Ray Epps' Statements At Trial

4,774 Views | 56 Replies | Last: 12 mo ago by YouBet
jja79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would bet that if someone ran a background check on Epps in a year this doesn't show up. This was grandstanding.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Antoninus said:

captkirk said:


Quote:

Epps ... praised ... antifa saying conclusively they had "no involvement" in January 6

That is a pretty weak statement to describe as "praise," unless there is something he said that the article does not bother to print.


So lame…
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

Antoninus said:

captkirk said:


Quote:

Epps ... praised ... antifa saying conclusively they had "no involvement" in January 6

That is a pretty weak statement to describe as "praise," unless there is something he said that the article does not bother to print.


So lame…
Well apparently there's rule somewhere that TDSers have to defend Epps.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keller6Ag91 said:

captkirk said:


Quote:

Epps was allowed to speak and he said the FBI had "nothing to do with what happened on January 6th," he blamed @FoxNews for "peddling election integrity conspiracy theories," and he blamed Trump.

He then said that he believes January 6, 2021 was an "insurrection."

Quote:

Epps in his statement not only lashed out at Fox News but he lashed out at what he called the "Trump Cult," who he blames for his conduct.

He then praised the FBI and antifa saying conclusively they had "no involvement" in January 6 and that only "angry trump supporters," were part of the "mob."

Epps said the 2020 election was "not stolen" and that he wants to spend the rest of his life trying to explain that to other


Quote:

He wants to speak about the "truth of the election results," and he assured Judge Boasberg he no longer gets his information from "Fox News" and he trusts the government.

Obviously just a diehard Trump Supporter in the wrong place at the wrong time

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=407810
What a load of crap. Epps is prime example #1 of the government shenanigans involved with the Jan 6th protest.


They're not even trying to hide it at this point. It is laughably transparent…as long as you aren't one of the "akktually" goaltenders above.
William K. Klingaman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If he's just a regular citizen, how would he even know if the FBI were involved?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
William K. Klingaman said:

If he's just a regular citizen, how would he even know if the FBI were involved?
Exactly.

There tens of thousands of people there. How would he know all of them?
William K. Klingaman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So a private citizen who encouraged others states that it was an insurrection, yet others are arrested and he isn't. Mkay.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DallasAg 94 said:

Reminds me...


Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
William K. Klingaman said:

So a private citizen who encouraged others states that it was an insurrection, yet others are arrested and he isn't. Mkay.


Think about how stupid or ideologically possessed you have to be to nod your head along in agreement to this hysterically transparent bull****.
William K. Klingaman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

William K. Klingaman said:

So a private citizen who encouraged others states that it was an insurrection, yet others are arrested and he isn't. Mkay.


Think about how stupid or ideologically possessed you have to be to nod your head along in agreement to this hysterically transparent bull****.


The mental gymnastics required to achieve this would make Simone Biles green with envy.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Antoninus said:

captkirk said:


Quote:

Epps ... praised ... antifa saying conclusively they had "no involvement" in January 6

That is a pretty weak statement to describe as "praise," unless there is something he said that the article does not bother to print.
Which really isn't even the point of highlighting his statement. Ray Epps could not possibly know that neither the FBI nor Antifa were involved with J6. We know for a fact they were. Ray Epps lied. Ray Epps worked for the Feds on J6 in some capacity. You can parse away about which agency he worked for.
William K. Klingaman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Antoninus said:

captkirk said:


Quote:

Epps ... praised ... antifa saying conclusively they had "no involvement" in January 6

That is a pretty weak statement to describe as "praise," unless there is something he said that the article does not bother to print.
Which really isn't even the point of highlighting his statement. Ray Epps could not possibly know that neither the FBI nor Antifa were involved with J6. We know for a fact they were. Ray Epps lied. Ray Epps worked for the Feds on J6 in some capacity. You can parse away about which agency he worked for.


Liberals are so committed to their ideology they will do anything to gaslight even themselves.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

Antoninus said:

captkirk said:


Quote:

Epps ... praised ... antifa saying conclusively they had "no involvement" in January 6

That is a pretty weak statement to describe as "praise," unless there is something he said that the article does not bother to print.


So lame…
Well apparently there's rule somewhere that TDSers have to defend Epps.
So your on the "if they don't agree with me they are TDSers" team now? I didn't think you lowered your responses to that level. Your takes are usually, if nothing else, reasoned responses.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BluHorseShu said:

aggiehawg said:

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

Antoninus said:

captkirk said:


Quote:

Epps ... praised ... antifa saying conclusively they had "no involvement" in January 6

That is a pretty weak statement to describe as "praise," unless there is something he said that the article does not bother to print.


So lame…
Well apparently there's rule somewhere that TDSers have to defend Epps.
So your on the "if they don't agree with me they are TDSers" team now? I didn't think you lowered your responses to that level. Your takes are usually, if nothing else, reasoned responses.
Wow, triggered much?

I was joking but given that response maybe I wasn't too far off the mark?
Layne Staley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He should probably at least change his pronouns, if not his identity and physical characteristics. His life is over as it was before and hopefully everyone learns a good lesson about becoming a Deep State asset.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BluHorseShu said:

aggiehawg said:


Well apparently there's rule somewhere that TDSers have to defend Epps.
So your on the "if they don't agree with me they are TDSers" team now?

You're a TDSer because you are, not because any of us say you are.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

BluHorseShu said:

aggiehawg said:


Well apparently there's rule somewhere that TDSers have to defend Epps.
So your on the "if they don't agree with me they are TDSers" team now?

You're a TDSer because you are, not because any of us say you are.
Plus whenever I say, "apparently there's a rule written somewhere..." I am being sarcastic and not speaking of a legal rule nor statute.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BluHorseShu said:

aggiehawg said:

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

Antoninus said:

captkirk said:


Quote:

Epps ... praised ... antifa saying conclusively they had "no involvement" in January 6

That is a pretty weak statement to describe as "praise," unless there is something he said that the article does not bother to print.


So lame…
Well apparently there's rule somewhere that TDSers have to defend Epps.
So your on the "if they don't agree with me they are TDSers" team now? I didn't think you lowered your responses to that level. Your takes are usually, if nothing else, reasoned responses.




You walked right into this one haha.

Now why did that, of all things, hit a nerve with you?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Señor Chang said:



Probably had to file his AAR in order to get paid.

Already had the right handlers…I mean agents in his contact list to make the call go through easier I am sure.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What. Happened. To. The. Pipe. Bomber?

They can find some redneck in the swamps of Florida from a single frame of a video, but they cant find the pipe bomber?


Here is a video that the FBI made on their official youtube page asking for leads with...get this....COMMENTS TURNED OFF!

How brainless of a bureaucrat can you be that you post a video on youtube of an investigation of an unknown perpetrator, presumably to generate leads, and TURN COMMENTS OFF!?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

and he trusts the government.
Not only a liar but stupid to boot with this statement.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.