used to extend gun rights throughout the country is absolutely hilarious...
Reply Quote
6
rocky the dog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:53p, 2/1/24
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Reply Quote
10
Secolobo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:58p, 2/1/24
AG
Can we just conquer them and get it over with…
Reply Quote
APHIS AG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to agracer • 8:59p, 2/1/24
agracer said:
The problem with so many of these cases is that the legislature's passing them KNOW they're unconstitutional. But they do it anyway to get the other side to waste time, money and resources going after them while ignoring the real problems. They also probably hope on of them will stick and 'voila' path to tearing apart the 2nd amendment.
This is not new for the Democrats have been using this tactic for a very long time. The Jan 6 "kangaroo court" is a good example.
Reply Quote
1
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.