barbacoa taco said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Govern me harder Daddy.

---

Or, you know, just value life.

Politics is never more important than the life of an innocent baby. You'd have to be sick to disagree.

---

I disagree and I promise you I'm not sick.

Sometimes, valuing life also includes compassion. Both for the mother and a child who is likely to be born with massive deformities, brain damage, and a 90+% life expectancy of days, if not hours or minutes - likely in pain.

Taking your argument at face value means that you should override a DNR and give a 90+ year old woman with heart failure "life saving actions" such as chest compressions, breaking her sternum in the process and ensuring that those extra 30 days of life will be lived in massive pain and suffering.

---

Actively killing someone is not the same as letting natural death occur.

---

The mother runs risks to her life, health, and fertility if she's forced to carry the pregnancy to term and "let natural death occur." You have no right to force her to do that just because it's what you think you would do if you were in the same situation.

---

the court order never identifies those risks because it is a leftist lie that paxton sees right through

it is not about protecting the mother and never was

Logos Stick said:

---

Of course you agree even though you haven't read the letter or the law.

Lefties want no restrictions on abortion whatsoever. That much is clear.

---

And a very small group of conservatives get off on forcing women to have babies, even if it kills them. Thankfully that group gets smaller and smaller with each passing generation.

Lives>>>>>>>>votes. I dismiss anybody that says otherwise.

barbacoa taco said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Govern me harder Daddy.

---

Or, you know, just value life.

Politics is never more important than the life of an innocent baby. You'd have to be sick to disagree.

---

I disagree and I promise you I'm not sick.

Sometimes, valuing life also includes compassion. Both for the mother and a child who is likely to be born with massive deformities, brain damage, and a 90+% life expectancy of days, if not hours or minutes - likely in pain.

Taking your argument at face value means that you should override a DNR and give a 90+ year old woman with heart failure "life saving actions" such as chest compressions, breaking her sternum in the process and ensuring that those extra 30 days of life will be lived in massive pain and suffering.

---

Actively killing someone is not the same as letting natural death occur.

---

The mother runs risks to her life, health, and fertility if she's forced to carry the pregnancy to term and "let natural death occur." You have no right to force her to do that just because it's what you think you would do if you were in the same situation.

---

How so?

You do realize that women carry Trisomy 18 babies to term, don't you?

No Spin Ag said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Of course you agree even though you haven't read the letter or the law.

Lefties want no restrictions on abortion whatsoever. That much is clear.

---

And a very small group of conservatives get off on forcing women to have babies, even if it kills them. Thankfully that group gets smaller and smaller with each passing generation.

---

Not true.

Mary Bailey said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Of course you agree even though you haven't read the letter or the law.

Lefties want no restrictions on abortion whatsoever. That much is clear.

---

And a very small group of conservatives get off on forcing women to have babies, even if it kills them. Thankfully that group gets smaller and smaller with each passing generation.

---

Not true.

---

True, I was taking the 180 view, because in the real world, it's not true that everyone on the left wants no restrictions.

Mary Bailey said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

clarythedrill said:

---

I am on the mothers side on this one. However, she could have gone to another state and had the fetus blended and sucked out of her already instead of going through all this rigamoroe with the Texas courts.

---

Paxton is being foolish to push on this, it's counterproductive. If a court ruled she is an exception so be it.

It is absolutely a setup by the Dems, they are loving this.

---

The problem is the legal precedent that it sets. How does carrying this pregnancy threaten her life or ability to have another child? It's a setup to legally permit tons more abortions.

---

I understand but if we aren't careful this could backfire badly. If someone has legit health concerns and a judge agrees with her then let it go. That's still a high bar to get over.

Fighting something like this is how you end up losing elections. Dems found a perfect setup and Paxton is jumping in the trap.

No Spin Ag said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Of course you agree even though you haven't read the letter or the law.

Lefties want no restrictions on abortion whatsoever. That much is clear.

---

And a very small group of conservatives get off on forcing women to have babies, even if it kills them. Thankfully that group gets smaller and smaller with each passing generation.

---

The odds of dying from childbirth in America today is like the odds of of winning the lottery 10 times in a row. It doesn't happen. Heck, we have C sections now so you don't even have to give vaginal birth anymore if it's even the slightest threat.

I don't know of any conservatives anywhere who believe what you stated.

aggie93 said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

clarythedrill said:

---

I am on the mothers side on this one. However, she could have gone to another state and had the fetus blended and sucked out of her already instead of going through all this rigamoroe with the Texas courts.

---

Paxton is being foolish to push on this, it's counterproductive. If a court ruled she is an exception so be it.

It is absolutely a setup by the Dems, they are loving this.

---

The problem is the legal precedent that it sets. How does carrying this pregnancy threaten her life or ability to have another child? It's a setup to legally permit tons more abortions.

---

I understand but if we aren't careful this could backfire badly. If someone has legit health concerns and a judge agrees with her then let it go. That's still a high bar to get over.

Fighting something like this is how you end up losing elections. Dems found a perfect setup and Paxton is jumping in the trap.

---

she does not and paxton explains in his letter that no legit exemptions from the law have been presented in the court order
fighting for innocent life is never wrong

Mary Bailey said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

clarythedrill said:

---

I am on the mothers side on this one. However, she could have gone to another state and had the fetus blended and sucked out of her already instead of going through all this rigamoroe with the Texas courts.

---

Paxton is being foolish to push on this, it's counterproductive. If a court ruled she is an exception so be it.

It is absolutely a setup by the Dems, they are loving this.

---

The problem is the legal precedent that it sets. How does carrying this pregnancy threaten her life or ability to have another child? It's a setup to legally permit tons more abortions.

---

Yes and everyone involved knows that is exactly what this case is designed to do. She could easily travel to another state, but this lawsuit will either set a bad precedent creating an abortion loophole here that will be abused or it will fail and rile up the double digit IQ liberal base that is mentally incapable of seeing this for what it is. You can not give these people and inch, they are evil, well funded, determined, and largely insulated from consequences for their actions.

More efficient to kill the baby and the mama.
-Canada

damiond said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

clarythedrill said:

---

I am on the mothers side on this one. However, she could have gone to another state and had the fetus blended and sucked out of her already instead of going through all this rigamoroe with the Texas courts.

---

Paxton is being foolish to push on this, it's counterproductive. If a court ruled she is an exception so be it.

It is absolutely a setup by the Dems, they are loving this.

---

The problem is the legal precedent that it sets. How does carrying this pregnancy threaten her life or ability to have another child? It's a setup to legally permit tons more abortions.

---

I understand but if we aren't careful this could backfire badly. If someone has legit health concerns and a judge agrees with her then let it go. That's still a high bar to get over.

Fighting something like this is how you end up losing elections. Dems found a perfect setup and Paxton is jumping in the trap.

---

she does not and paxton explains in his letter that no legit exemptions from the law have been presented in the court order
fighting for innocent life is never wrong

---

A judge gave the order though. Now you can fight the judge and hold them accountable if they are violating the law but this is a losing battle that will damage the GOP and she will still get the abortion. It's about winning the war and this is a foolish battle to fight that could lose the bigger fight. The weak point in the abortion argument is always with extreme situations like this where you have a woman with a health concern. This is how you lose even pretty damned conservative women voters.

This just made countless ads for Dems and is going to raise them an ocean of money. I expect they will make a movie about it.

Logos Stick said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Of course you agree even though you haven't read the letter or the law.

Lefties want no restrictions on abortion whatsoever. That much is clear.

---

And a very small group of conservatives get off on forcing women to have babies, even if it kills them. Thankfully that group gets smaller and smaller with each passing generation.

---

The odds of dying from childbirth in America today is like the odds of of winning the lottery 10 times in a row. It doesn't happen. Heck, we have C sections now so you don't even have to give vaginal birth anymore if it's even the slightest threat.

I don't know of any conservatives anywhere who believe what you stated.

---

And I don't know any liberals who believe what some on the right state.

And you're right, the odds of dying in childbirth is extremely small, yet even that is too much for those that seem to want no abortion allowed under any exception.

damiond said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

clarythedrill said:

---

I am on the mothers side on this one. However, she could have gone to another state and had the fetus blended and sucked out of her already instead of going through all this rigamoroe with the Texas courts.

---

Paxton is being foolish to push on this, it's counterproductive. If a court ruled she is an exception so be it.

It is absolutely a setup by the Dems, they are loving this.

---

The problem is the legal precedent that it sets. How does carrying this pregnancy threaten her life or ability to have another child? It's a setup to legally permit tons more abortions.

---

I understand but if we aren't careful this could backfire badly. If someone has legit health concerns and a judge agrees with her then let it go. That's still a high bar to get over.

Fighting something like this is how you end up losing elections. Dems found a perfect setup and Paxton is jumping in the trap.

---

she does not and paxton explains in his letter that no legit exemptions from the law have been presented in the court order
fighting for innocent life is never wrong

---

Paxton would never lie to you, right?

Fighting a case like this is a losing battle.

Modest proposal: Federal government nationalizes all hospital networks in the state, placing them under the jurisdiction of the VA.

Thus allowing medical staff to do their jobs, and insulating them from religious fanatics and corrupt, venal politicians.

Problem solved.

Mary Bailey said:

---

barbacoa taco said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Govern me harder Daddy.

---

Or, you know, just value life.

Politics is never more important than the life of an innocent baby. You'd have to be sick to disagree.

---

I disagree and I promise you I'm not sick.

Sometimes, valuing life also includes compassion. Both for the mother and a child who is likely to be born with massive deformities, brain damage, and a 90+% life expectancy of days, if not hours or minutes - likely in pain.

Taking your argument at face value means that you should override a DNR and give a 90+ year old woman with heart failure "life saving actions" such as chest compressions, breaking her sternum in the process and ensuring that those extra 30 days of life will be lived in massive pain and suffering.

---

Actively killing someone is not the same as letting natural death occur.

---

The mother runs risks to her life, health, and fertility if she's forced to carry the pregnancy to term and "let natural death occur." You have no right to force her to do that just because it's what you think you would do if you were in the same situation.

---

How so?

You do realize that women carry Trisomy 18 babies to term, don't you?

---

They do...and that baby may live a day or so in pain on a feeding tube. And that may also cause the mother to watch her baby die and then be told she'll never have kids. This is a difficult case in my opinion. In 99% of cases where a woman would choose to have an abortion, I am thankful they cannot. But maybe Texas should even get rid of any caveats to the law and just force all to go to another state. That way there is no room for debate on any of it.

damiond said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

clarythedrill said:

---

I am on the mothers side on this one. However, she could have gone to another state and had the fetus blended and sucked out of her already instead of going through all this rigamoroe with the Texas courts.

---

Paxton is being foolish to push on this, it's counterproductive. If a court ruled she is an exception so be it.

It is absolutely a setup by the Dems, they are loving this.

---

The problem is the legal precedent that it sets. How does carrying this pregnancy threaten her life or ability to have another child? It's a setup to legally permit tons more abortions.

---

I understand but if we aren't careful this could backfire badly. If someone has legit health concerns and a judge agrees with her then let it go. That's still a high bar to get over.

Fighting something like this is how you end up losing elections. Dems found a perfect setup and Paxton is jumping in the trap.

---

she does not and paxton explains in his letter that no legit exemptions from the law have been presented in the court order
fighting for innocent life is never wrong

---

Respectfully, Paxton has no idea what he is talking about, and neither do you. He thinks knows more than her OBGYN. He also hilariously and ironically accuses the judge of improperly making medical decisions for the plaintiff.

No exemptions have been presented because they don't exist. The fetus is nonviable, her doctors have advised her she runs health risks in carrying the pregnancy to term. But Texas is saying "you aren't sick enough." She needs to get sicker and have one foot in the grave before this decision can be considered. Basically, Texas (and you) are saying she needs to suffer more first.

In reality, if a doctor says she runs serious health and fertility risks if she continues with a nonviable pregnancy, that's the end of the ****ing discussion. But because Texas is a Christian nationalist police state run by big government *******s, she has to humiliate herself by making her medical situation public like this.

All this is going to do is get baby killers all riled up to vote even more Dems into office than they used to do.

The GOP is so screwed its not even funny. The leading candidate has already been defeated by the Dems Vote Creation Machine, so now the Dems won't even debate him, which is ironic in that he won't debate others within his party. All that the Dems do these days is ballot harvest, provide mail-in ballots to everyone, and put abortion and recreational drug use on the ballots to get their grotesque voters out to the polls. Nothing the GOP does can beat this...not with Ronna running things and the Dems making abortion a voting issue over and over.

Mary Bailey said:

---

barbacoa taco said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Govern me harder Daddy.

---

Or, you know, just value life.

Politics is never more important than the life of an innocent baby. You'd have to be sick to disagree.

---

I disagree and I promise you I'm not sick.

Sometimes, valuing life also includes compassion. Both for the mother and a child who is likely to be born with massive deformities, brain damage, and a 90+% life expectancy of days, if not hours or minutes - likely in pain.

Taking your argument at face value means that you should override a DNR and give a 90+ year old woman with heart failure "life saving actions" such as chest compressions, breaking her sternum in the process and ensuring that those extra 30 days of life will be lived in massive pain and suffering.

---

Actively killing someone is not the same as letting natural death occur.

---

The mother runs risks to her life, health, and fertility if she's forced to carry the pregnancy to term and "let natural death occur." You have no right to force her to do that just because it's what you think you would do if you were in the same situation.

---

How so?

You do realize that women carry Trisomy 18 babies to term, don't you?

---

Yeah, and maybe the baby will survive briefly and suffer horribly for those few minutes or hours he or she lives. How very "pro-life" of you to want both the baby and mother to suffer like this just because YOU think the mother should be forced at gunpoint to follow your personal morals.

You seem to know a hell of a lot more about this mother's health situation than her doctors, based on your posts. What else can you tell us that the doctors are clearly so ignorant about?

HTownAg98 said:

---

damiond said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

clarythedrill said:

---

I am on the mothers side on this one. However, she could have gone to another state and had the fetus blended and sucked out of her already instead of going through all this rigamoroe with the Texas courts.

---

Paxton is being foolish to push on this, it's counterproductive. If a court ruled she is an exception so be it.

It is absolutely a setup by the Dems, they are loving this.

---

The problem is the legal precedent that it sets. How does carrying this pregnancy threaten her life or ability to have another child? It's a setup to legally permit tons more abortions.

---

I understand but if we aren't careful this could backfire badly. If someone has legit health concerns and a judge agrees with her then let it go. That's still a high bar to get over.

Fighting something like this is how you end up losing elections. Dems found a perfect setup and Paxton is jumping in the trap.

---

she does not and paxton explains in his letter that no legit exemptions from the law have been presented in the court order
fighting for innocent life is never wrong

---

Paxton would never lie to you, right?

Fighting a case like this is a losing battle.

---

Yeah, we all know Paxton is a stand up guy who lives with integrity. He surely wouldn't lie about this and I'm sure he's acting in the best interest of all parties involved here.

FlyRod said:

---

Modest proposal: Federal government nationalizes all hospital networks in the state, placing them under the jurisdiction of the VA.

Thus allowing medical staff to do their jobs, and insulating them from religious fanatics and corrupt, venal politicians.

Problem solved.

---

Great idea, Vlad!

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Govern me harder Daddy.

---

Or, you know, just value life.

Politics is never more important than the life of an innocent baby. You'd have to be sick to disagree.

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

barbacoa taco said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Govern me harder Daddy.

---

Or, you know, just value life.

Politics is never more important than the life of an innocent baby. You'd have to be sick to disagree.

---

I disagree and I promise you I'm not sick.

Sometimes, valuing life also includes compassion. Both for the mother and a child who is likely to be born with massive deformities, brain damage, and a 90+% life expectancy of days, if not hours or minutes - likely in pain.

Taking your argument at face value means that you should override a DNR and give a 90+ year old woman with heart failure "life saving actions" such as chest compressions, breaking her sternum in the process and ensuring that those extra 30 days of life will be lived in massive pain and suffering.

---

Actively killing someone is not the same as letting natural death occur.

---

The mother runs risks to her life, health, and fertility if she's forced to carry the pregnancy to term and "let natural death occur." You have no right to force her to do that just because it's what you think you would do if you were in the same situation.

---

How so?

You do realize that women carry Trisomy 18 babies to term, don't you?

---

They do...and that baby may live a day or so in pain on a feeding tube. And that may also cause the mother to watch her baby die and then be told she'll never have kids. This is a difficult case in my opinion. In 99% of cases where a woman would choose to have an abortion, I am thankful they cannot. But maybe Texas should even get rid of any caveats to the law and just force all to go to another state. That way there is no room for debate on any of it.

---

You've disguised murder as empathy and want to legalize it so you don't have to debate it? This is shameful and abhorrent for a Christian. Children suffer the most in the sexual revolution.

aggie93 said:

---

damiond said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

clarythedrill said:

---

I am on the mothers side on this one. However, she could have gone to another state and had the fetus blended and sucked out of her already instead of going through all this rigamoroe with the Texas courts.

---

Paxton is being foolish to push on this, it's counterproductive. If a court ruled she is an exception so be it.

It is absolutely a setup by the Dems, they are loving this.

---

The problem is the legal precedent that it sets. How does carrying this pregnancy threaten her life or ability to have another child? It's a setup to legally permit tons more abortions.

---

I understand but if we aren't careful this could backfire badly. If someone has legit health concerns and a judge agrees with her then let it go. That's still a high bar to get over.

Fighting something like this is how you end up losing elections. Dems found a perfect setup and Paxton is jumping in the trap.

---

she does not and paxton explains in his letter that no legit exemptions from the law have been presented in the court order
fighting for innocent life is never wrong

---

A judge gave the order though. Now you can fight the judge and hold them accountable if they are violating the law but this is a losing battle that will damage the GOP and she will still get the abortion. It's about winning the war and this is a foolish battle to fight that could lose the bigger fight. The weak point in the abortion argument is always with extreme situations like this where you have a woman with a health concern. This is how you lose even pretty damned conservative women voters.

This just made countless ads for Dems and is going to raise them an ocean of money. I expect they will make a movie about it.

---

that is what paxton is doing and it is not foolish to battle the evil left that is trying to wreck tx law and kill the innocent with lies about health concerns

In 2020, Texas had over 50,000 abortions. In 2018, ~60,000.

Year to date... 17. SEVENTEEN.

Take the win. Otherwise, risk losing it all. It's simply math.

barbacoa taco said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

damiond said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

clarythedrill said:

---

I am on the mothers side on this one. However, she could have gone to another state and had the fetus blended and sucked out of her already instead of going through all this rigamoroe with the Texas courts.

---

Paxton is being foolish to push on this, it's counterproductive. If a court ruled she is an exception so be it.

It is absolutely a setup by the Dems, they are loving this.

---

The problem is the legal precedent that it sets. How does carrying this pregnancy threaten her life or ability to have another child? It's a setup to legally permit tons more abortions.

---

I understand but if we aren't careful this could backfire badly. If someone has legit health concerns and a judge agrees with her then let it go. That's still a high bar to get over.

Fighting something like this is how you end up losing elections. Dems found a perfect setup and Paxton is jumping in the trap.

---

she does not and paxton explains in his letter that no legit exemptions from the law have been presented in the court order
fighting for innocent life is never wrong

---

Paxton would never lie to you, right?

Fighting a case like this is a losing battle.

---

Yeah, we all know Paxton is a stand up guy who lives with integrity. He surely wouldn't lie about this and I'm sure he's acting in the best interest of all parties involved here.

---

Ironic post is ironic.

barbacoa taco said:

---

damiond said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

Mary Bailey said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

clarythedrill said:

---

I am on the mothers side on this one. However, she could have gone to another state and had the fetus blended and sucked out of her already instead of going through all this rigamoroe with the Texas courts.

---

Paxton is being foolish to push on this, it's counterproductive. If a court ruled she is an exception so be it.

It is absolutely a setup by the Dems, they are loving this.

---

The problem is the legal precedent that it sets. How does carrying this pregnancy threaten her life or ability to have another child? It's a setup to legally permit tons more abortions.

---

I understand but if we aren't careful this could backfire badly. If someone has legit health concerns and a judge agrees with her then let it go. That's still a high bar to get over.

Fighting something like this is how you end up losing elections. Dems found a perfect setup and Paxton is jumping in the trap.

---

she does not and paxton explains in his letter that no legit exemptions from the law have been presented in the court order
fighting for innocent life is never wrong

---

Respectfully, Paxton has no idea what he is talking about, and neither do you. He thinks knows more than her OBGYN. He also hilariously and ironically accuses the judge of improperly making medical decisions for the plaintiff.

No exemptions have been presented because they don't exist. The fetus is nonviable, her doctors have advised her she runs health risks in carrying the pregnancy to term. But Texas is saying "you aren't sick enough." She needs to get sicker and have one foot in the grave before this decision can be considered. Basically, Texas (and you) are saying she needs to suffer more first.

In reality, if a doctor says she runs serious health and fertility risks if she continues with a nonviable pregnancy, that's the end of the ****ing discussion. But because Texas is a Christian nationalist police state run by big government *******s, she has to humiliate herself by making her medical situation public like this.

---

we agree on that

it is a singular doctor that did not follow the hospitals own procedure and policy to seek a second opinion from a colleague at the hospital

Logos Stick said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Of course you agree even though you haven't read the letter or the law.

Lefties want no restrictions on abortion whatsoever. That much is clear.

---

And a very small group of conservatives get off on forcing women to have babies, even if it kills them. Thankfully that group gets smaller and smaller with each passing generation.

---

The odds of dying from childbirth in America today is like the odds of of winning the lottery 10 times in a row. It doesn't happen. Heck, we have C sections now so you don't even have to give vaginal birth anymore if it's even the slightest threat.

I don't know of any conservatives anywhere who believe what you stated.

---

Man...someone should have told my brother's wife this two years ago.

FlyRod said:

---

Modest proposal: Federal government nationalizes all hospital networks in the state, placing them under the jurisdiction of the VA.

Thus allowing medical staff to do their jobs, and insulating them from religious fanatics and corrupt, venal politicians.

Problem solved.

---

That's not a modest proposal, it's pure lunacy that would come with a mountain of unintended consequences.

The baby might have SIDS! Might as well kill it intentionally!

BMX Bandit said:

---

have you seen "rigamarole"?

---

BOOM!!!




Lawyered!!

You're all wrong. It's actually "rigmarole."

GeorgiAg said:

---

Yeah, go hard right on this issue and force one of the few ladies with a valid medical reason to have a baby that will die and/or affect her ability to have kids in the future. The moderate voters will love it.

Govern me harder Daddy.

---

Should we stop prosecuting murder and violent crime to appease the inner city black community? Or should we do the right thing?

FlyRod said:

---

Modest proposal: Federal government nationalizes all hospital networks in the state, placing them under the jurisdiction of the VA.

Thus allowing medical staff to do their jobs, and insulating them from religious fanatics and corrupt, venal politicians.

Problem solved.

---

Just say no to socialism.

That is a HELL NO! from me.

BG Knocc Out said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Yeah, go hard right on this issue and force one of the few ladies with a valid medical reason to have a baby that will die and/or affect her ability to have kids in the future. The moderate voters will love it.

Govern me harder Daddy.

---

Should we stop prosecuting murder and violent crime to appease the inner city black community? Or should we do the right thing?

---

Your thesis here is that the "inner city black community" at large is pro-murder and pro-violent crime.

Do you need paperweights on your desk to counteract the wind from all those dog whistles?